(in fictional writing) the narrator's position in relation to a story being told.
"this story is told from a child's point of view"
the position from which something or someone is observed.
"certain aspects are not visible from a single point
Jacob Said,"have you read this book?
"
Answer:
The sentence "Jacob said, 'Have you read this book?'" is an example of direct speech. It is a complete sentence that consists of two parts: the reporting clause (Jacob said) and the reported clause (Have you read this book?).
In direct speech, the exact words spoken by a person are quoted and enclosed in quotation marks. In this case, the exact words spoken by Jacob are "Have you read this book?", and they are enclosed in quotation marks.
Direct speech is commonly used in writing to convey the exact words spoken by a person, and it is usually introduced with a reporting verb or phrase such as "said," "asked," or "inquired."
Read the excerpt from "Fear" by Guy de Maupassant. Answer the question that follows. "I was crossing the great sands to the south of Onargla. It is one of the most curious districts in the world. You have seen the solid continuous sand of the endless ocean strands. Well, imagine the ocean itself turned to sand in the midst of a storm. Imagine a silent tempest with motionless billows of yellow dust. They are high as mountains, these uneven, varied surges, rising exactly like unchained billows, but still larger, and stratified like watered silk. On this wild, silent, and motionless sea, the consuming rays of the tropical sun are poured pitilessly and directly. You have to climb these streaks of red-hot ash, descend again on the other side, climb again, climb, climb without halt, without repose, without shade. The horses cough, sink to their knees and slide down the sides of these remarkable hills. We were a couple of friends followed by eight spahis and four camels with their drivers. We were no longer talking, overcome by heat, fatigue, and a thirst such as had produced this burning desert. Suddenly one of our men uttered a cry. We all halted, surprised by an unsolved phenomenon known only to travelers in these trackless wastes." Which type of conflict is present in this passage? A. Character vs. character B Character vs. nature C Character vs. self C Character vs. society
Answer:
B. Character vs. nature
Explanation:
Answer: B. Character vs. nature
Which of the following sentences has no punctuation, spelling, or grammar mistakes?
If you were to fall the harness would catch you.
If, you were to fall, the harness would catch you.
If you were to fall, the harness would catch you.
If you was to fall the harness would catch you
Answer:
number 3
Explanation:
because it has the correct use of commas and correct use of words.
The correct sentence is 'If you were to fall, the harness would catch you.' as it uses the correct punctuation and grammar. It separates the two independent clauses with a comma which is essential in English for clarity and understanding.
Explanation:The correct sentence that has no punctuation, spelling, or grammar mistakes is, 'If you were to fall, the harness would catch you.'. In this sentence, the use of the comma after 'fall' correctly separates the two independent clauses, making it grammatically correct.
The importance of using correct punctuation in English cannot be overstated. It provides the necessary pauses, separations, and emphasis that sentences require to be correctly and easily understood. In the first option, a comma is required after the word 'fall' to correctly separate two independent clauses. The second option overuses commas, placing them where they are not necessary. The last option uses the incorrect form of the verb 'be', it should be 'were' instead of 'was'.
Learn more about Punctuation here:
https://brainly.com/question/35492880
#SPJ2
Macmillan Learning
If any of the underlined segments has an error, select the answer option that IDENTIFIES the error. If no segments have an
error, select "No error."
Daniel suggested that we come up with a better way to study for our English test, so we decided to look up all the new
vocabulary words in a dictionary and then look over the definitions.
O come up with
look up
look over
No error
In the given sentence, the phrase "look over" is the underlined segment. This phrase is incorrect because it does not convey the intended meaning.
The correct answer option that identifies the error is "look over."
The phrase "look over" means to quickly review or examine something. However, in the context of studying for an English test, it would be more appropriate to use the phrase "go over" instead. "Go over" means to thoroughly review or study something.
Therefore, the corrected sentence would be: "Daniel suggested that we come up with a better way to study for our English test, so we decided to look up all the new vocabulary words in a dictionary and then go over the definitions."
By using "go over" instead of "look over," the sentence now conveys the idea of thoroughly reviewing the definitions of the new vocabulary words. This would be more effective in studying for an English test, as it emphasizes a deeper understanding of the material.
Know more about vocabulary here :
brainly.com/question/1587636
#SPJ8
Bob resents eating junk food.
O Enjoys
O Loves
O Hates
O Admits
The sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" indicates that Bob has negative feelings or emotions toward consuming junk food. Therefore, the appropriate word to complete the sentence is "hates."
Resenting something means feeling bitterness, anger, or frustration toward it. In this case, Bob experiences these negative emotions towards eating junk food. The use of the word "resents" implies that Bob has a strong aversion or dislike towards this type of food.
While it is possible for someone to enjoy, love, or admit to eating junk food, these options do not accurately reflect the negative sentiment expressed in the sentence. Enjoying or loving junk food would indicate a positive or pleasurable association with it, which contradicts the notion of resentment. Similarly, admitting to eating junk food does not necessarily capture the negative emotions associated with it.
By using the word "resents," the sentence conveys Bob's disapproval or dissatisfaction with consuming unhealthy food choices. It suggests that Bob may have concerns about the impact of junk food on his health, well-being, or personal goals.
In conclusion, the word that best completes the sentence "Bob resents eating junk food" is "hates," as it accurately reflects the negative emotions and aversion towards consuming unhealthy food.
Know more about junk food here:
https://brainly.com/question/4136688
#SPJ8
Reread paragraph 6. What can you infer about Keller's understanding of sight?
(b) Explain what the text says explicitly.
Reread paragraph 9. What does this paragraph reveal about Keller's sighted friends' opinion of the Empire State Building? Use details from the text to support your answer.
RI.O-10.6 Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analuze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
2. Determine an author's point of view.
Reread paragraphs 10-12. What is Keller's point of view about the Empire State Building?
Support your answer with details from the text.
All information is proprietary in nature.
Keller's understanding of sight, as inferred from paragraph 6, indicates that she perceives it as a powerful sense that enables people to connect with the world around them. Despite being blind, Keller grasps the concept of sight by comparing it to a tangible experience. She comprehends sight as a "soul-sense" that allows individuals to appreciate the beauty of nature and interpret the world's wonders.
Explicitly, the text states in paragraph 9 that Keller's sighted friends find the Empire State Building "amazing," "wonderful," and "marvelous." Their opinion highlights their fascination and admiration for the architectural masterpiece. The text further supports this by describing how Keller's friends "gaze in admiration" at the building, emphasizing their positive perception.
Keller's point of view about the Empire State Building, as revealed in paragraphs 10-12, is that its magnificence transcends visual appreciation. She believes that the beauty of the building lies not just in its appearance but also in the emotions it evokes. Keller describes how the building's grandeur "thrills" and "stirs" the human spirit, emphasizing its impact on a deeper level. She regards the Empire State Building as an embodiment of human progress and achievement, representing the "giant step" humanity has taken towards conquering the skies.
In conclusion, Keller's understanding of sight is that it enables individuals to connect with the world, her sighted friends hold a high opinion of the Empire State Building, finding it marvelous, and Keller sees the building as a symbol of human progress and achievement, evoking deep emotions.
For more such questions on Keller, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/19079087
#SPJ8
when should I use a semicolon
Answer:
You may use a semicolon to connect two independent clauses that are closely related in thought, but not closely related enough to be in the same sentence. For example: "I have a big presentation tomorrow; I need to get some rest."
Explanation: