Yearly healthcare expenses for a family of four are normally distributed with a mean expense equal to $3,000 and a standard deviation equal to $500. A sample of 36 families was selected and the mean and standard deviation were was found to be $3250 and $400 respectively. What is the probability of healthcare expenses in the population being greater than $4,000?

Answer:

The calculated value t = 4.976 > 2.6264 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is rejected

Alternative hypothesis is accepted

The  mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012

Step-by-step explanation:

Given Mean of the population μ = $53,900

Given sample size 'n' = 100

Mean of the sample size x⁻ = 55,144

Sample standard deviation 'S' = 5200

Null hypothesis:H₀: There is no difference between the means

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁: The  mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012

Test statistic

[tex]t = \frac{x^{-} -mean}{\frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{55144-53900}{\frac{5200}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]

t = 4.976

Degrees of freedom

ν = n-1 = 100-1 =99

t₀.₀₁ = 2.6264

The calculated value t = 4.976 > 2.6264 at 0.01 level of significance

Null hypothesis is rejected

Alternative hypothesis is accepted

Final answer:-

The  mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012

Answer:

We conclude that the mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the Wall Street Journal reported that bachelor’s degree recipients with majors in business average starting salaries of $53,900 in 2012.

A sample of 100 business majors receiving a bachelor’s degree in 2013 showed a mean starting salary of $55,144 with a sample standard deviation of $5,200.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean starting salary for business majors in 2013.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] $53,900     {means that the mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is smaller than or equal to the mean starting salary in 2012}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] > $53,900     {means that the mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviation;

                               T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean starting salary = $55,144

            s = sample standard deviation = $5,200

            n = sample of business majors = 100

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{55,144-53,900}{\frac{5,200}{\sqrt{100} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_9_9[/tex]

                                     =  2.392

The value of t-test statistic is 2.392.

Now, at 0.01 significance level the t table gives a critical value of 2.369 at 99 degree of freedom for right-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of t as 2.392 > 2.369, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean starting salary for business majors in 2013 is greater than the mean starting salary in 2012.

Answer:

is m= 10.5 espero que te ayude

Answer:

x = ± i sqrt(5/8)

Step-by-step explanation:

8x^2+4=-1

Subtract 4 from each side

8x^2+4-4=-1-4

8x^2 = -5

Divide by 8

8/8x^2=-5/8

x^2 = -5/8

Take the square root of each side

sqrt(x^2) = ±sqrt(-5/8)

x =  ±sqrt(-5/8)

x =  ±sqrt(5/8) sqrt(-1)

x = ± i sqrt(5/8)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Look below

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. P(x=0)=0.2967

b. P(x=1)=0.4444

c. P(x=2)=0.2219

d. P(x=3)=0.0369

Step-by-step explanation:

The variable X: "number of meals that exceed $50" can be modeled as a binomial random variable, with n=3 (the total number of meals) and p=0.333 (the probability that the chosen restaurant charges mor thena $50).

The probabilty p can be calculated dividing the amount of restaurants that are expected to charge more than $50 (5 restaurants)  by the total amount of restaurants from where we can pick (15 restaurants):

[tex]p=\dfrac{5}{15}=0.333[/tex]

Then, we can model the probability that k meals cost more than $50 as:

[tex]P(x=k) = \dbinom{n}{k} p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}\\\\\\P(x=k) = \dbinom{3}{k} 0.333^{k} 0.667^{3-k}\\\\\\[/tex]

a. We have to calculate P(x=0)

[tex]P(x=0) = \dbinom{3}{0} p^{0}(1-p)^{3}=1*1*0.2967=0.2967\\\\\\[/tex]

b. We have to calculate P(x=1)

[tex]P(x=1) = \dbinom{3}{1} p^{1}(1-p)^{2}=3*0.333*0.4449=0.4444\\\\\\[/tex]

c. We have to calcualte P(x=2)

[tex]P(x=2) = \dbinom{3}{2} p^{2}(1-p)^{1}=3*0.1109*0.667=0.2219\\\\\\[/tex]

d. We have to calculate P(x=3)

[tex]P(x=3) = \dbinom{3}{3} p^{3}(1-p)^{0}=1*0.0369*1=0.0369\\\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

c. 13.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

In the right triangle formed by the main sail.

Using the trigonometric function

[tex]\tan \theta =\dfrac{\text{Opposite}}{\text{Adjacent}} \\\tan 52^\circ =\dfrac{x}{9} \\x=9 \times \tan 52^\circ\\x=11.52$ cm[/tex]

Therefore:

Height of the mast = 2+11.5=13.5 cm

The height of the mast is 13.5 cm.

Answer:

There are 10 teams.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the question wants at least 48 swimmers so any numbers above 47 are counted.

In this diagram, there are 10 teams consisting 48 swimmers and above, 48, 52, 53, 63, 76, 79, 82, 84, 85 and 86.

Answer:

10 teams have 48 or more swimmers.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we look at stem 4 there is one team with 48 members.

So counting from there we  have:

1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 4

= 10 teams.

Answer: 8/3 and -9/4

Step-by-step explanation:

1. [tex]\frac{2^{3}}{3} = \frac{2 * 2 * 2}{3} = \frac{8}{3}[/tex]

2. In this problem, when raising a whole fraction to a power, you must both raise the numerator and denominator to that power.

[tex]-(\frac{3}{2})^2 = -(\frac{3^2}{2^2}) = -(\frac{9}{4}) = -\frac{9}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\dfrac{15}{19}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The soccer player so far has made 15 penalty kicks in 19 attempts.

Therefore:

Total Number of trials =19

Number of Successes =15

Therefore, the relative frequency probability that she will make her next penalty​ kick is:

[tex]=\dfrac{\text{Number of Successes}}{\text{Total Number of Trials}} \\=\dfrac{15}{19}[/tex]

Answer:

x < -4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

X + 5/7 < 1/7

Subtract 5/7 from each side

X + 5/7  -5/7 <1/7-5/7

x < -4/7

Answer:

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

When A and B are independent events:

P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)

OR

P(A|B) = P(A) * P(B)

EASY!

Answer: 17/16 or 1 1/16

Step-by-step explanation:

BRO IT'S ELEMANTARY FRACTIONS!!!!

Answer:

we need at least 17 - card deck

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given :

We can attempt to solve the question by using pigeonhole principle;

"The pigeonhole principle posits that if more than n pigeons are placed into n pigeonholes some pigeonhole must contain more than one pigeon"

Thus; the minimum number of pigeon; let say at least n pigeons sit on at least one same hole among m hole can be represented by the formula:

m(  n - 1 ) + 1

where ;

pigeons are synonymous to card

pigeonholes  are synonymous to suits

So; m = 4 ; n = 5

∴  4 (5 -1 ) + 1 ⇒ 4 (4) + 1

= 16 + 1

= 17

Hence; we need at least 17 - card deck

Answer:

2/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Seven employees can be arranged in 7! ways. n(S) = 7!

Two adjacent desks for married couple can be selected in 6 ways viz.,(1, 2), (2, 3), (3,4), (4, 5), (5,6),(6,7).

This couple can be arranged in the two desks in 2! ways. Other five persons can be arranged in 5! ways.

So, number of ways in which married couple occupy adjacent desks

= 6×2! x 5! =2×6!

so, the probability that the married couple will have adjacent desks

[tex]\frac{n(A)}{n(s)} =\frac{2\times6!}{7!} \\=\frac{2}{7}[/tex]

Answer:

a. 3.686 %

b. 0.41 %

c. 4.096%

Step-by-step explanation:

We make use of the binomial probability equation, which is as follows:

P = [n! / (n - r)! r!] p ^ r * q ^ (n - r)

where,

n total number samples = 6

r is the selected number, depends on each point (a, b, c)

p is the of believing in reincarnation = 0.40

q = 1 - p = 0.60

to. What is the probability that exactly 5 of the selected adults believe in reincarnation?

So we use r = 5

P = [6! / ((6 - 5)! * 5!)] * [0.40 ^ 5 * 0.60 ^ (6 - 5)]

P = 6 * 0.006144

P = 0.0368 = 3.686%

b. What is the probability that all of the selected adults believe in reincarnation?

So we use r = 6

P = [6! / ((6 - 6)! * 6!)] * [0.40 ^ 6 * 0.60 ^ (6 - 6)]

P = 1 * 0.004096

P = 0.004096 = 0.41%

c. What is the probability that at least 5 of the selected adults believe in reincarnation?

So we use r = 5 to 6

P (r = 5) = [6! / ((6 - 5)! * 5!)] * [0.40 ^ 5 * 0.60 ^ (6 - 5)]

P (r = 5) = 6 * 0.006144

P (r = 5) = 0.0368 = 3.686%

P (r = 6) = [6! / ((6 - 6)! * 6!)] * [0.40 ^ 6 * 0.60 ^ (6 - 6)]

P (r = 6) = 1 * 0.004096

P (r = 6) = 0.004096 = 0.41%

The total is the sum of all:

P (total) = 3.686% + 0.41%

P (total) = 4.096%

Answer:

(a) 2.81%

(b) 0.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following information from the statement:

P = 64 + - 0.9

(a) We know that the perimeter is:

P = 2 * pi * r

if we solve for r, we have to:

r = P / 2 * pi

We have that the formula of the area is:

A = pi * r ^ 2

we replace r and we are left with:

A = pi * (P / 2 * pi) ^ 2

A = (P ^ 2) / (4 * pi)

We derive with respect to P, and we are left with:

dA = 2 * P / 4 * pi * dP

We know that P = 64 and dP = 0.9, we replace:

dA = 2 * 64/4 * 3.14 * 0.9

dA = 9.17

The error would come being:

dA / A = 9.17 / (64 ^ 2/4 * 3.14) = 0.02811

In other words, the error would be 2.81%

(b) tell us that dA / A <= 0.01

we replace:

[P * dP / 2 * pi] / [P ^ 2/4 * pi] <= 0.01

solving we have:

2 * dP / P <= 0.01

dP / P <= 0.01 / 2

dP / P <= 0.005

Which means that the answer is 0.5%

Answer:

f(x-2) = (x-2)²

or

f(x-2) = x² -4x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Simply plug in (x - 2) into f(x) to find your graph.

Edit (With Picture):

You are moving the graph right 2.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = x²

f(x - 2) = (x - 2)²

f(x - 2) = x² - 4x + 4

The grafic is below.

I hope I've helped you.

Answer:

At first it increases by 25%, then you have 1.25x the original temp. A drop of 40% gives you .6 x 1.25, or 75% of the original temperature

Step-by-step explanation:

found that on the web for yuh. I really hope it helped.

Answer:

decreased by 25%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2> 0[/tex]

where μ1 is the population mean sales with compensation plan, and μ2 is the populatiojn mean sales without compensation plan.

A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would be concluded that the compensation plan increases sales, when in fact it does not (at least, not significantly).

The consequences of this error would be that the compensation plan would have evidence to be implemented in the company when in fact it will not bring the results it is expected to have.

Step-by-step explanation:

This hypothesis test will test the claim that the compensation plan increases the average sales per salesperson. This claim will be stated in the alternative hypothesis, and will state that, with the compensation plan, the sales are significantly higher than without the compensation plan.

The null hypothesis, that Steve wants to falsify, will state that the sales will not differ with or withour compensation plan.

We can write this hypothesis as:

[tex]H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2> 0[/tex]

where μ1 is the population mean sales with compensation plan, and μ2 is the populatiojn mean sales without compensation plan.

A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would be concluded that the compensation plan increases sales, when in fact it does not (at least, not significantly).

The consequences of this error would be that the compensation plan would have evidence to be implemented in the company when in fact it will not bring the results it is expected to have. The sales would be expected to increase due to this implementation, and they will not increase, at least, not for the compensation plan.

Answer:

[tex](f+g)(x)=x^2-x-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

If [tex]f(x)=2x-1[/tex], and [tex]g(x)=x^2-3x-2[/tex], then the addition [tex](f+g)(x)[/tex] equals:

[tex](f+g)(x)=2x-1+x^2-3x-2=x^2-3x+2x-2-1=x^2-x-3[/tex]

Answer:

$783.46

Step-by-step explanation:

Compounded interest rate (quarterly) formula: A = P(1 + r/4)^4t

Simply plug in our known variables and solve:

910 = P(1 + 0.015/4)^4(10)

910 = P(1.00375)^40

910 = 1.16151P

P = 783.464

Answer: 783

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. with 3000 successes of 5000 cases sample

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that we need to test if the proportion of success is greater than 0.5.

From the given options, we can see that they all have the same proportion which equals to;

Proportion p = 30/50 = 600/1000 = 0.6

p = 0.6

But we can notice that the number of samples in each case is different.

Test statistic z score can be calculated with the formula below;

z = (p^−po)/√{po(1−po)/n}

Where,

z= Test statistics

n = Sample size

po = Null hypothesized value

p^ = Observed proportion

Since all other variables are the same for all the cases except sample size, from the formula for the test statistics we can see that the higher the value of sample size (n) the higher the test statistics (z) and the highest z gives the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis. So the option with the highest sample size gives the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

Therefore, option C with sample size 5000 and proportion 0.6 has the highest sample size. Hence, option C gives the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis

Answer:

68 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

The time taken for the driver to drive 119 miles is 105 minutes.

The average speed is equal to distance divided by the time taken.

105 minutes is equal to 1.75 hours.

[tex]S=119/1.75[/tex]

[tex]S =68[/tex]

The driver's average speed is 68 miles per hour.

Answer:

Speed = 68 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Distance = 119 miles

Time = 1 hour 45 minutes = 1.75 hours

Required:

Speed = ?

Formula:

Average Speed = Total Distance Covered / Total Time Taken

Solution:

Speed = 119/1.75

Speed = 68 mph

Answer:

9 people

Step-by-step explanation:

37, 39, 41, 46, 61, 63, 69, 77, 80

9 people waited more than 36 minutes.

Answer:

CICI

Step-by-step explanation: NO cici

Christian, Iris and Morgan each get an equal share of 1/2 of the pizza and the model 1/6 represent the fraction of the ​pizza each person gets.

The division in mathematics is one kind of operation. In this process, we split the expressions or numbers into the same number of parts.

Given:

Christian, Iris and Morgan each get an equal share of 1/2 of the pizza.

To find the fraction of the ​pizza each person gets:

Divide the amount of pizza by the number of people.

There are 3 people and 1/2 pizza.

The fraction of the pizza each person gets

= The amount of pizza / number of people

The fraction of the pizza each person gets

= (1/2) / 3

Simplifying into multiplication,

The fraction of the pizza each person gets = 1/2 x 1/3

The fraction of the pizza each person gets

= 1/(2x3)

= 1/6

Therefore, the model that represents the requirement is 1/6.

To learn more about the division;

https://brainly.com/question/13263114

#SPJ5

Answer:

Option 4 is not true

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{d}\\\\[/tex]

1)Cross multiply,

ad = bc

So, true

2) a/ c = b/d also true

3) a+b/b = c+d/d  also true

For example:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}=\frac{2}{8}\\\\\frac{1+4}{4}=\frac{2+8}{8}\\\\\frac{5}{4}=\frac{10}{8}\\\\[/tex]

When simplifying 10/8, it is 5/4.

5) b/a = d/c is also true

Answer:

.8 miles further on Monday

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the miles on Monday and subtract the miles on Wednesday

3.4 - 2.6 =.8 miles

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are not given the height of the trapezoid, we can split this into a triangle and a rectangle. We find the area of each and then add them together. In order to do so, we must use Pythagorean Theorem to find the missing length so that we can find the area.

a²+b²=c²

a²+4²=8²

a²+16=64

a²=48

a=√48

a=4√3

Now that we know the missing length of the triangle, we can find the area of the triangle and the rectangle.

Triangle

A=1/2bh

A=1/2(4)(4√3)

A=8√3

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rectangle

A=lw

A=7(4√3)

A=28√3

With our areas, we can add them together.

4√3+28√3=36√3 cm²

Answer:

y+1=3(x-1), D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slope: Slope should be 3.

y+1=3(x-1)