The box plots show Devonte’s scores in Spanish and in French. Devonte inferred that his French scores have less variability than his Spanish scores. Which explains whether Devonte’s inference is correct?




Devonte is correct because the range is greater for French.
Devonte is correct because the interquartile range is less for French. Devonte is not correct because his highest grade is in Spanish.
Devonte is not correct because the interquartile range is less for Spanish.

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be Option d (181 degrees of freedom).

Step-by-step explanation:

The given values are:

Regression model,

n = 200

Observations,

p = 18

Now,

⇒  [tex]n-p-1[/tex]

On putting the estimated values, we get

⇒  [tex]200-18-1[/tex]

⇒  [tex]181[/tex]

So that the correct choice will be "181 degrees of freedom".

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{31.1-31.3}{\frac{1.3}{\sqrt{140}}}=-1.82[/tex]  

The p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.82)=0.0688[/tex]  

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=31.1[/tex] represent the sample mean  

[tex]\sigma=1.3[/tex] represent the population standard deviation

[tex]n=140[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =31.3[/tex] represent the value that we want to test  

[tex]\alpha=0.02[/tex] represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.  

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to test if the true mean is equal to 31.3 MPG, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu =31.3[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu \neq 31.3[/tex]  

Since we know the population deviation, the statistic is given by

[tex]z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing we got:

[tex]z=\frac{31.1-31.3}{\frac{1.3}{\sqrt{140}}}=-1.82[/tex]  

The p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.82)=0.0688[/tex]  

For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG

Answer:

Y = 5x -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's look for the gradient to solve this question for.

We are given y= -1/5x-3

Any line perpendicular to the above line will have a graient of m'.

Where mm'= -1

m = -1/5 from the line equation

So

mm'= -1

-1/5m'= -1

m' =5

For the equation of point (1,2)

(Y-y1)/(x-x1) = m'

(Y-2)/(x-1)= 5

Y-2= 5x -5

Y = 5x -3

Answer:

c and d

Step-by-step explanation:

the x intercepts are the solutions

Answer:

(0,2) and (-5,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

the point where the two graph lines meet would be the answer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that, in this case, the subset of X for which R is defined is called the domain of R. The mistake occurs when we assume that the domain R is the whole set X, but it could happen that R is not defined for some elements of X.

Recall the following example:

X = {2,4,6}.

We can define R as follows {(2,2), (4,4), (2,4), (4,2)}. We can easily check that this is a transitive and symmetric relation, but since we don't have the element (6,6) it fails to be reflexive.

Answer:

The probability that the final settlement amount is between 1 and 3 given that the initial claim is 2 = (2/9) = 0.2222

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is presented in the attached image to this solution

The joint probability distribution is given as

f(x, y) = {2/[x²(x - 1)} × y^-[(2x-1)/(x-1)] for x>1 And y>1

Given that the initial claim estiamted by the comapny is 2, determine the probability that the final settlement amount is between 1 and 3.

That is, x = 2, and y ranges from 1 to 3

Inserting x = 2 into the expression, we obtain

f(y) = (1/2) × y⁻³ = (y⁻³/2)

The required probability would then be

P(1 < y ≤ 3) = ∫³₁ f(y) dy

= ∫³₁ (y⁻³/2) dy

= [y⁻²/-4]³₁

= [3⁻²/-4] - [1⁻²/-4]

= (-1/36) - (-1/4)

= (1/4) - (1/36)

= (8/36)

= (2/9) = 0.2222

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

not 100% sure but my answer is 110

Step-by-step explanation:

It is More Affordable and is the better Buy From All the other choices.

Answer:

(a)Jupiter

(b)24.4 km

(c)[tex]1.33 \times 10^{27}$ kg[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A

The planet with the greatest ma.ss is Jupiter.

It has a ma.ss of [tex]1.898 X 10^{27}$ kg[/tex]

Part B

The diameter of Mercury = 4.88 X 10

Radius = Diameter/2

Therefore:

Radius of Mercury

[tex]=\dfrac{4.88 X 10}{2}\\ =2.44 X 10\\=24.4$ km[/tex]

Part C

[tex]M$a.ss of Saturn = 5.68 X 10^{26}\\$Mass of Jupiter = 1.898 X 10^{27}\\$Difference in their ma.ss =(1.898 X 10^{27})-(5.68 X 10^{26})\\=1.33 \times 10^{27}$ kg[/tex]

Answer:

A. y = 7(x + 1)²-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Parabola:

[tex]y = 7x^{2} + 14x + 4[/tex]

[tex]y = 7(x^{2} + 2x) + 4[/tex]

Putting into vertex form, remember that:

[tex](x + a)^{2} = x^{2} + 2ax + a^{2}[/tex]

In this question:

[tex]x^{2} + 2x[/tex], to put into this format:

[tex]x^{2} + 2x + 1 = (x + 1)^{2}[/tex]

We add one inside the parenthesis to do this. The parenthesis is multiplied by 7, so for the equivalent, we also have to subtract 7. Then

Vertex form:

[tex]y = 7(x^{2} + 2x + 1) + 4 - 7[/tex]

[tex]y = 7(x + 1)^{2} - 3[/tex]

So the correct answer is:

A. y = 7(x + 1)²-3

Answer:

g(x) = -x² - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case, we are only changing a (reflection and vertical shrink/stretch) and k (vertical movement)

k = -4 because we are moving 4 units down

a = -1 because we are just reflecting over the x-axis

Answer:

This is because 2 is the stem and the leaves are 1, 2, 4, and 5

so the numbers are 21, 22, 24, and, 25

This is because 2 is the stem for the leaves 6 and 7

3 is the stem for the leaf 0

So the numbers are 26, 27, and 30

Hope this helped

Answer:

As you know about the stem and leaf plot

1 |7 7 7 8                   => 17, 17, 17, 18

2|1 2 4 5 6 7             => 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27

3|0 2 5 5 6 7 7 8 9  => 30, 32, 35, 35, 36, 37, 37, 38, 39

4|1 2                         => 41, 42

Now we count to complete the table:

16-20       |       4    {17, 17, 17, 18}

21-25       |       4    {21, 22, 24, 25}

26-30      |       3    {26, 27, 30}

31-35       |       3    {32, 35, 35}

36-40      |       5    {36, 37, 37, 38, 39}

41-45       |       2    {41, 42}

Hope this helps!

Answer:

39 degrees and 51 degrees respectively.

Step-by-step explanation:

Two angles are complementary if their sum adds up to 90 degrees.

Given the pair of complementary angles formed by the three support beams:

3x+3 and 5x-9

Then:

3x+3+5x-9=90 degrees

Collect like terms

3x+5x=90+9-3

8x=96

Divide both sides by 8

x=12

Therefore, the measure of each angle is:

[tex](3x+3)=3(12)+3=36+3=39^\circ\\(5x-9)=5(12)-9=60-9=51^\circ[/tex]

The measure of each angle is 39 degrees and 51 degrees respectively.

Answer:

39 and 51 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

23.27%

Step-by-step explanation:

From the statement we know that random sample n is 110 and that p is 75% and x the percentage to evaluate is 78%

We have that the probability would be equal:

P (x > 0.78) =  [tex]P(z <\frac{x-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p*(1-p)}{n} }})[/tex]

Replacing we have:

[tex]P(z <\frac{0.78-0.75}{\sqrt{\frac{0.75*(1-0.75)}{110} }})[/tex]

P ( z < 0.73) =  1 - P ( z => 0.73)

= 1 - 0.7673

= 0.2327

Therefore the probability is 23.27%

Answer:

17.50

Step-by-step explanation:

The profit on one hotdog is

1 - .65 = .35

Multiply by the number of hotdogs sold

.35 * 50 =17.50

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

I think the least preferred method the researcher would like is to select a random sample of students from each college. This means the researcher would have to go to every college and randomly selects participants which is very exhausting. Thus, this would be the least prefer method over the others...

Answer:

0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

An uniform probability is a case of probability in which each outcome is equally as likely.

For this situation, we have a lower limit of the distribution that we call a and an upper limit that we call b.

The probability that we find a value X higher than x is given by the following formula.

[tex]P(X > x) = \frac{b - x}{b-a}[/tex]

The mail arrival time to a department has a uniform distribution over 5 to 45 minutes.

This means that [tex]a = 5, b = 45[/tex].

What is the probability that the mail arrival time is more than 25 minutes on a given day?

[tex]P(X > 25) = \frac{45 - 25}{45 - 5} = 0.5[/tex]

So the probability that the mail arrival time is more than 25 minutes on a given day is 0.5.

Answer:

# of plants    # of gardens

  10-14                   2

  15-19                   2

  20-24                 5

  25-29                 3

  30-34                  3

  35-39                  5

  40-44                  4

Step-by-step explanation:

10-14: 10, 12 (2 numbers)

15-19: 18, 19 (2 numbers)

20-24: 20, 22, 23, 24, 24 (5 numbers)

25-29: 25, 27, 38 (3 numbers)

30-34: 31, 33, 33 (3 numbers)

35-39: 36, 36, 36, 37, 38 (5 numbers)

40-44: 40, 44, 44, 44 (4 numbers)

Answer:

10-14 ⇒ 2

15-19 ⇒ 2

20-24 ⇒ 5

25-29 ⇒ 3

30-34 ⇒ 3

35-39 ⇒ 5

40-44 ⇒ 4

Answer:

x^4 - 3x^3 - x^2 - 27x - 90 = 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

If 3i is one root then another is -3i.

In factor form we have:

(x + 2)(x - 5)(x - 3i)(x + 3i) = 0

(x^2 - 3x - 10)(x^2 -9i^2) = 0

(x^2 - 3x - 10)(x^2 + 9) = 0

x^4 + 9x^2 - 3x^3 - 27x - 10x^2 - 90 = 0

x^4 - 3x^3 - x^2 - 27x - 90 = 0.

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

x=60 .

The triangle is equilateral and x=60 cause the two lines are ||

a. x=60°

b. Alternate interior angles

Solution,

Given,

All sides of triangle are equal.

AB=BC=AC

<ABC=<ACB=<BAC=y

By angle sum property of triangle,

<ABC+<BCA+<CAB=180

or y+y+y=180

or 3y=180

or y=180/3

y=60

Now,

<ACB=<CAD

<CAD(x)=60( Alternate interior angles)

Hope this helps ..

Good luck on your assignment..

Answer:

1,280,000 (1.28 million.)

Step-by-step explanation:

If Network B schedules its top show (with a probability of 0.7), Network A will get 1.1 million viewers.

If Network B schedules a different show during that time​ slot, (with a probability of 0.3), Network A will get 1.9 million viewers.

Therefore, the probability distribution table of number of viewers of Network A is:

[tex]\left|\begin{array}{c|c|c}$Number of Viewers, x&1.1$ million&$1.7 million\\P(x)&0.7&0.3\end{array}\right|[/tex]

Therefore, the expected number of viewers for Network​ A's top show

= (1100000 X 0.7) + (1700000 X 0.3)

=1,280,000

The expected number of viewers for Network​ A's top show is 1.28 million.

Answer:

h= pi(r)2/A or h= 3.14 times 7 times 2 divided by A

Step-by-step explanation:

u need to do the opposite of multiplication which is division to find the height

hope this helps

correct me if this is wrong

Answer:

20 - 60 - 135

95

Step-by-step explanation:

All you have to do is add/subtract the factors together

Answer:

5(x - 3)(x + 3)(x^2 + 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

First take out the GCF of the 3 numbers (5):-

= 5(x^4 - 6x^2 - 27)

= 5(x^2 - 9)(x^2 + 3)

= 5(x - 3)(x + 3)(x^2 + 3).

Answer:

There is enough evidence to support the claim that that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage (61%).

Test statistic z = -2.19.

P-value = 0.03.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage (61%).

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.61\\\\H_a:\pi\neq 0.61[/tex]

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample has a size n=1300.

The sample proportion is p=0.58.

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.61*0.39}{1300}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000183}=0.014[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi+0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.58-0.61+0.5/1300}{0.014}=\dfrac{-0.03}{0.014}=-2.189[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(z<-2.189)=0.03[/tex]

As the P-value (0.03) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is  significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage (61%).

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Claim: if the mean amount of garbage per bin is different from 50.

Null hypothesis: u=50

Alternative hypothesis : u =/ 50

Using the z score formular for a one sample z test - z = (x - u ) / (sd/√n)

Where x = 48.99, u = 50 sd =3.7 and n = 36

z = 48.99 - 50 / (3.7/√36)

z = -1.01 / (3.7/6)

z = -1.01/0.6167

z = -1.6377

To find the p value at a 0.01 level of significant from the -1.6377 z score for a two tailed test the p value using the p value calculator is 0.1016. The result is not significant at 0.01 level of significant thus we will fail to reject the null and conclude that the mean amount of garbage per bin is 50.

Answer:

340

Step-by-step explanation:

If x is the amount of pages in the book we can write:

1/4x + 5 + 3/5(x - (1/4x + 5)) + 10 + 12 + 24 = x

1/4x + 51 + 3/5(3/4x - 5) = x

1/4x + 51 + 9/20x - 3 = x

7/10x + 48 = x

3/10x = 48

x = 160

Answer:

a. 16 years

b. 50 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us assume the age of Ahsan be X

And, the age of his mother be Y

It is mentioned in the question that the sum of the both ages to be 61 years and their difference is 29 years

So now the equation is as follows

X + Y = 61 .............................. (1)

-X + Y = 29 .............................. (2)

Now solve this

We get

2Y = 90

Y = 45 = Ahsan mother age age

Now put the value of Y in any of the above equation

So X would be

X = 61 - 45

= 16 i.e ahsan age

The mother age is

= 45 years + 5 years

= 50 years

The 5 years come from

= 21 years - 16 years

= 5 years

Answer:

3422 x232

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the value of the car decreases by a common factor each year, the decay is exponential.

An exponential decay function is of the form

[tex]A(t)=A_0(1-r)^t$ where:\\Initial Value, A_0=\$11,000\\$Decay Factor, r=9%=0.09[/tex]

Therefore, the function modeling the car's decay is:

[tex]A(t)=11000(1-0.09)^t[/tex]

We want to determine the car's value in two years.

When t=2

[tex]A(2)=11000(1-0.09)^2\\A(2)=\$9109.10[/tex]

The value of the car in 2 years will be A(t)=$9109.10

Final value of the car after 2 years will be $9109.10

 Value of the car decay by 9%.

Since, 9% is a common factor by which the value of car is decreasing,

Therefore, decay will be exponential.

Expression for the exponential decay is given by,

[tex]P=P_0(1-\frac{r}{100} )^t[/tex]

Here, [tex]P=[/tex] Final price

[tex]P_0=[/tex] Initial price

[tex]r=[/tex] Rate of decay

[tex]t=[/tex] time

  If initial price of the car [tex]P_0=11000[/tex], rate of decay [tex]r=0.09[/tex] and [tex]t=[/tex] Number of years

By substituting the values in the expression,

P = [tex]11000(1-0.09)^2[/tex]

  = 11000(0.91)²

  = $9109.10

   Therefore, final value of the car after 2 years will be $9109.10

Learn more,

https://brainly.com/question/24515212

Answer:

649,006

Step-by-step explanation:

Six hundred and forty nine thousand= 649,000

and six so we have

649006

THE ANSWER IS 649,006 HOPE IT HELPS