Where can the the commas go?

They believed being wealthy translated to living the American dream. Gatsby, Myrtle, and Daisy failed to live the American dream due to lack of knowledge. The wrong factors motivate most people in search of the American dream. Myrtle was driven by the desire to lead a wealthy and luxurious life.

Answer:

Gatsby is a clear embodiment of the American Dream: he was born poor and rose to achieve a higher wealth and social status. ... The American Dream is the hope that anyone can earn success if they work hard enough. Gatsby's love for Daisy led him to achieve extravagant wealth.

Explanation:

hope this helps with the essay YOU ARE going to write! :)

Answer: If it's the movie Monster it shows how people around Steve when he is acting.

Explanation:

Answer: The setting of a story is important because it gives the reader a sense of the time, location, and atmosphere in which the story takes place. It is also important because it enhances the experience of the reader and adds plot, atmosphere, and characters to the production of the story.

Answer:

I told you my lifeboat all the way.

Explanation:

I'm pretty sure im the one drowning, in my own loneliness-

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

C is your answer

Explanation:

Answer:

Judy, and Michael noticed a flaw in the sweater.

Explanation:

I don't know if this was a question with answers for a story, or if you just think of a random name..

The confrontation advanced the plot as C. The suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal.

In a literary work, a plot simply means the sequence of events where a particular event causes another event or occurrence. It is used by writers to structure what happens in a story.

From the story, it can be deduced that the confrontation advanced the plot as the suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal. This was vital in conveying the theme of the story to the readers.

Learn more about plots on:

https://brainly.com/question/20726607

Answer:The answer is C

Explanation: Got the question right on edge.

Answer:

Explanation:

What kind of cake?

Answer:

How's it taste? Did you do it right?

Answer:

D. reflecting on the overall topic

Explanation:

The main idea is not always clearly stated. It is more difficult to identify the main idea when it is inferred or implied. It can be implied through other words in the paragraph. An implied main idea can be found in several ways.

1. Several sentences in a paragraph can imply the main idea by introducing facts about the topic before actually stating the topic.

2. Implied ideas can be drawn from facts, reasons, or examples that give hints or suggestions concerning the main idea. These hints will be clues leading you to discover the main idea in the selected text.

Try the passage below to see if you can pick out the main idea.

Answer: both mean great

Explanation:

Immense majestic and Numerous, are similar to each other as both mean both can be stated in the place of grand, where there is something grandiose or big then it is meant to be numerous in nature, more often than not.

A Noun can be defined as the part of speech that is used to name a place, an animal, or a thing. There are many different kinds of nouns - Common Noun, Proper Noun, Collective Noun, Abstract Noun, and Concrete Noun.

A Common Noun can be defined as the type of noun which enumerates or encompasses the things, places, or names that are common to all. For example - A book, A pen.

A Proper Noun can be defined as the type of noun that addresses a specific kind of thing or we can say that the kind which mentions non-generic things, names, etc. example - Trimax Pen or Tess of the d'Urbervilles.

Hence, the Grand is a common link between Immense majestic and Numerous.

To know more about Common Noun, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/20292103

#SPJ2

Answer:

I believe the answer is A

Answer:

Social media plays a big part in cyber bullying. For example, in social media, you can post pictures of your face, and usually jealous people can pick apart your body and tell you what they think is "ugly" about it. In other cases, on social media, you could simply be stating some of your opinions about things. While it's ok for people to disagree with your opinions, they can be extremely rude and hate on you just for speaking out and stating how you feel about something.

Hope this helped with whatever your doing. Completely original I promise.

Answer:

The answer to Part A would be Ignorant, as the author goes on to state that his youthful understanding had struggled in vain. If someone is ignorant of something, yet they do not take the time to actually go research or learn about that thing, then they would be struggling in vain because they are selfish and not taking time to research what it is that the other person is saying that they do not understand.

For the answer to Part B, I would say that (Frederick) Douglass' new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation. I say this because he seems to have an awakening/epiphany in the very last line: "I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty".

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Part A) brand new. Part B) It shows that Douglass's new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The average human produces 25,000 quarts of saliva or spit in a lifetime. That's enough saliva to fill 2 swimming pools

Answer:

This - pronoun

is - verb

unbelievably giant - adjective

cat - noun

everyone - pronoun

should be - verb

afraid - adjective

of - preposition

it - pronoun

Explanation:

Parts of speech are defined as the different types of words that are linked together to give meaning to the sentence. Nouns are defined as the referral words to denote a person, place, or thing while the pronouns function to replace the noun. The nouns and pronouns primarily function as the subjects or objects in the sentence. The verb functions to denote the being or action performed by the subject in the sentence. Adjectives are defined as the words that qualify a noun or pronoun. While prepositions function to connect the words of phrases or show relationship between them.

Answer:

Answer: by adding "however" to the beginning of a sentence.

Explanation:

:)

The best way to revise the passage from the argumentative sentence is by adding "however" to the beginning of the second sentence, as expressed in option B.

The word "however" is used to create contrast between the ideas expressed in different sentences. It is usually placed at the beginning of the second sentence to show that its idea will differ from the previous one.

Here, we have two contrasting ideas. The first one is that going to college should be free, which is good. The second one is that the middle classes would end up paying for that, which is bad.

Therefore, to show that one idea is good and the other is bad, that is, that they are contrasting, we should add "however" to the beginning of the second sentence.

Learn more about revising sentences here:

https://brainly.com/question/8823021

#SPJ5

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

If you are charitable you give your stuff to people willingly because you a selfless. If a community is in need and this person is willing to give a lot it is very kind and helpful to the people in that community! Hope this helps!! :)

Answer:

Express Inner thoughts. It would be 'Show flashbacks' if it had more detail after "again", but it's Express Inner thoughts because someone is saying their thoughts aloud.

Answer:

i havent but lemme help you cause not lots of ppl answer these types of questions

Explanation:

go to spark notes its a site where it summarizes books you can even read the summarys paragraph by paragraph just search up your book :)

hope this helps!

`brianna/edgumacation

Answer:

When someone told me recently that they thought I was very brave, I dismissed the comment. To me, having courage means overcoming extraordinary challenges, like climbing Mount Everest or running with the bulls. It never dawned on me that I demonstrate bravery every day, yet we all do. In fact, even though we aren’t necessarily facing tough physical challenges like climbing a mountain, we deal with a variety of obstacles and a multitude of fears as a part of our daily lives. And for the most part, we dismiss our ability to overcome these as not worthy of acknowledgement.

Answer:

23=

24=

25=c

26=b

Explanation:

I just knew only this much sorry

Answer: Hope this helps

Explanation: 1. Economic inequality can give wealthier people an unacceptable degree of control over the lives of others.

If wealth is very unevenly distributed in a society, wealthy people often end up in control of many aspects of the lives of poorer citizens: over where and how they can work, what they can buy, and in general what their lives will be like. As an example, ownership of a public media outlet, such as a newspaper or a television channel, can give control over how others in the society view themselves and their lives, and how they understand their society.

2. Economic inequality can undermine the fairness of political institutions.

If those who hold political offices must depend on large contributions for their campaigns, they will be more responsive to the interests and demands of wealthy contributors, and those who are not rich will not be fairly represented.

3. Economic inequality undermines the fairness of the economic system itself.

Economic inequality makes it difficult, if not impossible, to create equality of opportunity. Income inequality means that some children will enter the workforce much better prepared than others. And people with few assets find it harder to access the first small steps to larger opportunities, such as a loan to start a business or pay for an advanced degree.

None of these objections is an expression of mere envy. They are objections to inequality based on the effects of some being much better off than others. In principle, these effects could avoided, without reducing economic inequality, through such means as the public financing of political campaigns and making high-quality public education available to all children (however difficult this would be in practice).

A fourth kind of objection to inequality is more direct. In Paul Krugman’s review of Capital in the 21st Century by Thomas Piketty, he mentions these stats from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: “Real wages for most U.S. workers have increased little if at all since the early 1970s, but wages for the top 1 percent of earners have risen 165 percent, and wages for the top 0.1 percent have risen 362 percent.” (Krugman calls those “supersalaries.”) Again, the idea that this is objectionable is not mere envy. It rests, I believe, on this idea, my fourth point:

4. Workers, as participants in a scheme of cooperation that produces national income, have a claim to a fair share of what they have helped to produce.

What constitutes a fair share is of course controversial. One answer is provided by John Rawls’ Difference Principle, according to which inequalities in wealth and income are permissible if and only if these inequalities could not be reduced without worsening the position of those who are worst-off. You don’t have to accept this exact principle, though, in order to believe that if an economy is producing an increasing level of goods and services, then all those who participate in producing these benefits — workers as well as others — should share in the result.

No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others.

Peter Singer’s powerful argument for altruistic giving draws on one moral relation we can stand in to others: the relation of being able to benefit them in some important way. With respect to this relation, to “matter morally” is to be someone whose welfare there is reason to increase.

But the objections to inequality that I have listed rest on a different moral relation. It’s the relation between individuals who are participants in a cooperative scheme. Those who are related to us in this way matter morally in a further sense: they are fellow participants to whom the terms of our cooperation must be justifiable.

In our current environment of growing inequality, can such a justification be given? No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others, that deprives them of meaningful political participation, that deprives their children of the opportunity to qualify for better jobs, and that deprives them of a share in the wealth they help to produce.

These are not just objections to inequality and its consequences: they are at the same time challenges to the legitimacy of the system itself. The holdings of the rich are not legitimate if they are acquired through competition from which others are excluded, and made possible by laws that are shaped by the rich for the benefit of the rich. In these ways, economic inequality can undermine the conditions of its own legitimacy.

As Singer shows, the possibility of improving the lot of the poor is a powerful reason for redistribution. But it is important to see that the case for equality is powerful in a different way.

Answer:

It reveals his admiration for Mr. Pollock’s ability to create valuable art from simple paints.

Explanation:

lol

It reveals his admiration for Mr. Pollock’s ability to create valuable art from simple paints is the author’s allusion to “turning straw into gold” from the folktale “Rumpelstiltskin” to contribute to the understanding of Ben’s feelings about abstract art and artists. Hence, option D is correct.

Instead of aiming to correctly describe a visual reality, abstract art uses shapes, colors, forms, and gestural strokes to achieve its impression. Wassily Kandinsky Cossacks Tate.

In a technical sense, the word "abstract" describes the process of taking something away from another object. The 1937 oil painting Guernica by Pablo Picasso is one of the most well-known works of abstract art. Others include Wassily Kandinsky's Composition X and Composition II in Red.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about abstract art, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13451940

#SPJ2

What? is the question

Answer:

match

Explanation:

the boys are matching and the second pic is a ligit match

Answer:

Fire Sweater (design)/Match (matching clothes/match)

Pls, give me Brainlist if I'm correct! :3

Answer: look at attached -

Explanation: