Consider
In square ABCD, the diagonals intersect at G.
If mLAGD = a + 2b and mzABC = 2a - b, find the values of
a and b.
C

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are nine numbers on the spinner with 4 even and 5 odd numbers. Flipping a tail is just 1/2 so

P(ETO)=(4/9)(1/2)(5/9)

P(ETO)=20/162

P(ETO)=10/81

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the 2nd and the 5th look good   :)

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

800

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up your proportion first (6/20 = 72/x). Then, square 6 and 20 (36/400 = 72/x). Cross multiply and divide (36x = 28800). Divide 28800 by 36 and that gives you 800 as your answer.

Answer:

10 points

Step-by-step explanation:

since they only said 5 days and each day 2 points drop.

1 day = 2 points

5 days = 2 x 5 = 10 points

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 4y = 13

 x - y = 3              Subtracting:

0 + 4y - (-y) = 13 - 3

5y = 10

y = 2.

Plug y = 2 into the second equation:

x - 2 = 3

x = 5.

Answer:

68.9°

Step-by-step explanation:

Using Sine rule

x/sin X = y/sin Y

4.5/sin X = 4/sin 56

sin X × 4 = 4.5 × sin 56

sin X = 4.5 × sin 56/4

X = arc sin (4.5 × sin 56/4)

X = 68.85449°

Approximately = 68.9°

Answer:

3. a. $4 b. 1/4 of a ticket

$4 = a pint of raspberries

1/4 of a pint

5 pints = $20

$32 = 8 pints

75 feet = 45 seconds

27 seconds = 45 feet

Answer:

x = - 2, y = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparing both the equations,

→ y = y → x + 3 = - 2x - 3

=> x + 3 = - 2x - 3

=> x + 2x = - 3 - 3

=> 3x = - 6

=> x = - 6/3 = - 2

Substitute the value of x in any of these:

=> y = x + 3 = - 2 + 3 = 1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If a solution exists for the system of equations y=y so we can say

x+3=-2x-3 Add 2x to each side

3x+3=-3 Subtract 3 from each side

3x=-6. Divide each side by 3

x=-2, since y=x+3

y=-2+3

y=1

So the solution to the system of equations is the point (x,y)=(-2,1)

Answer:

37.5

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to realize that these are similar triangles.

You can do a easy cross multiplication with these types of questions by forming an equation with the similar angles.

put the smaller above the decimal and the bigger one below like this.

[tex]\frac{8}{25}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{12}{x}[/tex]

Now cross multiply

8x=300

x=37.5

Answer:

Point Y

Step-by-step explanation:

I have attached a picture of me showing which point lies on the bisector since it says to bisects <C of polygon ABCDE.

Hope this helps, thank you :) !!

Answer:

1/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Y=-x^2 -2x

Step-by-step explanation:

First distribute -1

Y=-x+0(x-2)

Foil and you get

y= x^2-2x

This is in standard form

Answer:

X axis is on the left of the Coordinates (x,y) and Y axis is on te right

X goes sideways

Y goes Vertical

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

'A' because it asks about pros and cons.

Answer:

8/3 or 2 2/3 gallons of paint

Step-by-step explanation:

If 2/3 of paint covers 1/4 of the wall, you must multiply 2/3 by 4 to get 4/4 (the whole wall).

2/3 x 4 = 8/3 or 2 2/3

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

If we have 84 feet of streamers. You cut 24 pieces that are each 1/2 yard long then 48 feet of streamers we left.

A unit of measurement is a definite magnitude of a quantity, defined and adopted by convention or by law, that is used as a standard for measurement of the same kind of quantity.

Given that we have a 84 feet of streamers.

You cut 24 pieces that are each 1/2 yard long.

Need to find the feet of streamers we left.

We know that 1 yard is equal to 3 feet.

Therefore, 1/2 yard is equal to 1.5 feet.

The total length of the streamers that were cut is:

24 pieces x 1.5 feet/piece = 36 feet

To find out how much streamer is left, we can subtract the length of the cut streamers from the total length we started with:

84 feet - 36 feet = 48 feet

Therefore, you have 48 feet of streamers left.

To learn more on Unit of Measurement click:

https://brainly.com/question/14026238

#SPJ2

Answer:

10 sections

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

i converted mixed number into decimals:

2 1/2 = 2.5

1/4= .25

Then 2.5/.25= 10

Answer:

0.01, 1%, or 1/100

Step-by-step explanation:

These are all the same.

Step-by-step explanation:

ES6 has a new Set data structure for storing sets of unique objects. However it is based on object references as opposed to value comparisons. As far as I can tell this makes it impossible to have a set of pairs of numbers without stringifying.

For example, typing in Chrome's console (needs Chrome 38+):

> var s = new Set(); < undefined > s.add([2, 3]); < Set {[2, 3]} > s.has([2, 3]) < false <--- was hoping for 'true'

This appears to be by design: since I passed a different array of [2, 3] to has(), it returns false, because although the contents is the same it only looks at object references, and I allocated a new and different array to pass to has(). I would need to store a reference to the original array I passed to add() to check with has(), but this is not always possible. For example if the number pairs represent co-ordinates, I might need to check if the set has [obj.x, obj.y], but this will always return false since it allocates a new array.

The workaround is to stringify the arrays and key on strings like "2, 3" instead. However in something performance-sensitive like a game engine, it is unfortunate if every set access needs to make a string allocation and convert and concatenate number strings.

Does ES6 provide any feature to solve this problem without stringifying, or is there any feature on the horizon with ES7 that could help as well?

javascriptperformancedata-structuressetecmascript-6

Share

2

Follow

asked Sep 21 '14 at 13:06



AshleysBrain

20.4k1515 gold badges8181 silver badges119119 bronze badges

Add a comment

3 Answers

ActiveOldestVotes

3

As you've noted [2, 3] === [2, 3] is false, meaning you can't use Set like this; however, is Set really the best option for you?

You may find that using a two-level data structure like this will be better for you

var o = {}; function add(o, x, y) { if (!o[x]) o[x] = {}; o[x][y] = true; } function has(o, x, y) { return !!(o[x] && o[x][y]); } function del(o, x, y) { if (!o[x]) return; delete o[x][y]; // maybe delete `o[x]` if keys.length === 0

Answer:

450

Step-by-step explanation:

One rotation would be 360 and a quarter of 360 is 90 so 360+90=450

Answer:

80,66

Step-by-step explanation:

70 + 82 + 90 = 242

for average: you have 3 tests, so 242÷3 = 80,66667

Answer:

i. Two angles can be vertical and supplementary.

ii. Yes, we can determine the angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

When two angles are vertical, it implies that they are equal (with respect to vertical opposite property). While two angles are supplementary if and only if they add up to [tex]180^{o}[/tex].

It is not mandatory for the two angles to be beside each other so as to be supplementary. So that in this special case, the only measure of angles that can be both vertical and supplementary is [tex]90^{o}[/tex].

Yes, angles that are both vertical supplementary can be determined. They can be  90° each.

Vertical angles are opposite angles where two lines intersect. They are equal. So, angle 1 = angle 2,

A1 = A2 ...{i}

Supplementary angles are those which sum upto form 180. So, angle 1 + angle 2 = 180; i.e.

A1 + A2 = 180 ...{ii} By {i} and {ii} ,

putting i} in ii},

A1 + A1 = 180

Twice A1 = 180

A1 = [tex]\frac{180}{2}[/tex]

= 90

As,

A1 = A2,

So,

A2 is also 90°

Thus, 90° is the correct answer.

To learn more about Angles,

https://brainly.com/question/24573165?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

90 inches

Step-by-step explanation: 7 feet*12 inches= 84 and .5 feet*12 inches= 6.

84 inches+ 6inches=90inches

Answer: 1.2ft × 12

= 14.4"

Step-by-step explanation:

GIVE ME DA BRAINS