Answer:
C: their actions show the ruthlessness of power
Explanation:
got it right on edg.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Did the assignment...
What conditions were present that led to labor conflicts in the United States?
Answer:
The labor movement in the United States grew out of the need to protect the. The labor movement led efforts to stop child labor, give health benefits. Most notable were the National Labor Union, launched in 1866, and the large numbers of workers hoping to improve their immediate conditions.
Explanation:
I need some opinions. what rights given to you by the constitution do you enjoy the most?
Answer:
Well for one i enjoy the right to freedom and for two i enjoy the right to bare arms.
I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
The right to bare arms and the freedom of speech
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!! :)
What were the major similarities AND differences between the idea of "Kingship" in England, France, and Iberia?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The major similarities and differences between the idea of "Kingship" in England, France, and Iberia were the following.
The similarities between the three were that these kingdoms ambitioned too much power and control by exploring, conquering, and colonizing new colonies that could get their respective kings more richness.
These kingdoms sent explorers to navigate and discover new routes and places to conquer. That is how, for instance, Christopher Columbus was sponsored by the King of Spain Ferdinand de Aragon and Queen Isabelle del Castille, to sail and discover the Americans on October 12, 1492.
These monarchies were violent and tried to conquer and took possession of territories no matter what.
The main difference between these three monarchies was the approach they had when conquering and colonizing new territories.
The kingdom of Spain conquered native tribes in Mesoamerica, the Caribbean, and South America, but did not destroy the native Indians. The Spaniards conquered great empires of the time such as the Great Aztec Empire or the Inca Empire, but they sent Catholic missioners to evangelize the Indians into the Catholic church principles. The Indians under Spanish rule were servants.
In the case of the English, the first colony that was founded was Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, in the North American territory. The white English colonists were very interested in settle the land to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources. To do that they had to fight and remove the Native American Indians that already lived there. The whites are were only interested in work the land to be rich.
In the case of France, the French were not really interested in settle the land or took it away from the Native Indians. The French were interested in getting rich through the fur trade to sell the beautiful and expensive animal fur in the European markets. That is why the French had a much better relationship with the Native American Indian tribes.
Compare and contrast Justice Breyer and Justice O'Connor's remarks on Judicial Activism. What examples did they provide? What were their concerns?
Answer:
The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.
Did Vikings has sex?
Answer:
wow I never thought of that thank you for opening up my eyes
but I believe they did
13 Points! Please help ASAP^^
Please match the word to the correct definition.
Question 1 options:
is a person that is accused of committing a crime or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.
legal reasons, stated in court session, in written and/ or verbal form, based on statutes, regulations, case precedents, and reasoning applied to the facts of the particular situation.
means to be in accordance with the rules, laws, and rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
the official power (of a court) to be able to hear cases and make legal decisions and judgements
The highest ranking or senior member of the court, they preside over the court in its public sessions when the court is hearing arguments of a case and during its private conferences when discussing and deciding cases.
the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court.
the highest judicial court in a state or a country. Is the highest court in the US
comes from the Latin word for city, because in earlier history people identified themselves as belong to cities. It is a legal status that gives you a right to live, work, pay taxes, and vote
anything that a person (or a business) has legal title over. They can be tangible or intangible and ownership give the owner enforceable rights
means to be in violation of one or more of the rules, laws, and/ or rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
a conclusion reached after an evaluation of the facts and the precedent, and law. It is also called a ruling, an opinion, or a judgement.
1.
Property
2.
Citizenship
3.
Supreme Court
4.
Jurisdiction
5.
Plaintiff
6.
Defendant
7.
Chief Justice
8.
Arguments
9.
Decision
10.
Constitutional
11.
Unconstitutional
Answer:
Appellate brief
An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.
Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).
Student brief
A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.
Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.
The parties and how to keep track of them
Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:
Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.
The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.
The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.
For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.
These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.
A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.
A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.
The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.
When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.
At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”
In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.
Student briefs
Explanation:
Why did Hannibal's attack on the city of Rome fail?
Answer:
His army was too small to either assault or securely besiege Rome. Rome itself remain defended by two legions and a large, conscriptable population. Marching on and laying siege to Rome was beyond his logistical capacity.
Explanation:
Hope this helped! ヾ(•ω•`)o
For our broad lifestyles today, more styles are popular at a time.
True
False
Answer:
it is True
Explanation:
For our broad lifestyles today, more styles are popular at a time.
True
Which event caused general William T. Sherman to send large squads of US soldiers to attack Comanche and Kiowa village
Answer:
I hope this helps!
Explanation:
The Warren Wagon Train raid, also known as the Salt Creek massacre, occurred on May 18, 1871.
Ross thinks the treaty is
A. a legal document.
B. the best the Cherokee can get.
C. false and illegal.
D. like previous U.S. treaties with the Chero
Answer:
Explanation:
is a document that shows freedom
What is the ultimate goal of a non-profit organization?
Answer:
The ultimate goal of a non-profit organization is to improve the lives of others.
I hope this helps!
Which historical world event connects most closely with the themes of William Golding's Lord of the Flies?
The answer is World war II
Answer: The answer is the holocaust
The U.S. Constitution establishes a federal system of government. Which statement best describes a federal system of government? (USHC 1.5)
Answer:
The people elect the president and member of the Congress.
Explanation:
What is Theocracy? Who rules?
What is Democracy? Who rules?
What is republic? Who rules?
What is oligarchy? Who rules?
What is a Dictatorship? Who rules?
Answer:
For democracy, there is direct democracy and representative democracy. The person who rules in direct democracy is the people as a whole and the person who rules in a representative democracy is someone elected by the people to represent them. Democracy is when the people are in charge. ]
Theocracy is technically a priest ruling saying they are ruling in the name of God or a deity. The priest rules.
A republic is technically a representative democracy except one person is in charge instead of many elected representatives.
An oligarchy is when a small group of people have control of the government. Usually wealthy individuals.
A dictatorship is when someone has absolute power over a sovereign state or a country. Famous examples of dictators are Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini
Explanation: Hope this helps
"In the past two centuries, a revolution has transformed women’s lives. Unlike national revolutions, this social upheaval crosses continents, decades, and ideologies. In place of armed struggle it gradually sows seeds of change, infiltrating our consciousness with the simple premise that women are as capable and valuable as men. To measure the breadth of this ongoing upheaval of old patterns, consider the way feminist movements have transformed law and politics. . . . Or note the change in leadership. . . . Women’s movements have never been so widespread.”
–Estelle B. Freedman,
No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women, 2002
A) Identify ONE specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
B) Identify ANOTHER specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
C) Explain ONE specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text.
Answer:
A) One specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can now run for public office. This connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
B) Another specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can get a post-secondary education now.
C) One specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text is that women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man. This counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Explanation:
These series of Women movement contributed to the creation of woman suffrage, bridge the gender inequality, changing role in the society etc.
What are Women movement?These are series of liberation movement for woman in the 1960s and 1970s that sought for equal rights, opportunities and personal freedom for women and also coincided with the “second wave” of feminism.
Example of change in the roles of women from 1800?A good example of the changing role is that women can now run for public office and this connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
Another example of change in the rights of women?Another good example of the changing role is that that women can get a post-secondary education now.
Example of continuity fight on the rights of women?Till date, the women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man and this counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Read more about Women movement
brainly.com/question/17010685
#SPJ2
Why was John Brown put to death in 1859?
A) He tried to kill General Robert E. Lee.
B) He wrote a book supporting secession. Eliminate
C) He attempted to cause a slave uprising.
D) He attempted to assassinate President Lincoln.
Which of the following statements is true about slavery prior to the Atlantic slave trade? a.) It was largely an issue of race, as only people with darker skin could become slaves. b.) Slaves were almost always considered to be the property of their masters. c.) It could involve one person bonding himself to another so as to work off a debt. d.) A person's religion had no impact on whether he or she could be enslaved.
The statement that is true about slavery prior to the Atlantic slave trade is it was largely an issue of race, as only people with darker skin could become slaves. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is the Atlantic slave trade?Slaves were transported by slave dealers from different enslaved African peoples, mostly to the Americas, as part of the Atlantic slave trade, transatlantic slave trade, or Euro-American slave trade.
Basically, From the 16th to the 19th century, the Middle Passage and the triangular trade route were frequently used for the slave trade.
Thus, Option A is correct.
Learn more about the Atlantic slave trade from here:
https://brainly.com/question/13838900
#SPJ1
Answer:
c work off debt
Explanation:
ICC reports and South Vietnam Intelligence reported that Communist North Vietnam had been illegally providing ______ to rebels in South Vietnam in order to overthrow the government there
A.) Arms
B.) Propaganda
C.) Drugs
Which of these was most responsible for triggering the U.S. entrance into world war 1
Answer:
A. The discovery of a proposed alliance between Germany and Mexico.
Explanation:
Took the quiz.
How much did William Howard Taft weigh
Answer:
Taft was the most obese president. He was 5 feet, 11.5 inches tall and his weight was between 325 and 350 pounds toward the end of his presidency
Explanation:
Answer:
He was 5 feet, 11.5 inches tall and his weight was between 325 and 350 pounds toward the end of his presidency.
Explanation:
Does that answer your question?
Most Congressional leaders wanted to treat the Southern states as defeated
Answer:
foreign powers
Explanation:
Many Congressional leaders disagreed with Lincoln’s view of the Reconstruction. They believed the states that had seceded had ended their connection to the Union and should be treated as defeated foreign powers.
also i got it right on my test lol
What do I do if I want to do something but then I also want to do something else that isn't as fun but its quicker????
Answer:
Do the quicker thing then reward yourself with the fun thing
bc you deserve it :)
What emotions did both Hitler and Mussolini stir in their followers?
Answer:
Anger and nationalism.
Explanation:
They felt as if they were wronged. File answers are scams btw.
Why was trade taxed in the Ghana Empire?
Answer:
O to reduce the amount of imported goods purchased O to limit the number of outsiders trading in Ghana O to provide support for the government of the empire O to increase the profits made by local merchants
Answer:
to provide support
Explanation:
What was often used to pay for the costs of new railroad lines?
Confederate currency
stocks and bonds
bartered goods
gold bars
Answer:
Answer: Large railroads offered discounts called rebates to their biggest customers. Smaller railroads that could not match these prices were often forced out of business. Giving discounts to big customers meant higher rates for other customers who shipped small loads
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What caused relations between the United States and the Soviet Union to begin to change in the early 1980s? Select two answers.
Answer:
B. Leonid Brezhnev died.
C. Ronald Reagan became president.
Explanation:
But the two events that caused relations between the U.S and the USSR to begin to change in the early 1980's were that Leonid Brezhnev died and Ronald Reagan became president.
Answer:
It's 2 and 4 :)
Explanation:
How do you think the Lowell system affected production?
What was the initial results of the presidential election in 2000?
Answer:
Bush, won the disputed election, defeating Democratic nominee Al Gore, the incumbent vice president. It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first in 112 years, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest elections in US history.
Explanation:
1. What economic issues existed in Europe before WWII?
Answer:
Before World War II, Germany and France had been in conflict in Europe for almost 80 years, and had fought two large wars, the Franco-Prussian War and World War I (aka The Great War). ... In the 1930s an economic crisis also added to German Dissatisfaction leading to Hitler's rise to power.
Explanation:
The goal of the Marshall Plan was to help countries in Western Europe resist communism through strong
Answer:
Economies.
Explanation:
The is also referred to as European Recovery Program and it was an assistance program of the United States of America to Western Europe. It was enacted by the 80th US Congress and signed into law on the 3rd of April, 1948 by President Harry S. Truman.
The US-sponspored program was revealed by the U.S Secretary of State, George C. Marshall and it was focused on promoting general welfare, global peace, and national interest through strong economic and financial interventions.
Hence, the goal of the Marshall Plan was to help countries in Western Europe resist communism through strong economies by stimulating an effective level of production and by extension the buying and selling of goods between various countries (world trade).
Answer:
the correct answer is b economies can I have brainliest?