Answer:
C. They both pushed for laws to regulate corporate behavior.
Answer:
C. They both pushed for laws to regulate corporate behavior.
Explanation:
Took the quiz.
Christine is writing practice outlines to study for her next essay test. What should she focus on when creating practice outlines?
a.
Christine should focus on learning the vocabulary words in the chapters so she can use them correctly in the essay
c.
Christine should focus on potential questions that may show up in the actual test
b.
Christine should focus on memorizing facts so she will know what to write about on the actual test
d.
Christine has gotten As on all previous essay test, so she shouldn’t spend too much time worrying about this one
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:C
Explanation:Must focus on the potential questions, not the others.
The option that she should focus on when creating practice outlines is that Christine should focus on potential questions that may show up in the actual test.
Why use practice outlining?The use of this Outline is known to be one that can help a student to be able to construct and arrange their ideas in a step by step manner and thoughtful sequence of information.
Note that The option that she should focus on when creating practice outlines is that Christine should focus on potential questions that may show up in the actual test as it will allow her to pick vital information that is important for her test.
Learn more about practice outlines from
https://brainly.com/question/26342782
#SPJ2
An aluminum pot was used to boil water on a gas stove. The cook picked up the pot by the handles, which were not touching the heat source, and got burned. Why did the cook get burned?
Answer:
Heat travels from a higher concentration of heat to lower concentration of heat. The heat will diffuse to the cooler areas, which means the handle would be heated, and the cook feels the burn since the heat will travel to him because of the temperature difference between him and the pot.
Do modern performers have the freedom to interpret music from the past in ways that the music original music composer had not intended? May we use modern instruments?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided or further context, we can comment on the following.
Yes, I consider that modern performers have the freedom to interpret music from the past. The only thing is that these modern performers do it with respect and comply with all the legal requirements of intellectual property, artists' royalties, and author's authorization to perform the songs.
Of course, modern interpreters would like to add their own personal touch or distinctive sound to past songs, and that is ok. Indeed, it is expected. Nobody wants to listen to the same song because that is why an original one already exists.
Modern instruments can be sued to perform songs from the past. It is more than welcome to have new styles, different instruments, that could improve the song or at least, that can be accepted by new audiences.