The body temperatures of a group of healthy adults have a bell-shaped distribution with a mean of 98.37 ∘
F and a standard deviation of 0.66 ∘
F. Using the empirical rule, find each approximate percentage below. a. What is the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures within 1 standard deviation of the mean, or between 97.71 ∘
F and 99.03 ∘
F ? b. What is the approximate percentage of healthy adults with body temperatures between 97.05 ∘
F and 99.69 ∘
F ? a. Approximately \% of healthy adults in this group have body temperatures within 1 standard deviation of the mean, or between 97.71 ∘
F and 99.03 ∘
F. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.) b. Approximately \% of healthy adults in this group have body temperatures between 97.05 ∘
F and 99.69 ∘
F. (Type an integer or a decimal. Do not round.)

A) The third quartile price of the  real estate prices data is  912031 .

B) [tex]85^{th}[/tex] percentile price of the real estate prices data is  1246316 .

A) The third quartile price and the 85th percentile price

192720, 250665, 365241, 429768, 574512, 628475, 782997, 873470, 912031, 1097863, 1132181, 1281818, 1366564

Sorting the data in ascending order:

192720, 250665, 365241, 429768, 574512, 628475, 782997, 873470, 912031, 1097863, 1132181, 1281818, 1366564

Now, let's find the third quartile price:

The third quartile divides the data into quarters, where 75% of the data is below the third quartile. Since we have 13 data points, the position of the third quartile is (3/4) × 13 = 9.75. We can round this down to the nearest whole number, which is 9.

So, the third quartile price is the 9th value in the sorted data:

Third quartile price = 912031

B) For the second set of data:

107262, 292560, 317025, 414420, 576989, 635162, 797679, 859411, 946570, 1054699, 1189013, 1246316, 1353339

Sorting the data in ascending order:

107262, 292560, 317025, 414420, 576989, 635162, 797679, 859411, 946570, 1054699, 1189013, 1246316, 1353339

Now, let's find the [tex]85^{th}[/tex] percentile price:

The [tex]85^{th}\\[/tex] percentile represents the value below which 85% of the data falls. Since we have 13 data points, the position of the [tex]85^{th}\\[/tex] percentile is (85/100) × 13 = 11.05. We can round this up to the nearest whole number, which is 12.

So, the [tex]85^{th}\\[/tex] percentile price is the 12th value in the sorted data:

[tex]85^{th}[/tex] percentile price = 1246316

To know more about quartile click here :

https://brainly.com/question/12481687

#SPJ4

The false statement is:

c. The mean value of X is 25

The mean value of a binomial distribution is given by the formula μ = np, where n is the number of trials and p is the probability of success. In this case, n = 100 and p = 0.5, so the mean value of X should be μ = np = 100 * 0.5 = 50. Therefore, statement c is false.

Learn more about binomial distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29137961

#SPJ11

Answer:

you can use pythagorus theorem... a² + b² = c²

1. To calculate the percentage change in price, we can use the midpoint formula:

Percentage change = [(New value - Old value) / ((New value + Old value) / 2)] * 100

Old value: $3.50 New value: $2.00

Percentage change = [($2.00 - $3.50) / (($2.00 + $3.50) / 2)] * 100 Percentage change = [(-$1.50) / ($5.50 / 2)] * 100 Percentage change = (-$1.50) / ($2.75) * 100 Percentage change = -54.55%

The percentage change in price is approximately -54.55%.

2. To calculate the percentage change in quantity, we use the same formula:

Old value: 7 cups New value: 14 cups

Percentage change = [(14 - 7) / ((14 + 7) / 2)] * 100 Percentage change = (7 / 10.5) * 100 Percentage change = 66.67%

The percentage change in quantity is 66.67%.

3. To calculate the Price Elasticity of Demand, we use the formula:

Price Elasticity of Demand = [(New quantity - Old quantity) / ((New quantity + Old quantity) / 2)] / [(New price - Old price) / ((New price + Old price) / 2)]

Old price: $3.50 New price: $2.00 Old quantity: 7 cups New quantity: 14 cups

Price Elasticity of Demand = [(14 - 7) / ((14 + 7) / 2)] / [($2.00 - $3.50) / (($2.00 + $3.50) / 2)] Price Elasticity of Demand = (7 / 10.5) / (-$1.50 / $2.75) Price Elasticity of Demand = (7 / 10.5) * (-$2.75 / $1.50) Price Elasticity of Demand = -3.5

The Price Elasticity of Demand is -3.5.

4. Based on the negative percentage change in price and the Price Elasticity of Demand being greater than 1 (in absolute value), we can conclude that RedBull is a price elastic good.

In summary:

To know more about percentage , visit

brainly.com/question/17075652

#SPJ11

We have shown that the conditional density of ψ given the data and the θ does not depend on the data Y.

To show that the conditional density of ψ given the data and the θ does not depend on the data, we can use the concept of conditional probability and Bayes' theorem.

Let Y_i, i = 1 to n, be the observed data with densities fθ_i(y), where θ_i are unspecified parameters. Let the θ_i be independent draws from the distribution gψ(θ), and let there be a prior distribution on ψ with density π(ψ).

We want to show that the conditional density of ψ given the data and the θ, denoted as p(ψ | Y, θ), does not depend on the data Y.

By Bayes' theorem, the conditional density can be expressed as:

p(ψ | Y, θ) = p(Y, θ | ψ) * π(ψ) / p(Y, θ)

where p(Y, θ) is the joint density of Y and θ.

Now, let's consider the numerator p(Y, θ | ψ) * π(ψ). The numerator represents the joint density of Y, θ given ψ, multiplied by the prior density of ψ.

Since the joint density of Y, θ given ψ is a function of θ alone (as mentioned in the problem statement), we can write:

p(Y, θ | ψ) * π(ψ) = p(Y | θ, ψ) * p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ)

where p(Y | θ, ψ) is the conditional density of Y given θ and ψ, and p(θ | ψ) is the conditional density of θ given ψ.

Now, let's consider the denominator p(Y, θ). The denominator represents the joint density of Y and θ, which can be written as:

p(Y, θ) = ∫ p(Y, θ | ψ) * p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ) dψ

where the integral is taken over all possible values of ψ.

Now, if we divide the numerator and denominator by the same term p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ) and simplify, we get:

p(ψ | Y, θ) = (p(Y | θ, ψ) * p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ)) / ∫ p(Y, θ | ψ) * p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ) dψ

Notice that the numerator and the denominator have the same terms p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ), which cancel out. We are left with:

p(ψ | Y, θ) = p(Y | θ, ψ) / ∫ p(Y, θ | ψ) * p(θ | ψ) * π(ψ) dψ

Now, we can see that the conditional density of ψ given the data and the θ, p(ψ | Y, θ), does not depend on the data Y, as it only involves the conditional density of Y given θ and ψ, p(Y | θ, ψ), and the integral of the joint density over ψ.

Therefore, we have shown that the conditional density of ψ given the data and the θ does not depend on the data Y.

Learn more about   data from

https://brainly.com/question/30459199

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the garden are 5 feet by 20 feet.

The width of the garden can be represented as 'w'. The length of the garden is 4 times the width, which can be represented as 4w.

The perimeter of a rectangle, such as a garden, is calculated as:P = 2l + 2w.

In this case, the perimeter is given as 50 feet.

Therefore, we can write:50 = 2(4w) + 2w.

Simplifying the equation, we get:50 = 8w + 2w

50 = 10w

5 = w.

So the width of the garden is 5 feet. The length of the garden is 4 times the width, which is 4 x 5 = 20 feet.

Therefore, the dimensions of the garden are 5 feet by 20 feet.

To know more about dimensions click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32471530

#SPJ11

The transformation f(x) = -|x - 4| + 6 reflects the parent function across the x-axis, shifts it 4 units to the right, and shifts it upward 6 units.

The transformation f(x) = -|x - 4| + 6 has several effects on the parent function:

1. Reflection across the x-axis: The negative sign outside the absolute value function causes a reflection of the parent function across the x-axis. This means that any points above the x-axis are flipped to their corresponding points below the x-axis.

2. Horizontal shift to the right: The term (x - 4) inside the absolute value function represents a horizontal shift of 4 units to the right. The original parent function is shifted horizontally, causing the graph to move to the right.

3. Vertical shift upward: The constant term 6 outside the absolute value function causes a vertical shift of 6 units upward. The entire graph is shifted vertically, moving it higher on the y-axis.

Combining these effects, the transformation results in a reflection across the x-axis, a horizontal shift 4 units to the right, and a vertical shift 6 units upward compared to the parent function.

Learn more about function  : brainly.com/question/28278690

#SPJ11

The Lake of Distress started with 4,000 square feet infected by flesh-eating bacteria. The cure reduces the amount of bacteria by 10% each day.

The Lake of Distress initially had an area of 4,000 square feet infected by flesh-eating bacteria. To combat the contamination, scientists have developed a cure that is capable of reducing the bacteria's presence by 10% each day. This means that each day, the infected area will decrease by 10% of its current value, gradually mitigating the contamination over time.

Assuming the bacteria reduction rate is constant at 10% per day, here's a table showing the infected area in square feet.

Complete Question: The Lake of Distress is contaminated with flesh-eating bacterial Scientists have come up with a cure, but it only reduces the amount of bacteria by 10% each day. The lake started with 4,000 square feet infected. Make a table to show the reduction of bacteria each

Read more about water contamination here: https://brainly.com/question/31375493

#SPJ11

Answer:

£4

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume that the normal price of the toy is x.

If the normal price is reduced by 20%, it means that the sale price is 80% of the normal price, or 0.8x.

We know that the sale price is £3.20, so we can set up an equation:

0.8x = 3.20

To solve for x, we can divide both sides by 0.8:

x = 3.20 ÷ 0.8

x = 4

Therefore, the normal price of the toy is £4.

(a) The type of bias in the survey is non-response bias

(b) The bias can be remedied by increasing the response rate, using follow-up methods, analyzing respondent characteristics, employing alternative survey methods, and utilizing statistical techniques such as weighting or imputation.

(a) Determining the type of bias in the survey:

The survey exhibits nonresponse bias.

Nonresponse bias occurs when the individuals who choose not to respond to the survey differ in important ways from those who do respond, leading to a potential distortion in the survey results.

(b) Suggesting a remedy for the bias:

One possible remedy for nonresponse bias is to increase the response rate.

This can be done by providing incentives or rewards to encourage participation, such as gift cards or entry into a prize draw.

Following up with nonrespondents through phone calls, emails, or personal visits can also help improve the response rate.

Additionally, comparing the characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents and adjusting the results based on any identified biases can help mitigate the bias.

Exploring alternative survey methods, such as online surveys or telephone interviews, may reach a different segment of the population and improve the representation.

Statistical techniques like weighting or imputation can be used to adjust for nonresponse and minimize its impact on the survey estimates.

Therefore, nonresponse bias is present in the survey, and remedies such as increasing the response rate, follow-up methods, analysis of respondent characteristics, alternative survey methods, and statistical adjustments can be employed to address the bias and improve the accuracy of the survey results.

To know more about bias, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13500874

#SPJ11

The probability of rolling a 1 on a die or rolling an even number on a die is 1/3. This is because the probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6, the probability of rolling an even number is 1/2

The probability of rolling a 1 on a die or rolling an even number on a die is P(E) = P(rolling a 1) + P(rolling an even number).

There are six possible outcomes of rolling a die: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6.

There are three even numbers: 2, 4, and 6. So, the probability of rolling an even number is 3/6, which simplifies to 1/2 or 0.5.

The probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6.

Therefore, P(E) = 1/6 + 1/2 = 2/6 or 1/3.

The correct answer is P(E) = P(rolling a 1) + P(rolling an even number).

If we roll a die, then there are six possible outcomes, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

There are three even numbers, which are 2, 4, and 6, and there is only one odd number, which is 1.

Thus, the probability of rolling an even number is P(even) = 3/6 = 1/2, and the probability of rolling an odd number is P(odd) = 1/6.

The question asks for the probability of rolling a 1 or an even number. We can solve this problem by using the addition rule of probability, which states that the probability of A or B happening is the sum of the probabilities of A and B, minus the probability of both A and B happening.

We can write this as:

P(1 or even) = P(1) + P(even) - P(1 and even)

However, the probability of rolling a 1 and an even number at the same time is zero, because they are mutually exclusive events.

Therefore, P(1 and even) = 0, and we can simplify the equation as follows:P(1 or even) = P(1) + P(even) = 1/6 + 1/2 = 2/6 = 1/3

In conclusion, the probability of rolling a 1 on a die or rolling an even number on a die is 1/3. This is because the probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6, the probability of rolling an even number is 1/2, and the probability of rolling a 1 and an even number at the same time is 0. To solve this problem, we used the addition rule of probability and found that P(1 or even) = P(1) + P(even) - P(1 and even) = 1/6 + 1/2 - 0 = 1/3. Therefore, the answer is P(E) = P(rolling a 1) + P(rolling an even number).

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The probability that an arbitrary draw y is greater than 2 when a=3, i.e. P(y>2) is 0.0025 (approx)

The exponential distribution with probability density function (PDF) f(t)=ae-at, where a>0 is an unknown constant. Here, we need to compute the probability that some arbitrary draw y is greater than 2 when a=3, i.e. P(y>2)

We can use the formula of the cumulative distribution function(CDF), which is given by:

[tex]$F_{X}(x)=\int_{0}^{x}f_{X}(t) dt$[/tex]

to solve the problem. Thus, the CDF for an exponential distribution with parameter a is given by:

[tex]$F_{X}(x)

= \int_{0}^{x} f_{X}(t) dt

= \int_{0}^{x} ae^{-at} dt

= [-e^{-at}]_{0}^{x}

= 1 - e^{-ax}$[/tex]

We need to calculate the probability that y is greater than 2, i.e.

[tex]P(y>2).Thus, P(y>2)

= 1 - P(y<2)

The, P(y>2)

= 1 - F(2)

= 1 - (1 - e-2a)

= e-2a[/tex]

Now, a=3, substitute a=3 in the above equation.

P(y>2) = e-6 = 0.0025 (approx.)

The probability that an arbitrary draw y is greater than 2 when a=3, i.e. P(y>2) is 0.0025 (approx).

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29657992

#SPJ11

The equation 4 - x = 4x + 14 has no solution. is obtained by Solving Linear Equations .The correct choice is B.

To solve the equation 4 - x = 4x + 14, we can simplify it by rearranging the terms and combining like terms.  First, let's bring all the terms with x to one side of the equation. Subtracting 4x from both sides, we have -x - 4x = 14 + 4. Simplifying further, we get -5x = 18.

Next, we isolate x by dividing both sides of the equation by -5. However, dividing both sides by -5 results in x = -18/5, which is a numerical value. Since the equation doesn't have a variable term on both sides (x term on one side and a constant on the other side), there is no solution that satisfies the given equation.

Therefore, the correct choice is B. There is no solution to the equation 4 - x = 4x + 14.

To know more about Linear Equations refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32634451

#SPJ11

Northwest corner algorithm can be defined as a mathematical method to solve the Transportation Problem (TP) in Operations Research. It is a cost-saving method used by organizations to minimize transportation costs.

The method of Northwest Corner Rule is based on the idea of making allocations from the cell located at the Northwest corner and then moving towards the Southeast corner, allocating as much as possible from each row or column till all requirements and supplies have been satisfied. This method will provide us with the initial basic feasible solution. Follow the below steps to solve the given problem:

Step 1: Formulate the given problem in the tabular form, which is shown below. CB
10
8
9
5
2
3
6
7
4
Demand
25
20
30
35 Supply 25
25
50

Step 2: Find the Initial Basic Feasible Solution by applying the Northwest Corner Rule method and the solution is shown below.CB
10
8
9
5
2
3
6
7
4
Demand
25
20
30
35 Supply
25

15 10

10
20 20

30

35 15

20
10
5
5
Therefore, the Initial Basic Feasible Solution is X11 = 25, X12 = 0, X13 = 0, X14 = 0, X21 = 15, X22 = 20, X23 = 0, X24 = 0, X31 = 10, X32 = 20, X33 = 0, X34 = 0, X41 = 0, X42 = 0, X43 = 30, X44 = 5.

Let's learn more about Northwest corner algorithm:

https://brainly.com/question/14857192

#SPJ11

Jackson will have $3,971.68 in his savings account at the end of 4 years, assuming no withdrawals during that period.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P*(1 + r/n)^(n*t)

where A is the amount after t years, P is the principal (initial deposit), r is the interest rate, n is the number of times compounded per year, and t is the time in years.

In this case, we have P = $70 per month, r = 2%/year = 0.02/12 per month, n = 12 (monthly compounding), and t = 4 years. We need to calculate the total amount deposited over 4 years, so we multiply the monthly deposit by the number of months in 4 years:

Total Deposits = $70 * 12 months/year * 4 years = $3,360

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

A = $70*(1 + 0.02/12)^(12*4) + $3,360 = $3,971.68

Therefore, Jackson will have $3,971.68 in his savings account at the end of 4 years, assuming no withdrawals during that period.

As for when he will reach his retirement goal, we would need more information about his retirement goal and other factors such as inflation, investment returns, etc.

Learn more about   savings account  from

https://brainly.com/question/25787382

#SPJ11

The first car was initially moving at a speed of 3.6 m/s before colliding with the second stationary car.

To determine the speed of the first car before the collision, we can apply the principle of conservation of momentum. According to this principle, the total momentum before the collision should be equal to the total momentum after the collision.

The momentum of an object is given by the product of its mass and velocity. Let's denote the velocity of the first car before the collision as v1, and the velocity of the second car as v2 (which is initially stationary). The total momentum before the collision is the sum of the individual momenta of the two cars:

Momentum before = (mass of the first car × velocity of the first car) + (mass of the second car × velocity of the second car)

                    = (20,000 kg × v1) + (40,000 kg × 0)  [since the second car is stationary initially]

                    = 20,000 kg × v1

After the collision, the two cars latch together and move off with a speed of 1.2 m/s. Since they are now moving together, their combined mass is the sum of their individual masses:

Total mass after the collision = mass of the first car + mass of the second car

                                          = 20,000 kg + 40,000 kg

                                          = 60,000 kg

Using the principle of conservation of momentum, the total momentum after the collision is:

Momentum after = Total mass after the collision × final velocity

                   = 60,000 kg × 1.2 m/s

                   = 72,000 kg·m/s

Since the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision, we can set up an equation:

20,000 kg × v1 = 72,000 kg·m/s

Now, solving for v1:

v1 = 72,000 kg·m/s / 20,000 kg

    = 3.6 m/s

Therefore, the first car was moving at a speed of 3.6 m/s before the collision.

The first car was initially moving at a speed of 3.6 m/s before colliding with the second stationary car. After the collision, the two cars latched together and moved off with a combined speed of 1.2 m/s. The principle of conservation of momentum was used to determine the initial speed of the first car. By equating the total momentum before and after the collision, we obtained an equation and solved for the initial velocity of the first car. The calculation showed that the first car's initial velocity was 3.6 m/s.

To know more about Speed, visit

https://brainly.com/question/25749514

#SPJ11

The eigenvalues of T are λ₁ = 2 and λ₂ = 0. The corresponding eigenvectors are v₁ = (1, 0, 0) and v₂ = (0, 1, 0).

To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the linear transformation T: R³ → R³, we need to solve the equation T(v) = λv, where v is a non-zero vector and λ is a scalar (the eigenvalue).

Let's consider an arbitrary vector v = (x, y, z) and apply T to it:

T(v) = T(x, y, z) = (2x, 3z, 0)

Now, we set up the equation T(v) = λv:

(2x, 3z, 0) = λ(x, y, z)

This gives us the following system of equations:

2x = λx

3z = λy

0 = λz

From the first equation, we can see that λ = 2 or x = 0. If x = 0, then the entire vector v is zero, which is not allowed for an eigenvector. Therefore, we consider λ = 2.

From the second equation, we have 3z = λy. Since λ = 2, this simplifies to 3z = 2y.

From the third equation, we have 0 = λz. Again, since λ = 2, this gives us 0 = 2z.

From the second and third equations, we can see that z = 0 and y can be any real number. Therefore, the eigenvectors corresponding to λ = 2 are of the form v₁ = (x, y, 0), where x and y are arbitrary.

Now, let's consider the case where λ = 0. In this case, we have:

2x = 0

3z = 0

0 = 0

From these equations, we can see that x and z can be any real numbers, and y must be zero. Therefore, the eigenvectors corresponding to λ = 0 are of the form v₂ = (0, 0, z), where z is an arbitrary real number.

The eigenvalues of T are λ₁ = 2 and λ₂ = 0. The corresponding eigenvectors are v₁ = (1, 0, 0) and v₂ = (0, 1, 0).

To know more about eigenvalues, visit

https://brainly.com/question/15586347

#SPJ11

Therefore, the probability of obtaining 5 successes when.

n = 7 and

π = 0.17 is 0.000207.

For n = 7 and π = 0.17, the probability of obtaining 5 successes (P(X = 5)) can be found using the binomial probability formula, which is given by:

P(X = k)

= (n C k) * (π^k) * [(1-π)^(n-k)]

where n is the number of trials, k is the number of successes, π is the probability of success in one trial, and (n C k) represents the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n items.

Using this formula, we can plug in the values

n = 7, π = 0.17,

and

k = 5

to obtain:

P(X = 5)

[tex]= (7 C 5) * (0.17^5) * [(1-0.17)^(7-5)][/tex]

Let's evaluate each part of the equation.

:[tex](7 C 5)

= (7! / (5! * (7-5)!))

= (7 * 6 / 2)

= 21(0.17^5) = 0.00014[(1-0.17)^(7-5)]

= (0.83^2) = 0.6889[/tex]

Now, we can substitute these values back into the original equation:

P(X = 5)

= (21) * (0.00014) * (0.6889)P(X = 5)

= 0.000207

Therefore, the probability of obtaining 5 successes when.

n = 7 and

π = 0.17 is 0.000207.

To know more about number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

To solve the non-homogeneous ordinary differential equation (ODE) problem y' + y = x, with the initial condition y(0) = 1, we can use the method of integrating factors.

First, let's rewrite the equation in standard form:

y' + y = x

The integrating factor is given by the exponential of the integral of the coefficient of y, which is 1 in this case. Therefore, the integrating factor is e^x.

Multiplying both sides of the equation by the integrating factor, we have:

e^x  y' + e^x  y = x  e^x

The left side of the equation can be rewritten using the product rule:

(d/dx) (e^x  y) = x  e^x

Integrating both sides with respect to x, we obtain:

e^x  y = ∫ (x  e^x) dx

Integrating the right side, we have:

e^x  y = ∫ (x  e^x) dx = e^x  (x - 1) + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Dividing both sides by e^x, we get:

y = (e^x  (x - 1) + C) / e^x

Simplifying the expression, we have:

y = x - 1 + C / e^x

Now, we can use the initial condition y(0) = 1 to find the value of the constant C:

1 = 0 - 1 + C / e^0

1 = -1 + C

Therefore, C = 2.

Substituting C = 2 back into the expression for y, we obtain the final solution:

y = x - 1 + 2 / e^x.

Learn more about Integrating Factor here :

https://brainly.com/question/32554742

#SPJ11

Jean Ackyroyd and Sue Bathgate will be earning the same salary after 6 years, which is equivalent to 12 semi-annual raises.

To determine after how many years Jean Ackyroyd and Sue Bathgate will be earning the same salary, we can set up an equation based on their starting salaries and semi-annual raises.

Let's denote the number of semi-annual raises as "n" (the same for both women). The total salary for Jean Ackyroyd after "n" raises can be represented as:

Total salary for Jean Ackyroyd = Starting salary + (Number of raises * Raise amount)

                             = $18,000 + (n × $750)

Similarly, the total salary for Sue Bathgate after "n" raises can be represented as:

Total salary for Sue Bathgate = Starting salary + (Number of raises × Raise amount)

                           = $16,200 + (n × $900)

To find the number of years when they will be earning the same salary, we can set these two equations equal to each other and solve for "n":

$18,000 + (n × $750) = $16,200 + (n × $900)

Simplifying the equation:

$18,000 - $16,200 = (n × $900) - (n × $750)

$1,800 = n × $150

Dividing both sides by $150:

n = $1,800 / $150

n = 12

Therefore, after 12 semi-annual raises (which corresponds to 6 years since there are two raises per year), Jean Ackyroyd and Sue Bathgate will be earning the same salary.

Read about salary here: https://brainly.com/question/12241195

#SPJ11

To prove that for each positive integer n, 3 divides (2n(n-1) - 1), we can use mathematical induction. Base Case:

For n = 1, we have:

2(1)(1-1) - 1 = 2(0) - 1 = -1

Since -1 is divisible by 3 (as -1 = -3 * 0 + (-1)), the statement holds true for the base case. Inductive Step:

Assume that for some positive integer k, 3 divides (2k(k-1) - 1). We will prove that this implies the statement is true for k+1 as well.

We need to show that 3 divides (2(k+1)(k+1-1) - 1).

Expanding this expression:

2(k+1)(k) - 1 = 2k(k+1) - 1 = 2k^2 + 2k - 1

We can rewrite 2k^2 + 2k - 1 as 2k^2 + k + k - 1.

Now, we can consider the term (2k^2 + k) separately. Assume that 3 divides this term, i.e., 2k^2 + k is divisible by 3.

We can write 2k^2 + k as 3p, where p is some integer.

Therefore, assuming that 3 divides (2k(k-1) - 1) holds for k, we have shown that it holds for k+1 as well.

By the principle of mathematical induction, we can conclude that for each positive integer n, 3 divides (2n(n-1) - 1).

Learn more about positive integer here

https://brainly.com/question/18380011

#SPJ11

The graph above represents the following functions: C. f(x) = [1/2(x)] + 2.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a greatest integer function is a type of function which returns the greatest integer that is less than or equal (≤) to the number.

Mathematically, the greatest integer that is less than or equal (≤) to a number (x) is represented as follows:

y = [x].

By critically observing the given graph, we can logically deduce that the parent function f(x) = [x] was horizontally stretched by a factor of 2 and it was vertically translated from the origin by 2 units up;

y = [x]

f(x) = [1/2(x)] + 2.

Read more on greatest integer function here: brainly.com/question/12165085

#SPJ1

The probability that in a random year the total snowfall in Linndale is less than or equal to 110 inches is approximately P(Z ≤ 0.846).

To find the probability of a random year having a total snowfall in Linndale, we can use the properties of the normal distribution. Given that the total snowfall per year follows a normal distribution with a mean of 99 inches and a standard deviation of 13 inches, we can calculate the probability using the Z-score formula.

The Z-score formula is given by:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

Where:

Z is the standard score (Z-score)

X is the random variable (total snowfall in this case)

μ is the mean of the distribution (99 inches)

σ is the standard deviation of the distribution (13 inches)

Let's say we want to find the probability of a random year having a total snowfall less than or equal to a certain value, let's call it X. We can calculate the Z-score for X using the formula above and then find the corresponding probability using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator.

For example, if we want to find the probability of a random year having a total snowfall less than or equal to 110 inches, we can calculate the Z-score as follows:

Z = (110 - 99) / 13 ≈ 0.846

Using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we can find the probability corresponding to a Z-score of 0.846. Let's assume this probability is P(Z ≤ 0.846).

Therefore, the probability that in a random year the total snowfall in Linndale is less than or equal to 110 inches is approximately P(Z ≤ 0.846).

Please note that the actual probability value will depend on the specific Z-score and the corresponding cumulative probability value from the standard normal distribution table or calculator.

Learn more about  probability   from

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ11

Q27: The periodic monthly rate is 0.0074, Q28: The equivalent effective semiannual rate is 0.0299.

Q27: To calculate the periodic monthly rate, we divide the APR by the number of compounding periods in a year. Since the loan has monthly compounding, there are 12 compounding periods in a year.

Periodic monthly rate = APR / Number of compounding periods per year

= 0.0888 / 12

= 0.0074

Q28: To find the equivalent effective semiannual rate, we need to consider the compounding period and adjust the periodic rate accordingly. In this case, the loan has monthly compounding, so we need to calculate the effective rate over a semiannual period.

Effective semiannual rate = (1 + periodic rate)^Number of compounding periods per semiannual period - 1

= (1 + 0.0074)^6 - 1

= 1.0299 - 1

= 0.0299

The periodic monthly rate for the loan is 0.0074, and the equivalent effective semiannual rate is 0.0299. These calculations take into account the APR and the frequency of compounding to determine the rates for the loan.

To know more about rate , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29781084

#SPJ11

The area of the circle is 1256 square centimeters.

The area of a circle is given by the formula:

Area = π x (radius)²

where π is the mathematical constant pi, and the radius is the distance from the center of the circle to its edge.

In this case, the radius of the circle is 20 cm and the ratio is 3.14, so we can substitute these values into the formula to get:

Area = 3.14 x (20 cm)²

= 3.14 x 400 cm²

= 1256 cm²

Therefore, the area of the circle is 1256 square centimeters.

Learn more about  area  from

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

Let us start by considering the first few days:

On the first day, the prospector gives the landlady a 1 cm piece, leaving him with a 30 cm piece.

On the second day, he gives her another 1 cm piece, leaving him with a 29 cm piece.

On the third day, he gives her a 2 cm piece (1 cm from the 30 cm piece, and 1 cm from the 29 cm piece), leaving him with a 27 cm piece and a 1 cm piece.

We can continue this process and observe that on each day, the prospector needs to give the landlady a piece that is the sum of two smaller pieces that he has. This suggests that we can use a divide-and-conquer approach, where we repeatedly split the largest piece into two smaller pieces until we have enough pieces to give to the landlady.

More specifically, we can start with the 31 cm piece and repeatedly split the largest remaining piece until we have 15 pieces (since the largest piece we need to give to the landlady is 15 cm). At each step, we split the largest piece into two pieces that add up to its length, and we keep track of the lengths of the two smaller pieces. We then select the largest of these smaller pieces and repeat the process until we have enough pieces.

Using this strategy, we can obtain the following sequence of splits:

31

16 + 15

9 + 7 + 8 + 7

5 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 4

2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2

This gives us a total of 15 pieces, which is the minimum number required to fulfill the prospector's agreement. Note that this solution is optimal because each split involves the largest piece, and it minimizes the number of splits required to obtain all the necessary pieces.

Learn more about " sequence " : https://brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ11

Out of the options listed, both 40 hours and 45 hours would be considered full-time work.

What can be considered as full-time work vary from country to county and also from industry to industry. Generally, full-time work is usually defined as working a certain number of hours per week, typically between 35 and 40 hours.

Therefore, out of the options given, both 40 hours and 45 hours would be considered full-time work. 51 hours is generally considered to be more than full-time work, and it may be considered overtime in many industries.

Learn more on full-time work on https://brainly.com/question/12368389

#SPJ4

The total milligrams each of levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol taken during the 28-day period are 0.450 mg and 0.280 mg, respectively.

What is Levonorgestrel?

Levonorgestrel is a synthetic hormone used in the form of a pill to prevent pregnancy. It is a progestin hormone that is similar to the hormone progesterone produced by the ovaries.

What is Ethinyl Estradiol?

Ethinyl Estradiol is a synthetic form of the estrogen hormone. It is used in combination with progestin hormones in birth control pills to prevent pregnancy.:

During the 28-day period, the following total milligrams each of levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol are taken: Total milligrams of levonorgestrel taken: (0.050 mg × 5) + (0.075 mg × 5) + (0.125 mg × 10) = 0.450 mg, Total milligrams of ethinyl estradiol taken: (0.030 mg × 15) + (0.040 mg × 5) = 0.280 mg. Therefore, the total milligrams each of levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol taken during the 28-day period are 0.450 mg and 0.280 mg, respectively.

levonorgestrel : https://brainly.com/question/2296833

#SPJ11

The z value associated with a two-sided 99% confidence interval is 1.96 (option c).

To find the z-value associated with a two-sided 99% confidence interval, we need to consider the standard normal distribution, also known as the Z-distribution. The Z-distribution is a symmetric bell-shaped curve with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.

Using statistical tables or software, we can find the z-value associated with a cumulative probability of 0.005. This value corresponds to the critical value at which 0.5% of the distribution lies to the left or right of it. Looking at the possible options provided, we can examine each one to determine which z-value is the closest match.

a) 1.28: This value corresponds to a two-sided 90% confidence interval, which is not the desired level of confidence.

b) 1.645: This value corresponds to a two-sided 95% confidence interval, which is still not the desired level of confidence.

c) 1.96: This value corresponds to a two-sided 97.5% confidence interval. Since we want a 99% confidence interval, this value is the closest match to our requirement.

d) 2.575: This value is greater than the z-value associated with a 99% confidence interval. It corresponds to an even higher level of confidence.

e) 2.33: This value is also greater than the z-value associated with a 99% confidence interval. It corresponds to a two-sided 99.5% confidence interval, which is more than what we need.

Therefore, the correct answer is c) 1.96. This z-value represents the critical value associated with a two-sided 99% confidence interval.

To know more about confidence interval here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The z value associated with a two-sided 99% confidence interval is _______.

a) 1.28

b) 1.645

c) 1.96

d) 2.575

e) 2.33

As per the concept of average, the price relatives for the four stocks making up the Boran index are as follows:

Stock A: January Year 3 - 73.88, March Year 3 - 67.16

Stock B: January Year 3 - 75.38, March Year 3 - 73.08

Stock C: January Year 3 - 82.50, March Year 3 - 73.75

Stock D: January Year 3 - 32.50, March Year 3 - 18.75

To calculate the price relatives for each stock, we need to compare the prices of each stock in different periods to the base-year price. The base-year price is the price per share in the year 1 base period. The formula for calculating the price relative is:

Price Relative = (Price in Current Period / Price in Base Year) * 100

Now let's calculate the price relatives for each stock based on the given data:

Stock A:

Price Relative for January Year 3 = (24.75 / 33.50) * 100 ≈ 73.88

Price Relative for March Year 3 = (22.50 / 33.50) * 100 ≈ 67.16

Stock B:

Price Relative for January Year 3 = (49.00 / 65.00) * 100 ≈ 75.38

Price Relative for March Year 3 = (47.50 / 65.00) * 100 ≈ 73.08

Stock C:

Price Relative for January Year 3 = (33.00 / 40.00) * 100 ≈ 82.50

Price Relative for March Year 3 = (29.50 / 40.00) * 100 ≈ 73.75

Stock D:

Price Relative for January Year 3 = (6.50 / 20.00) * 100 ≈ 32.50

Price Relative for March Year 3 = (3.75 / 20.00) * 100 ≈ 18.75

To know more about average here

https://brainly.com/question/16956746

#SPJ4