Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz’s argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or weak?

Answer:

Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz’s argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or weak?

Yes, I found it very convincing because of the fact that she has personal experience, facts, and good examples.

Answer: You probably don't want to hear this, but you need to be on your own for this one.

Explanation: This is a question asking for your opinion and your perspective. I will, however, give you some things that could be interpreted as strong or weak.

Strong: meaningful talk about the gap between humans and other animals, she has treated both before which gives her a bigger perspective, she is honest about feeling the disconnection herself, and she gives several examples

Weak: the video is quite long and can be hard to follow if you're not like, really passionate about animals, some of what she says goes to be a little ridiculous as well, like ppl thinking cheese comes from trees

good luck!

The shoulder is ___ to the hip anatomical terms​

What pharmacological agent serves to reduce the frequency and severity of seizures?

A. cerebral stimulants

B. antidepressants

C. opioid analgesics

D. anticonvulsants

E. antipsychotics

how do tissues work together as an organs ?​