Explanation:
We need to bear in mind the context of President Ronald Regan when uttered those words on Tuesday, January 20, 1981.
At the time it was uncommon among countries of the world for a peaceful transition of power from a sitting president to a newly elected one. In Ronald's case, he won sitting president Jimmy Carter in the elections and Carter accepted the outcome.
Hence, Regan described the peaceful transfer of power as a "miracle" in the eyes of citizens of other countries at the time who had probably not experienced that before.
Essay Questions Grades 5-8 Carter G Woodson believed that education was important and that we should all celebrate one another's contributions and achievements. Think about what you know about Abraham and Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Why do you think Carter G Woodson chose the week of their birthdays to start Negro History Week?
g Other than your family, identify and describe a primary group in which you belong. Do you have a status in this group? Is this status ascribed or achieved. Do you have a role in this group? How do you practice impression management in this group? Identify one secondary group which you belong. Do you have a status in this group? Is this status ascribed or achieved. Do you have a role in this group? Have you ever experience role strain or role conflict in this group? What is the difference between role conflict and role strain? Identify two of your in-groups and two of your out-groups and share how they have influence the way you see the world. How has social media had an influence on your primary groups, your secondary groups, your in-groups, and your out-groups? Do believe that is possible for someone to have a primary group made of people that they have never met?
Answer and Explanation:
A primary group to which I belong is the Christian community in my neighborhood. We can be considered a primary group, because all members have direct contact with each other, possessing a high degree of intimacy. This group has status that must be achieved through greater participation in the activities of the congregation. I do not have this status because I am recently participating in the events promoted by this group. I do not have a specific role in the group and I maintain print management, stimulating the knowledge of members before making decisions about them.
The secondary group to which I belong is the group of residents of my condominium. We are a secondary group because we have little contact with each other, in addition, this contact does not present intimacies and is made in a very shallow and formal way. I have no status in that group, which must be achieved. I also have no function. It was already possible to witness the tension and conflict of roles in this group, in condominium meetings. The role tension is related to the difficulty in fulfilling the role that an individual is responsible, within the group. Whereas role conflict occurs when the roles that a person has contradict and clash.
My family and childhood friends are two in-groups to which I belong. My neighborhood and political groups in my city are examples of out-groups to which I participate. They stimulate my view of belonging, showing what are the subjects and activities that make me comfortable and happy to participate. It makes me know myself better and understand what I can do well and what I can't.
The media encourages the roles and participation of each member of the groups to which I participate. This is because all these groups must adapt to the changes that are happening in the world and that are related to changes in the lives of all members and social interactions.
I believe that primary groups can be formed by people who do not know each other if the bond that unites them is tightened and if they develop strong contact and intimidation with each other.
Explain the role of our district assemblies in refuse collection and it impact on our health delivery system
What is considered one of Athens Greece's most notable contributions to society that is still evident today
A. the birth of democracy
B. the rise of dictators
C. the development of equal rights for men and women
D. the beginning of free market economy
Answer:
A. the birth of democracy
Explanation:
The political organization known as democracy has its roots in the ancient greek city-state of Athens. It developed there, somewhere around the 6th century BC, and prevailed for two centuries.
The term democracy comes from the word demos, which referred to the citizens. This is because it was the citizens who had the right to vote and decide on various political questions. All who could participate had the equal right to discuss and state their ideas, and their votes had an equal effect.
However, not everyone was considered to be a citizen. In fact, only adult free males who were not foreigners had the right to vote. This strictly excluded women and slaves who were not considered to be politically adept.
Waves Study Guide
What does each term stand for?
v=
f=
λ=
Answer: λ= wavelength v= velocity f= frequency
Hope this helps!
Answer:
v= velocity
f= frequency
λ= wavelength
Relationship, v=f×λ
Which Roman officials were in charge of the law
Answer: The laws were enforced by an official called the praetor. The praetor was the second highest ranking official in the Roman republic (after the consuls). The praetor was responsible for the administration of justice. To keep the laws in the city, the Romans had a police force called the Vigiles.
Explanation:
Please Help Question in picture
Describe where the Byzantine Empire fell within Roman territory.
Answer:
The Byzantine Empire was a vast and powerful civilization with origins that can be traced to 330 A.D. , when the Roman emperor Constantine I dedicated a “New Rome” on the site of the ancient Greek colony of Byzantium. Though the western half of the Roman Empire crumbled and fell in 476 A.D. , the eastern half survived for 1,000 more years, spawning a rich tradition of art, literature and learning and serving as a military buffer between Europe and Asia. The Byzantine Empire finally fell in 1453, after an Ottoman army stormed Constantinople during the reign of Constantine XI.
Explanation:
There ya go! :]
Answer:The Byzantine Empire was a vast and powerful civilization with origins that can be traced to 330 A.D., when the Roman emperor Constantine I dedicated a “New Rome” on the site of the ancient Greek colony of Byzantium. Though the western half of the Roman Empire crumbled and fell in 476 A.D., the eastern half survived for 1,000 more years, spawning a rich tradition of art, literature and learning and serving as a military buffer between Europe and Asia. The Byzantine Empire finally fell in 1453, after an Ottoman army stormed Constantinople during the reign of Constantine XI.
Explanation: i ned more points
In order to find speed, what two variables are needed? *
Answer:
d= distance and t=total time/miles
Explanation:
What does it mean if a product has inelastic demand?
A. Demand will stay the same even as prices change.
B. Demand will rise, even as prices increase.
C. Demand will vary greatly depending on the price.
D. Demand will fall even as prices decrease.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
Inelastic demand means that the demand would not change as price changes. It generally happens for goods that are non-replacable, with little competition, and other factors (e.g. location, short-run) that make the buyer insensitive to the price.
The product has inelastic demand, then demand will stay the same even as prices change. Thus, option (A) is correct.
What is Inelastic Demand?The Inelastic Demand refers to the concept in which change in the prices of the commodity initiates the little change or no change in the demand. For example, The essential goods have the inelastic demand.
The product which has inelastic demand will have the demand same as the level of the price changes. Therefore, Thus, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about Inelastic Demand here:
https://brainly.com/question/16966671
#SPJ2
Imagine the world without socio-cultural and political institutions. What do
you think will happen?
Answer:
I have no idea
Explanation:
clarify the concept of public services
Answer:
Public services are the foundation of a fair and civilised society.
Explanation:
the other person copied and pasted from go'ogle
g: To see how well a weight loss drug works, a doctor randomly selects which people in the study will be given the actual drug and which will be given a placebo. All study participants think they are getting the weight loss drug. Is this a blind experiment, double blind experiment, or neither
Answer:
Blinded experiment
Explanation:
This is a blinded experiment. a blind or blinded experiment is one where thise information that could influence the participants of the experiment are withdrawn from the participants until after the experiment has seen a completion.
In the question, the participants do not know which of the drugs they are being given. They all think they are getting the same thing
Use your knowledge of the definitions of validity, soundness, strength, and cogency to determine which of the following statements are true. Check all that apply. A statement is either valid or invalid. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.
Answer:
The true statements are:
1. A statement is either valid or invalid.
False
2. If an inductive argument is weak, then the argument's premises cannot all be true.
True
3. All valid deductive arguments are equally valid.
True
4. If a deductive argument's premises are not all true, then you know that the argument must be unsound.
True
5. If an inductive argument has true premises and a false conclusion, then the conclusion still could be strong, as long as the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
False
5. An inductive argument cannot be both strong and uncogent.
True
6. Some inductive arguments are stronger than others.
True
7. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound.
True
8. In a cogent inductive argument, the conclusion is probably true.
False
9. It is possible for an inductive argument to be both uncogent and strong.
False
10. If the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, then you know that the argument is sound.
True
11. Some inductive arguments are both strong and weak.
False
12. If a deductive argument is unsound, then the argument's premises must all be false.
True.
13. In a valid deductive argument it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false simultaneously.
True
14. A cogent argument that has a large degree of inductive strength could still have a conclusion that is actually false.
True
Explanation:
A statement is either true or untrue. A statement cannot be valid or invalid. Validity, soundness, strength, and cogency apply to arguments and not to statements. When one makes a valid argument, it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
Please hurry I’m on timed I’ll give you the brainlest if you answer but please make sure it’s right
Fact Pattern:
Peter Protester is a fairly well-known rabble-rouser. His demonstrations have made news across the southwest, and he's been on TV several times. Now, he has had it with the current state of politics. He gathers his group of followers, and they head to downtown Phoenix to make their grievances known. Peter's followers are generally law-abiding, but there are a few in there who have been arrested after turning peaceful protest into vandalism.
After about two hours of chanting and marching, Peter yells, "Alright, we've done the peaceful thing long enough. Now let's take some real action! Let's start breaking some windows now!"
Phoenix Police immediately arrest him.
Meantime, Rachel Reporter is in the KPHO-TV newsroom and gets a call from a police source. The source tells Rachel to take a look at the police report from Peter's arrest. Rachel heads down to the Phoenix Police Records Department and gets a copy of the police report. In it, the arresting officer writes, "This is the same Peter Protester who was convicted of domestic terrorism in 2010."
Rachel believes she has a real scoop on her hands and calls for a live truck to meet her at the scene of the protest. Rachel's live report includes the news of today's arrest. She also quotes the police report, saying Peter was convicted of domestic terrorism in 2010." Rachel did not check with police or try to get ahold of Peter in jail or speak to his lawyer to verify the conviction.
As it turns out, the police report was inaccurate. Peter was never convicted of domestic terrorism.
What charge would prosecutors likely file against Peter and will the case succeed? why?
If Peter sues Rachel, what lawsuit would he likely file and would he succeed? why? Is actual malice required here and is it present? why? Does the fair report privilege apply here to protect Rachel from liability? why?
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
Which of the following is not an advantage for the South?
Widespread hunting skills
Better trained leaders
Greater population
Knowledge of terrain
true or false, first amendment rules don't apply to private companies.
Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
What is Hints colonial parent? Who took them over?
Answer:
in 1763, no British subject on either side of the Atlantic could have foreseen the coming conflicts between the parent country and its North American colonies.
foreseen the coming conflicts between the parent country and its North American colonies. ... In January 1763, Great Britain's national debt was more than 122 million ... Rebellion - led to the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade colonial settlement west ... British leaders also felt the need to tighten control over their empire.
Explanation:
How does the Dr.Guillotine represent the rally cry of the revolution "liberty, equality and fraternity"?
I will give brainliest please answer
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Dr.Guillotine represented the rallying cry of the revolution "liberty, equality and fraternity" in that the Guillotine represented the symbol of harsh punishment to people that had abused the poor people in France.
During the French Revolution, Dr. Joseph-Ignace Guillotin was the French politician that recommended the use of the Guillotine for the death penalty. Let us have a clarification here. Although the device has his name, he was not the inventor of the guillotine. The credit corresponds to a man named Tobias Schmidt.
Dr. Gullotin had this idea on October 10, 1789, considering the Guillotine was a "less painful" way to kill people.
Daria's mother and uncle got into an argument. Daria's father was also angry about the situation. Before the situation became too tense, the three of them sat down and openly discussed the problem, which is an example of a family who uses: A.high conversation orientation. B.low interdependent orientation. C.high ritualistic orientation. D.high conformity orientation. E.low systematic orientation.
Answer:
high conversation orientation
Explanation:
The level and grade of relationship between family members whereby a channel and free mode of communication exists whereby members can give unrestrained, open and free thoughts, feeling and items relating to pressing issues and problems within the family are resolved without fear of oppression or being chastised. In a high conversionation orientation setting all family members are carried along and involved in family decision leading to a more unanimous output on matters concerning the family. In the context above, the ensuing argument was settled amicably through open and free talks and ideas in other to reach a compromise.
In which climate zone is the Yucatan peninsula?
tierra fria
tierra caliente
tierra templada
tierra mediana
Answer: Tropical, so tierra templada would be your answer
Explanation:
What is a define for Rising action and for failing action ?HELP ME PLZ
Answer:
Rising action is where the suspension takes plac. Falling action is where everything starts to get resolved. Ps i am chinese so sorry if my English not good.
Explanation:
Where do most salamanders live?
A Asia
B Europe
C North America
D Australia
Answer:
Your correct anwser is C. North America
Explanation:
i just took the test and got a 100%
Answer:
C
Explanation:
its on edge
what is the meaning of contents of curriculum
All it means is the totality of what is to be taught in a school system.
which of the following is export item from Nepal?
a. cement
b. cashew nuts
c. pashmina
d. palm oil
Answer:
d.cuz I guess sodjsjjzjdkd0
Answer:
d.pashmina
hope it helps
I need a brief on this question.
Should the government collect taxes?
The Louisiana Purchase expanded the boundaries of the United States in which direction?
Answer:
It expanded west of the united states
Explanation:
What was President Woodrow Wilson’s campaign slogan? Why is this ironic?
Answer:
"He kept us out of war."
Explanation:
In the Presidential Election of 1916, President Woodrow Wilson campaign slogan was, "He kept us out of the war." He narrowly won the election and was the Democratic candidate. His slogan meant that America will not enter into World War I in Europe. Ironically, a few months before the United States entered World War I.
How do south and north Korea differ
Answer:
North Korea is in the North and South Korea is in the South
Explanation:
Answer:
The primary distinction between North Korea and South Korea is that North Korea has a socialist regime, whereas South Korea has a constitutional administration. North Korea and South Korea are the two nations on the Korean Peninsula.
Explanation: