Which proportional relationship has the greatest rate of change?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

250 for place  4 for books each.

If they charge 14 per person, 4 of that goes for the books and 10 will be applied to the rental fee.

250/10= 25 people to break even. Any people beyond that  is a profit of 10.00 since the other 4 will still go to the books.

Tell us the value of the variable to solve

The graph is attached btw

Answer:

Bet.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

wait what grade are you in ?

Answer:

0.295

Step-by-step explanation:

you needed to subtract 2.175-1.88=0.295

Answer:

C is your y intercept 3.99b is your slope

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

518

Step-by-step explanation:

P = 2

Q = 8

p3 + 64q

Multiply "p" (which is 2) with 3

Multiply "q" (which is 8) with 8

Add the two numbers you get

And you have you answer

I hope this helps. :)

Answer:

x=-7

Step-by-step explanation:

BRAINLIEST PLS

Step-by-step explanation:

1 can of corn = c

1 can of green beans = b

Marissa-> 4c+8b=7

Bob-> 8c+7b=8.60

form a simultaneous equation:

4c+8b=7

8c+7b=8.60

find a common coefficient, e.g. make the number of cans of corn that Marissa has, equal to the number of cans of corn that Bob has, so you would multiply the top equation by 2, so both people have 8 cans of corn

8c+16b=14

8c+7b=8.60

now you can cancel out the cans of corn, and subtract the second equation from the first one, so you would get:

16b-7b=9b

14-8.60= 5.4

so, 9b=5.4, and b= 0.6

so 1 can of green beans would cost $0.60

The statement that best explains why Maricella's strategy is incorrect based on the distribution property and order of operation is option A.

Recall:

In the equation given, to solve for x, Maricella needs to apply the distribution property by using -2 to multiply each term in (3x - 4) and using +3 to multiply every term in (x + 1).

The next step will now be addition and subtraction of like terms.

Therefore, the statement that best explains why Maricella's strategy is incorrect based on the distribution property and order of operation is option A.

Learn more about distribution property on:

https://brainly.com/question/11279503

Answer:

A!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

edge2022

Answer:

-19

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It's not similar :)

hope this helps<3

The triangles are not similar because the sides are not proportional.

Similar triangles are those triangles which has the same shape but different size.

The length of sides and angles are proportional in similar triangles.

So we know that length of sides are proportional.

If we find the ratio of corresponding sides of the two triangles, then they must be equal to a common value.

We have only the length of two sides of each triangle.

If those sides are proportional, we must have an angle of each triangle to be equal.

Here, the angles formed by the intersecting lines are vertical angles and are thus equal.

Let's look if the sides are proportional.

20 / 36 = 5/9

24 / 42 = 4/7

Sides are not proportional.

Hence the given triangles are not similar.

Learn more about Similar Triangles here :

https://brainly.com/question/14926756

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

domains:-6,-4,-1,4

Range:5,3,0,3

will you include the image of the line so i can answer the rest of the question?

Answer: Water: The battle between the clean vs the dirty :P

Step-by-step explanation:

It's B!!!           ik cuz i ggogled it lol

Answer:

I think the answer is B. $92

Step-by-step explanation:

$80 time (115 on calculator will give you 9200

Answer:

849.7m2

Step-by-step explanation:

L= length

SA = surface area

volume = L x L x L

1700= L x L x L

find cube root

=11.93m

round off to 1 dp

=11.9m

SA= 6( L x L)

     = 6( 11.9 x 11.9)

       =6(141.61)

       =849.66m2

round off to 1 dp

=849.7m2

Answer:

i think its the 3erd one... im giveing a estimate because of that one dude. lol

Step-by-step explanation:

im so so so so sorry if its wrong!!!

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\sf 2x-y-3=0\dots \dots (1)[/tex]

[tex]\sf 3x+4y=65 \\ \implies\sf 3x+4y-65=0 \dots\dots(2)[/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 2x-y-3=0 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 2x-3=y [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf y=2x-3 \dots\dots(3)[/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 3x+4y-65=0 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 3x +4 (2x-3)-65=0 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 3x+8x-12-65=0 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 11x-77=0 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf 11x=77 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf x={\dfrac {77}{11}}[/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf x=7 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf y=2x-3 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf y=2 (7)-3 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf y=14-3 [/tex]

[tex]{:}\longrightarrow[/tex][tex]\sf y=11 [/tex]

[tex]\therefore[/tex][tex]{\underline{\boxed{\bf (x,y)=(7,11)}}}[/tex]

Answer:

I am sorry what are you showing

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

formula for inverse proportion is y = [tex]\frac{k}{x}[/tex]

k is the constant of probability

to find k,

y is 12, x is 6

12 = [tex]\frac{k}{6}[/tex]

so x = 12 × 6

∴ k is 72

so y = [tex]\frac{72}{8}[/tex]

∴ y is 9

Answer:

I believe the first is arithmetic because it has a difference Of 6 between each number. The second is geometric because each number is divided by 4 to get the next number

Step-by-step explanation:

5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35. (Difference of 6)

4000, 1000, 250, 62.5, 15.62, 3.90 (divide by 4)

As for the formulas I’m not sure, but I I would guess something like

an=6n-1

an=n/4

I am not sure about the formulas though

Answer:

7x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2(2x+8)

=x+4

x+4+6x

=7x+4

PLS GIVE BRAINLIEST

Answer:

7x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2(2x+8)+6x

divide by 2 or multiply 1/2 it equals the same anyway

x+4+6x

add like terms

7x+4

Answer: Answer: The answer should be x = -1. Hope this helps!

Answer:

-48-22i

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The perimeter of the new TV is approximately  95.32 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonal dimension of the original TV = 32 inches

The perimeter of the original TV = 87.16 inches

The diagonal dimension of the new TV = 70 inches

The perimeter of the new TV = 87.16 inches

For the original TV, we have;

Let w be the width of the original TV and l be the length of the original TV, we have;

2·w + 2·l = 87.16

√(w² + l²) = 32

Therefore, we have;

32² = w² + l²

w = (87.16 - 2·l)/2

w = 43.58 - l

32² = l² + (43.58 - l)²

l² + (43.58 - l)² - 32² = 0

l² + 43.58² - 2 × 43.85 × l + l² - 32² = 0

2·l² - 87.16·l + 875.2164 = 0

By the quadratic formula, we have;

l = (87.16 ± √((-87.16)² - 4×2 × 875.2164))/(2 × 2)

Therefore, l = 27.89 inches or l = 15.69

Therefore, w = (87.16 - 2·l)/2 = (87.16 - 2× 27.89)/2 = 15.69

or w = (87.16 - 2× 15.69)/2 = 27.89

Whereby the ratio of the width to the length of the original TV and the new TV are the same, we have;

15.69/27.89

w₂/l₂ for the new TV = 15.69/27.89

∴ w₂ = l₂ × 15.69/27.89

w₂² + l₂² = 70²

∴ (l₂ × 15.69/27.89)² + l₂² = 70²

l₂² × (15.69/27.89)² + l₂² = 70²

l₂²((15.69/27.89)² + 1) = 70²

l₂² = 70²/((15.69/27.89)² + 1) = 3722.04

l₂ = √(3722.04) ≈ 61.0

w₂ = l₂ × 15.69/27.89 = 61 × 15.69/27.89 ≈ 34.32

Therefore;

The perimeter of the new TV = 34.32 + 61 = 95.32 inches.

In this exercise we have to use the knowledge and information given to calculate the perimeter that will correspond to:

The perimeter of the new TV is approximately  95.32 inches

So the data for this exercise is from:

Let w be the width of the original TV and l be the length of the original TV, we have;

[tex]2*(w) + 2*(l) = 87.16\\\sqrt{(w^2 + l^2)} = 32[/tex]

Therefore, we have:

[tex]32^2 = w^2 + l^2\\w = (87.16 - 2*l)/2\\w = 43.58 - l\\32^2 = l^2 + (43.58 - l)^2\\l^2 + (43.58 - l)^2 - 32^2 = 0\\l^2 + 43.58^2 - (2 * 43.85 * l)+ l^2 - 32^2 = 0\\(2)*(l)^2 - 87.16*l + 875.2164 = 0[/tex]

By the quadratic formula, we have;

[tex]l = (87.16 +/- \sqrt{((-87.16)^2 - 4*2 * 875.2164))/(2 * 2)} )[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]w = (87.16 - (2)*(l))/2 = (87.16 - 2* 27.89)/2 = 15.69\\w = (87.16 - 2* 15.69)/2 = 27.89[/tex]

Whereby the ratio of the width to the length of the original TV and the new TV are the same, we have;

w₂/l₂ for the new TV = [tex]15.69/27.89[/tex]

[tex]w_2 = (l_2)* (15.69/27.89)\\w_2^2 + l_2^2 = 70^2\\(l_2 *15.69/27.89)^2 + l^2_2 = 70^2\\l^2_2 * (15.69/27.89)^2 + l^2_2 = 70^2\\l^2_2((15.69/27.89)^2 + 1) = 70^2\\l^2_2 = 70^2/((15.69/27.89)^2 + 1) = 3722.04\\l_2 = \sqrt{(3722.04)} = 61.0\\w_2= l_2 * 15.69/27.89 = 61 * 15.69/27.89 = 34.32\\[/tex]  

The perimeter of the new TV :

[tex]P = 34.32 + 61 = 95.32[/tex]

See more about perimeter at brainly.com/question/6465134

Answer:

There wouldn't be a fraction form because its a whole number which is 9

Answer:

Dgfyb

Step-by-step explanation: