Solids X and Y are similar.
X has volume of 64 cm3
Y has volume of 729 cm3
The surface area of X is 208 cm2
Work out the surface area of Y.​

Answer:

80% of the rectangle is shaded.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 10 rows and of those rows 8 are shaded.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

80/10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

 8 shaded so 80 percent

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-3.25a+4a=2-5

0.75a=-3

a = -4

Tell me if its right

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

30/2 = 15

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey, sorry if this is a little late, but think of the tiles in an arrangement where 4 fit into a rectangle type thing. Now, since you want to find the maximum number of boards, find the closest number that you can multiply by 4 to get something close to 30. Here, you can see that 7x4=28, which is both an even number and the closest number to 30 as you can get. So, the answer is 7.

Answer:

Itz B.

Step-by-step explanation:

To form a triangle to two smaller sides have to be able to add up to be greater than the big side

Answer:

Option A

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle most likely got translated. A translation is a rigid transformation. Rigid transformed shapes have the same angle measure and side lengths.

Option A should be the correct answer.

Side Note: You can also tell that the markings on the triangle are the same. This means that the shapes are congruent. They are just in different positions.

The true statement is (a) the transformation is rigid because corresponding side lengths and angles are congruent.

From the figure, we have the following highlights

The above means that the transformation from one triangle to the other is a rigid transformation

Hence, the true statement is (a)

Read more about rigid transformation at:

https://brainly.com/question/4057530

#SPJ5

Answer:

Alex : 18

Step-by-step explanation:

3 + 2 = 5

30 ÷ 5 = 6

6 × 3 = 18

6 × 2 = 12

Answer:

I think there is an error in the question because

(f-g) = -4

(f-g) (7) = NO SOLUTION

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]f(x) = -9x + 2 \\g(x) = -9x + 6\\(f - g)(7)\\(f - g) = -9x + 2 - (-9x+6)\\(f - g) = -9x +2 +9x-6\\(f - g) = -9x +9x+2-6\\(f - g) = -4[/tex]

Answer:

The equivalent of 5.651 mi is 9945.76  yards

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Length of lake = 5.651 mi

Required:

Length of bridge in yards

From table of facts;

1 mile = 1760 yards

This implies that

5.651 miles will be:5.651 * 1760 yards

5.651 * 1760 yards = 9945.76  yards

5.651 * 1760 yards = 9945.8  yards (Aproximated)

Hence, the equivalent of 5.651 mi is 9945.76  yards

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]A = 20,000(0.85)^t[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We will use the formula for compound interest here

where [tex]A = p( 1 + r)^t[/tex]

   A=future value  for any sum

   P=present value of the sum

   r= yearly interest rate, it should be expressed in  decimal

   t=time period , it should be in years

______________________________

given in the problem

p = $20,000

r = 15% (in decimal 15/100 = 0.15)

t is the time for which equation is to be model to find future value p

since, rate is for depreciation we need to take negative value of rate as value for computer will decrease

thus

r = -0.15

using the above values in formula  [tex]A = p( 1 + r)^t[/tex]

[tex]A = p( 1 + r)^t\\A = 20,000(1 - 0.15)^t\\A = 20,000(0.85)^t[/tex]

Thus, model  equation for the value of the computer is [tex]A = 20,000(0.85)^t[/tex]

Answer:

48 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle 2 is a right angle.

Right angles are 90 degrees.

A line is 180 degrees.

Angle 1, 5, and 2 form a line.

180-90=90

That means that Angles 1 and 5 add up to 90 degrees.

We know that Angle 3 is 42 degrees.

Angle 3 and 5 are Vertical angles.

Vertical angles are always congruent.

This means that Angle 5 is also 42 degrees.

As we discussed earlier, Angles 1 and 5 are complementary. (Add up to 90 degrees)

42+x=90

Subtract 42 from both sides.

x=48

m<1=48

Answer:

It is 48 degrees because I took the test

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

g(1) =7

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x) = 2x + 5

Let x=1

g(1) = 2(1) +5

      = 2+5

       =7

Answer:

g(1) = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x) = 2x + 5

Put x as 1 and evaluate.

g(1) = 2(1) + 5

Multiply 2 and 1.

g(1) = 2 + 5

Add 2 and 5.

g(1) = 7

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

2(7)+6=20

14+6=20

20=20

Answer:

2x + 6 = 20

2x = 20 - 6

2x = 14

Divide both sides by 7

x = 7

That's option D.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

x = [tex]-7\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

=> 6(2x+11) + 15 = 3x+12

(Expand the brackets)

=> 12x+66+15 = 3x+12

(Adding 66+15)

=> 12x+81 = 3x+12

(Subtracting 81 and 3x to both sides)

=> 12x-3x = 12-81

=> 9x = -69

(Dividing both sides by 9)

=> x = [tex]\frac{-69}{9}[/tex]

(Simplifying)

=> x = [tex]\frac{-23}{3}[/tex]

(Converting it into mixed form)

=> x = [tex]-7\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

So, x = [tex]-7\frac{2}{3}[/tex] will make the equation true.

Answer:hello

The answer is 7

Step-by-step explanation:at first solve this6(2x-11)=12x-66

Then write 12x-66+15

Then we have this 12x-66-15=3x+12

Then we have to write (x) in the left side and number in right side

12x-3x=66-15+129x=63

X=7

Good luck

Answer:

1,242,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5/14

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply.

(-5 × -1 × 4) / (7 × 8)

20/56

Simplify.

5/14

Answer:

The answer is [tex]\frac{5}{14}[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

1. -5 × [tex]\frac{-1}{7}[/tex] =  [tex]\frac{5}{7}[/tex]

2.  [tex]\frac{5}{7}[/tex] · [tex]\frac{4}{8}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{20}{56}[/tex]

3. Simplify:

[tex]\frac{20}{56}[/tex]  = [tex]\frac{5}{14}[/tex]

Answer: domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

Step-by-step explanation:

DOMAIN: {4}

RANGE: {2,5,7,9}

FUNCTION? NO!

Your domain is always your x-coordinates, which are the first coordinates in a pair.

Your range is always your y-coordinates, which are the second coordinates in a pair.

When listing the points, it's important to remain a relation CANNOT be a function if the x's repeat, so luckily, they do not repeat.

Also, when listing points for your range, remember, if they repeat, you should only count one of the numbers, as you can see from the answer, there were two nines, but instead, I put one.

Answer:

38

Step-by-step explanation:

38 because

Answer:

1 1/3 meter a minute

Step-by-step explanation:

it pretty simple i just added

Answer:

1 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3i + 63j

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Replace the variables with the given statements

5(3i+9j) - 3(4i-6j)

Step 2: Distribute

15i + 45j -12i + 18j

Step 3: Combine like terms

3i + 63j

Answer:

9 possible combinations: RGB, RYG, RGB, OYG, OGB, OBP, YGB, YBP, GBP

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's see what are the possible combinations:

3+4= 7 so possible 3rd side is 5

3+5= 8 so possible 3 rd side is 7

3+7= 10 so possible 3rd side is 5 or 9 (5 is repeat of the one above)

3+9= 12 so possible 3rd side is 7, see one above

3+12= 15 so possible 3 rd side is none

4+5=9 so possible 3rd side is 7

4+7= 11 so possible 3rd side is 9

4+9= 13 so possible 3rd side is 12

5+7= 12 so possible 3rd side is 9

5+9= 14 so possible 3rd side is 12

7+9= 16 so possible 3rd side is 12

So the possible 9 combinations are:

Answer:

[tex]g(x) = \frac{1}{9} \,x^2[/tex] which agrees with option A in the list of possible answers

Step-by-step explanation:

A vertical compression by a factor 9 is represented by the transformation:

[tex]\frac{1}{9} \,f(x) = \frac{1}{9} \,x^2[/tex]

Therefore the answer to the problem is:

[tex]g(x) = \frac{1}{9} \,x^2[/tex]

Answer:

Based on the given information in the problem, 18 is found to be 75% of 24.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve this problem, we must first know what we are being asked to do. In the problem, we are asked to find what percent of 24 is 18. We can find this percentage by dividing. We will divide 24 by 18.

18 ÷ 24 = 0.75

Now, we multiply this number by 100 to get the percent.

0.75 × 100 = 75

So, 18 is 75% of 24.

Answer:

the correct answer would be 75%

Answer:

x= 70

Step-by-step explanation:

This question needs an attachment; see attached

Given

ABD = 55

Required

Find x?

In the figure shown in the attachment, angle b and ABD are alternate interior angles;

From parallel and perpendicular line theorems; alternate interior angles are equal.

This implies that <b = 55

Also; when a rectangle is divided by two diagonals, the resulting triangles are isosceles triangles;

where 2 sides and 2 angles are equal;

This implies that <b = <c = 55

Sum of angles in a triangle  = 180;

So,

<x + <b + <c = 55

x + 55 + 55 = 180

x + 110 = 180

Subtract 110 from both sides

x + 110 - 110 = 180 - 110

x = 180 - 110

x = 70

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is known that a parallelogram has rotational symmetry, rotated 180 degrees about it's center point. Now by definition a parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides, hence it's name. If you were to take a look at the attachment below, you might see the connection.

Rotational Symmetry will make it so that side AB corresponds to CD, respectively AD and CB. The sides will coincide with one another after a 180 degree rotation, so that AB = CD, and AD = CB. Hence, in the same parallelogram, opposite sides are congruent.

Proved!

Answer:

x ≈ 31.3°

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use sin∅ to solve this:

sinx = 13/25

x = [tex]sin^{-1}(13/25)[/tex]

x = 32.3323

Answer:

Reflect the graph of f across the y-axis and then reflect across the x-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Reflection rules:

Reflection over x -axis:(x,y)→(x,-y)

Reflection over y-axis : (x,y)→(-x,y)

Graph:[tex]y= f(x)=x^2[/tex]

We are given that the graph of f into the graph of g.

[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = -(-x)^2[/tex]

Reflect over y axis.

Reflected graph [tex]=(-x)^2[/tex]

Reflect the obtained graph over x axis

[tex]g(x)=-(-x)^2[/tex]

So, Option B is true

Hence Reflect the graph of f across the y-axis and then reflect across the x-axis.

Answer:

i reflected it over the x and y axis tho

Step-by-step explanation:

bro trust me

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

Answer:

[tex]\frac{x^{12}y^{4}}{z^3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Multiply exponents

[tex]\frac{y^{6/6}z^{-6/2}}{x^{-12}y^{-6/2}}[/tex]

Step 2: Simplify

[tex]\frac{yz^{-3}}{x^{-12}y^{-3}}[/tex]

Step 3: Flip the negative exponents

[tex]\frac{x^{12}y^{4}}{z^3}[/tex]