Legal protections and societal acceptance provide opportunities for satirists today, unlike in colonial America when broadsides faced censorship and prosecution.
Today's political, religious, or personal satirists have various opportunities to express their views while avoiding prosecution. In many democratic countries, freedom of speech and expression is protected by law, allowing satirists to engage in sharp criticism without fear of legal repercussions. Rap lyrics, cartoons, television entertainment, movies, newspapers, books, and the web all provide platforms for satirical expression. These mediums offer wide reach and diverse audiences, enabling satirists to disseminate their critiques effectively.In comparison to the broadsides in colonial and revolutionary America, contemporary satirists enjoy significantly greater freedom of expression. During that era, broadsides were often subject to strict censorship and could lead to prosecution for libel or sedition. Today's satirists benefit from legal protections, societal acceptance of satire, and a wider range of mediums to convey their messages, making it less likely for them to face persecution for their work. However, it is important to note that even in modern times, there can still be instances where satirists face backlash, controversy, or social repercussions for pushing boundaries or challenging powerful individuals or institutions.For more such questions on Satirists:
https://brainly.com/question/11926015
#SPJ8