Working for commission can be considered a blessing and a curse for an artist. How might it be interpreted to be a good thing for an artist? (I'll give brainliest please help!)

A.
The artist has no one to consult with during the process.

B.
The artist must create whatever art they are told to create.

C.
The artist will get paid for the completed work.

D.
The artist will never get to share the completed work with anyone.

It might be interpreted to be a good thing for an artist as by The artist must create whatever art they are told to create Option(b) is correct which is very much necessary as and when required.

An artist is an individual taken part in a movement connected with making workmanship, rehearsing human expression, or showing a craftsmanship.

The normal utilization in both ordinary discourse and scholarly talk alludes to a professional in the visual expressions in particular. During the Middle Ages the word artist previously existed in certain nations like Italy, yet the importance was something looking like expert, while the word was at this point unclear.

An artist was somebody ready to accomplish a work better compared to other people, so the talented excellency was underlined, as opposed to the movement field. In this period some "distinctive" items (like materials) were considerably more valuable and costly than compositions or figures.

The primary wellspring of expertise for both specialty artists and fine artists is long haul reiteration and practice. Many fine artists have concentrated on their work of art at college and some have a graduate degree in expressive arts. Artists may likewise concentrate all alone or get hands on preparing from an accomplished artist.

Therefore Option(b) is correct.

Learn more about Artist here:

brainly.com/question/3872714

#SPJ6