What is the molar solubility of BaF2 in 0.30 m Naf? (ksp of baf2 = 1.0 x 10^−6)

To determine the length of the string of lights needed for Seth's doughnut replica, we can follow these steps:

A. The length of the string of lights needed can be expressed as the circumference of the doughnut replica. The formula for the circumference of a circle is C = 2πr, where C represents the circumference and r represents the radius.

B. Given that the diameter of the replica is 18 feet, the radius would be half of that, which is 9 feet. Using the approximation 3.14 for π, we can simplify the expression: C = 2 × 3.14 × 9.

C. Simplifying further, we have C = 56.52 feet. Therefore, the string of lights needed for Seth's doughnut replica would need to be approximately 56.52 feet long.

In summary, the length of the string of lights needed for the doughnut replica is approximately 56.52 feet. This is calculated by using the formula for the circumference of a circle, substituting the radius of the doughnut replica, and simplifying the expression using the approximation 3.14 for π.

To learn more about circumference click here : brainly.com/question/28757341

#SPJ11

The e° for the reaction Cu⁺ → Cu²⁺ + e⁻ is 0.18 V.

To find the e° for the overall reaction, we need to subtract the e° value for the reduction half-reaction from the e° value for the oxidation half-reaction:

Cu⁺ + e⁻ → Cu°   E°(reduction) = 0.52 V (reduction half-reaction)
Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu°   E°(reduction) = 0.34 V (reduction half-reaction)

To find E°(oxidation), reverse the E° value for the reduction half reaction so that overall value of E°cell is positve.
Cu° → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻   E°(oxidation) = -0.34 V (oxidation half-reaction)

The overall reaction is thus:
Cu⁺ + e⁻ → Cu°  
Cu° → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻
=Cu⁺ → Cu²⁺ + e⁻  

E°cell = E°(reduction) + E°(oxidation) = 0.52 V + (-0.34 V) = 0.18 V

Therefore, standard cell potential (E°cell) is 0.18 V.

To learn more about E°cell visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19036092

#SPJ11

Approximately 190 grams of thallium may be formed by the passage of 7,678 amps for 3.23 hours through an electrolytic cell that contains a molten Tl(I) salt. Faraday's Law, which states that the amount of substance produced by electrolysis is directly proportional to the quantity of electricity passed through the cell.

The formula for this is: moles of substance = (current x time) / (96500 x n) where current is measured in amperes, time is measured in seconds, n is the number of electrons transferred per mole of substance, and 96500 is the Faraday constant.

In this case, we are given the current (7,678 amps) and the time (3.23 hours, which is 11,628 seconds). We also know that the substance being electrolyzed is Tl(I) salt, which has a charge of +1. Therefore, n = 1.

Using the formula above, we can calculate the moles of thallium produced: moles of Tl = (7678 x 11628) / (96500 x 1) = 0.930 moles. To convert moles to grams, we need to multiply by the molar mass of thallium, which is 204.38 g/mol: grams of Tl = 0.930 moles x 204.38 g/mol = 190.04 grams

Therefore, approximately 190 grams of thallium may be formed by the passage of 7,678 amps for 3.23 hours through an electrolytic cell that contains a molten Tl(I) salt.

For more such questions on Faraday's Law

https://brainly.com/question/17012638

#SPJ11

Approximately 182 grams of thallium (Tl) may be formed by the passage of 7,678 amps for 3.23 hours through an electrolytic cell that contains a molten Tl(I) salt.

To calculate the amount of Tl formed, we need to use Faraday's law of electrolysis, which states that the amount of substance formed during electrolysis is directly proportional to the quantity of electricity passed through the cell.

The formula for Faraday's law is:

Amount of substance = (Current × Time × Atomic weight) / (Valency × Faraday constant)

In this case, the current is 7,678 amps, the time is 3.23 hours, the atomic weight of Tl is 204.38 g/mol, the valency is 1, and the Faraday constant is 96,485 coulombs/mol.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Amount of substance = (7,678 × 3.23 × 204.38) / (1 × 96,485) = 182.04 g

Therefore, approximately 182 grams of thallium may be formed by the passage of 7,678 amps for 3.23 hours through an electrolytic cell that contains a molten Tl(I) salt.

learn more about thallium  here:

https://brainly.com/question/25203208

#SPJ11

The aqueous solution that is expected to have a pH less than 7 at 25 degrees Celsius is NH_4Br (aq). This is because NH_4Br is an ammonium salt and when it dissolves in water, it undergoes hydrolysis to produce H+ ions, leading to an acidic solution.

RbC_2H_3O_2 (aq), MgCl_2 (aq), and LiNO_3 (aq) are not expected to produce an acidic solution, as they do not undergo hydrolysis to produce H+ ions.

Which aqueous solution is expected to have a pH less than 7 at 25°C? The solution that will have a pH less than 7 at 25°C is NH_4Br (aq). This is because NH_4Br is an ammonium salt that will release NH_4+ ions in water. NH_4+ ions will react with water to form NH_3 and H_3O+, leading to an acidic solution with a pH less than 7. The other compounds (RbC_2H_3O_2, MgCl_2, and LiNO_3) are not expected to produce acidic solutions.

To know more about Aqueous Solution visit-

https://brainly.com/question/26856926

#SPJ11

The electronegativity (EN) increases from left to right across a period in the periodic table and decreases from top to bottom in a group. Therefore, in the set (N, Br, I), nitrogen (N) has the lowest EN and iodine (I) has the highest EN.

In the set (H, Ca, F), hydrogen (H) has the lowest EN and fluorine (F) has the highest EN. Hydrogen is located in the upper-left corner of the periodic table, whereas fluorine is located in the upper-right corner. Therefore, the difference in their EN values is the greatest among the set, making fluorine the most electronegative and hydrogen the least electronegative. Calcium (Ca) is a metal and has a lower EN than both hydrogen and fluorine.

For more questions like element  visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28295498

#SPJ11

At constant temperature and pressure, the maximum non-PV work that can be performed by a process is given by the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG).

The choices are:

A) ΔH - Enthalpy change, does not give max non-PV work at constant T and P

B) ΔG - Correct choice. ΔG determines maximum non-PV work at constant T and P.

C) ΔA - What is ΔA? Not defined.

D) ΔS - Entropy change, does not give max non-PV work at constant T and P

So the answer is B: ΔG

The answer is B) ΔG. A measure of the maximum non-PV work that can be performed by a process occurring at constant T and P is given by the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG).

ΔG (delta G) represents the change in Gibbs free energy, which is a thermodynamic potential that measures the maximum amount of non-PV work that can be performed by a system at constant temperature and pressure. In other words, ΔG tells us whether a reaction is spontaneous or not, and if it is, how much energy is available to do work.

Option A, ΔH (delta H), represents the change in enthalpy, which is a measure of the heat absorbed or released during a reaction at constant pressure. Enthalpy is not a direct measure of the amount of work that can be performed by a system.

Option C, ΔA (delta A), represents the change in Helmholtz free energy, which is another thermodynamic potential that measures the maximum amount of non-PV work that can be performed by a system at constant temperature and volume. Since the question specifies that the process is occurring at constant pressure, ΔA is not the correct answer.

Option D, ΔS (delta S), represents the change in entropy, which is a measure of the degree of disorder in a system. While entropy is important in determining whether a reaction is spontaneous or not, it is not a direct measure of the amount of work that can be performed.

To learn more about Gibbs Free Energy visit:

brainly.com/question/20358734

#SPJ11

The reactant concentration in a first-order reaction decreased from 7.60 x 10^-2 M to 5.50 x 10^-3 M over a time period of 85.0 s - 35.0 s = 50.0 s. To find the rate constant (k) for this reaction, we can use the first-order rate law equation:
ln([A]t / [A]0) = -kt

To solve this problem, we can use the first-order rate law:
ln([A]t/[A]0) = -kt
Where [A]t is the concentration of the reactant at time t, [A]0 is the initial concentration, k is the rate constant, and t is time.
Using the given values:
[A]0 = 7.60 x 10-2 M
[A]35 = 5.50 x 10-3 M
t1 = 35.0 s
t2 = 85.0 s
We can plug these values into the rate law and solve for k:
ln(5.50 x 10-3 M / 7.60 x 10-2 M) = -k (85.0 s - 35.0 s)
ln(7.24 x 10-5) = -k (50.0 s)
k = -ln(7.24 x 10-5) / 50.0 s
k = 0.000280 s-1
Therefore, the rate constant for this reaction is 0.000280 s-1.

To know more about first-order rate law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13264346

#SPJ11

The molality is 9.84 mol/kg and molarity of concentrated hcl is 32.30 mol/L.

To determine the molality (m) of concentrated HCl, first determine the moles of HCl present in 1 kg of solution.

To begin, we can convert the supplied density of 1.18 g/mL to kg/L as follows:

1.18 kg/L = 1.18 g/mL x (1 kilogramme / 1000 g) x (1000 mL / 1 L)

This means that one litre of concentrated HCl solution weighs 1.18 kilogramme. Because the solution contains 36.0% HCl by mass, the mass of HCl in one litre of solution is:

1.18 kg x 0.36 = 0.4248 kilogramme

Because HCl has a molar mass of 36.46 g/mol, the number of moles of HCl in 0.4248 kg is:

11.63 mol = 0.4248 kg x (1000 g / 1 kilogramme) / 36.46 g/mol

The molality (m) of a solute (in this case, HCl) is defined as the number of moles of solute per kilogramme of solvent (in this case, water).  As a result, the molality is:

9.84 mol/kg = m = 11.63 mol / 1.18 kg

To calculate the molarity (M) of concentrated HCl, we must first determine the volume of the solution containing one mole of HCl.

Using its molar mass and density, the volume of 1 mole of HCl may be calculated:

30.93 mL/mol = 36.46 g/mol / 1.18 g/mL

As a result, one litre of concentrated HCl solution contains:

1000 mL divided by 30.93 mL/mol equals 32.30 mol

As a result, the molarity of concentrated HCl is as follows:

M = 32.30 mol/L

For such more question on molarity:

https://brainly.com/question/30404105

#SPJ11

The molality is 9.84 mol/kg and molarity of concentrated hcl is 32.30 mol/L.To determine the molality (m) of concentrated HCl, first determine the moles of HCl present in 1 kg of solution.

To begin, we can convert the supplied density of 1.18 g/mL to kg/L as follows:1.18 kg/L = 1.18 g/mL x (1 kilogramme / 1000 g) x (1000 mL / 1 L)This means that one litre of concentrated HCl solution weighs 1.18 kilogramme. Because the solution contains 36.0% HCl by mass, the mass of HCl in one litre of solution is:1.18 kg x 0.36 = 0.4248 kilogrammeBecause HCl has a molar mass of 36.46 g/mol, the number of moles of HCl in 0.4248 kg is:11.63 mol = 0.4248 kg x (1000 g / 1 kilogramme) / 36.46 g/molThe molality (m) of a solute (in this case, HCl) is defined as the number of moles of solute per kilogramme of solvent (in this case, water).  As a result, the molality is:9.84 mol/kg = m = 11.63 mol / 1.18 kgTo calculate the molarity (M) of concentrated HCl, we must first determine the volume of the solution containing one mole of HCl. Using its molar mass and density, the volume of 1 mole of HCl may be calculated:30.93 mL/mol = 36.46 g/mol / 1.18 g/mLAs a result, one litre of concentrated HCl solution contains:1000 mL divided by 30.93 mL/mol equals 32.30 molAs a result, the molarity of concentrated HCl is as follows:M = 32.30 mol/L

Learn more about concentrated here:

brainly.com/question/30404105

#SPJ11

The most likely decay mode of the unstable nuclide ¹¹C (carbon-11) would be: positron production (option A).

Carbon-11 is a radioactive isotope with 6 protons and 5 neutrons. It has a relatively short half-life of about 20 minutes. Due to the imbalance between the number of protons and neutrons, the nucleus becomes unstable and undergoes decay to achieve a more stable configuration.

In positron production, a proton in the nucleus is converted into a neutron, releasing a positron (a positively charged particle with the same mass as an electron) and a neutrino. This process reduces the number of protons in the nucleus by one, while increasing the number of neutrons, thus creating a more stable nucleus. In the case of carbon-11, the decay results in the formation of boron-11, which has 5 protons and 6 neutrons.

The other options (B, C, D, and E) are not the most likely decay modes for carbon-11, as they involve different particle interactions and transformations that are not as probable for this specific isotope. Hence, the correct asnwer is option A.

Learn more about decay mode here: https://brainly.com/question/24148346

#SPJ11

1. Calculate the moles of Fe2O3:

moles of Fe2O3 = mass of Fe2O3 / molar mass of Fe2O3

moles of Fe2O3 = 35 g / (2 * atomic mass of Fe + 3 * atomic mass of O)

moles of Fe2O3 ≈ 35 g / (2 * 55.85 g/mol + 3 * 16.00 g/mol)

moles of Fe2O3 ≈ 35 g / 159.7 g/mol

moles of Fe2O3 ≈ 0.219 mol

2. Calculate the moles of HCl:

moles of HCl = mass of HCl / molar mass of HCl

moles of HCl = 35 g / (1 * atomic mass of H + 1 * atomic mass of Cl)

moles of HCl ≈ 35 g / (1 * 1.01 g/mol + 1 * 35.45 g/mol)

moles of HCl ≈ 35 g / 36.46 g/mol

moles of HCl ≈ 0.959 mol

3. Determine the limiting reactant:

Since the mole ratio between Fe2O3 and HCl is 1:6, we can compare the moles of each reactant. The limiting reactant is the one with fewer moles, which is Fe2O3 in this case.

4. Calculate the moles of products formed based on the limiting reactant:

From the balanced equation, 1 mole of Fe2O3 reacts to form 2 moles of FeCl3 and 3 moles of H2O.

moles of FeCl3 = 2 * moles of Fe2O3 ≈ 2 * 0.219 mol ≈ 0.438 mol

moles of H2O = 3 * moles of Fe2O3 ≈ 3 * 0.219 mol ≈ 0.657 mol

Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. 0.32 mol FeCl3 and 0.48 mol H2O.

To learn more about balanced equation click here : brainly.com/question/31242898

#SPJ11

The number of grams of W formed when 3.20 x 10^22 molecules of WO3 react with excess H2 is 97.63 grams.

To find the number of grams of W formed, we need to follow these steps:

1. Determine the molar mass of WO3:

  - The molar mass of W is 183.84 g/mol.

  - The molar mass of O is 16.00 g/mol.

  - Since WO3 has three oxygen atoms, its molar mass is 183.84 + (3 * 16.00) = 231.84 g/mol.

2. Convert the number of molecules of WO3 to moles:

  - Divide the given number of molecules (3.20 x 10^22) by Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23) to get the number of moles.

3. Use the balanced chemical equation to determine the molar ratio between WO3 and W:

  - From the balanced equation, we know that 2 moles of WO3 react to form 6 moles of W.

4. Convert moles of W to grams:

  - Multiply the number of moles of W by its molar mass (183.84 g/mol) to obtain the mass in grams.

After performing these calculations, the resulting value is 97.63 grams of W.

To learn more about  molar mass click here

brainly.com/question/31545539

#SPJ11

The resulting element after the alpha decay of 230 90Th is 226 88Ra.

Alpha decay is a type of radioactive decay in which an atomic nucleus emits an alpha particle, which consists of two protons and two neutrons. The parent nucleus, in this case, is 230 90Th, which means it has 90 protons and 140 neutrons.

When it undergoes alpha decay, it emits an alpha particle, which means it loses two protons and two neutrons. This reduces its atomic number by two and its mass number by four.

So, the resulting element has an atomic number of 88 (90 - 2) and a mass number of 226 (230 - 4), which corresponds to the element radium (Ra). Therefore, the resulting element after the alpha decay of 230 90Th is 226 88Ra.

Learn more about element here :

https://brainly.com/question/24407115

#SPJ11

Using 75J of energy to heat an 8.5g piece of aluminum foil with a specific heat of 0.897 J/g°C results in a temperature change of approximately 9°C.

The first step in determining the temperature change is to use the equation Q = m * c * ΔT, where Q is the energy input, m is the mass of the aluminum foil, c is the specific heat of aluminum, and ΔT is the change in temperature.

Rearranging the equation to solve for ΔT gives ΔT = Q / (m * c). Plugging in the given values, ΔT = 75J / (8.5g * 0.897 J/g°C) ≈ 9°C.

This means that the piece of aluminum foil will increase in temperature by approximately 9°C when 75J of energy is used to heat it.

The specific heat is a measure of how much energy is required to raise the temperature of a substance by 1°C per gram, so a substance with a higher specific heat, such as water, requires more energy to heat up than a substance with a lower specific heat, such as aluminum.

Learn more about energy here.

https://brainly.com/questions/2409175

#SPJ11

The estimated volume of the gas sample when the pressure increased to 85.0 ATM is approximately 123.25 units.

Based on the given information and assuming the gas follows the ideal gas law, we can estimate the volume of the sample when the pressure increased to 85.0 ATM.

Using the ideal gas law equation (PV = nRT), where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is temperature, we can rearrange the equation as:

V1/P1 = V2/P2

Given that the initial pressure (P1) is 1.00 ATM and the initial volume (V1) is 1.45, and the final pressure (P2) is 85.0 ATM, we can calculate the approximate volume (V2):

V2 = (V1 * P2) / P1

V2 = (1.45 * 85.0) / 1.00

V2 ≈ 123.25

Therefore, the estimated volume of the gas sample when the pressure increased to 85.0 ATM is approximately 123.25 units.

To learn more about ideal gas law click here

brainly.com/question/30458409

#SPJ11

At equilibrium, the concentrations of PCl3 and Cl2 in the 1.0 L container are 0.40 M and 0.30 M, respectively.

To find the concentrations of PCl3 and Cl2 at equilibrium, we need to consider the stoichiometry of the reaction and use the given equilibrium concentration of PCl5.

From the balanced equation for the reaction:

PCl3 + Cl2 ⇌ PCl5

We can determine that one mole of PCl3 reacts with one mole of Cl2 to form one mole of PCl5.

Let's assume x represents the change in concentration for both PCl3 and Cl2.

At equilibrium, the concentration of PCl3 is given as 0.40 M. Since one mole of PCl3 reacts to form one mole of PCl5, the concentration of PCl5 at equilibrium is also 0.40 M.

Using the stoichiometry of the reaction, the change in concentration for Cl2 is also x.

The equilibrium concentration of Cl2 can be calculated by subtracting the change in concentration from the initial concentration:

[Cl2]equilibrium = [Cl2]initial - x = 0.70 M - x

From the given information, we know that the concentration of PCl5 at equilibrium is 0.040 M.

Using the stoichiometry of the reaction, the change in concentration for PCl3 is also x.

The equilibrium concentration of PCl3 can be calculated by subtracting the change in concentration from the initial concentration:

[PCl3]equilibrium = [PCl3]initial - x = 0.60 M - x

Since the stoichiometry of the reaction is 1:1 for PCl3 and Cl2, the concentration of PCl5 can be used to determine the value of x.

From the balanced equation, the initial concentration of PCl5 is zero, and at equilibrium, it is given as 0.040 M. This indicates that x has a value of 0.040 M.

Substituting the value of x in the expressions for [PCl3]equilibrium and [Cl2]equilibrium:

[PCl3]equilibrium = 0.60 M - 0.040 M = 0.56 M

[Cl2]equilibrium = 0.70 M - 0.040 M = 0.66 M

Therefore, at equilibrium, the concentrations of PCl3 and Cl2 in the 1.0 L container are 0.40 M and 0.30 M, respectively.

To learn more about balanced equation click here : brainly.com/question/31242898

#SPJ11

Out of the atoms mentioned, the atom with the smallest atomic radius (size) is "p" (phosphorus).

In an atom, the distance from the nucleus to the valence shell is the atomic radius.

As the electronegativity (nuclear attraction increases) increases, the atomic radius decreases.

From left to right in a period, the atomic number increases, and the size of atoms decreases.

Whereas, down the group, the atomic radius increases because of the increasing number of shells.

Based on the given elements Aluminum (Al), Phosphorus (P), Arsenic (As), Tellurium (Te), and Sodium (Na), the atom with the smallest atomic radius (size) is P (Phosphorus) though arsenic is at the extreme right.

It is because Arsenic achieves a stable electronic configuration and so is a noble gas.

To know more about atomic radius, click below.

https://brainly.com/question/16821948

#SPJ11

The grams of NO3 produced in the reaction will be 0.72 g. The limiting reagent is NO.

First, we need to calculate the moles of O3 and NO using their molar masses. The molar mass of O3 is approximately 48 g/mol, and the molar mass of NO is approximately 30 g/mol.

The moles of O3 can be calculated by dividing the given mass of O3 (7.40 g) by its molar mass, which gives approximately 0.154 moles.

Similarly, the moles of NO can be calculated by dividing the given mass of NO (0.670 g) by its molar mass, which gives approximately 0.0223 moles.

Next, we can use the stoichiometric coefficients from the balanced equation to determine the moles of NO3 that can be produced from each reactant. According to the balanced equation, 2 moles of O3 react with 3 moles of NO to produce 3 moles of NO3.

From the calculated moles, we find that O3 can produce approximately 0.231 moles of NO3 (0.154 moles O3 × 3 moles NO3 / 2 moles O3).

On the other hand, NO can produce approximately 0.0335 moles of NO3 (0.0223 moles NO × 3 moles NO3 / 3 moles NO).

To convert the moles of NO3 to grams, we multiply by the molar mass of NO3, which is approximately 62 g/mol.

Thus, O3 produces approximately 0.72 grams of NO3 (0.231 moles NO3 × 62 g/mol).

Since NO produces a lesser amount of NO3 (0.0335 moles NO3 or approximately 2.08 grams), it is the limiting reagent in this reaction. The amount of NO3 produced is determined by the amount of NO available, and any excess O3 is left unreacted.

To learn more about molar mass click here : brainly.com/question/31545539

#SPJ11

The concentration of hydronium ions in a 0.100 M hypochlorous acid solution with a Ka value of 3.5 x 10⁻⁸ is (b) 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M.

The dissociation reaction for hypochlorous acid is:

HOCl(aq) + H₂O(l) ⇌ H₃O⁺(aq) + OCl⁻(aq)

The equilibrium constant expression for this reaction is:

Kₐ = [H₃O⁺][OCl⁻]/[HOCl]

We are given the value of Kₐ as 3.5 x 10⁻⁸ and the initial concentration of HOCl as 0.100 M. Let the concentration of H₃O⁺ and OCl⁻ at equilibrium be x M. Then we can write:

[tex]K_a = \frac{x^2}{0.100 - x}[/tex]

Since the dissociation constant is very small, we can assume that the change in concentration of HOCl is negligible compared to its initial concentration. This means that we can assume that x ≈ [H₃O⁺] ≈ [OCl⁻]. Substituting this in the above expression, we get:

[tex]K_a = \frac{x^2}{0.100 - x}[/tex]

[tex]3.5 \times 10^{-8} = \frac{x^2}{0.100 - x}[/tex]

x² = 3.5 x 10⁻⁹ (0.100 - x)

x² = 3.5 x 10⁻⁹ (0.100) - 3.5 x 10⁻⁹ x

x² + 3.5 x 10⁻⁹ x - 3.5 x 10⁻¹⁰ = 0

Solving for x using the quadratic formula:

[tex]x = \frac{{-3.5 \times 10^{-9} \pm \sqrt{{(3.5 \times 10^{-9})^2 + 4 \times 1 \times (3.5 \times 10^{-10})}}}}{{2 \times 1}}[/tex]

x = 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M or x = -1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M

Since the concentration of H₃O⁺ cannot be negative, the only valid solution is:

[H₃O⁺] = [OCl⁻] = 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M

Therefore, the hydronium ion concentration of the 0.100 M hypochlorous acid solution is 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M.

The correct answer is (b) 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ M.

To know more about the hydronium ion refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/14619642#

#SPJ11

What is the hydronium ion concentration of a 0.100 M hypochlorous acid solution with Ka = 3.5 x 10⁻⁸ The equation for the dissociation of hypochlorous acid is:

HOCl(aq) + H₂O(l) ⇌ H₃O⁺(aq) + OCl⁻(aq)

Group of answer choices

a. 5.9 × 10-4 M

b. 1.9 × 10-5 M

c. 1.9 × 10-4 M

d. 5.9 × 10-5 M

The compounds arranged in order of increasing number of hydrogen atoms/ions per formula unit are 1. Lithium hydride

2. Barium hydroxide , 3. Ammonium carbonate , 4. Ammonium chlorate.

Lithium hydride (LiH) has one hydrogen atom per formula unit.

Barium hydroxide ([tex]Ba(OH)_2[/tex]) has two hydrogen atoms per formula unit.

Ammonium carbonate (([tex]NH_4)2CO_3[/tex]) has four hydrogen atoms per formula unit, as there are two ammonium ions, each containing one hydrogen ion, and one carbonate ion, containing two hydrogen ions.

Ammonium chlorate ([tex]NH_4ClO_3[/tex]) has five hydrogen atoms per formula unit, as there is one ammonium ion containing one hydrogen ion, and one chlorate ion containing three hydrogen ions.

Therefore, the correct order from fewest to greatest number of hydrogen atoms/ions per formula unit is:

Lithium hydride < Barium hydroxide < Ammonium carbonate < Ammonium chlorate

To know more about hydrogen refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/24433860

#SPJ11

Dimethyl sulfide posses tetrahedral geometry with ~109.5° bond angles; Dimethyl sulfoxide makes trigonal pyramidal geometry with ~107° bond angles.

Dimethyl sulfide  and dimethyl sulfoxide are considered natural mixtures that comprises sulfur. In order to make their Lewis structures, we have to measure the valence electrons for every particle and orchestrate them likewise.

In case of  dimethyl sulfide, every methyl bunch contributes one valence electron, and sulfur contributes six. Thusly, the all out number of valence electrons is 14. We can organize them as follows:

Duplicate code in the figure 1

This design has a tetrahedral math, with bond points of roughly 109.5 degrees. The atom is polar because of the electronegativity contrast among sulfur and carbon.

For dimethyl sulfoxide, every methyl bunch contributes one valence electron, sulfur contributes six, and oxygen contributes six. Accordingly, the complete number of valence electrons is 22. We can orchestrate them as follows:

Duplicate code in the figure 2

This design has a three-sided pyramidal math, with bond points of roughly 107 degrees. The atom is polar because of the electronegativity contrast between sulfur, oxygen, and carbon.

The CS-C bond points in dimethyl sulfide will be bigger than those in dimethyl sulfoxide because of the presence of an oxygen particle, which will apply a more grounded horrendous power on the neighboring iotas. This distinction in bond points can influence the physical and substance properties of these mixtures.
To learn more about Lewis structures,
brainly.com/question/9227593
#SPJ1

The explanation for this is that oxygen has a higher electronegativity and a greater attraction for its valence electrons compared to boron, carbon, and sodium. This means that it requires more energy to remove an electron from oxygen, resulting in the formation of a cation.

To determine which element requires the most energy to remove a valence electron, we need to consider ionization energy. Ionization energy is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom or ion. In general, ionization energy increases from left to right across a period and decreases from top to bottom within a group on the periodic table.

Locate the elements on the periodic table. Boron, Carbon, Oxygen, and Sodium are in groups 13, 14, 16, and 1, respectively. Observe the ionization energy trends. Since ionization energy increases from left to right across a period, Oxygen in group 16 will have a higher ionization energy than Boron, Carbon, and Sodium. Consider the vertical trend. Ionization energy decreases from top to bottom within a group, but since all these elements are in the same period, this trend is not relevant for this comparison.
To know more about sodium visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29327783

#SPJ11

We will need 11.58 g of Li3PO4 to prepare 0.500 L of a 0.200 M solution.

To prepare a 0.200 M solution of Li3PO4 with a volume of 0.500 L, you will need to calculate the amount of Li3PO4 required and then dissolve it in water to prepare the solution.

Here are the steps to follow:

Calculate the amount of Li3PO4 required:

The formula to calculate the amount of Li3PO4 required is:

mass = molarity × volume × molar mass

Substituting the given values, we get:

mass = 0.200 mol/L × 0.500 L × 115.8 g/mol

mass = 11.58 g

Therefore, you will need 11.58 g of Li3PO4 to prepare 0.500 L of a 0.200 M solution.

Dissolve the Li3PO4 in water:

To prepare the solution, weigh out 11.58 g of Li3PO4 and add it to a volumetric flask containing a small amount of water. Swirl the flask to dissolve the Li3PO4 completely. Once dissolved, add more water to bring the volume up to 0.500 L. Mix well to ensure that the solution is homogeneous.

Verify the concentration:

You can verify the concentration of the solution using a molarity calculator or by taking a sample and titrating it with a standard solution of an acid or base of known concentration.

That's it! You have now prepared a 0.200 M solution of Li3PO4 with a volume of 0.500 L.

Click the below link, to learn more about Molar mass of solution:

https://brainly.com/question/28330953

#SPJ11

If not all the salt dissolves in the solution preparation, the [tex]K_s_p[/tex] value will decrease due to the lower concentration of dissolved ions. You can expect your result to be lower than the actual value because not all the salt dissolved.

[tex]K_s_p[/tex], or the solubility product constant, is a constant value that represents the equilibrium between a solid salt and its ions in solution. It is determined by the concentration of the ions in solution at equilibrium.

If not all of the salt dissolves in solution preparation, the concentration of ions in solution will be lower than expected. This means that the [tex]K_s_p[/tex] value will also be lower, as it is determined by the concentration of ions in solution.

Therefore, we can expect the result to decrease because not all of the salt dissolved. This is because the equilibrium between the solid salt and its ions in solution will not be reached, leading to a lower concentration of ions in solution and a lower  [tex]K_s_p[/tex] value.

To know more about concentration refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/30665317

#SPJ11

The mammoth lived about 22,200 years ago.

We can use the radioactive decay law to solve this problem. The law states that the amount of radioactive material remaining after time t is given by: N = N0 * e^(-kt)

where N0 is the initial amount, k is the decay constant, and e is the base of the natural logarithm.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for t: t = ln(N0/N) / k

The decay constant for carbon-14 can be calculated using its half-life:

t1/2 = 5715 yr

k = ln(2) / t1/2

k = ln(2) / 5715 yr

k = 1.21 x 10^-4 yr^-1

Now we can solve for the age of the mammoth:

N0/N = (0.50 dis/mingC) / (15.3 dis/mingC)

N0/N = 0.0327

t = ln(N0/N) / k

t = ln(0.0327) / (1.21 x 10^-4 yr^-1)

t = 22,200 years

For more such questions on mammoth

https://brainly.com/question/24163999

#SPJ11

The mammoth lived about 22,200 years ago. We can use the radioactive decay law to solve this problem.

The law states that the amount of radioactive material remaining after time t is given by: N = N0 * e^(-kt)

where N0 is the initial amount, k is the decay constant, and e is the base of the natural logarithm.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for t: t = ln(N0/N) / k

The decay constant for carbon-14 can be calculated using its half-life:

t1/2 = 5715 yr

k = ln(2) / t1/2

k = ln(2) / 5715 yr

k = 1.21 x 10^-4 yr^-1

Now we can solve for the age of the mammoth:

N0/N = (0.50 dis/mingC) / (15.3 dis/mingC)

N0/N = 0.0327

t = ln(N0/N) / k

t = ln(0.0327) / (1.21 x 10^-4 yr^-1)

t = 22,200 years

Learn more about mammoth here:

brainly.com/question/24163999

#SPJ11

Using Einstein's equation, we can calculate the energy released by the fusion of one mole of br-81: E = Delta m * c² * Avogadro's number
E = -1.9885 amu * (2.998 x 10⁸ m/s)² * 6.022 x 10²³/mol
E = -3.17 x 10¹¹ J/mol

To calculate the energy released by the fusion of one mole of br-81, we need to first determine the mass of the products after fusion.

The fusion of br-81 involves the combination of a bromine atom with a hydrogen atom to form krypton-83 and a neutron. The mass of krypton-83 is 82.91413 amu (80.9163 amu + 1.0073 amu + 0.00055 amu) and the mass of the neutron is 1.0087 amu.

Therefore, the total mass of the products after fusion is 83.92283 amu (82.91413 amu + 1.0087 amu).

To calculate the energy released by fusion, we can use the famous Einstein's equation E = mc², where E is the energy, m is the mass, and c is the speed of light.

The change in mass during fusion is given by the difference between the mass of the reactants (br-81 and hydrogen) and the mass of the products (krypton-83 and neutron), which is:

Delta m = (mass of reactants) - (mass of products)
Delta m = (80.9163 amu + 1.0073 amu) - (82.91413 amu + 1.0087 amu)
Delta m = -1.9885 amu

The negative sign indicates that mass is lost during fusion.

Using Einstein's equation, we can calculate the energy released by the fusion of one mole of br-81:

E = Delta m * c² * Avogadro's number
E = -1.9885 amu * (2.998 x 10⁸ m/s)² * 6.022 x 10²³/mol
E = -3.17 x 10¹¹ J/mol

Note that the negative sign indicates that energy is released during fusion, as expected. The magnitude of the energy released is quite large, which highlights the potential of fusion as a source of energy.

To know more about energy, refer

https://brainly.com/question/13881533

#SPJ11

The correct coefficient for zinc is "8", since we need to multiply the coefficient by the subscripts in the formula of Zn. the correct answer is option (D) 16.

To balance the given redox equation, we need to assign oxidation numbers to each element first. Here, zinc has an oxidation number of 0 since it is in its elemental state, and the oxidation number of oxygen in ReO4- is -2. Therefore, the oxidation number of Re is +7.

Next, we can balance the equation using the half-reaction method. First, we balance the oxygen atoms by adding H2O to the side of the equation that needs more oxygen. This gives us:

Zn(s) + ReO4-(aq) + 8H+(aq) → Re(s) + Zn2+(aq) + 4H2O(l)

Next, we balance the hydrogen atoms by adding H+ to the other side:

Zn(s) + ReO4-(aq) + 8H+(aq) → Re(s) + Zn2+(aq) + 4H2O(l) + 8H+(aq)

Now we can balance the electrons by multiplying the zinc half-reaction by 8:

8Zn(s) + ReO4-(aq) + 16H+(aq) → Re(s) + 8Zn2+(aq) + 4H2O(l) + 8H+(aq)

Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

For more such questions on zinc:

https://brainly.com/question/13890062

#SPJ11

The balanced equation with smallest whole number coefficients is:

[tex]Zn(s) + 4H+(aq) + ReO4-(aq) → Re(s) + Zn2+(aq) + 2H2O(l)[/tex]

Therefore, the coefficient for zinc is 1.

To balance the redox equation in acidic solution, first, we write down the unbalanced equation:

Zn(s) + ReO4-(aq) → Re(s) + Zn2+(aq)

Next, we identify the oxidation states of each element in the equation:

[tex]Zn(s) → Zn2+(aq) (+2)[/tex]

[tex]ReO4-(aq) → Re(s) (+7)[/tex]

We can see that zinc is being oxidized (losing electrons) while rhenium is being reduced (gaining electrons).

To balance the equation, we add water molecules and hydrogen ions to balance the charge and oxygen atoms:

[tex]Zn(s) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e-[/tex]

[tex]ReO4-(aq) + 8H+(aq) + 3e- → Re(s) + 4H2O(l)[/tex]

Now, we balance the electrons by multiplying the half-reactions by appropriate coefficients:

[tex]Zn(s) + 4H+(aq) + ReO4-(aq) → Re(s) + Zn2+(aq) + 2H2O(l)[/tex]

The coefficient for zinc is 1, which is the smallest whole number coefficient.

Learn more about zinc here :

brainly.com/question/13890062

#SPJ11

To prepare a 1.00 L of 2.00 M solution of copper(II) sulfate (CuSO4), you would follow the steps below: Calculate the amount of copper(II) sulfate needed.

Molarity (M) = moles of solute / volume of solution (L)

 moles of solute = Molarity × volume of solution (L)

 moles of CuSO4 = 2.00 mol/L × 1.00 L = 2.00 moles

2. Determine the molar mass of copper(II) sulfate (CuSO4):

  Cu: 1 atom × atomic mass = 1 × 63.55 g/mol = 63.55 g/mol

  S: 1 atom × atomic mass = 1 × 32.07 g/mol = 32.07 g/mol

  O4: 4 atoms × atomic mass = 4 × 16.00 g/mol = 64.00 g/mol

  Total molar mass = 63.55 g/mol + 32.07 g/mol + 64.00 g/mol = 159.62 g/mol

3. Calculate the mass of copper(II) sulfate needed:

  mass = moles × molar mass = 2.00 moles × 159.62 g/mol = 319.24 grams

4. Weigh out 319.24 grams of powdered copper(II) sulfate using a balance.

5. Transfer the weighed copper(II) sulfate into a container or beaker.

6. Add distilled water to the container while stirring to dissolve the copper(II) sulfate. Continue adding water until the total volume reaches 1.00 L.

7. Stir the solution well to ensure thorough mixing.

8. You now have a 1.00 L of 2.00 M copper(II) sulfate solution ready for your lab experiment.

To learn more about  copper click here:

brainly.com/question/30892946

#SPJ11

The number of photons emitted from the laser pointer in one second can be calculated using the power of the laser, the energy of the photons, and the relationship between power and energy.

The power of a laser pointer is typically measured in milliwatts (mW). Let's assume the laser pointer has a power output of 5 mW.

The energy of each photon is related to the wavelength of the laser light. Let's assume the laser pointer emits light with a wavelength of 650 nanometers (nm), which corresponds to red light. The energy of each photon can be calculated using the following formula:

E = hc/λ

Where E is the energy of each photon, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ joule seconds), c is the speed of light (299,792,458 meters per second), and λ is the wavelength of the light in meters.

Plugging in the values for h, c, and λ, we get:

E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s)(299,792,458 m/s)/(650 x 10⁻⁹ m) ≈ 3.04 x 10⁻¹⁹ joules

Now, to calculate the number of photons emitted from the laser pointer in one second, we can use the following formula:

Number of photons = Power/ Energy per photon

Plugging in the values for power and energy per photon, we get:

Number of photons = (5 x 10⁻³ W) / (3.04 x 10⁻¹⁹ J) ≈ 1.64 x 10¹⁶photons/second

Therefore, approximately 1.64 x 10¹⁶ photons are emitted from the laser pointer in one second.

To know more about photon emission visit:

https://brainly.com/question/726233

#SPJ11

0. 300 mole of urea in [tex]2. 50x10^2[/tex] ml of solution. the concentration of urea in the solution is 1.20 M.

To understand the given information, we need to calculate the concentration of urea in the solution. The concentration is expressed as moles of solute per liter of solution (mol/L) or molarity (M). Given that the volume is provided in milliliters, we need to convert it to liters.

The given volume is [tex]2. 50x10^2[/tex] ml, which is equal to 2.50x10^-1 L.

Now, let's calculate the concentration of urea:

Concentration (M) = \[tex]\(\frac{{\text{{moles of urea}}}}{{\text{{volume of solution in liters}}}}\)[/tex]

Given moles of urea = 0.300 mol

Volume of solution = 2.50x10^-1 L

Concentration (M) = [tex]\(\frac{{0.300 \, \text{{mol}}}}{{2.50x10^-1 \, \text{{L}}}}\) = 1.20 M[/tex]

The concentration of urea in the solution is 1.20 M.

, the chemical formula of urea is [tex](CH_4N_2O\)[/tex] and the concentration equation can be represented as:

[tex]\[ \text{{Concentration (M)}} = \frac{{\text{{moles of urea}}}}{{\text{{volume of solution in liters}}}} \][/tex]

Substituting the given values:

[tex]\[ \text{{Concentration (M)}} = \frac{{0.300 \, \text{{mol}}}}{{2.50x10^{-1} \, \text{{L}}}} \][/tex]

Thus, the concentration of urea in the solution is 1.20 M.

Learn more about molarity here:

https://brainly.com/question/13386686

#SPJ11