Is this right please help me

Answer:

You should know more about the history you pick for your interpretaion and you must really understand about the history you want to interpret and the most important is to know and do your best for it.

Explanation:

do know... sana mka help

Answer:

b is the awnser

Explanation:

Answer: People wrongly accused others who, as a result, were convicted with little or no evidence or wrong doing.

Answer:

According to a source:

Red Scare Impact The Red Scare was hysteria over the perceived threat posed by Communists in the U.S. during the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, which intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s. (Communists were often referred to as “Reds” for their allegiance to the red Soviet flag.)

Hope this helps!

One of the main reasons of the Red Scare was World War I, which prompted many people to adopt strong patriotic and anti-immigrant sentiments.

The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia sparked fears that foreigners, notably from Russia,  Europe, were plotting to topple the US administration.

Even during Great War seen between Ussr And the united Countries, which increased in the 1940s and 1950s, the Red Scare was panic about the potential threat presented by Communism in the The Us.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/21462636?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.  

Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.  

The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”

One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.  

The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.

Explanation:

    im  a nerd with this stuff.  

Answer:

I belive it was japan in WWII

Explanation:

Answer:

In 1942, 29 Navajo men joined the U.S. Marines and developed an unbreakable code that would be used across the Pacific during World War II. They were the Navajo Code Talkers. The Code Talkers conveyed messages by telephone and radio in their native language, a code that was never broken by the Japanese.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

World War II convinced U.S. leaders that the policies of isolationism and appeasement had been mistakes. To counter the growing Soviet threat, they sought new ways to keep the U.S. safe and protect its interests abroad.

Answer:

he understood the importance of new orleans

Explanation:

the French had coats.

Answer:

C- to gain control of New Orleans.

Explanation:

Answer:

Washington feared the current government was so powerless that it would soon dissolve either from deteriorating support of the people or from the fact that states would no longer bother to send representatives to the Confederation Congress.

Explanation:

The reason which  Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the  Articles of Confederation is:

The thing which must be done to solve the problem in his view is:

According to the given question, we are asked to show the reason which  Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the  Articles of Confederation

As a result of this, can see that George Washington and some other Americans believed that the Articles of Confederation was weak and did not give the states enough power and would soon crumble.

However, he believed that giving the central government more power such as taxing the people would help solve the problem

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/18377156

Answer: People can join together and express their common interests.

Explanation: Please give me brainliest if you can!

Answer:

In what ways did the framers claim to have already tried in addressing the complaints? They tried to tell the people that they were being ignored. What will change in the colonies as a result of the declaration? The colonists would face hardships, with protests, consequences, and war resulting from this.

Explanation:

I love the Declaration of independence. But hope this helped!  

The people were being ignored, they sought to convey. The Founding Fathers assert that they handled the objections by reminding the British of their overstepping of their borders, the reasons the colonies came to America, and by appealing to Britain's sense of justice and goodness.

They clashed on congressional representation and trade policy both domestically and internationally. The Three-Fifths Compromise, the Connecticut Compromise, and the Compromise on Commerce and Slave Trade.

The American Constitution's creators were forward-thinking individuals. They made our Constitution durable. In addition to addressing the particular issues the country was facing at the moment, their goal was to lay the groundwork for the new country's future stability and direction.

Learn more about the Framers here:

https://brainly.com/question/10781730

#SPJ2

Answer

4, He hoped to make more land available for white settlement.

Explanation:

Jackson wanted to spread west to establish American city's and sieze native land.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If you ask us to find any poll, we are going to choose the polls that made the news on CNN one week before the past US elections of November 2020.

I think polls have a neutral effect on the democratic process in United States politics.

It is clear that initially, polls were used to know the opinion of voters before an election. Even before, when the political party is trying to select a candidate, the poll can tell campaign managers about the favorable or not opinion voters have about one specific candidate.

Next, polls have used recently as a competitive advantage for candidates in that the campaign teams make the poll information public through news media and they say that its candidate is at the top of the public preferences. The real message they are trying to say is that as its candidate is at the top, you should consider voting for the right gut that is at the top of the preferences.

However, in the two last elections, polls have been far from reality. In the 2016 US election, most polls favored Hillary Clinton by far, and she lost the election. In the recent election, most polls -including the ones at CNN- predicted an easy victory for Bidden, and that did not happen.

Many scholars believe that the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was caused by climate change. Some experts believe the drying of the Saraswati River, which began around 1900 BCE, was the main cause for climate change, while others conclude that a great flood struck the area.

According to another theory by British archaeologist Mortimer Wheeler, a nomadic, Indo-European tribe, called the Aryans, suddenly overwhelmed and conquered the Indus River Valley.

Answer:

That makes no sense dude, explain

Answer:

ur fine

Explanation:

There were the other examples from history where individuals have voluntarily given up great power were the dictatorships. There was the common name on the related to the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.

What is history?

History is the study of previous events, as defined by the term. Everything pertaining to human behavior is covered in history. History encompasses a variety of facets, including political, cultural, scientific, religious, person, location, and economic.

According to the history was the famous examples of the voluntarily and the great power into the dictatorships. There was the related on the history are the common names was the situated on the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet. This is the important role play.

As a result, the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.

Learn more about on history, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3583505

#SPJ5

Answer:

friends i think well please mark it

Have a great night day afternoon wherever you are :D

Explanation:

Answer:

Regular salary for all government workers + senators.

Explanation:

This would lead to less corruption which destroyed Roman abillity to create defensive forces quickly.

Answer:

False, they had some sort of code of honor, I don't remember the name, it's been some time

Answer:

Puget Sound

Explanation:

Have a good time!

Answer:The period saw major technological advances, including the adoption of gunpowder, the invention of vertical windmills, spectacles, mechanical clocks, and greatly improved water mills, building techniques (Gothic architecture, medieval castles), and agriculture in general (three-field crop rotation).

Explanation:

Answer:

Europeans wanted to gain riches from the New World. They also wanted to claim land for their countries. ... The Northwest Passage is a water route that goes through North America. Vespucci helped people notice that the New World was unknown land.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. HITLER WAS REJECTED FROM ART SCHOOL MORE THAN ONCE

We know that Hitler’s failed art career eventually led to his life of fascism, but you may not know that he actually applied to art school twice – and was rejected so hard the second time that he wasn’t even allowed to sit in on the entry exams. Even now, art experts maintain that Hitler was a sub-par artist.

2. HITLER LOVED ICONIC GERMAN ARTISTS

Hitler’s affinity for classic German artists could be seen in his own work, which is why it’s easy to draw the parallels between Hitler’s sketches and the works of painter Hans Thoma.

3. HE PRACTICED FOR SPEECHES BY TAKING PHOTOS OF HIMSELF . . . MAKING SPEECHES

A megalomaniac supreme, Hitler was so obsessed with his image that he had photographer Heinrich Hoffman take photos of him making speeches. Fortunately for us, despite being told to destroy the photos afterwards, Hoffman did not and included them in his memoir instead.

4. HE WAS AN OUT-OF-CONTROL SPENDER

Hitler was out-of-control in general, but biographer Volker Ullrich recently uncovered that the Fuhrer actually spent thousands on opulence (cars, champagne, clothes, etc.) while pretending to be “a man of the people.” What didn’t he spend money on? Income tax.

5. HITLER WAS ONCE ORDERED TO TRIM HIS MOUSTACHE

Hitler's preferred moustache style was actually of the handlebar variety. Unfortunately for him, during WWI service he was ordered to scale it back so it would fit underneath gas masks (which didn’t work – he was gassed in 1918 and temporarily blinded).

6. HE LOVED DISNEY

While Disney represents kids’ films and family to us, to the dictator, it represented the advance of technology since "Snow White" boasted some pretty impressive animation circa its 1937 release. Rumour has it he also felt strongly for "King Kong" because of its special effects, and watched both that and war films repeatedly.

7. HITLER’S OBSESSION WITH WAGNER BEGAN EONS BEFORE WWII

At age 12, Hitler stumbled upon Wagner and he never looked back. Writing in Mein Kampf that he was “addicted” after attending the opera, "Lohengrin", Hitler reportedly skipped school to attend the opera well into his teens.

8. RUMOUR HAS IT THAT HITLER HAD BRED AN ARMY OF TALKING DOGS

According to Dr. Jan Bondeson, Hitler and his henchman rounded up “educated” dogs with whom they communicated (through tapping paws, barking, and wagging their tails) – and got even one to bark, “Mein Fuhrer!”

These dogs were supposed to help win the war, which makes a bit of sense considering Hitler was heavily attached to his dogs, Blondi and Bella. (The former, he killed before killing .

9. HITLER WAS A VEGETARIAN WHO WAS DILIGENT ABOUT FOOD TESTING

Hitler was a paranoid person. So paranoid, in fact, that he employed food tasters who, on one side, got to enjoy the crème de la crème of German cuisine (during a time of rations and starvation). On the other? After an attempted assassination, he kept his food tasters imprisoned, according to Margot Woelk, who had to suffer through the terrible ordeal.

10. HIS FAVOURITE ACTOR ONLY DIED IN 2011

At age 108, Hitler’s favourite actor – the Dutch Johannes Heesters – passed away.

However, despite being a favourite of the dictator and the S.S., Heesters was still allowed to perform because the Allies didn’t think he was involved in Nazi propaganda. However, because he did perform for the Nazi regime, he was still scrutinised for several decades.

True    

thx for points have good night

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all-out battle.” How did he characterize the two sides in the “battle”?

What Republican Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy did was to confront the American People by accusing that several members of the federal government and the US military had ties with Communists or were Communists.

Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?

I think he was a cruel person with peculiar political ambitions because he did accuse people but never present a valid or serious argument or piece of evidence to support his claims. He only accused people, affecting their public image and reputation. And that was so wrong. However, he scared and alienated many citizens and made the federal government investigate the alleged cases.