Answer Because they wan`t popular.
. Who tended to be opponents of
Prohibition
the 1920s
The Anti-Saloon League, with strong support from Protestants and other Christian denominations, spearheaded the drive for nationwide prohibition. In fact, the Anti-Saloon League was the most powerful political pressure group in US history—no other organization had ever managed to alter the nation’s Constitution.
Which of the four types of government existed in Russia at the time of the Russian Revolution?
In Petrograd, the Bolsheviks and their supporters took control of government structures and other key areas, and Lenin rapidly established a new administration. First communist state in history was ruled by Lenin.
What do you mean by Revolution?Revolution is a change in a country's political system that typically involves employing force or going to war.
The First World War marked the beginning of the Russian Revolution, a period of political and social upheaval in the former Russian Empire. Following two subsequent revolutions and a terrible civil war during this time, Russia abolished its monarchy and transitioned to a socialist system of governance.
Therefore, In Petrograd, the Bolsheviks and their supporters took control of government structures and other key areas, and Lenin rapidly established a new administration. First communist state in history was ruled by Lenin.
Learn more about Revolution, here;
https://brainly.com/question/1291142
#SPJ1
What did you learn about the mongols?
Crusades changes to the king powers
Answer:
The power vacuums that resulted were filled by European kings and queens, and i think in the process, greatly strengthened the power and role of monarchs throughout Europe . In order to pay for these Crusades, taxes were levied by those
ruling, which increased their power.
when was jorge washinton borm
Answer: Feb 22, 1732
Explanation: I think you meant George Washington.
Anti-imperialists opposed establishing colonies for economic reasons
because:
A. U.S. markets would have too much competition from foreign
products.
B. thousands of American workers would lose their jobs.
C. having to defend the colonies from other nations outweighed any
advantages.
D. it would be too expensive to support the residents of the colonies.
Anti-imperialists opposed establishing colonies for economic reasons because having to defend the colonies from other nations outweighed any advantages.
Therefore option C is correct.
What is Imperialism?
Imperialism refers to the state policy or act of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial addition or by clinching political and economic control of other areas, often through employing hard power, but also soft power.
Imperialism is usually birthed because of the desire to gain wealth or other resources from weak or smaller nations.
In the United states, the Anti-imperialists were strongly opposed establishing colonies for economic reasons because they thought that having to defend the colonies against external aggression/nations outweighed any advantages of establishing such colonies.
Learn more about Imperialism at https://brainly.com/question/377688
#SPJ1
Before the 1920s, radios were used only for one on one communication. True or false
Answer: true
Explanation: due to no cellphones all they had were radios for communications.
What effect did the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Worcester v. Georgia have on
the Cherokee peoples?
OA. The ruling forced the Cherokee peoples to leave Georgia and
surrender all their land.
OB. The ruling created great tension between the Cherokee peoples
and the U.S. government.
C. The ruling had little or no effect on the Cherokee peoples'
sovereignty or rights.
OD. The ruling finally allowed the Cherokee peoples the sovereignty
they had long pursued.
The ruling had little or no effect on the Cherokee peoples' sovereignty or rights. Hence option C is the answer.
What was the impact of Worcester v. Georgia?A significant Supreme Court decision was Worcester v. Georgia. The decision was frequently used to draft subsequent Indian law in the United States, even though it did not stop the Cherokee from being expelled from their land. In Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court upheld the federal government's sole authority to negotiate treaties with other countries and set the precedent that the constitutional authority of the federal government preempts or supersedes state laws.
Georgia disregarded the Supreme Court's decision, refused to let the missionaries go, and kept pushing the federal government to expel the Cherokees. By highlighting their status as a sovereign nation, this decision had an impact on the Cherokee Nation. To protect them, a treaty was made with the federal government.
To learn more about Worcester v. Georgia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/304881
#SPJ1
21.
How did the reception of Vietnam veterans by the American public differ from the reception that World War I and II veterans received?
A memorial was erected in Washington, D.C., to honor world war veterans, and victory parades were held to honor Vietnam veterans.
Americans fully honored Vietnam veterans immediately following their return home.
Vietnam veterans did not receive a warm welcome, whereas victory parades were held for veterans from the world wars.
Veterans of the world wars were not welcomed warmly, whereas Vietnam veterans were hailed as heroes.
Answer:
Vietnam veterans did not receive a warm welcome, whereas victory parades were held for veterans from the world wars.
Explanation:
Vietnam is very different from the other wars. Public opinion was very negative of the United States' presence in Vietnam. This is for a few reasons. There was no clear objective, it appeared to be unwinnable, and many were against the violence and devastation of war in general. It was perceived as unfair, unnecessary and unjustifiable.
When the soldiers finally came home, they were not heroes to anyone. They were often portrayed as very bad people. This is despite the fact that many of them were sent there against their will due to the draft.
Why didn’t the ratification of the 19th Amendment bring about sweeping changes in American politics?
During the debate over ratification, the Anti-Federalists were against the Constitution. They claimed that the new system infringed upon and compromised the people's rights.
What is the 19th amendment?The United States Constitution's Nineteenth Amendment forbids the federal government and its states from denying citizens the right to vote on the grounds of sex, thus recognizing the right of women to vote.
The House of Representatives passed a suffrage amendment on May 21, 1919, but it wasn't until June 4 that it passed the Senate. The following day, it was sent to the states for ratification, and it received the necessary 36 ratifications to be adopted and take effect on August 18, 1920.
This broadside explains the arguments anti-suffragists used to argue against the 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote. They claimed that men and women generally had similar interests and that voting would not affect the fact that women were not "suffering from any injustice."
To know more about American Politics, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28520441
#SPJ1
what changes allowed women to enter the workforce in the 1920?
It is estimated that approximately five million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. Describe how the Jews lived (and died) in ghettos, concentration camps, and extermination camps. Compare the details of these locations, and list 10 facts about the locations. The details should include how people there spent their days, how they died, how they were governed, and so on.
Answer:
Jews in ghettos lived in cramped and overcrowded conditions, often in poverty; many were employed in factories or small workshops. They were subjected to strict regulations enforced by the Gestapo and were regularly attacked by Nazis. People in the ghettos were generally malnourished and lacked adequate healthcare, which resulted in a high mortality rate.
Jews in concentration camps were usually subject to inhumane treatment and slave labor. Many were forced to do hard physical labor for long hours, with little to no food or rest. Jews in concentration camps were also subjected to medical experiments and brutal punishments.
In extermination camps, Jews were immediately separated upon arrival and sent to gas chambers. People in these camps were subjected to horrific and inhumane treatment
Facts about the locations:
1. Nazi Germany systematically rounded up Jews and forced them into ghettos, concentration camps, and extermination camps
2. Jews in ghettos faced overcrowding and poverty conditions
3. Jews in concentration camps faced regular abuse, slave labor, and medical experimentation
4. Jews in extermination camps faced immediate death upon arrival
5. Jews in ghettos faced restrictions enforced by the Gestapo
6. Jews in concentration camps faced starvation and exhaustion due to long hours of hard labor
7. Jews in extermination camps faced extreme degradation and treatment
8. Jews in ghettos and concentration camp faced harsh punishment for breaking rules or resisting
9. Jews in extermination camps were subjected to mass genocide
10. All locations were governed by Nazi rule and harshly enforced
Explanation:
Why did the U.S. government take land in the West that had previously been
granted to Indigenous groups in the mid-1800s?
O A. More immigrants came to the United States from Europe and
needed land.
OB. White settlers realized it was suitable for farming and began
moving there.
OC. Treaties previously agreed to by Indigenous groups were violated.
OD. A gold rush to the west began after gold was discovered on the
land.
Answer: The United States government owns 47 percent of all land in the West. In some states, including Oregon, Utah and Nevada, the majority of land is owned by the federal government. Of course, it used to own nearly all of it.
White settlers realized it was suitable for farming and began moving there. the U.S. government take land in the West that had previously been granted to Indigenous groups in the mid-1800s
What is government?The term government refers that the system which was governed by a state or a country in it, we see there are different governments are being there in states the government is made by the people and govern for the people also in it. There is a system being made and under the system, the government is being run.
President Andrew Jackson approved and put into effect the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This law made it possible for Native American tribes to be forcibly ejected from their already-claimed territories and relocated to areas west of the Mississippi River. This forced government expulsion was carried out in order to facilitate American westward development.
Following the eviction of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, the federal government confined tribal people to reservations, which are defined by law as parcels of land given to tribes that have received federal recognition. government
Therefore, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about the government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ2
How did the court system broken up?
Answer:94 District Courts (trial courts), 13 Courts of Appeals (intermediate appellate courts), and the United States Supreme Court (the court of final review).
Explanation:
The Dreyfus affair was important in French history because:
the military showed the public that they could be trusted.
France defeated Prussia.
the French Republic proved it could survive divisive crises.
it demonstrated that anti-Semitism in France was over.
The Dreyfus case exposed the antisemitism that permeated the French military and, given how highly the decision was received, France as a whole.
What is Dreyfus affair?From 1894 until it was resolved in 1906, the Dreyfus affair was a political crisis that tore the French Third Republic apart. In the Francophone world, "L'Affaire," as it is known in French, has come to represent contemporary injustice and is still one of the most egregious instances of a complex miscarriage of justice and antisemitism. The press's role and the public's perception both had an impact on the conflict.
As soon as Captain Alfred Dreyfus was found guilty of treason in December 1894, the controversy got underway. Dreyfus was an Alsatian French artillery commander of Jewish ancestry who was 35 years old. He spent nearly five years in jail on Devil's Island in French Guiana after being wrongfully found guilty and given a life sentence for passing French military secrets to the German Embassy in Paris. The Dreyfusard affair, which lasted from 1894 until 1906, split France into pro-Army, primarily Catholic "anti-Dreyfusards" and pro-Republican, anti-clerical Dreyfusards. French politics became nastier, and radicalization increased.
To know more about Dreyfus affair, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/472544
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 10
The
peoples lived east of the Mississippi River and lost 23 million acres
of land in the Treaty of Fort Jackson.
A. Muscogee (Creek)
O B. Seminole
O C. Chickasaw
OD. Choctaw
The peoples lived east of the Mississippi River and lost 23 million acres of land in the Treaty of Fort Jackson ----- Muscogee ( Creek )
Option A is correct .
Over 800 Creek warriors were slaughtered in the battle, severely weakening the Creek military. That year he ceded over 23 million acres of his land to the United States federal government under the Treaty of Fort Jackson, signed on August 9.
What did the Fort Jackson Treaty do?The Treaty of Fort Jackson ended the fighting in the Creek War, but initiated a series of negotiations over land, property, and financial resources between the Creek community and the U.S. government. Under the terms of the treaty, Creek Nation ceded nearly 22 million acres of her land to the United States.
Learn more about Treaty of Fort Jackson :
brainly.com/question/17039875
#SPJ1
Which president was the first republican to hold offfice?
Answer: James Buchanan, the 15th President of the United States (1857-1861), served immediately prior to the American Civil War.
Explanation:
i believe
need a little detailed answers please
1: What is Lincoln’s view of America’s options as it deals with slavery? Compare/Contrast his perspective with the secession of the South.
2: How do Lincoln’s attitudes and actions just before and just after his inauguration compare or contrast with his resolve that America could not exist as “a house divided” and with his desire to keep the Union together?
1. Lincoln’s view of America’s options as it deals with slavery as he thought colonization could resolve the issue of slavery.
2. Lincoln’s attitudes and actions just before and just after his inauguration was simply on ways to ensure the unity of the country and to stop slavery and racism.
In the House Divided speech, how does Lincoln view America's options in relation to slavery?In his "house divided" speech, Lincoln argued that the previous year's Dred Scott decision had already made slavery legal in the north, as well as all territories into which the United States had expanded. He argued that if the United States wanted to be a free country, it needed to act now, before it was too late.
Lincoln believed that colonization could end slavery. For much of his career, Lincoln believed that colonization which is the idea that the majority of African Americans should leave the United States and settle in Africa or Central America as this was the best way to address the issue of slavery.
Learn more about Lincoln on:
https://brainly.com/question/7955162
#SPJ1
What did the patriots want
Patriots were people who wanted the American colonies to gain their independence from Britain. They wanted their own country called the United States.
Answer: Patriots were people who wanted the American colonies to gain their independence from Britain. They wanted their own country called the United States.
Explanation: The Patriots were those colonials who were growing weary of British rules and policies, especially when they had no say in how these laws would be made or implemented. They strived for freedom from a tyrannical royal government, often led by Royal Governors who suppressed any utterance of rebellion.
why might canon law interfere with the laws of the king and the nobles?
Canon law interferes with the rules of the king and nobility because it became more defensive, with restrictions on books, mixed marriages, and involvement of Roman Catholics in Protestant worship.
What is the canon law?Canon law is the Christian Church's law. Its power is limited to particular church and its members. It is also defined as a corpus of religious law that governs the behavior of adherents of a certain faith.
To achieve the licentiate of canon law, a candidate must finish a six-semester program of canonical studies (two years year-round, three years with summer break), pass a rigorous oral examination before a jury of faculty members, and prepare a thesis on a specific issues.
This law conflicts with the king's and nobility's norms because it became more protective, with bans on books, mixed marriages, and Roman Catholic engagement in Protestant worship.
Learn more about the canon law, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/514184
#SPJ1
List the planetary conditions that humans need to live
Answer:
Explanation:
you will need water
What actions illustrate Japanese, German, and Italian aggression in the 1930s? min 400 words
What does the court system look like?
why was the United States fearful of communism spreading to other countries?
Domino effect..............
PLEASE HELP ASAP, NEED ANSWERS NOW
Which of the following places the end of the major pre-Columbian American civilizations in the correct chronological order?
Aztec, Maya, Inca
Inca, Aztec, Maya
Inca, Maya, Aztec
Maya, Aztec, Inca
Based on historical aspects, the end of the major pre-Columbian American civilizations in the correct chronological order is Maya, Aztec, and Inca.
What are the pre-Columbian American civilizationsThe pre-Columbian American civilization is a term that is used to describe the ancient cultures located south of the present-day United States border.
The pre-Columbian American civilizations are used to describe the period in which people lived in the South of the United States, before the arrival of Columbus.
The end of the major pre-Columbian American civilizations in the correct chronological order is determined by the year the civilization ended.
The chronological order isMaya - lasted around 900 ADAztec - lasted around 1521 AD Inca - lasted around 1533 ADHence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Maya, Aztec, Inca
Learn more about the pre-Columbian American civilization here: https://brainly.com/question/20687823
#SPJ1
Answer: Maya, Aztec, Inca.
Explanation:
Maya: 250 AD
Aztec: 1300 AD
Inca: 1438 AD
How do you think humans would behave in a "state of nature"? Explain your thinking in a response that is at least two sentences.
Answer: I think humans would behave erratically.
Explanation: I think this is because this because humans are higher up then any other animals alive.
What were the main reasons for World War Two?
Answer:
The main causes of World War II include: The Treaty of Versailles following WWI. Economic depression across the world. Rise of Nazism.
Explanation:
May I have Brainliest please? My next rank will be the highest one: A GENIUS! Please help me on this journey to become top of the ranks! I only need 9 more brainliest to become a genius! I would really appreciate it, and it would make my day! Thank you so much, and have a wonderful rest of your day!
i'm a white nigerian if you know what i mean
Answer:
Cool. Be proud.
Explanation:
this question just caught my attention.
Discuss the ethics of slavery. How did slaves cope with their lack of rights?
The the ethics of slavery is that:
Slavery can be defined as the possession, acquisition, or sale of human beings for the purpose of compelled or unpaid work. Everyone agrees that slavery is a morally repugnant behavior. In fact, there is such widespread agreement that most individuals would likely agree that slavery is morally wrong just because it is.Slaves rebelled against the institution of slavery in America by escaping, using the legal system as a weapon, and even committing heinous crimes like murder and force death. This is how slaves deal with their lack of rights.How did slaves end their enslavement?Many people opposed slavery in a number of methods with varying degrees of fervor and strategy. Actions like making up an illness, working slowly, doing subpar work, misplacing or harming tools and equipment were among the less obvious forms of resistance.
The possession, purchasing, and selling of human people for the purpose of forced and unpaid labor can all be considered forms of slavery. One practice that everyone thinks is wrong is slavery.
Therefore, No white person could call a slave as a witness against them in court, and slaves were not allowed to leave the plantation without permission. Slaves also had no constitutional rights. Slaves frequently ended up being hired out, used as lottery prizes, or stakes in card games and horse races.
Learn more about slavery from
https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ1
How did the Students for a Democratic Society expand the boundaries of American politics in the 1960s?
Answer:
The New Left mainly referred to the student movement that came about in the 1960s that focused on social injustices throughout the United States. They were heavily concerned with the “establishment” of the country and wanted to change the government with (in the very least) a social revolution, though many groups were even more radical.