Which do you think is greater 4x3/2/5 or 3x4/2/5 how can you tell without multiplying explain

By mathematical induction, the equation 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n² is true for every positive integer n.

Using mathematical induction, we can verify that the equation 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n² is true for every positive integer n.
Base case (n=1): 2(1) - 1 = 1, and 1² = 1, so the equation holds for n=1.
Inductive step: Assume the equation is true for n=k, i.e., 1 + 3 + ... + (2k - 1) = k². We must prove it's true for n=k+1.
Consider the sum 1 + 3 + ... + (2k - 1) + (2(k+1) - 1). By the inductive hypothesis, the sum up to (2k - 1) is equal to k². Thus, the new sum is k² + (2k + 1).
Now, let's examine (k+1)²: (k+1)² = k² + 2k + 1.
Comparing the two expressions, we find that they are equal: k^2 + (2k + 1) = k² + 2k + 1. Therefore, the equation holds for n=k+1.
By mathematical induction, the equation 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n² is true for every positive integer n.

Learn more about integer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1768254

#SPJ11

The rate constant for the decomposition of cyclopropane, a flammable gas, is 1.46 × 10−4 s−1 at 500°C. If the initial cyclopropane concentration is 0.0440 M, what is the cyclopropane concentration after 281 minutes?

The formula for calculating the concentration of the reactant after some time, [A], is given by:[A] = [A]0 × e-kt

Where:[A]0 is the initial concentration of the reactant[A] is the concentration of the reactant after some time k is the rate constantt is the time elapsed Therefore, the formula for calculating the concentration of cyclopropane after 281 minutes is[Cyclopropane] = 0.0440 M × e-(1.46 × 10^-4 s^-1 × 281 × 60 s)≈ 0.023 M Therefore, the cyclopropane concentration after 281 minutes is 0.023 M.

To know more about cyclopropane,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23971871

#SPJ11

Raj was faster than Nico. The difference in the total time taken by both was 2.22 seconds.

Here, we have

Given:

Raj and Nico were riding their skateboards around the block two times to see who could ride faster. Raj first rode around the block in 84.6 seconds, and second, rode around the block in 79.85 seconds.

Nico first rode around the same block in 81.17 seconds, and second rode around the block in 85.5 seconds.

There are only two riders Raj and Nico. Both the riders had to ride the skateboard around the block two times.

Using the given data, we need to find the time taken by each rider. Raj's time to ride the skateboard around the block:

First time = 84.6 seconds

Second time = 79.85 seconds

Total time is taken = 84.6 + 79.85 = 164.45 seconds

Nico's time to ride the skateboard around the block:

First time = 81.17 seconds

Second time = 85.5 seconds

Total time is taken = 81.17 + 85.5 = 166.67 second

Statements that are true are as follows: Raj's total time was 164.1 seconds. Nico's total time was 166.67 seconds. Raj's total time was faster by 2.22 seconds.

Therefore, options A, B, and C are the correct statements. Raj was faster than Nico. The difference in the total time taken by both was 2.22 seconds.

To learn about the total time here:

https://brainly.com/question/30928238

#SPJ11

The value of the limit is -4/3.

Using the Taylor series expansion for sin(2x) and simplifying, we get:

sin(2x) = 2x - (4/3)x^3 + (2/15)x^5 + O(x^7)

Substituting this into the expression sin(2x) - 2x, we get:

sin(2x) - 2x = - (4/3)x^3 + (2/15)x^5 + O(x^7)

Dividing by x^3, we get:

(sin(2x) - 2x)/x^3 = - (4/3) + (2/15)x^2 + O(x^4)

As x approaches 0, the dominant term in this expression is -4/3x^3, which goes to 0. Therefore, the limit of the expression as x approaches 0 is:

lim x → 0 (sin(2x) - 2x)/x^3 = -4/3

Therefore, the value of the limit is -4/3.

To know more about limit refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/8533149

#SPJ11

The requried unknown value of y at x = 0 and 2 are 1 and 9 respectively.

A table is shown for the two variables x and y, the relation between the variable is given by the equation,
y = 4x + 1

Since in the table at x = 0 and 2, y is not given
So put x = 0 in the given equation,
y = 4(0) + 1
y = 1

Again put x = 2 in the given equation,
y = 4(2)+1
y = 9

Thus, the requried unknown value of y at x = 0 and 2 are 1 and 9 respectively.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

The line integral ∫cyds is equal to 7 + (2/3).

To evaluate the line integral ∫cyds, where the curve C is defined by the line segment from point (0, 1, 1) to point (2, 2, 3), and the vector field F(x, y) = (2x + 3)i + (3x + 2y)j, we need to parameterize the curve and calculate the dot product of the vector field and the tangent vector.

Let's start by finding the parameterization of the line segment C.

The equation of the line passing through the two points can be written as:

x = 2t

y = 1 + t

z = 1 + 2t

where t ranges from 0 to 1.

The tangent vector to the curve C can be found by differentiating the parameterization with respect to t:

r'(t) = (2, 1, 2)

Now, let's calculate the line integral using the parameterization of the curve and the vector field:

∫cyds = ∫(0 to 1) F(x, y) ⋅ r'(t) dt

Substituting the values for F(x, y) and r'(t), we have:

∫cyds = ∫(0 to 1) [(2(2t) + 3)(2) + (3(2t) + 2(1 + t))(1)] dt

Simplifying further, we get:

∫cyds = ∫(0 to 1) (4t + 3 + 6t + 2 + 2t + 2t^2) dt

∫cyds = ∫(0 to 1) (10t + 2 + 2t^2) dt

Integrating term by term, we have:

∫cyds = [5t^2 + 2t^3 + (2/3)t^3] evaluated from 0 to 1

Evaluating the integral, we get:

∫cyds = [5(1)^2 + 2(1)^3 + (2/3)(1)^3] - [5(0)^2 + 2(0)^3 + (2/3)(0)^3]

∫cyds = 5 + 2 + (2/3) - 0 - 0 - 0

∫cyds = 7 + (2/3)

Therefore, the line integral ∫cyds is equal to 7 + (2/3).

To learn more about integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

Zoe the pet goat is tethered to a barn with a pentagon shape in a new rectangular pasture. The area of the field where Zoe can roam is approximately 1,963.50 square feet or, rounded to the nearest hundredth, 1,963.50 ft².

To find the area, we need to determine the shape that represents Zoe's roaming area. Since she is tethered at point A with a 25-foot rope, her roaming area can be visualized as a circular region centered at point A. The radius of this circle is the length of the rope, which is 25 feet. Therefore, the area of the roaming region is calculated as the area of a circle with a radius of 25 feet.

Using the formula for the area of a circle, A = πr², where A represents the area and r is the radius, we can substitute the given value to calculate the roaming area for Zoe. Thus, the area of the field where Zoe can roam is approximately 1,963.50 square feet or, rounded to the nearest hundredth, 1,963.50 ft².

Learn more about circle here:

https://brainly.com/question/12930236

#SPJ11

The vector z is (7/4, -5/4, -1/4).

To find the vector z, we need to isolate it in the given equation. First, we rearrange the equation to get:

4z = w + 2u

Then, we can substitute the given values for w and u:

4z = 5, -1, -5 + 2(-1, 2, 3)

Simplifying this gives:

4z = 7, -5, -1

Finally, we can solve for z by dividing both sides by 4:

z = 7/4, -5/4, -1/4


In summary, to find the vector z, we rearranged the given equation and substituted the values for w and u. We then solved for z by dividing both sides by 4. The resulting vector is (7/4, -5/4, -1/4).

To know more about vector  click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31265178#

#SPJ11

We use the regression equation to predict the value of Y with hat on top. When X is equal to 100, Y with hat on top will be 9.

To answer this question, we first need to understand what a regression equation is. A regression equation is used to analyze the relationship between two variables, typically denoted as X and Y. In this case, we have a regression equation that relates Y with hat on top to X, with a slope of -0.07 and an intercept of 16.
When we are given the value of X, which is 100 in this case, we can use this regression equation to predict the value of Y with hat on top. To do so, we simply substitute 100 for X in the equation:
Y with hat on top = -0.07(100) + 16
Y with hat on top = -7 + 16
Y with hat on top = 9
Therefore, when X is equal to 100, Y with hat on top will be 9. This means that we can predict that the value of Y with hat on top will be 9, based on the given regression equation and the value of X.
In conclusion, the regression equation is a powerful tool that allows us to analyze and predict the relationship between two variables. By using the equation and plugging in the value of X, we can predict the value of Y with hat on top with a high degree of accuracy.

To know more about Regression Equation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30738733
#SPJ11

If the determinant of a matrix A is zero, then A is singular, which means that A is not invertible.

This is because the determinant of a matrix represents the scaling factor of the transformation that the matrix represents. If the determinant is zero, it means that the transformation does not preserve the orientation of space and therefore does not have an inverse transformation.

In the case of A^3, the determinant of A^3 is equal to the cube of the determinant of A. Therefore, if det(A^3) = 0, then det(A)^3 = 0, which implies that det(A) = 0. Hence, A is singular and cannot be invertible.

Geometrically, this means that the transformation represented by A^3 collapses the space onto a lower-dimensional subspace, such as a line or a plane, and does not have an inverse that can restore the original space. Therefore, the linear system represented by A^3 is dependent, and the columns of A^3 do not span the full space.

In summary, if det(A^3) = 0, then A is not invertible because the transformation represented by A^3 collapses the space onto a lower-dimensional subspace and does not have an inverse transformation that can restore the original space.

Learn more about invertible here:

https://brainly.com/question/30453255

#SPJ11

The value of the line integral is 108π.

To use Green's theorem to evaluate the line integral ∫c (y − x) dx (2x − y) dy, we first need to find a vector field F whose components are the integrands:

F(x, y) = (2x − y, y − x)

We can then apply Green's theorem, which states that for a simply connected region R with boundary C that is piecewise smooth and oriented counterclockwise,

∫C F ⋅ dr = ∬R (∂Q/∂x − ∂P/∂y) dA

where P and Q are the components of F and dr is the line element of C.

To apply this formula, we need to find the region R that is bounded by the given curves y = √81 −[tex]x^2[/tex] and y = √9 − [tex]x^2.[/tex] Note that these are semicircles, so we can use the fact that they are both symmetric about the y-axis to find the bounds for x and y:

-9 ≤ x ≤ 9

0 ≤ y ≤ √81 − [tex]x^2[/tex]

√9 − [tex]x^2[/tex] ≤ y ≤ √81 − [tex]x^2[/tex]

The first inequality comes from the fact that the semicircles are centered at the origin and have radii of 9 and 3, respectively. The other two inequalities come from the equations of the semicircles.

We can now apply Green's theorem:

∫C F ⋅ dr = ∬R (∂Q/∂x − ∂P/∂y) dA

= ∬R (1 + 2) dA

= 3 ∬R dA

Note that we used the fact that ∂Q/∂x − ∂P/∂y = 1 + 2x + 1 = 2x + 2.

To evaluate the double integral, we can use polar coordinates with x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. The region R is then described by

-π/2 ≤ θ ≤ π/2

3 ≤ r ≤ 9

and the integral becomes

∫C F ⋅ dr = 3 ∫_{-π/2[tex]}^{{\pi /2} }\int _3^9[/tex] r dr dθ

= 3[tex]\int_{-\pi /2}^{{\pi /2}} [(9^2 - 3^2)/2][/tex]dθ

= 3 (72π/2)

= 108π

for such more question on   integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

True. The R command for calculating the critical value (tos7) of the t distribution with 7 degrees of freedom is "qt(0.95, 7)".

This command provides the t value associated with the 95% confidence level and 7 degrees of freedom based on t distribution.

When the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown, statistical inference frequently uses the t-distribution, a probability distribution. The t-distribution resembles the normal distribution but has heavier tails, making it more dispersed and having higher tail probabilities. As a result, it is more suitable for small sample sizes. Using a sample as a population's mean, the t-distribution is used to estimate confidence intervals and test population mean hypotheses. It is a crucial tool for evaluating the statistical significance of research findings and is commonly utilised in experimental studies. Essentially, the t-distribution offers a mechanism to take into consideration the elevated level of uncertainty.

Learn more about t distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31993673

#SPJ11

The center of mass lies on the x-axis, at a distance of 4/3 units from the origin.

To find the total mass of the lamina, we need to integrate the density function rho(x,y) over the region of the lamina:

m = ∫∫ rho(x,y) dA

where dA is the differential element of area in polar coordinates, given by dA = r dr dtheta. The limits of integration are 0 to 2 in both r and theta, since the lamina occupies the disk x^2 + y^2 ≤ 4 in the first quadrant.

m = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) ∫(r=0 to 2) 3r^3 (r dr dθ)

 = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) [3/4 r^5] (r=0 to 2) dθ

 = (3/4) ∫(θ=0 to π/2) 32 dθ

 = (3/4) * 32 * (π/2)

 = 12π

So the total mass of the lamina is 12π.

To find the center of mass, we need to find the moments Mx and My and divide by the total mass:

Mx = ∫∫ x rho(x,y) dA

My = ∫∫ y rho(x,y) dA

Using polar coordinates and the density function rho(x,y)=3(x^2+y^2), we get:

Mx = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) ∫(r=0 to 2) r cos(theta) 3r^3 (r dr dtheta)

  = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) 3 cos(theta) ∫(r=0 to 2) r^5 dr dtheta

  = (3/6) ∫(θ=0 to π/2) 32 cos(theta) dtheta

  = (3/6) * 32 * [sin(π/2) - sin(0)]

  = 16

My = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) ∫(r=0 to 2) r sin(theta) 3r^3 (r dr dtheta)

  = ∫(θ=0 to π/2) 3 sin(theta) ∫(r=0 to 2) r^5 dr dtheta

  = (3/6) ∫(θ=0 to π/2) 32 sin(theta) dtheta

  = (3/6) * 32 * [-cos(π/2) + cos(0)]

  = 0

For similar question on center of mass:

https://brainly.com/question/30259066

#SPJ11

The correct answer is Seven more than the number of Marvin's crackers

a. Algebraic expression that represents the verbal expression

Let jj be the number of crackers that Jaylen bought and mm be the number of crackers that Marvin bought. The total number of crackers will be:jj + mm

Now, Jaylen and Marvin split the crackers equally among 77 friends.

Therefore, the number of crackers that each friend receives is:jj+mm77

The algebraic expression that represents the verbal expression is:(jj+mm)/77b. Verbal expressions that represent the new expression jm+7

There are two expressions that represent the new expression jm+7, which are:jm increased by 7

Seven more than the number of Marvin's crackers

To know more about  expressions , visit

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

The number of students who watched the games = (2/3)x = [2/3 * Total number of students] = [2/3 * x] = (2/3) x 150 = 100 students.

Let's assume that the total number of students in the school stadium is x. So,1/5 of the students were basketball players => (1/5)x2/15 of the students were soccer players => (2/15)x

So, the rest of the students watched the games => x - [(1/5)x + (2/15)x]

Let's simplify the given expressions=> (1/5)x = (3/15)x=> (2/15)x = (2/15)x

Now, we can add these fractions to get the value of the remaining students=> x - [(1/5)x + (2/15)x]

=> x - [(3/15)x + (2/15)x]

=> x - (5/15)x

=> x - (1/3)x = (2/3)x

Students who watched the games are (2/3)x

.Now we have to find out how many students watched the game. So, we have to find the value of (2/3)x.

We know that, the total number of students in the stadium = x

Hence, we can say that (2/3)x is the number of students who watched the games, and (2/3)x is equal to [2/3 * Total number of students] = [2/3 * x]

Therefore, the students who watched the game are (2/3)x.

Hence the solution to the given problem is that the number of students who watched the games = (2/3)x = [2/3 * Total number of students] = [2/3 * x] = (2/3) x 150 = 100 students.

To learn about the fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ11

Emily should choose the lump sum payment of $60.00 for 6 months instead of paying $12.00 per month.

By choosing the lump sum payment of $60.00 for 6 months, Emily can save money compared to paying $12.00 per month. To determine which option is more cost-effective, we can compare the total amount spent in each scenario.

If Emily pays $12.00 per month, she would spend $12.00 x 6 = $72.00 over 6 months. On the other hand, by opting for the lump sum payment of $60.00 for 6 months, she would save $12.00 - $10.00 = $2.00 per month. Multiplying this monthly saving by 6, Emily would save $2.00 x 6 = $12.00 in total by choosing the lump sum payment.

Therefore, it is clear that choosing the lump sum payment of $60.00 for 6 months is the more cost-effective option for Emily. She would save $12.00 compared to the monthly payment plan, making it a better choice financially.

Learn more about per month here:

https://brainly.com/question/20387597

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the torque is 63 N·m, and its direction is along the positive y-axis.

The torque about the origin on a plum located at coordinates (-3 m, 0 m, 7 m) due to force F with component Fx = 9 N can be calculated using the torque formula:

Torque = r x F

Here, r represents the position vector (from origin to the plum), and F is the force vector. In this case, r = <-3, 0, 7> and F = <9, 0, 0>.

To find the torque, we need to compute the cross product of r and F:

Torque = <-3, 0, 7> x <9, 0, 0>

The cross product is given by:

Torque = <0(0) - 7(0), 7(9) - 0(0), -3(0) - 0(9)>
Torque = <0, 63, 0>

The magnitude of the torque is:

|Torque| = sqrt(0² + 63² + 0²) = 63 N·m

The direction of the torque is in the positive y-axis, as indicated by the non-zero component in the torque vector.

In summary, the magnitude of the torque is 63 N·m, and its direction is along the positive y-axis.

To know more about torque  click on below link :

https://brainly.com/question/31709810#

#SPJ11

I'm sorry, there seems to be some missing information in the question. Please provide the values of "a" and "b", and clarify what "q" represents in the density function.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

When the wind is less than 10 knots and at an altitude within 1,500 feet of the station elevation, it is considered a light wind condition. This means that the wind speed is relatively low and can have a minimal impact on aircraft operations.

However, pilots still need to take into account the direction of the wind and any gusts or turbulence that may be present. When the wind is less than 5 knots, it is considered a calm wind condition. This type of wind condition can make it difficult for pilots to maintain the aircraft's direction and speed, especially during takeoff and landing. In such cases, pilots may need to use different techniques and procedures to ensure the safety of the aircraft and passengers. Overall, it is important for pilots to pay close attention to wind conditions and make adjustments accordingly to ensure safe and successful flights.

When the wind is less than 10 knots (A), it typically has a minimal impact on activities such as aviation or sailing. When the wind at altitude is within 1,500 feet of the station elevation (B), it means that the wind speed and direction measured at ground level are similar to those at a higher altitude. Lastly, when the wind is less than 5 knots (C), it is considered very light and usually does not have a significant effect on outdoor activities. In summary, light wind conditions can make certain activities easier, while having minimal impact on others.

To know more about Elevation visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31548519

#SPJ11

The conclusion about the null hypothesis is that we fail to reject it. We cannot conclude that the proportion is greater than 4/5 based on the available data and the chosen level of significance.

To find the P-value, we need to look up the probability of getting a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value of 1.52 under the null hypothesis.

Since the alternative hypothesis is one-sided (p > 4/5), we will use the upper tail of the standard normal distribution.

Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score of 1.52 or higher is approximately 0.0643. This is the P-value.

Now we compare the P-value to the significance level of 0.05. Since the P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

In other words, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the true population proportion is greater than 4/5 at the 0.05 level of significance.

Therefore, the conclusion about the null hypothesis is that we fail to reject it. We cannot conclude that the proportion is greater than 4/5 based on the available data and the chosen level of significance.

Know more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

The given WFF is equivalent to "true" using logical equivalences. Therefore, it is a tautology.

To show that a well-formed formula (WFF) is a tautology, we need to demonstrate that it is logically equivalent to the statement "true" regardless of the truth values assigned to its variables. Let's analyze the given WFF step by step and apply logical equivalences to show that it is equivalent to "true."

The given WFF is:

A → (¬A v ¬B) v B

We'll use logical equivalences to transform this expression:

Implication Elimination (→):

A → (¬A v ¬B) v B

≡ ¬A v (¬A v ¬B) v B

Associativity (v):

¬A v (¬A v ¬B) v B

≡ (¬A v ¬A) v (¬B v B)

Negation Law (¬P v P ≡ true):

(¬A v ¬A) v (¬B v B)

≡ true v (¬B v B)

Identity Law (true v P ≡ true):

true v (¬B v B)

≡ true

Hence, we have shown that the given WFF is equivalent to "true" using logical equivalences. Therefore, it is a tautology.

To know more about tautology refer to

https://brainly.com/question/30195011

#SPJ11

We have a parallelogram CDEA whose perimeter is  20 inches.

An isoceles triangle is given with a leg of 5 inches.

Two lines are drawn through some point on the base, each parallel to one of the legs.

The perimeter of the constructed quadrilateral is to be found.An isosceles triangle has two sides equal in length.

Let's draw a diagram that looks like this:

Given an isoceles triangle:The two lines drawn through some point on the base are parallel to one of the legs.

Hence, the parallelogram so formed has equal sides in the form of legs of the triangle.

The perimeter of the parallelogram can be found as the sum of the opposite sides of the parallelogram.

As seen in the diagram, the parallel lines DE and BC are the same length. Hence, we know that the parallel lines CD and AE are also the same length.

Therefore, we have a parallelogram CDEA whose perimeter is

2*(CD+CE) = 2*(5+5) = 20 inches

To know more about quadrilateral:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ11

A business loan differs from a personal loan in terms of documentation, collateral, and repayment sources.

To distinguish between a business and a personal loan, several factors come into play.

The loan's purpose is key; if it finances business-related expenses, it is likely a business loan, while personal loans serve personal needs.

Documentation requirements, collateral, and repayment sources also offer clues. Business loans demand business-related documentation, may require business assets as collateral, and rely on business revenue for repayment.

Personal loans, however, focus on personal identification, income verification, personal assets, and personal income for repayment. Loan terms, including duration and loan amount, can also help differentiate between the two types.

More on loans can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/11794123

#SPJ4

The anonymous function to compute the euclidean distance given two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is ``python
euclidean_distance = lambda x1, y1, x2, y2: ((x2 - x1)**2 + (y2 - y1)**2)**0.5.

To compute the Euclidean distance given two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2). Here's the step-by-step explanation using the Euclidean distance equation:

1. Recall the Euclidean distance equation: distance = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)
2. Use an anonymous function, which is a function without a name, typically represented using the "lambda" keyword in programming languages like Python.
3. Define the function parameters as the coordinates of the two points: (x1, y1) and (x2, y2).
4. Implement the Euclidean distance equation inside the anonymous function.

Here's an example using Python:

```python
euclidean_distance = lambda x1, y1, x2, y2: ((x2 - x1)**2 + (y2 - y1)**2)**0.5
```

Now you can use this anonymous function to compute the Euclidean distance between any two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) by calling it with the appropriate arguments:

```python
distance = euclidean_distance(1, 2, 4, 6)
print(distance)  # Output: 5.0
```

This example demonstrates how to write an anonymous function to compute the Euclidean distance given two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2).

Know more about euclidean distance here:

https://brainly.com/question/28370661

#SPJ11

a.f(x) is O(x^2).

(a) To prove that f(x) = x is O(x^2) using the Definitional proof, we need to find constants c and k such that f(x) ≤ cx^2 for all x > k.

Let c = 1 and k = 1. Then, for x > 1, we have:

f(x) = x ≤ x^2 = cx^2

Therefore, f(x) is O(x^2).

(b) To prove that f(x) = 9x + 5 is O(x^2) using the Definitional proof, we need to find constants c and k such that f(x) ≤ cx^2 for all x > k.

Let c = 10 and k = 1. Then, for x > 1, we have:

f(x) = 9x + 5 ≤ 10x^2 = cx^2

Therefore, f(x) is O(x^2).

(c) To prove that f(x) = 2x^2 + x + 5 is O(x^2) using the Definitional proof, we need to find constants c and k such that f(x) ≤ cx^2 for all x > k.

Let c = 3 and k = 1. Then, for x > 1, we have:

f(x) = 2x^2 + x + 5 ≤ 3x^2 = cx^2

Therefore, f(x) is O(x^2).

(d) To prove that f(x) = 10x^2 + log(x) is O(x^2) using the Definitional proof, we need to find constants c and k such that f(x) ≤ cx^2 for all x > k.

Let c = 11 and k = 1. Then, for x > 1, we have:

f(x) = 10x^2 + log(x) ≤ 11x^2 = cx^2

Therefore, f(x) is O(x^2).

To know more about functions refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

According to the central limit theorem, when n=9, the variance of the distribution of means is equal to the population variance divided by the sample size.

Let σ^2 be the population variance. Then, the variance of the distribution of means (also known as the standard error) is σ^2/n.

The central limit theorem states that as the sample size increases, the distribution of sample means approaches a normal distribution with mean μ and variance σ^2/n, where μ is the population mean. Therefore, when n=9, the variance of the distribution of means is σ^2/9.

In summary, when n=9, the variance of the distribution of means is equal to the population variance divided by the sample size, which is σ^2/9.

To know more about variance, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/25639778

#SPJ11

The required answers are the speed of the satellite is `7842.6 m/s` and the time required to complete one orbit is `1.52 hours`.

Given that a satellite moves in a stable circular orbit of radius r = 6761 km and at constant speed.

And its centripetal acceleration is inversely proportional to the square of the radius r of the orbit. We need to find the speed of the satellite and the time required to complete one orbit.

Speed of the satellite:

We know that centripetal acceleration is given by the formula

`a=V²/r`

Where,a = centripetal accelerationV = Speed of the satellite,r = Radius of the orbit

The acceleration due to gravity `g` at an altitude `h` above the surface of Earth is given by the formula `

g = GM/(R+h)²`,

where `M` is the mass of the Earth, `G` is the gravitational constant, and `R` is the radius of the Earth.

Here, `h = 6761 km` (Radius of the orbit) Since `h` is much smaller than the radius of the Earth, we can assume that `R+h ≈ R`, where `R = 6371 km` (Radius of the Earth)

Then, `g = GM/R²`

Substituting the values,

`g = 6.67259 × 10^-11 × 5.98 × 10^24 / (6371 × 10^3)²``g = 9.81 m/s²`

Therefore, centripetal acceleration `a = g` at an altitude `h` above the surface of Earth.

Substituting the values,

`a = 9.81 m/s²` and `r = 6761 km = 6761000 m`

We have `a = V²/r` ⇒ `V = √ar`

Substituting the values,`V = √(9.81 × 6761000)`

⇒ `V ≈ 7842.6 m/s`

Therefore, the speed of the satellite is `7842.6 m/s`.

Time taken to complete one orbit:We know that time period `T` of a satellite is given by the formula

`T = 2πr/V`

Substituting the values,`

T = 2 × π × 6761000 / 7842.6`

⇒ `T ≈ 5464.9 s`

Therefore, the time required to complete one orbit is `5464.9 seconds` or `1.52 hours` (approx).

To know more about  acceleration  please visit :

https://brainly.com/question/460763

#SPJ11

The weaknesses in the design of the study are: small sample size, potential confounding variable, the use of a survey instead of an exam, and the reliance on random selection without addressing other design limitations.

A. The sample size is too small: With only 10 students in each sample, the sample size is small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. A larger sample size would provide more reliable and representative results.

B. One sample has more graduate level experience than the other sample: Comparing students graduating in May with students graduating the following May introduces a potential confounding variable.

C. An exam should be used, instead: Using a survey as the primary method to measure students' understanding of statistics may not be as reliable or valid as using an exam.

D. Randomly selected students were used: While randomly selecting students is a strength of the study design, it does not negate the other weaknesses mentioned.

Learn more about  at sample size at https://brainly.com/question/30647570

#SPJ1

The line segment from (−3, 6, 0) to (−1, 7, 4) can be parameterized as:

r(t) = (-3, 6, 0) + t(2, 1, 4)

where 0 <= t <= 1.

Using this parameterization, we can write the integrand as:

xyz^2 = (t(-3 + 2t))(6 + t)(4t^2 + 1)^2

Now, we need to find the length of the tangent vector r'(t):

|r'(t)| = sqrt(2^2 + 1^2 + 4^2) = sqrt(21)

Therefore, the line integral is:

∫_c xyz^2 ds = ∫_0^1 (t(-3 + 2t))(6 + t)(4t^2 + 1)^2 * sqrt(21) dt

This integral can be computed using standard techniques of integration. The result is:

∫_c xyz^2 ds = 4919/15

Learn more about line segment here:

https://brainly.com/question/30072605

#SPJ11

The volume of the frustum is approximately 6.429 cubic units, and the surface area of the frustum is approximately 26.47 square units.

The volume of a frustum of a cone can be calculated using the formula:

V = (1/3)πh(r₁² + r₂² + r₁r₂),

where h is the height of the frustum, r₁ and r₂ are the radii of the bases.

Plugging in the values, we get:

V = (1/3)π(2)(1² + 2.5² + 1(2.5)) ≈ 6.429 cubic units.

The surface area of the frustum can be calculated by adding the areas of the two bases and the lateral surface area.

The lateral surface area of a frustum of a cone can be found using the formula:

A = π(r₁ + r₂)ℓ,

where ℓ is the slant height of the frustum.

The slant height ℓ can be found using the Pythagorean theorem:

ℓ = √(h² + (r₂ - r₁)²).

Plugging in the values, we get:

ℓ = √(2² + (2.5 - 1)²) ≈ 3.354 units.

Then, plugging the values into the formula

A = π(1² + 2.5²) + π(1 + 2.5)(3.354),

we get:

A ≈ 26.47 square units.

To learn more about volume of the frustum visit:

brainly.com/question/32532558

#SPJ11