Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety prevent disorder or crime protect health or morals protect the rights and reputations of other people prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"Cheers!
The United States does not guarantee the freedom of expression. However, the United Kingdom does. It states that is properly used so nobody gets hurt. The United Kingdom offers broader protections by protecting the well-being of the state. The U.s is less strict.
what is vicarious liability in tort ?
Answer:
Vicarious liability in tort involves holding a particular entity responsible for any wrong doing . The entity may not necessarily be the one who committed it.
The entity bears the consequences and brunt of such tortious actions which may vary from accidents to loss or damage of certain goods and services. The entity is the one who pays the compensations or other forms of reliefs to the victims of the tortious actions.
Sheela is severely injured by Alex in an automobile accident caused by Alex’s negligence. Sheela wishes to sue Alex for the tort of negligence to recover monetary damages for her injuries. Sheela borrows $ 5000 from TD Bank to pay her debts as she cannot work due to her injuries. Sheela defaults on the loan payment repayable with 8 per cent interest in equal monthly installments.
1. Can Sheela’s right to sue Alex be assigned?
2. Can TD Bank assign its right to recover loan amount from Sheela?
Answer: 7
Explanation: im a genius
The legitimacy of the police as a social institution implemented to provide assistance to the public is weakened when officers enforce the law for reasons other than public safety.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
It is true because of the fact that basic function of policing revolves around the safety of the public and when law is enforced for other reasons than assisting public for their safety, their legitimacy is weakened and people tend to lose trust in the institution.
Answer: A. TRUE
Explanation:
The police was implemented as a social institution established by the government which represents the civil authority of government.
Police are generally responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, investigating and detecting criminal activities. Performing of this functions is what is known as policing. When police officers enforces the law for reasons other than public safety they undermine the legitimacy of the police as a social institution established for providing assistance to the general public.
I waited for my dad to come back from the store to get milk its been 18 years what happened to him
Answer:
I am sorry that this has happened however he is not going to come back. Most likely cause he dislikes you. :)
Explanation:
A rule of law enabling a defendant to win even if all of plaintiff's allegations are true is a(n) _____. Select one: a. counterclaim b. affirmative defense c. deposition d. judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Answer:
d .
Explanation:
d.judgment not withstanding the verdict
According to Hirschi and Hindelang, there is a clear link between criminality and:
Answer:
Low intelligence.
Answer:
low IQ
Explanation:
Also known as low intelligence
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
A) To show how primitive human beings lived before they formed societies.
B)To determine the natural rights of human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
C)To show that all governments represents at least marginal improvements to the state of nature.
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
E)To show the rights to property obtains in the state of nature but not in civil society.
Answer:
b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
The purpose in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.
What is natural rights?Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.
These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about natural rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2