The laws passed by Georgia which were aimed at driving the Cherokee peoples off their land, they were challenged because C. the Cherokee peoples' constitution made them a sovereign nation.
Why could Georgia not pass laws against the Cherokee?As the Cherokee nation had a constitution which was recognized by the United States, it meant that they were a sovereign nation and as per the United States Constitution, states could not make deals or agreements with sovereign nations. That power alone belonged to the federal government of the United States which was to be the one negotiating and dealing with Native Americans.
What this meant was that when the state of Georgia passed laws in the 1830s that were meant to remove the Cherokee from their lands, the Cheorkee were able to successfully challenge these laws. However, the federal government stepped in and basically drove the Cherokee from their lands anyway.
Find out more on the Cherokee at https://brainly.com/question/6359081
#SPJ1
What impact did the battle of bunker hill among the colonists?
Answer:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.
Explanation:The American patriots were defeated at the Battle of Bunker Hill, but they proved they could hold their own against the superior British Army. The fierce fight confirmed that any reconciliation between England and her American colonies was no longer possible.
Is this statement true or false?
Parallels are numbered from 0° to 90° east and from 0° to 90° west.
Otrue
false
What was Nixon's real motive in keeping his White House tapes private?
Answer: President Nixon initially refused to release the tapes, putting two reasons forward: first, that the Constitutional principle of executive privilege extends to the tapes and citing the separation of powers and checks and balances within the Constitution, and second, claiming they were vital to national security.
Explanation:
Which statement expresses the central idea of the text a the Romans move towards a more democracy Society by spreading power among elected officials but they favored the wealthy more than the actors did be wrong wasn't a truly Democratic Society because the Roman citizens were severely limited when it came to which officials they could vote for see the actors had a very successful Democratic Society consisting of elected officials with limited terms 4D the Romans made it so that the individuals wealth could not affect their
ability to run for office or to vote for officials
The statement that expresses the central idea is that a the Romans move towards a more democracy Society by spreading power among elected officials but they favored the wealthy more than the public.
How was Roman society set up?After the fall of the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Republic was established where people could be elected in various offices to lead the city - state's government.
However, this process was not entirely fair as the wealthy people in Rome were more favored in the process and even had more say in government. Rome was therefore not truly democratic.
Find out more on Rome at https://brainly.com/question/26519729
#SPJ1
Should the states (and voters) have the ability to decide which rights we can enjoy and which rights can be voted out? Why or why not?
Answer:
no -why - because if they had the ability to decide which right we can enjoy it be bad because many could think for example : that slaves should be allowed again for every state . or for example: purge be allowed (which would be very bad it would decrease population). some people think good and some bad or dangerous they shouldn't because even if they did states and voters get a long and agree people would not agree for sure . please give me a star if it was helpful !
Answer:
Voting is a very important part of any democracy. Citizens vote for leaders to represent them and their ideas, and the leaders support the citizens' interests.
What was a major cause of the Panic of 1819?
• A. Farmers and businesses being unable to pay back money
borrowed from banks
•
B. A need to provide a stronger army and navy for America's armed
forces
C. Too many women and
children working in new factories
• D. High demand for American products in European countries
Answer:
Explanation:
B. needed a stronger army and navy.
What war had saddled the British government with debt?
Answer:
The French Indian War
Explanation:
This war also lead to excessive taxing in the colonies which then lead to the Revolutionary War
Improvement task: Describe two features of Harold Godwinson's background that would have made a credible (worthy) candidate for the throne in 1066
Answer:
Harold Godwinson was a mighty noble in England, a fine soldier, and a talented politician.
Explanation:
In 1066, having a lot of talents would make you a worthy candidate for the throne.
I hope this helped:)
Which of the following was NOT a result of the Battle of Bunker Hill?
A :American morale was boosted because they stood up to the British
B : Americans kept control of Bunker and Breed's Hill.
C :The British took control of Bunker and Breed's Hill.
D :More Americns paned the colonists to fight the British.
I need help please :(
The Yellow sea in the west helped the Han dynasty to provide a free defense for its people. Option (d) is correct.
The South china sea in the south helped the Han dynasty to provide a free defense for its people. Option (c) is correct.
What do you mean by Defense?Defense is the capacity to defend against injury or attack, or that that can defend against harm or attack.
Liu Bang founded the Han dynasty, a Chinese imperial dynasty that was ruled by the Liu family. The short-lived Qin dynasty and a fighting interregnum known as the Chu-Han dispute came before the dynasty, while the Three Kingdoms period came after it.
Therefore, Option (d) and (c) are correct respectively. The Yellow sea in the west and the South china sea in the south helped the Han dynasty to provide a free defense for its people.
Learn more about Defense, here;
https://brainly.com/question/9789405
#SPJ1
You are one of the Freedom Riders. Write a short journal entry in which you describe your experience and your thoughts or feelings.
Freedom Riders are those persons who are Civil Rights activists working to fight for the various rights of their own and also the people belonging to the society.
What are the Freedom Riders?To protest segregated bus terminals, groups of white but also African American civil rights activists took part in Freedom Riders, bus excursions through the American South in 1961.
To protest the lack of execution of US Supreme Court rulings that segregated public transportation was unconstitutional, civil rights activists known as "Freedom Riders" boarded intercity buses through into segregated Southern US in 1961 and succeeding years.
The Freedom Riders united civil rights advocates who traveled by interstate bus from Washington, DC, towards the segregated South around 1961 to enforce new U.S. Supreme Court rulings declaring segregated public transportation to be illegal.
Due to the frequent acts of violence directed at them, the Freedom Riders gained national prominence for their cause while traveling across the South on interstate buses. Discover the effects of something like the travels mostly on the Civil Rights Movement as well as the nation by traveling to the places where Freedom Riders made stops throughout their route.
Learn more about the Freedom Riders here:
https://brainly.com/question/27106432
#SPJ1
ASAP!!
Round 1 – Which would have been a bigger change to a European community?
From bartering for everything to trading with money
OR
From living on a feudal estate to living in a city
Round 2 – Which would have been a bigger change to a European community?
From making all essential goods locally to regionally trading
OR
From there only being nobles and peasants to there being a middle class of merchants and artisans
For each of the rounds above, answer the question directly and explain your reasoning in one well-developed paragraph. Your explanation should show that you understand both changes (not just the one you chose as the bigger change). You should write in complete sentences, and while images are not required for full credit, they will make your presentation stronger. You also are not required to do outside research, but should if you need more information to do your comparison.
The biggest changes for a European community are: From bartering for everything to trading with money, From having only nobles and peasants to having a middle class of merchants and artisans.
What are the biggest changes for the European communities of the Middle Ages?During the Middle Ages there were very few changes. However, many of them meant fundamental changes in society and the functioning of human communities. In general, these changes gave way to the following stages of humanity such as modernity, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, among others.
Some of the most radical changes that occurred in Europe were the change from barter to trade with money and the appearance of new social classes such as the middle class, which included the merchants who would later become bourgeois.
In the case of the changes in commerce, they were one of the biggest changes because people had to adapt to this new way of commerce. Therefore, people made objects and later sold them to obtain money and thus be able to buy the objects they needed for their daily lives. This was a challenge because some items were more in demand than others and this defined their price.
Additionally, this allowed the kingdoms to grow and accommodate a greater number of people. Kingdoms became cities where people had other social dynamics and abandoned feudal ways of life that were mainly rural.
On the other hand, the appearance of the middle class in which there were merchants and artisans was an important change for feudal society because these merchants began to enrich themselves by reducing the gap between the nobility and the middle class. This is how the bourgeoisie arose in the following centuries.
Lastly, these merchants had the ability to increase the area of influence of trade by reaching other countries and massifying the import and export of products. This caused the cities to become even more crowded and the merchants had an economic status similar to that of the nobility.
Learn more about the Middle Ages in: https://brainly.com/question/26586178
#SPJ1
Answer: im literally doing the assignment rn but its bartering to money and from only nobles to middle class merchants
Explanation: i just called my teacher and shes cool so i got the answer
A major part of early hip-hop was the use of:
(select all that apply)
Group of answer choices
tight vocal harmony
acoustic instruments
previously recorded material
turntables
A major part of early hip-hop was the use of turntables. The Option D is correct.
What is the history of hip-hop music?It is also known as rap music and disco rap, which is a genre of popular music that originated in New York City in the 1970s. It was developed by inner-city African Americans, Latino Americans and Caribbean Americans and consists of stylized rhythmic music (usually built around drum beats) that commonly accompanies rapping, a rhythmic and rhyming speech that is chanted..
This hip-pop music was developed as part of hip hop culture, a subculture defined by a four key stylistic elements including MCing/rapping, DJing/scratching with turntables, break dancing, and graffiti writing.
The hip hop's early evolution occurred as sampling technology and drum machines became widely available and affordable. The turntablist techniques such as scratching and beatmatching developed along with the breaks.
Read more about hip-hop music
brainly.com/question/29557615
#SPJ1
How were the attacks on September 11 (911) similar, or different, than previous attacks on the United States military? Compare and contrast 911 with either the sinking of the USS Maine OR the attack on Pearl Harbor OR the “firing” on the USS Maddox? How did these events change public opinion and how did the U.S. government react in both of these cases? min 400 words
Although there were civilian casualties at Pearl Harbor, Japan's main targets were military installations. 9/11 was specifically aimed at civilians.
Response of United States' to September 11:In both the 9/11 and Pearl Harbor responses, the President called for national unity and vowed to revenge the assaults. In both cases, military action was swiftly taken against those guilty. After both assaults, the country joined together in varying degrees of solidarity.United States' response to the September 11 attacks differ from its response to the Pearl Harbor attack in following manner-
The Japanese navy attacked the US naval station at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941, causing the US to enter the Second World War. The attack on Pearl Harbor, dubbed "awakening a sleeping giant," set in motion a chain of events that eventually led to the defeat of the Axis powers. The Pearl Harbor assault killed 2,403 Americans and injured 1,178 others. These assaults triggered a global war on terrorism led by the United States.U.S. government reaction in both cases:
Twenty years ago, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Americans were united in grief and patriotism.With Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States could no longer avoid active combat. As part of this policy, NATO invaded Afghanistan and eliminated the Taliban regime (which hosted Al Qaeda).To learn more about September 11 attacks, click
brainly.com/question/1297602
#SPJ1
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of __________.
A.
Africa
B.
Asia
C.
North America
D.
South America
Answer:
Explanation:
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America.
D. South America
The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the land of South America
Therefore, the correct answer is option D.
The recently found regions beyond Eurasia were split between the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire by the Treaty of Tordesillas, which was signed on June 7, 1494, at Tordesillas, Spain, and validated in Portugal.
The Treaty of Tordesillas established a border that split the non-European world into two distinct regions, one ruled by Spain and the other by Portugal. In 1494, Spain and Portugal signed the Treaty of Tordesillas, dividing the non-European globe between them.
The Treaty of Tordesillas thus resulted in the division of South America.
To learn more about Tordesillas, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29406901
What’s the fastest animal in the world
Answer:
Peregrine falcon
Explanation:
Peregrine falcon :L
Who is at the top of the court system and who is involved?
Answer: supreme court is the top of the court system and the people/persons that are on the top of their court system is chief justice
Explanation:
Briefly explain Metacom’s grievances against the English.
First Indian War, the Great Narragansett War, or Metacom's Rebellion. It was the Native Americans' desperate attempt to elude acknowledging English rule and prevent English settlement on their ancestral territories.
From 1675 to 1676, southern New England was the scene of King Philip's War, also known as the A fellow Christian Indian reported to English authorities that Sassamon, who had earlier accused Metacom of plotting an uprising against the English, had been slain by three warriors working for the local sachem Metacom, known to the English as King Philip.
The Indians attacked adjacent villages because they were worried about encroachments and the rifts that missionaries were causing in native culture. Twelve of the ninety Puritan towns were completely destroyed by Metacom's campaign, which also attacked forty other Puritan towns.
Learn more about the Metacom here: https://brainly.com/question/2251429
Compare and contrast European and Japanese feudalism
https://brainly.com/question/7847947?referrer=searchResults
plese give a brainlist
Why were chinampas important to the Aztec economy?
i really need help with this answer i am on right now
can someone help?
Answer:
a
Explanation:
cause i did it
Which statement BEST explains how the overall
structure of Passage 2 influences the reader?
Instructions on how to use defensive pessimism to
handle negative experiences give the reader tools
that can be applied to daily life.
Comparisons help the reader understand how
defensive pessimism differs from positive thinking.
and why it could be a better coping strategy.
An explanation of cause and effect allows the
reader to recognize how defensive pessimism can
result in reducing stressful situations.
A history of defensive pessimism helps the reader
understand how it began, and why psychologists
believe it is suited to the modern age.
People, especially those who are highly worried, can benefit from defensive pessimism by thinking more positively and making better decisions. Conversely, defensive pessimists create strategies for handling issues in their heads.
What is defensive pessimism?In the middle of the 1980s, Nancy Cantor and her students identified the cognitive approach known as defensive pessimism. People employ defensive pessimism as a coping mechanism before anxiety-inducing situations or performances. No of how well they have performed in the past when someone uses defensive pessimism, they have low expectations for their performance.
Then, defensive pessimists consider particular unfavorable occurrences and failures that might have a detrimental impact on their efforts to achieve their goals. Defensive pessimists can prevent or prepare for potential negative consequences by imagining them in advance. By employing this technique, defensive pessimists might constructively channel anxiety that otherwise might have a negative impact on their performance.
Learn more about pessimism, from:
brainly.com/question/23812584
#SPJ1
Answer:
Comparisons help the reader understand how defensive pessimism differs from positive thinking, and why it could be a better coping strategy.
what is the annexation of hawaii
The graph above shows reelection rates for incumbents in the House and Senate. From this information and your knowledge of United States politics, perform the following tasks.
A. Identify two patterns displayed in the graph
B. Identify two factors that contribute to incumbency advantage. Explain how each factor contributes to incumbency advantage.
C. Discuss one consequence of incumbency advantage for the United States political process
The graph shows that House incumbents win roughly 85% of the time.
55–97% of senators are reelected.
Gerrymandering and franking privilege boost incumbency.
The incumbency advantage has corrupted U.S. politics. The graph shows that incumbents win 85% of the time, giving the opposition little chance. The incumbent modified district borders, thus a challenger may have won a state but lost other districts, losing the election. Thus, the incumbency advantage is a farce since newcomers have awful chances and incumbents virtually always win.
What is the House and Senate. ?Generally, The House of Representatives incumbents consistently win elections around 85% of the time on average, according to the graph.
Reelection percentages for senators range from around 55 to 97%.
The franking privilege and gerrymandering are two elements that support the incumbency advantage. REQUIRES EXPLAINING
The American political system has been skewed and corrupted by the use of the incumbency advantage. The data shows that incumbents often win around 85% of the time, giving the opposition party little chance at all. Although the incumbent adjusted the district boundaries, a contender might have theoretically won the state.
However, since he lost some of those districts, the candidate ended up losing the race. Because newcomers have poor chances and incumbents are practically certain to win every time, the incumbency advantage has therefore turned into a farce.
Read more about American political system
https://brainly.com/question/14481897
#SPJ1
Describe the early oil boom and city life in Louisiana
In 1904 Savage Brothers and Morrical drilled the first oil well. After the discovery of oil in 1905, the flag stop was destined to become a "boom town". Three years later a man named Howard Hughes (the father of the famous Howard Hughes) convinced the government to locate a post office in Oil City.
Do you think that the Act Respecting Alien Enemies is reasonable or unreasonable?
Answer:
I think it's unreasonable
1. What is the term for a culture or cultural trait's origin or where it
is from?
a. Hearth
b. Culture Family
c. Indigenous
d. Nationality
Answer:
i would say nationality
Explanation:
The relationship between levels of military personnel and state revenues as shown in the table is best understood in the context of which of the following global developments in the period 1450–1750 ?
answer choices
As military forces expanded and became more professionalized, states were forced to develop new ways to generate revenue.
As agricultural technology became more advanced, less people were needed to farm and more people were able to be enrolled in state militaries.
As commercial profits and urbanization increased, states were able to obtain more revenue.
As states expanded their territories, they were able to acquire access to more natural resources.
The global developments in the period 1450–1750 the military forces expanded and became more professionalized, states were forced to develop new ways to generate revenue. The correct option is A.
Why did this split intensify during the 1450-1750 time period?The political rivalries between the Ottoman and Safavid empires, as well as their ties to Islam, exacerbated the schism. Explain the evolution of Sikhism in relation to the Mughal Empire.
The increased use of gunpowder, cannons and armed trade in Europe and Asia resulted in the establishment of large empires. By conquering other countries' lands and erecting palaces to demonstrate their power, and forcing their people to live with them so they could not work against them.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about The Ottoman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/19205737
#SPJ1
How do you think humans would behave in a "state of nature"?
In the state of nature, this equal ability to kill each other leads to mistrust. All of our belongings, and our life itself, might be taken at any moment, because there is no greater power to stop anyone from attacking us . Some people would attack us because they need our resources to survive.
What is a state of nature?In moral and political philosophy, religion, social contract theories, and international law, the state of nature is the hypothetical life of people before societies existed. State of nature philosophers deduce that there must have been a time before organised societies existed, and this assumption raises questions such as: "What was life like before civil society?"; "How did government first emerge from such a starting position?," and "What are the hypothetical reasons for entering a state of society by establishing a nation-state?"
In political theory, the state of nature is the actual or hypothetical condition of humans prior to or after political association. The concept of a natural state was central to the social-contract theories of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, as well as French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Social-contract theorists' visions of the state of nature differed sharply, though most associated it with the absence of state sovereignty.
Therefore ,the idea of a state of nature is an effort to try and understand what humans would be like without any government or society and considers why we let ourselves be governed.
To learn more about state of nature, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13162622
#SPJ1
Theodore Roosevelt background
Answer:
Theodore Roosevelt Jr., often referred to as Teddy or by his initials, T. R., was an American politician, statesman, soldier, conservationist, naturalist, historian, and writer who served as the 26th president of the United States from 1901 to 1909.
Explanation:
Theodore Roosevelt Jr., often referred to as Teddy or by his initials, T. R., was an American politician, statesman, soldier, conservationist, naturalist, historian, and writer who served as the 26th president of the United States from 1901 to 1909.
why was slavery a thing
Answer:
Slavery existed because of human greed. Slaves provided indispensable (and easily discardable) labor for almost no price to their masters, which was effective for high profit margins during ages of unrestricted plantation management.