The numerator of a rational number is greater than its denominator by 3. If the new number becomes 13/4 when the numerator is tripled and the denominator is decreased by23, find the original number.

Answer : The value of x is 4.1 cm.

Step-by-step explanation :

As we know that the perpendicular dropped from the center divides the chord into two equal parts.

That means,

AB = CB = [tex]\frac{15.6cm}{2}=7.8cm[/tex]

Now we have o calculate the value of x by using Pythagoras theorem.

Using Pythagoras theorem in ΔOBA :

[tex](Hypotenuse)^2=(Perpendicular)^2+(Base)^2[/tex]

[tex](OA)^2=(OB)^2+(BA)^2[/tex]

Now put all the values in the above expression, we get the value of side OB.

[tex](8.8)^2=(x)^2+(7.8)^2[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{(8.8)^2-(7.8)^2}[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{77.44-60.84}[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{16.6}[/tex]

[tex]x=4.074\approx 4.1[/tex]

Therefore, the value of x is 4.1 cm.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. The complete question is:

The mean annual tuition and fees for a sample of 15 private colleges was $35,500 with a standard deviation of $6500. A dotplot shows that it is reasonable to assume that the population is approximately normal. You wish to test whether the mean tuition and fees for private colleges is different from $32,500. State the null and alternate hypotheses. A) H0: 4 = 32,500, H:4=35,500 C) H: 4 = 35,500, H7:35,500 B) H: 4 = 32,500, H : 4 # 32,500 D) H0:41 # 32,500, H : 4 = 32,500

Solution

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

H0: µ = 32500

For the alternative hypothesis,

Ha: µ ≠ 32500

This is a two tailed test.

Since the number of samples is small and the population standard deviation is not given, the distribution is a student's t.

Since n = 15,

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 15 - 1 = 14

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 35500

µ = population mean = 32500

s = samples standard deviation = 6500

t = (35500 - 32500)/(6500/√15) = 1.79

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p = 0.095

Assuming alpha = 0.05

Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.095, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

(C)Out of 5,000 randomly chosen children, 250 children carry the virus.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{Option A}: \dfrac{210}{5000}=0.042=4.2\% \\\text{Option B}: \dfrac{3}{60}=0.05=5\% \\\text{Option C}: \dfrac{250}{5000}=0.05=5\% \\\text{Option D}: \dfrac{1}{20}=0.05=5\%[/tex]

The higher the research sample, the more credible the results. In options A and C, the research sample was 5000. However, since the relative frequency of children carrying the virus is 5% in both, we take the result with a higher number of positives.

Option C is the correct option.

Answer:

For this case they want to proof if the proportion of readers own a Rolls royce is less than 0.29 and that wuld be the alternative hypothesis. The complement would represent the null hypothesis. Then the system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex] p \geq 0.29[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]p< 0.29[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case they want to proof if the proportion of readers own a Rolls royce is less than 0.29 and that wuld be the alternative hypothesis. The complement would represent the null hypothesis. Then the system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex] p \geq 0.29[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]p< 0.29[/tex]

Answer:

-8 * 5 = -40

a⁵ * a = a⁶

b⁶ * b³ = b⁹

Answer is -40a⁶b⁹

Answer:

-1/4 is the slope and the y intercept is -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for y

x +4y = -16

Subtract x

4y = -x-16

Divide by 4

4y/4 = -x/4 -16/4

y = -1/4 x -4

This is in slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

-1/4 is the slope and the y intercept is -4

Answer:

india

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

root 61

Step-by-step explanation:

You can use the distance formula or draw a triangle with sides 5 and 6

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

Please see attached photo for diagrammatic explanation.

Note: r is the radius

Using pythagoras theory, we can obtain the value of 'x' in the attached photo as shown:

|EB|= x

|FB| = 10

|EF| = 6

|EB|² = |FB|² – |EF|²

x² = 10² – 6²

x² = 100 – 36

x² = 64

Take the square root of both side.

x = √64

x = 8

Now, we can obtain line AB as follow:

|AB|= x + x

|AB|= 8 + 8

|AB|= 16

Therefore, line AB is 16

Answer:

$38,645.7208

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

Principal = $70,000

Time = 20 years

Rate = 2.2%

The calculation of the amount of saving is shown below:-

[tex]=P(1+r)^t[/tex]

A = Future amount

P = Principal amount  

[tex]r = \frac{APR}{12}[/tex]  

[tex]r = \frac{0.022}{12}[/tex]

0.001833333

t = 20 years which is equals to 240 months

[tex]A=\$70,000\times (1+0.001833333)^{240}[/tex]

[tex]A=\$70,000\times 1.552081726[/tex]

= $108,645.7208

And, the loan amount for 20 years is $70,000

So,

He would save by paying off 9 years early is

= $108,645.7208  - $70,000

= $38,645.7208

Its $3644.67  since everyone couldn't find it solved it myself ;)

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

functions include parabolas so yes!

Answer:

24.5

Step-by-step explanation:

24 = 24

1/2 -->

convert to a decimal => 1 divided by 2

0.5

24+0.5 = 24.5

Hope this helps!

Decreased height = 10 x [tex]\frac{100 - 25}{100}[/tex]

                              = 10 x [tex]\frac{75}{100}[/tex]

                              = [tex]\frac{750}{100}[/tex]

                              = 7.5 cm

Answer:

7.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Decreased height = 25% of 10

                              [tex]=\frac{25}{100}*10\\\\=0.25*10\\=2.5[/tex]

New height = 10 - 2.5 = 7.5 cm

Answer:

P(B1) = (11/15)

P(B2) = (4/15)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = (5/7)

P(B2|A) = (2/7)

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 11 red chips and 4 blue chips in a box. Two chips are selected one after the other at random and without replacement from the box.

B1 is the event that the chip removed from the box at the first step of the experiment is red.

B2 is the event that the chip removed from the box at the first step of the experiment is blue. A is the event that the chip selected from the box at the second step of the experiment is red.

Note that the probability of an event is the number of elements in that event divided by the Total number of elements in the sample space.

P(E) = n(E) ÷ n(S)

P(B1) = probability that the first chip selected is a red chip = (11/15)

P(B2) = probability that the first chip selected is a blue chip = (4/15)

P(A) = probability that the second chip selected is a red chip

P(A) = P(B1 n A) + P(B2 n A) (Since events B1 and B2 are mutually exclusive)

P(B1 n A) = (11/15) × (10/14) = (11/21)

P(B2 n A) = (4/15) × (11/14) = (22/105)

P(A) = (11/21) + (22/105) = (77/105) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = probability that the first chip selected is a red chip given that the second chip selected is a red chip

The conditional probability, P(X|Y) is given mathematically as

P(X|Y) = P(X n Y) ÷ P(Y)

So, P(B1|A) = P(B1 n A) ÷ P(A)

P(B1 n A) = (11/15) × (10/14) = (11/21)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = (11/21) ÷ (11/15) = (15/21) = (5/7)

P(B2|A) = probability that the first chip selected is a blue chip given that the second chip selected is a red chip

P(B2|A) = P(B2 n A) ÷ P(A)

P(B2 n A) = (4/15) × (11/14) = (22/105)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B2|A) = (22/105) ÷ (11/15) = (2/7)

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

the answer is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

For a sample size of n = 609.

Step-by-step explanation:

Central limit theorem for proportions:

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

In this question:

We have that p = 0.58.

We have to find n for which s = 0.02. So

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.02 = \sqrt{\frac{0.58*0.42}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.02\sqrt{n} = \sqrt{0.58*0.42}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{\sqrt{0.58*0.42}}{0.02}[/tex]

[tex](\sqrt{n})^{2} = (\frac{\sqrt{0.58*0.42}}{0.02})^{2}[/tex]

[tex]n = 609[/tex]

For a sample size of n = 609.

Answer:

The total sales in dollars to make their pay equal is: $ 3800

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we need to find the number of sales that make both function equal in value, we equal both expressions, and solve for 'x":

[tex]180+0.05 \,x=104+0.07 \,x\\180-104=0.07\,x-0.05\,x\\76=0.02x\\x=\frac{76}{0.02} \\x=3800[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]t=\frac{2045-2058}{\frac{13}{\sqrt{22}}}=-4.69[/tex]      

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=22-1=21[/tex]  

And the p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{21}<-4.69)=0.000125[/tex]  

Since the p value is a very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 2058 mm at the significance level of 0.1 (10%) given

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=2045[/tex] represent the sample mean      

[tex]s=13[/tex] represent the standard deviation

[tex]n=22[/tex] sample size      

[tex]\mu_o =2058[/tex] represent the value to test

[tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] represent the significance level

t would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to cehck if the true mean for this case is equal to 2058 or not, the system of hypothesis would be:      

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu = 2058[/tex]      

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu \neq 2058[/tex]      

The statistic for this case is given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)      

And replacing we got:

[tex]t=\frac{2045-2058}{\frac{13}{\sqrt{22}}}=-4.69[/tex]      

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex]df=n-1=22-1=21[/tex]  

And the p value would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(t_{21}<-4.69)=0.000125[/tex]  

Since the p value is a very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 2058 mm at the significance level of 0.1 (10%) given

Answer:

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Before a researcher specifies the relationship among variables he must have an inventory of propositions/constructs which are mostly stated in a declarative form. These are then tested by examining the relationships between measurable variables of this constructs/propositions.

Answer:

[tex]2x+2=-50[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x+2=y\\x+y=-50\\x+x+2=-50\\2x+2=-50[/tex]

The equation that can be used to find out [tex]x[/tex] and [tex]y[/tex] is [tex]2x+2=-50[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\mathrm{A}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Two consecutive even integers.

The first integer is even and can be as [tex]x[/tex]

The second integer is also even and can be as [tex]x+2[/tex]

Their sum is [tex]-50[/tex]

[tex]x+x+2=-50[/tex]

[tex]2x+2=-50[/tex]

Description:

As we that that 3 of the students voted for counting .

4 Students voted for sorting

6 Students voted for shapes

7 Students voted for addition

Answer:

Counting - 3%

Sorting - 4%

Shapes-  6%

Addition-  7%

Please mark brainliest

Hope this helps.

Answer:

Counting: 15%

Sorting: 20%

Shapes: 30%

Addition: 35%

Step-by-step explanation:

Counting: [tex]\frac{3}{3+4+6+7} =\frac{3}{20} =\frac{15}{100} =[/tex] 15%

Sorting: [tex]\frac{4}{3+4+6+7} =\frac{4}{20} =\frac{20}{100} =[/tex] 20%

Shapes: [tex]\frac{6}{3+4+6+7} =\frac{6}{20} =\frac{30}{100} =[/tex] 30%

Addition: [tex]\frac{7}{3+4+6+7} =\frac{7}{20} =\frac{35}{100} =[/tex]35%

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3 wooden plank he can saw

Answer:

he can saw 3 wooden planks

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x=\frac{cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3} ,x=\frac{2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: [tex]2 cos(3x)=0.9[/tex]

To find: solutions of the given equation

Solution:

Triangle is a polygon that has three sides, three angles and three vertices.

Trigonometry explains relationship between the sides and the angles of the triangle.

Use the fact: [tex]cos x=a[/tex]⇒[tex]x=cos^{-1}(a)+2n\pi,x=2\pi-cos^{-1}(a)+2n\pi[/tex]

[tex]2 cos(3x)=0.9[/tex]

Divide both sides by 2

[tex]cos(3x)=\frac{0.9}{2}=0.45[/tex]

[tex]3x=cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi,3x=2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi[/tex]

So,

[tex]x=\frac{cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3} ,x=\frac{2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

it should look like this

Answer:

No solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

9|x-1|=-45

Divide 9 into both sides.

|x-1| = -45/9

|x-1| = -5

Absolute value cannot be less than 0.

Answer:

No solution

Step-by-step explanation:

=> 9|x-1| = -45

Dividing both sides by 9

=> |x-1| = -5

Since, this is less than zero, hence the equation has no solutions

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean is the average of the sum of all integers in a data set.

Caroline has 2 pieces of cheese, Samuel has 4 pieces of cheese, Abby has 4 pieces of cheese, and Jason has 2 pieces of cheese

2 + 4 + 4 + 2 = 12

12 divides by 4, since there are 4 people, to equal the mean

12 / 4 = 3

Now since we have the mean, find the distance from the mean to each number

3 - 2 = 1

4 - 3 = 1

4 - 3 = 1

3 - 2 = 1

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4

4 / 4 = 1

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write out the expression

x + 2x = 24

Step 2: Combine like terms

3x = 24

Step 3: Isolate x

x = 8

And we have our final answer!

Answer:

X=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Is possible to make a Type I error, where we reject a true null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have a hypothesis test of a proportion. The claim is that the proportion of paid leave has significantly decrease from 2011 to january 2012. The P-value for this test is 0.0271 and the nunll hypothesis is rejected.

As the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, the only error that we may have comitted is rejecting a true null hypothesis.

The null hypothesis would have stated that there is no significant decrease in the proportion of paid leave.

This is a Type I error, where we reject a true null hypothesis.

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.60 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{340}}}=-1.933[/tex]  

The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.933)=0.0532[/tex]  

For this case is we use a significance level of 5% we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion is different from 0.65 or 65%. We need to be careful since if we use a value higher than 65 for the significance the result would change

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=340 represent the random sample taken

[tex]\hat p=0.60[/tex] estimated proportion of readers owned a laptop

[tex]p_o=0.65[/tex] is the value that we want to test

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v{/tex} represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to check if the true proportion of readers owned a laptop if different from 0.65

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.65[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.65[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.60 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{340}}}=-1.933[/tex]  

The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.933)=0.0532[/tex]  

For this case is we use a significance level of 5% we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion is different from 0.65 or 65%. We need to be careful since if we use a value higher than 65 for the significance the result would change