In the allegory of the cave the items under the sun depict the genuine shapes of objects, which we can only perceive via reason, while the shadows depict the portion of reality that we typically perceive with our senses.
There are three higher levels: the theory of forms; the natural sciences; and mathematics, geometry, and deductive logic. Socrates compares the philosopher to a prisoner who escapes from a cave and realizes that the images seen are not genuinely being created by the shadows on the wall. A philosopher seeks to comprehend and see reality's higher planes. The other cave dwellers, on the other hand, have no desire to flee their cage because they have never known anything better.
To know more about the allegory of the cave:
https://brainly.com/question/24243913
#SPJ4
Soviet Union wanted eastern Europe to be composed of ___________ countries.
A) democratic
B) communist
C) theologist
D) liberal
Which letter choice is correct?
Answer:
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Write a letter (must be at least one paragraph) to submit to Governor Alvan Fuller and the Lowell Committee. Choose one founding ideal and describe whether it was advanced or restricted during the postwar period. Explain how the advancement or restriction of this ideal may have helped or hurt Sacco and Vanzetti in their trial.
Your paragraph should include
a clear thesis that states your position.
two pieces of evidence from this lesson that support your thesis.
an explanation of how each piece of evidence supports your thesis.
Answer: Dear Governor Fuller and the Lowell Committee,
I write to you today to discuss the advancement or restriction of one of the founding ideals of America during the postwar period and how it may have impacted the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti. My thesis is that the restriction of the ideal of due process in the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti resulted in the unjust conviction of two innocent men.
As evidence, I point to the fact that Judge Thayer, who presided over the trial, was prejudiced against the defendants before the start of the trial. Judge Thayer specifically stated that he believed Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty before the trial began, and he was even heard making prejudicial remarks about them outside the court. This restricted the defendants' right to due process and gave them an unfair trial.
Furthermore, the Lowell Committee's report concluded that Judge Thayer had made indiscreet conversations with outsiders during the trial. This further restricted Sacco and Vanzetti's right to due process, giving them an even more unfair trial due to his prejudicial and biased attitude.
In conclusion, the restriction of the ideal of due process in the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti resulted in the unjust conviction of two innocent men. The prejudicial attitude of Judge Thayer, as well as his indiscreet conversations with outsiders, restricted the defendants' right to due process and gave them an unfair trial. Thank you for taking the time to consider this matter.
Sincerely,
[Name].
Explanation:
What was the major economic goal for Nixton
Answer:
Explanation:
On August 15, 1971, President Richard M. Nixon announced his New Economic Policy, a program “to create a new prosperity without war.” Known colloquially as the “Nixon shock,” the initiative marked the beginning of the end for the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates established at the end of World War II.
Answer:
Nixon adopted a policy of monetary restraint to cool what his advisers saw as an overheating economy. "Gradualism," as it was called, placed its hopes in restricting the growth of the money supply to rein in the economic boom that occurred during Lyndon Johnson's last year in office.
Have a wonderful day! :-)
Question 2
1 pts
Here people line up to lay claim to government-subsidized apartments. The
government seeks to meet the basic needs of all people. Every citizen receives free
education, free medical service, organized vacation trips, pensions, and access to day
care centers for small children of working parents.
Individual
Equality
O Freedom
Customers of health care services may be taken advantage of by private vendors, particularly monopolies, as they have limited knowledge about the caliber of facilities offered.
The decision of a nation's government to offer free medical care to its population depends on a variety of factors. Explanation: It ought to do so because: Health care facilities' effects on their patients are long-lasting and irreversible. Health care facilities are a basic human right, but in a developing nation many people will not be able to afford them from high-priced private vendors. Customers of health care services may be taken advantage of by private vendors, particularly monopolies, as they have limited knowledge about the caliber of facilities offered. However, as was already said, if people have access to health care as a fundamental amenity, it may lower their motivation to work and make them unmotivated to do so.
Learn more about Health care facilities here:
https://brainly.com/question/15276017
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Here people wait in line to claim government subsidized apartments. The government seeks to meet the basic needs of all people. Every citizen receives free education, free medical services, organized vacations, and a pension. Working parents receive access to day-care centers for small children.
Think about the Article. The reader can tell that
A. pollution is a problem in Cuba
B. bringing car parts to Cuba costs a lot of money
C. bringing car parts to Cuba does not cost a lot of money
D. pollution is not a problem in Cuba
The reader can infer that bringing car parts to Cuba costs a lot of money. Option B
What are the issues with export to Cuba?Exporting to Cuba has been historically difficult due to the long-standing economic embargo imposed by the United States on the island nation. The embargo was first imposed in 1960 in response to the nationalization of American-owned businesses in Cuba, and it has been tightened and loosened over the years. The main issues with exporting to Cuba are:
Restrictions on trade: The United States has imposed strict trade restrictions on Cuba, which make it illegal for American companies to sell goods or services to the country without obtaining a special license from the U.S. government. This can be a long and complex process, and many businesses are hesitant to invest the time and resources to navigate the regulations.
Financial restrictions: The U.S. has also imposed financial restrictions on Cuba, which make it difficult for American companies to conduct financial transactions with Cuban entities.
Read more on Cuba here: https://brainly.com/question/457425
#SPJ1
what central/south american kingdom showed the most tolerance for varying people and religions?
The Inca Empire is the Central/South American kingdom showed the most tolerance for varying people and religions.
What is Inca Empire known for?The Inca Empire, which was located in what is now Peru, was known for its religious tolerance and incorporation of different cultures and beliefs into its own. The Incas had a complex religious system that included a wide variety of gods and goddesses, and they often incorporated the gods and rituals of conquered peoples into their own religion.
Additionally, the Incas were known for their policy of mit'a, which required conquered peoples to provide labor for the empire but also allowed them to maintain their own religious and cultural practices.
Learn more about Inca Empire here: https://brainly.com/question/11798792
#SPJ1
Bobby was found guilty of spray painting his neighbor’s house and had to pay a fine of $100. Now they want to put him on trial and fine him again for the same incident.
Can I be put on trial for the same crime twice?
Why or why not?
Which amendment applies?
No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once." Section 26 of the General Clauses Act points out that.
What is Section 26 in The General Clauses Act?Section 26 in The General Clauses Act, of 1897 is 26 Provision as to offences punishable under two or more enactments. Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more enactments, then the offender shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either or any of those enactments, but shall not be liable to be punished twice for the same offence.
Therefore Bobby will not be put on trial for the same crime.
Learn more about section, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11030497
#SPJ1
what nation started world war 1 and what two nations escalated the conflict
The death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the quick reason for a conflict between two extraordinary powers — Russia and the Habsburg Austro-Hungarian Domain. Germany seeing Russia preparing, announced a battle with Russia.
World War I (First World War or Great War o WWI) began on July 28, 1914, and finished on November 11, 1918, was a conflict centered in Europe. The conflict separated two countries: the Partners comprising of Russian Domain, France, Italy, and Japan, and Joined Realm or English Domain against the Focal powers comprising Germany, Ottoman Domain, and Austria-Hungary.
The conflict, presenting new military innovation weapons, had killed an assessment of 9,000,000 troopers in demolition, carnage, and slaughter.
Learn more about world war 1:
https://brainly.com/question/485441
#SPJ4
what contributed to the decline of both the ottoman and safavid empires?
Invasion, economic destitution, and growing European power all played a role in the decline of the Ottoman and Safavid empires.
ABOUT OTTOMAN EMPIREOttoman Empire, often referred to in modern Turkish as Osmanlı İmparatorluğu (Ottoman Empire) or Osmanlı Devletisman State; sometimes called the Ottoman Empire, Ottoman Empire, Turkish Sultanate, Ottoman Empire or Ottoman Turks was a transcontinental empire founded by Turkish tribes under Osman Bey in northwestern Anatolia in 1299. After 1354, the Ottomans crossed Europe and began their conquest of the Balkans, turning the Ottoman state from a small duchy into a transcontinental state. The Ottomans ended the history of the Eastern Roman Empire with the conquest of Constantinople by Mehmed II in 1453.
Throughout the 16th and 17th centuries, to be precise at the height of its power under Suleiman Al-Qanuni, the Ottoman Empire was one of the most powerful states in the world, a multinational and multilingual empire that controlled most of Southeastern Europe, West Asia/Caucasus, North Africa, and The Horn of Africa.
By the early 17th century, the sultanate consisted of 32 provinces and numerous vassal states, some of which were annexed to the empire's territories, while the rest were granted varying degrees of autonomy over the centuries.
Learn more about ottoman empire at https://brainly.com/question/17850038.
#SPJ4
What rights did the Abbe Sieyes claim in his speech to the Estates General? Why did he call for a radical restructuring of French society? Are his views more reflective of the concerns of the First Estate or the Third Estate?
Answer:
In his speech to the Estates General, Abbe Sieyes claimed that the Third Estate, which represented the common people of France, should have the same rights and privileges as the First Estate (nobility) and the Second Estate (clergy). He called for a radical restructuring of French society in order to give the Third Estate a greater say in the governance of the country, arguing that the current system was unjust and that the Third Estate was being unfairly taxed without representation. His views were more reflective of the concerns of the Third Estate, as he called for a more equal distribution of power and representation in the government.
Election of lincoln summary
A summary on the election of President Lincoln would include how he got elected even on the platform of the Repeublican party, which was an anti- slavery party.
How did Abraham Lincoln get elected ?Lincoln's victory marked the first time that a Republican had been elected president. This was a significant shift in American politics, as the Democrats had been in power for most of the country's history.
Lincoln's campaign was focused on preserving the Union and ending the expansion of slavery, which was a contentious issue at the time. His position on slavery was a major factor in his election.
Lincoln's victory in the presidential election was a major factor in the secession of several southern states from the Union. In response, they formed the Confederate States of America, which led to the American Civil War.
Find out more on the election of Lincoln at https://brainly.com/question/16444986
#SPJ1
Now, write an argumentative paragraph in response to
the prompt.
Give your answer in the form of at least four to six
sentences, and provide evidence for your claim for political perspectives
I disagree that access to sugary beverages should be restricted in schools. Personally, I think people should consume fewer sugar-sweetened beverages, but I don't think the government should be requiring it.
What is meant by evidence?Choosing one's own path—even a terrible one—must be left to the individual. My conservative political outlook is in line with this viewpoint. According to this perspective, the government should have less influence over people and should place a strong emphasis on individual freedom.Any sort of proof that is provided to the court to establish the reality of a fact is considered evidence. Although evidence is necessary for proof, not all evidence supports a claim. A fact that shows something to be actual or true is called a proof. Evidence is information that might persuade someone that something is true or real. Proof is definitive and conclusive. The usefulness of evidence in proving a claim. evidence that is pertinent. Direct evidence circumstantial evidenceIn philosophy, evidence has been understood to include things like personal experiences, claims, reports of observations, mental states, current events, and even physiological occurrences like the stimulation of one's sensory surfaces.To learn more about evidence refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/20840904
#SPJ1
explain the ancient greek attitude about money, and why the greeks were suspicious of this invention?
The ancient Greek had a varied outlook on the issue of money in the past. This caused them to ne suspicious.
Why were the Greeks suspicious of money?The ancient Greek attitude towards money was complex and varied. On one hand, money played an important role in Greek society as a means of exchange and a way to facilitate trade and commerce. On the other hand, the Greeks were suspicious of money because they saw it as a corrupting influence that could lead to greed and inequality.
In ancient Greece, the traditional economy was based on bartering, where goods and services were exchanged directly without the use of money. The introduction of coinage, which began around 600 BCE, was seen as a new and foreign concept. The Greeks associated money with the wealthy merchants and traders, who they believed were amassing wealth at the expense of the poorer citizens. They also saw money as a way for the wealthy to gain political power and influence.
Read more on Ancient Greek here: https://brainly.com/question/183135
#SPJ1
Are these statement true or false if false correct the statement
Answer:
2, 3, 6 are wrong
Explanation:
2. not GA = florida
3. he did not have a nicknme
6. not the first day but 5th day
how did fears of foreign invasion contribute to the destruction of the old regime
The peasants were afraid that foreign troops would support the monarchy, whose policies were causing their food shortages.
Preceding the French Revolution, issues mounted in France and then some, incorporating worries with the weighty tax assessment, hunger, unfortunate harvests, and social imbalance. Expanded degrees of proficiency and schooling in the eighteenth century drove individuals to scrutinize the methods of the Ancient Regime.
The ancient régime, or "old request," alludes to the social and political request that existed in France from the late Medieval times until the French Upset. Under this framework, all men were subjects of the lord of France. There was no such thing as public citizenship in France.
Learn more about foreign invasion:
https://brainly.com/question/29615948
#SPJ4
Place these events in their correct order:
Click an item to highlight it. Use the plus sign to move the item up or the minus sign to move it down.
Before Caiaphas
Before Annas
Before Pilate the second time
Before Herod
Before the Sanhedrin
Before Pilate the first time
The events placed in the correct order are given as follows:
Before AnnasBefore CaiaphasBefore the SanhedrinBefore Pilate the first timeBefore HerodBefore Pilate the second time.Note that this is the order of events for the trial of Jesus, as described in the Bible.
Who was Herod During the Dispensation of Jesus?During Jesus' time, Herod was the ruler of the Roman province of Judaea. He was a member of the Herodian dynasty and was known as Herod the Great.
He was in charge of various construction projects, notably the expansion of Jerusalem's Second Temple. According to the Bible, he is also infamous for commanding the slaughter of innocents.
Learn more about Jesus:
https://brainly.com/question/20572865
#SPJ1
PLS HELP ME ASAP!!
The first ___(I)____ amendments to the Constitution were created to protect ____(II)____.
I. II.
10 federal rights
12 individual rights
15 merchants' rights
20 slaveholders' rights
merchants' rights
10
20
15
federal rights
individual rights
12
slaveholders' rights
The first ten amendments to the Constitution were created to protect individual rights and freedoms.
What are the constitutional amendments?A constitutional amendment modifies a polity's, organization's, or other sort of entity's constitution. Frequently, amendments are included directly into the pertinent portions of an existing constitution.
The Constitution has been revised 27 times since it was ratified, and the founders also laid out the procedure by which amendments may be made.
Read more on the constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/16385413
#SPJ1
What was the impact of Washington's Farewell Address?
(A) It kept future Presidents from running for more than two terms.
(B) It guided American foreign policy toward neutrality for quite some time.
(C) It made the new nation realize how much Washington had given up to be President.
(D) It made Congress determined that all Presidents would follow Washington's example
Washington's Farewell Address guided American foreign policy toward neutrality for quite some time. Thus option B is the answer.
George Washington's Farewell Address was a statement given by him during his last weeks as President of the United States, in which he advised the nation on various issues. Among them, he emphasized the importance of American neutrality in foreign affairs and the avoidance of long-term alliances with other nations.
The address was widely read and discussed in the press, and its ideas about neutrality and avoiding entangling alliances were influential in shaping American foreign policy for many years. As a result, it played a key role in guiding American foreign policy toward neutrality and non-interference in European conflicts for quite some time.
Learn more Farewell Address:
https://brainly.com/question/30187943
#SPJ4
whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly
The phrase that assuming one individual's rights are disregarded, especially while they are in their most weak state, then, at that point, our aggregate freedoms have additionally been compromised. Activities stand out and change is infectious.
Baptist clergyman and social activist Martin Luther king, Jr., advanced peaceful dissent. Ruler battled for uniformity and basic freedoms for African Americans, the oppressed, and all survivors of unfairness from the mid-1950s until he died in 1968.
We are bound together in a solitary piece of clothing of predetermination, ensnared in a tough trap of correspondence. What influences one straightforwardly additionally influences every other person by implication. We are trapped in a certain organization of commonality.
Learn more about Martin Luther king:
https://brainly.com/question/30299884
#SPJ4
This question is not complete , here I am attaching the complete question:
What does the phrase "whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly" mean?
Compose an Essay
Select one woman from the progressive era you read about and write a brief essay about her work. Be sure to include her accomplishments and the impact her actions had on women's rights. Cite evidence from the materials you just read and any connections you can make with the research you have gathered: Feel free to use the work you did in your History Journal to help with your essay. In your essay you should support your points using evidence from the lesson and the material you just read.
Jane Addams was one of the most influential women of the Progressive era.
What is essay writing?
Essay writing is the process of creating an essay or paper typically for an academic purpose. An essay is a written composition that expresses a certain idea, claim, or concept and backs it up with supporting statements. It will discuss the writer's point of view on a certain topic, often backed up with evidence and examples.
Addams was born in 1860 and grew up in the Midwest. She was the daughter of a small-town factory owner. Addams was an active member of the Women's Christian Temperance Union and the National American Woman Suffrage Association, and she was a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Jane Addams was an American social reformer and women's rights activist who was instrumental in the founding of the settlement house movement and help to shape the modern discipline of sociology in the United States. She founded the Hull House settlement in Chicago in 1889, which was the first settlement house in the United States. Her work in Hull House and activism in the settlement house movement focused on providing healthcare, education, and recreation opportunities to the working class, especially immigrants and women.
Addams was a leader in the women's suffrage movement, advocating for the right of women to vote. She also fought for women's labor rights, including the right to fair wages and safer working conditions. Her efforts to improve the quality of life of the working class led to the passage of the Chicago Minimum Wage Law in 1913, the first minimum wage law in a major U.S. city.
Addams was the first woman to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1931. She was also a leader in the anti-war movement, speaking out against the First and Second World Wars. Addams was an advocate for peace, social justice, and civil rights, and her work helped to shape the modern civil rights movement.
Therefore, Jane Addams was one of the most influential women of the Progressive Era.
To learn more about Jane Addams from the link
https://brainly.com/question/29774514
#SPJ1
In examining the history of the visionary companies, we were struck by how often they made some of their best moves not by detailed strategic planning, but rather by experimentation, trial and error, opportunism, and--quite literally--accident. What looks in hindsight like a brilliant strategy was often the residual result of opportunistic experimentation and purposeful accidents." References: Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. L. (2002). Built to last; Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks. When I look back on the decisions I've made, it's clear that I made some of my best choices not through a thorough analytical investigation of my options, but instead by trial and error and, often, simply by accident. The somewhat random aspect of my success or failure is, at the same time, both encouraging and scary, Which of the following is true for the Student Version above? Word-for-Word plagiarism Paraphrasing plagiarism This is not plagiarism
In the student version, the student has referred to the source which Collins and Porras called attention to and have composed it in quotes expressing that it isn't their work. The understudy has given out his/her viewpoint toward the start of the form which isn't any sort of plagiarism. Hence, overall there is no plagiarism in the student's version.
The student version can't be delegated plagiarism because it is a translation of the first text and makes all references to it appropriately. The message presents a few statements of the first message and numbers the page from where it was taken and the name of the creators with the extended period of distribution.
There is no reiteration of words with inaccurate references or summaries, there is just an understanding and clarification of the reference made.
Hence option (C) is correct.
Learn more about Student Version:
https://brainly.com/question/13414261
#SPJ4
Please help, this is due on the 24th!!
1) The people who made this painting differ from the Pueblo people of the American Southwest in that they were Nomadic and hunted the animals on the open plains for food. One of the animals hunted is the Bison which is depicted in the picture. (Option D)
2) One can infer from the exerpt that "Powhatan's people have provided the colonists With food and help."(Option D) This is evident from the first and second sentences.
3) We can also infer that the motive of the British soldiers is to to drive Powhatan's people from the land and occupy their villages. (Option B) See the answer to option 2 above.
4) It may be inferred that the challenge that Winthrop identifies as a challenge that they face in the colony is: "conflict with Native Americans for land" (Option B)
5) The conclusion one can draw about the Impact of the French colony of Quebec's environmental conditions that Champlain describes is that: "Arable land and moderate climate made large agricultural settlements possible." (Option A)
What is an inference and why is it important?An inference is a conclusion made from evidence and reasoning rather than explicit facts in literature.
It is to be noted that it is significant because it lets readers to comprehend suggested ideas and themes that may not be conveyed clearly in the text.
Learn more about inference:
https://brainly.com/question/16780102
#SPJ1
The painting shows Napoleon.
This painting shows Napoleon on his horse. Napoleon is wearing a coat, and his horse is moving slowly through the snow. Other soldiers around Napoleon are marching. They are all dressed in winter clothing. Many of their heads are down as they march.
Which word best explains how Napoleon is portrayed in this painting?
heroic
frightened
brave
weakened
Answer: Napoleon is portrayed as frightened
Answer:
frightened
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
March 2nd is to Texas as _________ is to the United States.
A. May 30
B. July 4
C. November 11
D. February 22
July 4th is to the United States as March 2nd is to Texas. (Option B).
What happened on July 4th in the United States?July 4th is celebrated as Independence Day in the United States. On this day in 1776, the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence, which declared the 13 American colonies to be independent of British rule. The day is typically celebrated with parades, fireworks, and other patriotic displays.
Therefore, just as March 2nd is celebrated in Texas, the United States celebrate and hold with reverence July 4th, 1776 as the day they got independent from England.
Learn more about United States here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
What was the government like in Uruguay for many years?
peaceful
just
democratic
unrest
For many years the government of Uruguay suffered from Unrest. There was a civic-military dictatorship of Uruguay from 1973 to 85, which was a military dictatorship of authoritarian nature which ruled for 12 years.
Due to its abuse of human rights, through use torture, and the mysterious disappearances of many Uruguayans, the dictatorship has generated a great deal of controversy. The term "civic-military" describes how the military government usurped authority from civilian president who maintained to function as head of state relatively gradually. The military dictatorship in question coexisted with other dictatorial regimes in the region and was the result of an upsurge in bloodshed and authoritarianism in a historically peaceful and democratic society. All previous political activities, including the conventional political parties, was put an end to as a result. Particularly Uruguayans with left-wing tendencies were jailed and tortured.
To know more about civic-military dictatorship :
https://brainly.com/question/1310466
#SPJ4
legislation that was passed in 1964 as a result of the march on washington
The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964 as a result of the march on Washington.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed in June 1964 as a result of activist agitation for years in support of comprehensive civil rights legislation. Prior to the March on Washington, President Kennedy had presented the civil rights measure to Congress, but it was held up in the Judiciary Committee by Southern senators' stalling tactics. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbade segregation and discrimination in employment, public accommodations, housing, and education.
It created a federal Community Relations Service to help local communities with civil rights issues and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to promote equitable hiring practises. The bill also gave the US Office of Education permission to provide financial support to areas that are battling to desegregate their public schools.
The question seems incomplete. The complete question is:
Which legislation was passed in 1964 as a result of the March on Washington?
Know more about Civil Rights Act of 1964 here
https://brainly.com/question/1264052
#SPJ4
Under the Articles of Confederation, the power of Congress could best be described as
A. restrictive
B. tyrannical
C. expansive
D. limited
Answer: D. limited
Explanation:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the power of Congress was limited. This means that Congress did not have a lot of authority or power to govern or make decisions for the country. The states retained most of the power and authority, and Congress could only make recommendations, not enforce laws. This led to a lack of unity and efficiency in the government and ultimately contributed to the need for a new Constitution.
French writer who wrote about freedom of speech, religious toleration, and separation of church and state; used satire to push for freedom of speech; said "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Voltaire was a French Enlightenment-era thinker and philosopher who was interested in free inquiry and secularism.
Voltaire was a talented and prolific writer who wrote in practically every literary style imaginable, including plays, poems, novels, essays, chronicles, and scientific expositions. He authored almost 20,000 letters as well as 2,000 booklets and pamphlets.
He was an outspoken supporter of civil freedoms who was often threatened by the Catholic French monarchy's severe censorship regulations. His polemics satirised intolerance, religious orthodoxy, and French institutions of the day. Candide, his best-known work and magnum opus, is a novella that reflects on, criticises, and mocks many events, ideas, and philosophies of the day.
To learn more about Voltaire, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18558336
#SPJ4
Unlike conflicts in Egypt and Syria, the conflict in the Byzantine territory of Anatolia
Unlike the conflicts in Egypt and Syria which were political, economic and territorial, the Byzantine-Seljuk conflict in Anatolia was primarily driven by religious differences between the two sides.
What is conflict?The conflict in Anatolia during the Byzantine period was primarily a religious one, as it involved the struggle between the Byzantine Empire, which was predominantly Christian, and the Seljuk Turks, who were Muslim.
The Seljuk Turks, who were originally from Central Asia, had migrated into Anatolia in the 11th century and established a powerful Muslim state there. The Byzantine Empire saw the Seljuk Turks as a major threat to their territorial and religious integrity, and several wars were fought between the two sides over the course of several decades.
Read more on conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/846617
#SPJ1
Gary used to make bottles of glitter glue.
Bottles Glue Glitter
1 3.8 1.9
4
How much glue and glitter would he need to make 4 bottles?
Gary would need 15.2 oz of glue and 3.8 oz of glitter to make 4 bottles.
Gary would need 6.8 oz of glue and 4.9 oz of glitter to make 4 bottles.
Gary would need 7.8 oz of glue and 5.9 oz of glitter to make 4 bottles.
Gary would need 15.2 oz of glue and 7.6 oz of glitter to make 4 bottles.
As per the given cups of glitter glue for different poster, ratio of the glitter to glue of both the colors had the same ratio.
How much glue and glitter would he need to make 4 bottles?As given in the question,
Fred made glitter glue to decorate posters ,
For making red glitter glue quantity used :
2 cups of glitter and 6 cups of glue
Ratio of glitter to glue for red color is
= 2 /6
= 1/3 ___(1)
For making gold glitter glue quantity used :
3 cups of glitter and 9 cups of glue
Ratio of glitter to glue for gold color is
= 3 /9
= 1/3 ____(2)
From (1) and (2) we get,
Ratio of red color =Ratio of gold color =1/3
Therefore, for the given cups of glitter glue for different poster, ratio of the glitter to glue of both the colors had the same ratio.
Learn more about Ratios here
https://brainly.com/question/29062755
#SPJ1