You buy a 33-pound bag of flour for $9 or you can buy a 1- pound bag for $0.39. Compare the per pound cost for the large and small bag. How much is the pounds per dollar

Answer:

50%

Step-by-step explanation:

The numbers that are not odd are 2, 4, and 6 on a dice.

3 numbers out of 6.

3/6 = 1/2 = 0.5

P(not odd)= 50%

Answer:

a) Test statistic

    Z = 1.265 < 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

The battery life is not exceeds 40 hours

b)

p- value = 0.8962

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given sample size 'n' =10

Mean of the sample x⁻ = 40.5 hours

Mean of  of the Population μ = 40 hours

Standard deviation of the Population = 1.25 hours

Step(ii):-

Null Hypothesis:H₀: μ = 40 hours

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁ : μ < 40 hours

step(ii):-

Test statistic

               [tex]Z = \frac{x^{-} -mean}{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

              [tex]Z = \frac{40.5 -40}{\frac{1.25}{\sqrt{10} } }[/tex]

             Z = 1.265

Level of significance = 0.05

Z₀.₀₅ = 1.96

Z = 1.265 < 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

The battery life is not exceeds 40 hours

Step(iii):-

P - value        

P( Z < 1.265) = 0.5 + A( 1.265)

                     = 0.5 + 0.3962  

                    = 0.8962

P( Z < 1.265) = 0.8962

i ) p- value = 0.8962 > 0.05

Accept H₀

There is no significant

The battery life is not exceeds 40 hours

Answer:  c) SAS Postulate

Step-by-step explanation:

DP = PC              Sides are congruent

∠ADP ≡ ∠BCP    Angles are congruent (angles are between the sides)

AD = BC             Sides are congruent

To finish the proof, we can state that ΔADP ≡ ΔBCP by the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Postulate

Answer:

(x, y) = (-8/3, -60)

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 30x + 20

y = 10 * 2 - 80 → y = 20 - 80

y = 30x + 20

y = -60

30x + 20 = -60

x = -8/3

(x, y) = (-8/3, -60)

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

not sure how to really answer this question.

Answer:

4.56,  4.65, 5.46, 5.64, 6.45, 6.54

Step-by-step explanation:

First we have to compare the first digits in each number as less is this digit as less is the number. So the least off all are

4.56 and 4.65

which of these two numbers is least ? Now we have to look to the 2-nd digits of these numbers:

they are 5 and 6 . 5<6 so 4.56<4.65

Lets select next numbers whicj first digit is 5. They are:

5.46 and 5.64. However the second digit of the number 5.64 -6 is bigger than the second digit of number 5.46 -4. That is why 5.46<5.64

Similarly 6.45< 6.54

Answer:

We want to find the usual limits using the rule of thumb and for this case rule states that we have most of the values within 2 deviations from the mean so then we can find the usual limits like this:

[tex] \mu -2*\sigma = 80.9 -2*10.7= 59.5[/tex]

[tex] \mu +2*\sigma = 80.9 -2*10.7= 102.3[/tex]

And for this case a value of 142.3 is higher than the upper limti so then we can conclude that would be significantly high with the rule of thumb criteria

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the follwing info given:

[tex] \mu = 80.9[/tex] represent the mean

[tex]\sigma = 10.7[/tex] represent the deviation

We want to find the usual limits using the rule of thumb and for this case rule states that we have most of the values within 2 deviations from the mean so then we can find the usual limits like this:

[tex] \mu -2*\sigma = 80.9 -2*10.7= 59.5[/tex]

[tex] \mu +2*\sigma = 80.9 -2*10.7= 102.3[/tex]

And for this case a value of 142.3 is higher than the upper limti so then we can conclude that would be significantly high with the rule of thumb criteria

Answer:

3.15 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

The sales tax rate is 7% = 0.07

So, we need to multiply the listed price and the sales tax rate.

= 45 * 0.07 = 3.150 (3.15)

Hope this helps and please mark as the brainliest

Answer:

the answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

about 10

Step-by-step explanation:

62.8 = 2 pi r/2

62.8/2 = pi r

31.4/pi = pi r/pi

about 10 = r

Answer:

Length =  502 ft

Width = 212 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall the formula for the perimeter of a rectangle of length "L" and width "W":

Perimeter = 2 L + 2 W = 1428  ft

Now, since the length is 78 ft more than twice the width, then we can write this in mathematical form as:

L = 2 W +78

so, 2 W = L -7 8

and now replace "2 W" with it equivalent  "L - 78"  in the first perimeter equation and solve for "L":

2 L + L - 78 = 1428

3 L = 1428 + 78

3 L = 1506

L = 1506/3

L = 502 ft

Then the width W can be obtained via:

2 W = L - 78

2 w = 502 -78

2 W = 424

w = 212 ft

Answer:

4320 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall,

1 day --->  24 hours

but each hour has 60 minutes, hence 1 day can also be expressed:

1 day -----> 24 x 60 = 1440 minutes

3 days -----> 1440 min/day  x 3 days = 4320 minutes

Answer: 4,320 minutes

Step-by-step explanation: 1 day = 1440 days. 1440 * 3 = 4,320 minutes

Answer:

Yes, it contradict this prior belief as there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true average escape time is significantly higher than 6 minutes.

Test statistic t=2.238>tc=1.708.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the true average escape time is significantly higher than 6 minutes (360 seconds).

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=360\\\\H_a:\mu> 360[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=26.

The sample mean is M=370.69.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=24.36.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{24.36}{\sqrt{26}}=4.777[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{370.69-360}{4.777}=\dfrac{10.69}{4.777}=2.238[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=26-1=25[/tex]

The critical value for a  right-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05 and 25 degrees of freedom is tc=1.708. If the test statistic is bigger than 1.708, it falls in the rejection region and the null hypothesis is rejected.

As the test statistic t=2.238 is bigger than the critical value t=1.708, the effect is significant.  The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true average escape time is significantly higher than 6 minutes (360 seconds).

Answer:

7/8 chance

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 7 numbers that are either even or greater than 2: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. There is a 7/8 chance choosing either of those.

Answer:

7/8

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 6 numbers that are greater than 2: 3,4,5,6,7,8

there are 4 even numbers: 2,4,6,8

Answer:

-4x -11

Step-by-step explanation:

-(x + 5) - 3(x + 2)

Distribute

-x -5  -3x -6

Combine like terms

-x-3x   -5-6

-4x -11

Answer:

[tex] = - (4x + 11)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-(x + 5) - 3(x + 2) \\ -x - 5 - 3x - 6 \\ -x - 3x -5 - 6 \\ - 4x - 11 \\ = -(4x + 11)[/tex]

Answer: x=-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know f(x)=6, we can set it equal to the equation.

6=9+4x           [subtract 9 on both sides]

-3=4x              [divide both sides by 4]

x=-3/4

Answer:

Angle P is congruent to itself due to the reflexive property.

Explanation:

Angle P must be congruent to angle S through corresponding angle theory.

Otherwise, it wouldn't prove ΔPQR is similar to ΔSTR.

Answer:

Angle P is congruent to itself due to the reflexive property.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

See Explanation below

Step-by-step explanation:

This question has missing details because the number of video games is not stated;

However, you'll arrive at your answer if you follow the steps I'll highlight;

The question requests for the number of arrangement; That means we're dealing with permutation

Let's assume the number of video games is n;

To arrange n games, we make use of the following permutation formula;

[tex]^nP_n = \frac{n!}{(n-n)!}[/tex]

Simplify the denominator

[tex]^nP_n = \frac{n!}{0!}[/tex]

0! = 1; So, we have

[tex]^nP_n = \frac{n!}{1}[/tex]

[tex]^nP_n = n![/tex]

Now, let's assume there are 3 video games;

This means that n = 3

[tex]^3P_3 = 3![/tex]

[tex]^3P_3 = 3 * 2 * 1[/tex]

[tex]^3P_3 = 6\ ways[/tex]

So, whatever the number of video games is; all you have to do is; substitute this value for n;

Answer:

a) Test statistic = 1.960

b) The critical values include -2.50 and 2.50.

The critical regions of rejection are thus

t < -2.50 or t > 2.50

c) The sketch of the curve is presented in the attached image to this solution. The shaded parents indicate the rejection regions.

d) The t-statistic obtained (1.96), lies within the acceptance region (-2.50 ≤ x ≤ 2.50), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Test statistic is computed using the expression

t = (x - μ₀)/σₓ

x = Sample mean = 104.2

μ₀ = the standard we are comparing Against

σₓ = standard error of the mean = (σ/√n)

σ = 9.6

n = Sample size = 24

σₓ = (9.6/√24) =

t = (0.425 - 0.35) ÷ 0.07816

t = 1.9595917942 = 1.960

b) To obtain these critical values, we first find the degree of freedom

Degree of freedom = n - 1 = 24 - 1 = 23

The critical values for significance level of 0.01 and degree of freedom of 23 is given as

t(0.01, 23) = 2.50

So, since the test is two-tailled (we are testing in both directions; greater than or less than), the regions of rejection include

t < -2.50 and t > 2.50

c) since the test is two-tailled (we are testing in both directions; greater than or less than), the regions of rejection include

t < -2.50 and t > 2.50

The t-distribution curve is very similar to the normal distribution curve. The t-distribution curve is also a bell shaped curve, but it is heavier at the limits indicating that the t-distribution favours outliers more than the normal distribution.

The sketch of the curve is presented in the attached image with the shaded regions indicating the rejection region.

d) Since the t-statistic obtained (1.96), lies within the acceptance region (-2.50 ≤ x ≤ 2.50), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Hope this Helps!!!

Let's raise i to various powers starting with 0,1,2,3...

i^0 = 1

i^1 = i

i^2 = ( sqrt(-1) )^2 = -1

i^3 = i^2*i = -1*i = -i

i^4 = (i^2)^2 = (-1)^2 = 1

i^5 = i^4*i = 1*i = i

i^6 = i^5*i = i*i = i^2 = -1

We see that the pattern repeats itself after 4 iterations. The four items to memorize are

i^0 = 1

i^1 = i

i^2 = -1

i^3 = -i

It bounces back and forth between 1 and i, alternating in sign as well. This could be one way to memorize the pattern.

To figure out something like i^25, we simply divide the exponent 25 over 4 to get the remainder. In this case, the remainder of 25/4 is 1 since 24/4 = 6, and 25 is one higher than 24.

This means i^25 = i^1 = i

Likewise,

i^5689 = i^1 = i

because 5689/4 = 1422 remainder 1. The quotient doesn't play a role at all so you can ignore it entirely

Area of one side of a U.S. dime is approximately 254  square millimeters.

A circle is a shape consisting of all points in a plane that are at a given distance from a given point, the centre.

Given that  U.S. dime has a diameter of about 18 millimeters.

We need to find the area of one side of a dime to the nearest square millimeter.

Diameter=18 millimeters

Diameter is two times of radius

D=2R

18=2R

Divide both sides by 2

Radius is 9 millimeters.

Area of dime=πr²

=3.14×(9)²

=3.14×81

=254 square millimeters.

Hence, area of one side of a U.S. dime is approximately 254  square millimeters.

To learn more on Circles click:

https://brainly.com/question/11833983

#SPJ5

Answer:

y = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

y = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x + 7 ← is in slope- intercept form

with slope m = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Parallel lines have equal slopes

line M crosses the y- axis at (0, 3) ⇒ c = 3

y = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x + 3 ← equation of line M

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A) u = 4      v = 4/(sqrt)3

B) b = 5      c = 10

C) b = 2(sqrt)2     a = 4

D) m and n are both 7(sqrt)2/2

The missing side lengths for the three triangles are 10√3, 12, and 8. The first triangle is a 30-60-90 triangle, the second triangle is a 45-45-90 triangle, and the third triangle is a right triangle. The missing side lengths were found using the properties of special triangles and the Pythagorean Theorem.

Here are the missing side lengths for the following triangles:

Triangle 1:

The missing side length is 15.

The triangle is a 30-60-90 triangle, so the ratio of the side lengths is 1:√3:2. The hypotenuse of the triangle is 20, so the shorter leg is 10 and the longer leg is 10√3. The missing side length is the longer leg, so it is 10√3.

Triangle 2:

The missing side length is 12.

The triangle is a 45-45-90 triangle, so the ratio of the side lengths is 1:1:√2. The hypotenuse of the triangle is 12√2, so each of the legs is 12. The missing side length is one of the legs, so it is 12.

Triangle 3:

The missing side length is 8.

We can use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the missing side length. The Pythagorean Theorem states that in a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

In this case, the hypotenuse is 10 and one of the other sides is 6. Let x be the missing side length.

[tex]10^{2}[/tex] = [tex]6^{2}[/tex] + [tex]x^{2}[/tex]

100 = 36 +[tex]x^{2}[/tex]

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] = 64

x = 8

Therefore, the missing side length is 8.

Learn more about side lengths here: brainly.com/question/18725640

#SPJ2

Answer:

  50.18°

Step-by-step explanation:

  ∠BAD = ∠BAC +∠CAD

  102° = (8x+17)° +(9x+11)° . . . . . substitute given values

  102 = 17x +28 . . . . . . . . . . simplify, divide by degrees

  x = (102 -28)/17 = 74/17 . . . . . solve for x

Then the angle of interest is ...

  ∠CAD = (9x +11)° = (9(74/17) +11)° = 50 3/17°

  ∠CAD ≈ 50.18°

Answer:

ln e = 1

ln e 2x = 2x

ln 1 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

ln e

ln(2.718282) = 1

In e 2x

ln(2.718282)(2)x = 2x

ln 1 = 0

Answer:

1. Test statistic t=1.581.

2. The null hypothesis H0 failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 41.

NOTE: if the null hypothesis is µ = 40, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 40 (test statistic t=3.161).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 41.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=41\\\\H_a:\mu> 41[/tex]

The significance level is 0.025.

The sample has a size n=38.

The sample mean is M=42.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=3.9.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{3.9}{\sqrt{38}}=0.633[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{42-41}{0.633}=\dfrac{1}{0.633}=1.581[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=38-1=37[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, with 37 degrees of freedom and t=1.581, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(t>1.581)=0.061[/tex]

As the P-value (0.061) is bigger than the significance level (0.025), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 41.

For µ = 40:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 40.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=40\\\\H_a:\mu> 40[/tex]

The significance level is 0.025.

The sample has a size n=38.

The sample mean is M=42.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=3.9.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{3.9}{\sqrt{38}}=0.633[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{42-40}{0.633}=\dfrac{2}{0.633}=3.161[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=38-1=37[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, with 37 degrees of freedom and t=3.161, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(t>3.161)=0.002[/tex]

As the P-value (0.002) is smaller than the significance level (0.025), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean number of calls per salesperson per week is significantly more than 40.  

Answer:

b median

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  orthocenter

Step-by-step explanation:

The red segment is an altitude of the triangle, as are the two legs. The intersection point of the altitudes is the orthocenter.

__

This is basically a vocabulary question.

Answer:

Suppose that the first die we roll comes up as a 1. The other die roll could be a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. Now suppose that the first die is a 2. The other die roll again could be a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. We have already found 12 potential outcomes, and have yet to exhaust all of the possibilities of the first die. But with a second dice, there will be 24 different possibilities.

Step-by-step explanation:

   1     2        3 4   5     6

1 (1, 1)   (1, 2)   (1, 3)   (1, 4)  (1, 5)   (1, 6)

2 (2, 1)   (2, 2)  (2, 3)  (2, 4) (2, 5)  (2, 6)

3 (3, 1)   (3, 2)  (3, 3)  (3, 4)  (3, 5)  (3, 6)

4 (4, 1)   (4, 2)  (4, 3)  (4, 4)  (4, 5)  (4, 6)

5 (5, 1)   (5, 2)  (5, 3)  (5, 4)  (5, 5)  (5, 6)

6 (6, 1)   (6, 2)  (6, 3)  (6, 4)  (6, 5)  (6, 6)

Answer:

a = ±4√5

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for c.

3√c = 9

√c = 9/3

√c = 3

c = 3²

c = 9

Put b=2√2 and c=9, solve for a.

a² + (2√2)² + 9² = 169

a² + 8 + 81 = 169

a² = 169 - 81 - 8

a² = 80

a = ±√80

a = ±4√5

Answer:

15.87%

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate the value of z:

z = (x - m) / (sd / n ^ (1/2))

where x is the value to evaluate, m is the mean, n is the sample size and sd is the standard deviation, we replace:

p (x <60,527) = z = (x - m) / (sd / n ^ (1/2))

p (x <60,527) = z = (60,527 - 60) / (5/90 ^ (1/2))

z = 1

if we look in the attached table, for z = 1 it is 0.8413

p (x> 60,527) = 1 - 0.8413

 p (x> 60,527) = 0.1587

Therefore the probability is 15.87%

Answer:

Two events are said to be dependent if the outcome or occurrence of the first affects the outcome or occurrence of the second so that the probability is changed.

Also, Two events are said to be independent if the outcome or occurrence of the first does not affects the outcome or occurrence of the second so that the probability is not changed.

Read more on Brainly.com

Answer:E. P(B\A)≠P(B)

Step-by-step explanation: