What was one major effect of the American victory in the revolutionary war?

brits winning america wins

The best is for your letter to include evidence to oppose Schenck's arrest, and not to include your name.

Charles Schneck was arrested in 1919 for printing thousands of fliers that encouraged men not to approve the World War I draft and therefore join was as Schneck considered this was against people's rights.

The government considered Schneck's actions a crime because it oppose the Espionage Act of 1917 that states people could not interfere with military recruitment.

Based on this context, if you want to express your disagreement with Shneck's arrest it is important you:

Learn more about World War I in: https://brainly.com/question/925121

Answer:

A recipe calls for 2/3 cup of sugar for every 1/2 teaspoon of vanilla.what is the unit rate of cups per teaspoon.

Explanation:

right ??

Answer:

a legal system of separation of race

Explanation:

White and black/brown people had different schools because of there skin colour this is an example. This was LEGAL because of the system made and therefore black/brown people could not say it was illegal or wrong as it stands for what the government said was ok (back then)

I hope this helps

Answer:

1. AMUN-RA: The Hidden One

2. MUT: The Mother Goddess

3. OSIRIS: The King of the Living

4. ANUBIS: The Divine Embalmer

5. RA: God of the Sun and Radiance

6. HORUS: God of Vengeance

7. THOTH: God of Knowledge and Wisdom

8. HATHOR: Goddess of Motherhood

9. SEKHMET: Goddess of War and Healing

10. GEB: God of Earth

Explanation:

Answer:

2. Union membership and activities fell sharply in the face of economic prosperity, a lack of leadership within the movement,

3. The main piece of progress that was made toward world peace in the 1920s was the League of Nations, which was founded in 1920 as a response to the evils of World War I. It ultimately failed to prevent another world war, however.

4. Mining companies, railroads and farms weren't doing well.

Explanation:

Answer:

What do you need help with there is no picture or anything

Explanation:

Answer: True

Explanation: Give me the brainiest

Answer:

False

Explanation:

David Brainerd was an American missionary to the Native Americans.

Answer:

okokokokokokoo

ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.

Answer:

In 1927, the Supreme Court ruled that the oil leases had been corruptly obtained. The Court invalidated the Elk Hills lease in February 1927, and the Teapot Dome lease in October. Both reserves were returned to the Navy. In 1929, Fall was found guilty of accepting bribes from Doheny.

Explanation:

Answer:

exadration

Explanation:

that's all there is to it

Answer

California grew fruits, vegetables,  and dairy products.  

Answer:

I believe it's B. I took a similar test

Explanation:

Answer:

bisheshwor parsad koirala (first elected PM) in 1959

Answer: Financial Assistance

Explanation:

It relatedto the issues of the Great Depression.

Answer:

A. the magna carta

Explanation:

Answer:

Besides additional soldiers and supplies, the French fleet destroyed part of the

British fleet and drove away the rest of the British ships trapping the British at

Yorktown

Explanation:

In the battle of the Chesapeake the french naval fleet and the british naval fleet fought on the water. In the end the french won the battle, driving the fleet away and then trapped the british at Yorktown

Answer:

In 1950 there were 2.5 billion people on the planet. Now in 2019, there are 7.7 billion. By the end of the century the UN expects a global population of 11.2 billion.

Explanation:

2.5 billion people i believe!

Answer:

If you're asking about the decline in the indigenous population after the arrival of European settlers in the Americas, then five factors are as follows:

1. Diseases brought by Europeans decimated the indigenous population, since they had no natural immunity to viruses such as smallpox.

2. Many indigenous people were killed by the settlers, as they where no match for the guns and horses that the Europeans brought.

3. Many natives where forced into slavery and terrible living conditions, causing further death.

4. In some cases, the European conquers turned the indigenous tribes against each other, inciting further violence.

5. The displacement of Native Americans by settlers as they pushed further and further into the continent also resulted in a decline in the population.

Answer:

Explanation:

The transportation revolution in the United States began when Americans taking advantage of features of the natural environment to move people and things from place to place began searching for ways to make transport cheaper, faster, and more efficient. Over time a series of technological changes allowed transportation to advance to the point where machines have effectively conquered distance. People can almost effortlessly travel to anywhere in the world and can inexpensively ship raw materials and products across a global market.

But this technology is not ubiquitous, and it is not necessarily democratic. As a famous science fiction writer once said, the future is already here, it’s just not very evenly distributed. Modern transportation infrastructure is controlled to a great extent by large corporations, but the benefits of transport are depended on by everyone. And transportation technology itself requires specific conditions such as abundant, cheap, portable energy in the form of fossil fuels, and public infrastructure created by our own and foreign governments, that even those large corporations depend upon but don’t control.

When we think of transportation, it is natural to think first about going places. Getting on a plane in one hemisphere and getting off on the other side of the world is a life-changing opportunity which was unavailable to most people as little as a generation ago, and unthinkable two generations ago. But more crucial to our daily lives than the freedom offered by world travel is the cargo from the other side of the world that reaches us quickly in the holds of jets and more slowly but in almost unimaginable volume in containers on ships. The global transportation of foods, raw materials, and finished goods goes virtually unnoticed in our daily lives, but makes our contemporary consumer lifestyle possible.

Answer:

well they lost their jobs and that was probably the worst time to be alive

Answer:

do you hear what i hear

Explanation:

written in response to tbe dread everyone felt due to the war

Answer:

The colonists fled over Bunker Hill, handing the Peninsula to the British. The fight was a tactical, though somewhat Pyrrhic, success for the British, as it proved to be a sobering experience for them, since they suffered far more losses than the Americans, including several commanders.

Explanation:

hope it helps :)

Answer:

1. agriculture

2. Mexican