You arrive in Montreal with ​$420. How many Canadian dollars can you​ buy? Currency Dollars per Foreign Foreign per Dollar British pound 1.414 0.7072 Canadian dollar 0.7834 1.277 European euro 1.256 0.7965 Japanese yen 0.01007 99.34 Mexican peso 0.06584 15.19 You can buy nothing Canadian dollars with ​$420. ​(Simplify your answer. Round to two decimal places as​ needed.)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of sides of a decagon is 10.

Sum of exterior angles is 360° for any regular polygon.

Each exterior angle of a regular decagon measures:

Step-by-step explanation:

pnotgrt8rthan4 = 3 ÷ 7 × 100

= 42.8571428571 / 43%

Answer:

S(t) = -13sin(t) -3cos(t)

Step-by-step explanation:

a(t) = 13 sin(t) + 3 cos(t)

The above is the acceleration if the moving particle.

To determine it's position at any given time we integrate the expression with respect to t to find the distance Expression and then solve

The integral will be a double Integral .

a(t) = 13 sin(t) + 3 cos(t)

First integral

V(t) =-13cos(t) +3sin(t)

Second integral

S(t) = -13sin(t) -3cos(t)

So to determine the position if the particle the expression will be used

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

y = (x - 5)^2 + 16

= x^2 - 5x - 5x + 25 + 16

= x^2 - 10x + 41

That corresponds with answer choice D.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

She makes conclusion about a population that is not well represented by the sample.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion she is making is about a population that is not well represented by her sample: the population is the homeowners in the nation, but the sample is made of homeowners or only her state.

The population about which she can make conclusions with this sample is the homeowners of her state, given that the sampling is done right.

Answer: The sample is biased

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

7 1/5 - 6 2/5

We need to borrow from the 7 in the form of 5/5

6 + 5/5 + 1/5 - 6 2/5

6 6/5 - 6 2/5

0 + 4/5

4/5

Answer:

4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

7 1/5 - 6 2/5= 36/5 - 32/5= 4/5

Answer:

A) NO and NM

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

96.41% of players on the team run the 100-meter dash in 13.36 seconds or faster

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 13, \sigma = 0.2[/tex]

What percentage of players on the team run the 100-meter dash in 13.36 seconds or faster

We have to find the pvalue of Z when X = 13.36.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{13.36 - 13}{0.2}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.8[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.8[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.9641

96.41% of players on the team run the 100-meter dash in 13.36 seconds or faster

Answer:

-x² + 12x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write expression

5x² + 9x + 3 - (6x² - 3x)

Step 2: Distribute

5x² + 9x + 3 - 6x² + 3x

Step 3: Combine like terms

-x² + 12x + 3

To obtain circle C', circle C was translated to the right 3 units and down 2 units, then dilated by a scale factor of 2

Transformation is the movement of a point from its initial location to a new location. Types of transformation are translation, rotation, reflection and dilation.

Dilation is the increase or decrease in the size of a figure.

To obtain circle C', circle C was translated to the right 3 units and down 2 units, then dilated by a scale factor of 2

Find out more on transformation at: brainly.com/question/4289712

#SPJ1

Answer:

x= 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Please see attached picture for full solution.

Points are labelled with alphabets so it's easier to understand.

The question is incomplete! Complete question along with answer and step by step explanation is provided below.

Question:

The attached Excel file 2013 NCAA BB Tournament shows the salaries paid to the coaches of 62 of the 68 teams in the 2013 NCAA basketball tournament (not all private schools report their coach's salaries). Consider these 62 salaries to be a sample from the population of salaries of all 346 NCAA Division I basketball coaches.

Question 1. Use the 62 salaries from the TOTAL PAY column to construct a 95% confidence interval for the mean salary of all basketball coaches in NCAA Division I.

xbar = $1,465,752

SD = $1,346,046.2

lower bound of confidence interval ________

upper bound of confidence interval _______

Question 2. Coach Mike Krzyzewski's high salary is an outlier and could be significantly affecting the confidence interval results. Remove Coach Krzyzewski's salary from the data and recalculate the 95% confidence interval using the remaining 61 salaries.

xbar = $1,371,191

SD = $1,130,666.5

lower bound of confidence interval _________

upper bound of confidence interval. ________

Answer:

Question 1:

lower bound of confidence interval = $1,124,027

upper bound of confidence interval = $1,807,477

Question 2:

lower bound of confidence interval = $1,081,512

upper bound of confidence interval = $1,660,870

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 1:

The sample mean salary of 62 couches is

 [tex]\bar{x} = 1,465,752[/tex]

The standard deviation of mean salary is

 [tex]s = 1,346,046.2[/tex]

The confidence interval for the mean salary of all basketball coaches is given by

 [tex]$ CI = \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } ) $[/tex]

Where [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] is the sample mean, n is the sample size, s is the sample standard deviation and  [tex]t_{\alpha/2}[/tex] is the t-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level.  

The t-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level is  

Significance level = α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05/2 = 0.025  

Degree of freedom = n - 1 = 62 - 1 = 61

From the t-table at α = 0.025 and DoF = 61

t-score = 1.999

So the required 95% confidence interval is  

[tex]CI = \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } ) \\\\CI = 1,465,752 \pm 1.999 \cdot (\frac{1,346,046.2}{\sqrt{62} } ) \\\\CI = 1,465,752 \pm 1.999 \cdot (170948.04 ) \\\\CI = 1,465,752 \pm 341,725 \\\\LCI = 1,465,752 - 341,725 = 1,124,027 \\\\UCI = 1,465,752 + 341,725 = 1,807,477\\\\[/tex]

Question 2:

After removing the Coach Krzyzewski's salary from the data

The sample mean salary of 61 couches is

[tex]\bar{x} = 1,371,191[/tex]

The standard deviation of the mean salary is

[tex]s = 1,130,666.5[/tex]

The t-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level is  

Significance level = α = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05/2 = 0.025  

Degree of freedom = n - 1 = 61 - 1 = 60

From the t-table at α = 0.025 and DoF = 60

t-score = 2.001

So the required 95% confidence interval is  

[tex]CI = \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2}(\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } ) \\\\CI = 1,371,191 \pm 2.001 \cdot (\frac{1,130,666.5}{\sqrt{61} } ) \\\\CI = 1,371,191 \pm 2.001 \cdot (144767 ) \\\\CI = 1,371,191 \pm 289,678.8 \\\\LCI = 1,371,191 - 289,678.8 = 1,081,512 \\\\UCI = 1,371,191 + 289,678.8 = 1,660,870\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

The predicted price of a 9 room house is $925.3 K.

Step-by-step explanation:

The regression equation for predicting the appraised value (in thousands of dollars) from the  number of rooms for houses in East Meadow, New York is as follows:

[tex]\text{Value}=748+19.7\ \text{Rooms}[/tex]

Compute the price of a 9 room house as follows:

[tex]\text{Value}=748+19.7\ \text{Rooms}[/tex]

         [tex]=748+(19.7\times 9)\\\\=748+177.3\\\\=925.3[/tex]

Thus, the predicted price of a 9 room house is $925.3 K.

The price of a 9-room house is (c) $252.262

The regression equation is given as:

[tex]\mathbf{y = 74.8 + 19.7 \times rooms}[/tex]

For a 9-room house, we have:

Rooms = 9

Substitute 9 for rooms in the above regression equation

[tex]\mathbf{y = 74.8 + 19.7 \times 9}[/tex]

Multiply

[tex]\mathbf{y = 74.8 + 177.3}[/tex]

Add

[tex]\mathbf{y = 252.1}[/tex]

The closest to this value is (c) $252.262

Hence, the price of a 9-room house is (c) $252.262

Read more about regression equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/7656407

Answer:

1250,Rs

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Reetu paid for the watch x Rs. Then Reetu sold the watch to Reshmi having 20% profit => the selling price is 1.2*x

Then Teshmi sold the wathes with 10% loss (or 0.9 from purchase price 1.2x)   to Nikita, i.e. selling price is

1.2*x*0.9=1350

1.08*x=1350

x=1350:1.08

x=1250, Rs

Answer:

The 95​% confidence interval for the true mean resale value of a​ 5-year-old car of this​ model

(11,688.68 , 12,511.32)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given sample size 'n' = 17

mean of the sample x⁻ = 12,100

Standard deviation of the sample (S) = 800

The 95​% confidence interval for the true mean resale value of a​ 5-year-old car of this​ model

[tex](x^{-} - t_{0.05} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } , x^{-} + t_{0.05} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } )[/tex]

Step(ii):-

Degrees of freedom ν =n-1 = 17-1 =16

[tex]t_{(16 , 0.05)} = 2.1199[/tex]

The 95​% confidence interval for the true mean resale value of a​ 5-year-old car of this​ model

[tex](x^{-} - t_{0.05} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } , x^{-} + t_{0.05} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } )[/tex]

[tex](12,100 - 2.1199\frac{800}{\sqrt{17} } , 12,100 + 2.1199 \frac{800}{\sqrt{17} } )[/tex]

(12,100 - 411.32 , 12,100 + 411.32)

(11,688.68 , 12,511.32)

Answer: a. 0.1031; fail to reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Significance level : [tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex]

The test statistic in a two-tailed test is z = -1.63.

The P-value for two-tailed test : [tex]2P(Z>|z|)=2P(Z>|-1.63|)=0.1031[/tex] [By p-value table]

Since, 0.1031 > 0.05

i.e. p-value > [tex]\alpha[/tex]

So, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. [When p<[tex]\alpha[/tex] then we reject null hypothesis  ]

So, the correct option is a. 0.1031; fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

[tex]n=(\frac{2.58(0.15)}{0.025})^2 =239.63 \approx 240[/tex]

So the answer for this case would be n=240 rounded up to the nearest integer

Step-by-step explanation:

We know the following info:

[tex]\sigma =0.15[/tex] represent the population deviation

[tex] ME= 0.025[/tex] the margin of error desired

The margin of error is given by this formula:

[tex] ME=z_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]    (a)

And on this case we have that ME =0.025 and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:

[tex]n=(\frac{z_{\alpha/2} s}{ME})^2[/tex]   (b)

The critical value for 99% of confidence interval now can be founded using the normal distribution. And we got [tex]z_{\alpha/2}=2.58[/tex], replacing into formula (b) we got:

[tex]n=(\frac{2.58(0.15)}{0.025})^2 =239.63 \approx 240[/tex]

So the answer for this case would be n=240 rounded up to the nearest integer

[tex]\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}[/tex]

Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Trigonometry.

Since we have to use here, Sine ration.

Sine of an Angle = Perpendicular side/Hypotenuse Side.

So we get as,

X = 3 .

Answer:

the answer is c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 12x²y²-4x²y-9xy²+3xy

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the product, you have to use the FOIL method.

12x²y²-4x²y-9xy²+3xy

Since there are no like terms, we don't need to combine anything.

Answer:

The product results in: [tex]6x^3y^2-2x^3y-9xy^2+3xy[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a product of two binomials, and we use distributive property to get rid of the parentheses (grouping symbols):

[tex](2x^2y-3y)\,(3xy-x)=6x^3y^2-2x^3y-9xy^2+3xy[/tex]

Answer:

g=22

Step-by-step explanation:

add 8 to both sides

g-8=14

g-8+8=14+8

g=14+8

g=22

The solution of expression g - 8 = 14 is,

⇒ g = 22

Mathematical expression is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Given that;

The equation is,

⇒ g - 8 = 14

Now, We can simplify as,

⇒ g - 8 = 14

Add 8 both side,

⇒ g - 8 + 8 = 14 + 8

⇒ g = 22

Thus, The solution of expression g - 8 = 14 is,

⇒ g = 22

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ3

Answer:

1. A, C

2. A, D

Step-by-step explanation:

The mutually exclusive events are one which cannot happen together. The observation is made regarding with which students live. They live with either one of their biological parent or grandparent. The student have the option to live with two legally married couple this is mutually exclusive event. If the student is living with their one biological parent he cannot live with two legally married parents.

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

area of a triangle is length x base

so 6 x 6 = 36

36 divided by 2 = 18

I hope it helps :)

Answer: The area is about 15.59 and is round to the nearest hundredth.

Step-by-step explanation:

An equilateral triangle has three equal sides is just like an isosceles triangle.

So in this case, we know that the base is 6 and since the base is 6 all the other two sides is also 6 .But we do not know the height to find the area so we need to find the height.

The height is the distance of from the base to the tip or top which helps form two right triangles.. And if you divide as  an equilateral triangle into two parts you will form two right triangles. Imagine we have divide the isosceles triangle into two parts to form two right triangles. We will now have a base of 3 instead of 6 and and hypotenuse of 6 .  but we still don't know the height so we need to  find it.

Using the Pythagorean Theorem we could say that a^2 plus b^2 squared is equal to c^2 squared.

We know a as 3 and c the hypotenuse as 6.

so 3^2 + b^2 =6^2  solve for b

  9 + b^2 = 36

 -9               -9

   b^2 = 27

  b= [tex]\sqrt{27}[/tex]  

b= 5.196  

Now we know that b is about 5.196 which is the  height.Now we could find the area by  multiplying  the base by the height.

5.196 * 6 = 31.176  

31.176/2 = 15.588  

Now you could round it to the nearest hundredth to be 15.59  

Answer:

Solved below.

Step-by-step explanation:

The data is provided for the starting salary (in $1,000) at some company and years of prior working experience in the same field for randomly selected 10 employees.

(a)

The formula to compute the correlation coefficient is:

[tex]r=~\frac{n\cdot\sum{XY} - \sum{X}\cdot\sum{Y}} {\sqrt{\left[n \sum{X^2}-\left(\sum{X}\right)^2\right] \cdot \left[n \sum{Y^2}-\left(\sum{Y}\right)^2\right]}} \\[/tex]

The required values are computed in the Excel sheet below.

[tex]\begin{aligned}r~&=~\frac{n\cdot\sum{XY} - \sum{X}\cdot\sum{Y}} {\sqrt{\left[n \sum{X^2}-\left(\sum{X}\right)^2\right] \cdot \left[n \sum{Y^2}-\left(\sum{Y}\right)^2\right]}} \\r~&=~\frac{ 10 \cdot 7252 - 97 \cdot 661 } {\sqrt{\left[ 10 \cdot 1335 - 97^2 \right] \cdot \left[ 10 \cdot 45537 - 661^2 \right] }} \approx 0.9855\end{aligned}[/tex]

Thus, the sample correlation coefficient r is 0.9855.

(b)

The slope of the regression line is:

[tex]b_{1} &= \frac{ n \cdot \sum{XY} - \sum{X} \cdot \sum{Y}}{n \cdot \sum{X^2} - \left(\sum{X}\right)^2} \\\\= \frac{ 10 \cdot 7252 - 97 \cdot 661 }{ 10 \cdot 1335 - \left( 97 \right)^2} \\\\\approx 2.132[/tex]

Thus, the slope of the regression line is 2.132.

(c)

The y-intercept of the line is:

[tex]b_{0} &= \frac{\sum{Y} \cdot \sum{X^2} - \sum{X} \cdot \sum{XY} }{n \cdot \sum{X^2} - \left(\sum{X}\right)^2} \\\\= \frac{ 661 \cdot 1335 - 97 \cdot 7252}{ 10 \cdot 1335 - 97^2} \\\\\approx 45.418[/tex]

Thus, the y-intercept of the line is 45.418.

(d)

The equation of the sample regression line is:

[tex]y=45.418+2.132x[/tex]

(e)

Compute the predicted starting salary for a person who spent 15 years working in the same field as follows:

[tex]y=45.418+2.132x\\\\=45.418+(2.132\times15)\\\\=45.418+31.98\\\\=77.398\\\\\approx 77.4[/tex]

Thus, the predicted starting salary for a person who spent 15 years working in the same field is $77.4 K.

Answer:

Yes correct

Step-by-step explanation:

I think this is correct becase: 2 50

5 55

7 62

etc

these are all correct

Answer: The answer is B)

B. The independent variable is time​ (t), in​ minutes, and the dependent variable is rental cost​ (r), in dollars. The linear function that models this situation is r equals to r=0.55x+8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7/2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Well first we need to put,

2x + 7y = 5,

into slope intercept

-2x

7y = -2x + 5

Divide y to all numbers

y = -2/7x + 5/7

So the slope for the given line is -2/7,

the slope of the line that is perpendicular to it is its reciprocal.

Meaning the slope of the perpendicular line is 7/2.

Thus,

the slope of the perpendicular line is 7/2x.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

The slope of the perpendicular line is 7/2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x+7y=5

Solve for y to find the slope

2x-2x+7y=5-2x

7y = -2x+5

Divide by 7

7y/7 = -2/7 x +5/7

y = -2/7x + 5/7

The slope is -2/7

The slope of perpendicular lines multiply to -1

m * -2/7 = -1

Multiply each side by -7/2

m * -2/7 *-7/2 = -1 * -7/2

m = 7/2

The slope of the perpendicular line is 7/2

Answer:

95891769

Step-by-step explanation:

This is extract from a brain teaser exercise in which sequence is formed to identify the numbers. In this brain teaser we have made combinations of different numbers which lead to the correct answer. The two correct forms of number are given which are used as a base for determining the correct answer.

Answer:

y = -1/2x + 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write in known variables

y = -1/2x + b

Step 2: Find b

2 = -1/2(-3) + b

2 = 3/2 + b

b = 1/2

Step 3: Rewrite equation

y = -1/2x + 1/2

Answer:

The probability that a player will receive such a penalty on any given turn is P=0.0046 or 1 chance in 216.

Step-by-step explanation:

Each roll involves two six-sided dice.

If we get the same value in both dice, the player is allowed to roll again.

We will have a penalty if we get the same value in both dices three times in a row.

First, we have to calculate the probability of getting the same value in both dices.

The possible outcomes are 6^2=36. There are only 6 numbers, so there are only 6 possible outcomes that have the same value.

Then, the probability of this event is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{6}{36}=\dfrac{1}{6}[/tex]

Now, we can calculate the probability of having this event three times in a row. This can be calculated as:

[tex]P=p^3=\left(\dfrac{1}{6}\right)^3=\dfrac{1}{216}\approx 0.0046[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure what are u asking exactly