Answer:
A
Explanation:
NY Maryland all that good stuff is in the north :)
According to Esherick, what two different opinions do historians have about the "sectarian" nature of the Boxers' organization?
Explanation:
The two important perspectives connected to the Boxers institution's divisive character seem to have been:
They remained resistant to China's established regime.
This was due to their earlier affiliation with the culture of Lotus.
Answer:
The following were the two main points of view regarding the sectarianism of the Boxers organization: Initially, the Boxers were an anti-Qing movement. They were opposed to China's current government. This was related to their early involvement with the Lotus society. By the 1890s, they had become Qing supporters. The Boxers, on the other hand, maintained their opposition to the foreigners. The second viewpoint held that the Boxers were recruited by the Qing as a military force to aid in the fight against the foreigners.
Explanation:
I just did the assignment.
Can someone tell me notes on The March Revolution
do you know what I can put here
What makes a good interpretation in history?
Answer:
You should know more about the history you pick for your interpretaion and you must really understand about the history you want to interpret and the most important is to know and do your best for it.
Explanation:
do know... sana mka help
How are the tools found at Gona
described? For what tasks were
the tools likely used?
Answer:
Gona is located in Ethiopia near the Awash River. The Oldowan tools which are the oldest known tools were found in Gona. Oldowan tools were used as choppers with heavy-duty scrapers and edged cores.
Oldowan tools were mostly used for primitive cutting and ancestors use them for hunting animals or cutting meat, cutting plants, or woodworking.
The Texas Bill of Rights promises citizens the right to peacefully assemble. This means that
citizens are allowed to overthrow the government if it is unfit.
citizens are allowed to overthrow the government if it is unfit.
people can join together and express their common interests.
people can join together and express their common interests.
people have the right to practice a religion of choice.
people have the right to practice a religion of choice.
citizens are at liberty to write or publish their opinions.
citizens are at liberty to write or publish their opinions.
Answer: People can join together and express their common interests.
Explanation: Please give me brainliest if you can!
Do you think polls have a positive, negative or neutral effect on the democratic process? Explain your answer using evidence (find a poll).
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
If you ask us to find any poll, we are going to choose the polls that made the news on CNN one week before the past US elections of November 2020.
I think polls have a neutral effect on the democratic process in United States politics.
It is clear that initially, polls were used to know the opinion of voters before an election. Even before, when the political party is trying to select a candidate, the poll can tell campaign managers about the favorable or not opinion voters have about one specific candidate.
Next, polls have used recently as a competitive advantage for candidates in that the campaign teams make the poll information public through news media and they say that its candidate is at the top of the public preferences. The real message they are trying to say is that as its candidate is at the top, you should consider voting for the right gut that is at the top of the preferences.
However, in the two last elections, polls have been far from reality. In the 2016 US election, most polls favored Hillary Clinton by far, and she lost the election. In the recent election, most polls -including the ones at CNN- predicted an easy victory for Bidden, and that did not happen.
What body of water did the Tacoma Narrows Bridge cross?
Lake Erie
The Mississippi River
The Pacific Ocean
Puget Sound
Answer:
Puget Sound
Explanation:
Have a good time!
Sumuari were kept very wealthy so that they would remain loyal to there nobels true or false?
Answer:
False, they had some sort of code of honor, I don't remember the name, it's been some time
Which country colonized the region that is now New Mexico?
A) France
B) Spain
C) England
Answer:
b. spain
Explanation:
new mexico is a spanish speaking state and was colonized by spain
How did US leaders respond to the threat of Soviet Expansion in
Europe?
Answer:
Explanation:
World War II convinced U.S. leaders that the policies of isolationism and appeasement had been mistakes. To counter the growing Soviet threat, they sought new ways to keep the U.S. safe and protect its interests abroad.
PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLSSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For this task you will be talking from the viewpoint of a great Souix leader. Tonight, you will speak with your people on your thoughts (as a leader of the tribe) on the new people (The Corps.) that came in to your village today. How do you feel about these outsiders coming into your homeland? Do you trust them? How do you interpret the "Peace Medal” that they presented you? Do you consider these strangers to be friends or foes, and why? What will you do next?
Answer:
friends i think well please mark it
Have a great night day afternoon wherever you are :D
Explanation:
8. The 'Lowell System was characterized by..
A. A system of interchangeable parts for factories.
B. The development of cottage industries.
C. An industrial system of mass production.
D. The adoption of labor unions and worker's rights.
Answer:
b is the awnser
Explanation:
2. What does Washington argue is the problem with the national government under the
Articles of Confederation? What must be done to solve the problem in his view
Answer:
Washington feared the current government was so powerless that it would soon dissolve either from deteriorating support of the people or from the fact that states would no longer bother to send representatives to the Confederation Congress.
Explanation:
The reason which Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the Articles of Confederation is:
The government did not have enough power to governThe thing which must be done to solve the problem in his view is:
To make the government have more power to tax the peopleAccording to the given question, we are asked to show the reason which Washington argues is the problem with the national government under the Articles of Confederation
As a result of this, can see that George Washington and some other Americans believed that the Articles of Confederation was weak and did not give the states enough power and would soon crumble.
However, he believed that giving the central government more power such as taxing the people would help solve the problem
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/18377156
Which state only allowed women to vote for school bonds or Texas.
7. Name some other examples from history where individuals have voluntarily given up great
power. Are they easy to find?
There were the other examples from history where individuals have voluntarily given up great power were the dictatorships. There was the common name on the related to the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.
What is history?
History is the study of previous events, as defined by the term. Everything pertaining to human behavior is covered in history. History encompasses a variety of facets, including political, cultural, scientific, religious, person, location, and economic.
According to the history was the famous examples of the voluntarily and the great power into the dictatorships. There was the related on the history are the common names was the situated on the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet. This is the important role play.
As a result, the Indira Gandhi, King Juan Carlos, Pinochet.
Learn more about on history, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3583505
#SPJ5
How did the South feel states' rights work?
Answer:
That makes no sense dude, explain
Are my answers right or wrong or do I need to add an answer
Answer:
ur fine
Explanation:
What significance does the Holocaust have to current world events?
Answer:
One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.
Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.
The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”
One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.
The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.
Explanation:
im a nerd with this stuff.
The events of Salem witch trials and McCarthyism are similar because__?
Answer: People wrongly accused others who, as a result, were convicted with little or no evidence or wrong doing.
What caused the Red Scare and What was the impact the Red Scare on the United States
Answer:
According to a source:
Red Scare Impact The Red Scare was hysteria over the perceived threat posed by Communists in the U.S. during the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, which intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s. (Communists were often referred to as “Reds” for their allegiance to the red Soviet flag.)
Hope this helps!
One of the main reasons of the Red Scare was World War I, which prompted many people to adopt strong patriotic and anti-immigrant sentiments.
The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia sparked fears that foreigners, notably from Russia, Europe, were plotting to topple the US administration.
Even during Great War seen between Ussr And the united Countries, which increased in the 1940s and 1950s, the Red Scare was panic about the potential threat presented by Communism in the The Us.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/21462636?referrer=searchResults
Describe the social classes of Latin America during the revolutions.
Tar pits in Los Angeles contained many varieties of plant and animal fossils.
A. True
B. False
True
thx for points have good night
In what way(s) did the Framers (writers) claim to have already tried in addressing the complaints?
Answer:
In what ways did the framers claim to have already tried in addressing the complaints? They tried to tell the people that they were being ignored. What will change in the colonies as a result of the declaration? The colonists would face hardships, with protests, consequences, and war resulting from this.
Explanation:
I love the Declaration of independence. But hope this helped!
The people were being ignored, they sought to convey. The Founding Fathers assert that they handled the objections by reminding the British of their overstepping of their borders, the reasons the colonies came to America, and by appealing to Britain's sense of justice and goodness.
What did the framers disagree on?They clashed on congressional representation and trade policy both domestically and internationally. The Three-Fifths Compromise, the Connecticut Compromise, and the Compromise on Commerce and Slave Trade.
The American Constitution's creators were forward-thinking individuals. They made our Constitution durable. In addition to addressing the particular issues the country was facing at the moment, their goal was to lay the groundwork for the new country's future stability and direction.
Learn more about the Framers here:
https://brainly.com/question/10781730
#SPJ2
What improvements would you suggest to
the Roman model of government? Why?
Answer:
Regular salary for all government workers + senators.
Explanation:
This would lead to less corruption which destroyed Roman abillity to create defensive forces quickly.
What country did the United States use the tactic of island hopping on?
Answer:
I belive it was japan in WWII
Explanation:
Why did President Jackson support the removal of Native Americans?
1.He hoped to distract attention from the rising economic crisis.
2.He hoped it would weaken the power of the U. S. military.
3.He hoped to gain support from Native American leaders.
4.He hoped to make more land available for white settlement.
Answer
4, He hoped to make more land available for white settlement.
Explanation:
Jackson wanted to spread west to establish American city's and sieze native land.
Why did Jefferson want to buy the Louisiana Territory?
b
He understood the importance of gaining control of the port of New Orleans for shipping and trade.
He needed the land in order to go to war with Spain.
He wanted to strip the Federalists of their power.
He wanted control of the Rocky Mountains.
Od
Answer:
he understood the importance of new orleans
Explanation:
the French had coats.
Answer:
C- to gain control of New Orleans.
Explanation:
McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all out battle.” How did he characterize
the two sides in the “battle”? Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all-out battle.” How did he characterize the two sides in the “battle”?
What Republican Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy did was to confront the American People by accusing that several members of the federal government and the US military had ties with Communists or were Communists.
Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?
I think he was a cruel person with peculiar political ambitions because he did accuse people but never present a valid or serious argument or piece of evidence to support his claims. He only accused people, affecting their public image and reputation. And that was so wrong. However, he scared and alienated many citizens and made the federal government investigate the alleged cases.
What changes in thought and technology Impacted Europe and Asia between 800 C.E. and the seventeenth
century?
pls answer asap
Answer:The period saw major technological advances, including the adoption of gunpowder, the invention of vertical windmills, spectacles, mechanical clocks, and greatly improved water mills, building techniques (Gothic architecture, medieval castles), and agriculture in general (three-field crop rotation).
Explanation: