What best completes this diagram

Answer:

The major outcome of the invasion of Poland in 1939 was that it started World War II. Explanation: The German invasion of Poland was a military action of Nazi Germany aimed at annexing the Polish territory.

Explanation:

This should help you <3

Answer:

United States

Explanation:

Answer:

Great Britain nearly went to war with the U.S. as a result of the Trent Affair.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! Have a nice day :)

Answer:

C. The Soviet Union suffered greater losses of life

Explanation:

The Nazis were literally invading the Russians and murdering people inside the country. The Soviets lost a tremendous amount of lives during that war.  

Answer:

I'M HERE NA MAY QUEEN I WILL SAVE YOU... ❤️❤️✨

[tex]\\[/tex]

Answer:

I didn't understand it

the answer is is c or b to this

What did the federal government do to prevent Jim Crow Laws?

In 1948 President Harry S. Truman issued Executive Order 9981, desegregating the armed services. As the Civil Rights Movement gained momentum and used federal courts to attack Jim Crow statutes, the white-dominated governments of many of the southern states countered by passing alternative forms of restrictions

Answer:

B for the first one, and C for the next one.

Explanation:

Some types of protists are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen between two organisms. Since euglena is a cell that forms a substance on water, its crucial that its parasitic.

Answer:

this is the order in my opinion

The correct sequence of the events of the Industrial Revolution according to the order of their occurrence is as follows,

The Industrial Revolution completely changed the ideas and the standard of living of the people, and industries were being set-up as a result of increasing population and demand.

Hence, the order of appearances and occurrence of events of the Industrial revolution are as aforementioned above.

Learn more about Industrial Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/855594

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

World War II resulted in several women taking jobs that were even considered before to be jobs that men only can do. Women took jobs in different factories and in defense plants. Women also became shipbuilders, welders, built airplanes as well as producing ammunition.

These jobs gave women many opportunities and resulted in more women having jobs. Even when the war ended, they continued working in several factories.

Answer:

The initial response was making fun of it. And only after 4 years of the health crisis did the Reagan administration accept the severity of the epidemic. there began researches, awareness programs, medicinal trials, and the urge to find a cure for it.

Explanation:

When the HIV AIDS epidemic first began in the early 1980s, the Reagan administration seemed to find it hilarious and even made jokes about it. The acceptance of the epidemic came only by 1985 when the President publicly acknowledged the epidemic as a "top priority".

In the recently unearthed documentary "When AIDS was Funny" by Scott Calonico was released, the Press Secretary to the President, Larry Speakes seemed to take it as a joke about the epidemic that killed one in every three people. Referred to as "gay plague", Speakes as well as members of the media would take it as a joke and make fun of it. It would be after a couple of says that the president would openly accept the epidemic as a serious threat.

The health emergency would be openly accepted by the leaders of the country after 4 years since it began. It was then that the issue would be met with medicines, research, and various awareness programs.  

Answer:inaction

Explanation:did the test

Answer:

Sultanate of Delhi

Explanation:

I checked it on quizlet.

Answer:

Erasmus  

Explanation:

Erasmus was a Dutch scholar and Catholic priest whose views were distinct from many other religious reformers. Erasmus travelled throughout Europe as a biblical and humanist educator. He trusted the power of words and used his writing to attack scholars theology and clerical abuses and promote his philosophy of Christ.

Erasmus was condemned from all sides because of his ideas which were opposed by clergies. He had worked for peace and unity, only to experience war and breakup.

Answer:

the way the people were grouped it made it very difficult to change your status

Explanation:

The 12th and 13th centuries saw a huge development of the English economy. This was partially driven by the growth in the population from around 1.5 million at the time of the creation of the Domesday Book in 1086 to between 4 and 5 million in 1300. England remained a primarily agricultural economy, with the rights of major landowners and the duties of serfs increasingly enshrined in English law. More land, much of it at the expense of the royal forests, was brought into production to feed the growing population or to produce wool for export to Europe. Many hundreds of new towns, some of them planned, sprung up across England, supporting the creation of guilds, charter fairs and other important medieval institutions. The descendants of the Jewish financiers who had first come to England with William the Conqueror played a significant role in the growing economy, along with the new Cistercian and Augustinian religious orders that came to become major players in the wool trade of the north. Mining increased in England, with the silver boom of the 12th century helping to fuel a fast-expanding currency.

Answer:

On September 29th, 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain flew to Munich to participate in a conference with Adolf Hitler of Germany, Eduoard Daladier, premier of France, and Benito Mussolini of Italy. The topic: the cession of the Czech Sudetenland to Germany. Czechoslovakia was not invited to the conference, and the Czech delegate was forced to remain outside the room until the conference was over.

Ten hours later, an agreement was reached which granted each of Hitler’s demands. The following morning, Chamberlain presented to Hitler an additional treaty which, to paraphrase it, demonstrated “the desire of the peoples of both our countries never to go to war again.” Then Chamberlain flew back to London, and when he arrived was granted a tremendous reception. He was invited to Buckingham Palace by George VI. After his audience with the King, Chamberlain then addressed the crowd that developed and uttered the now famous sentence: “I believe this represents peace in our time.”

As everyone knows, six months later, Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia and, 11 months after Munich, England and Germany were at war. Ever since then, Munich has been characterized as England’s greatest embarrassment, Chamberlain has been characterized as a wimp with an umbrella, and any attempt to “sooth or to pacify,” which is the original meaning of Appeasement, has been tainted with the stigma of Munich.

During the Battle of Britain three British journalists (Michael Foot, Peter Howard, and Frank Owen), writing under the pseudonym “Cato,” wrote Guilty Men, blaming Chamberlain, Stanley Baldwin (Prime Minister from 1935-37), and Ramsay MacDonald (Prime Minister from 1929-35), and other members of the National Government (the Government from 1931-40) entirely for the crisis that Britain found itself in then. According to Foot, Howard, and Owen, they “. . . were “guilty” of being blind to their duty, of failing to rearm sufficiently, of refusing to hear – in fact of stifling – other voices which spoke the truth.” (1) This has been the consensus that has been accepted in the past 58 years by nearly everyone.

Britain eventually did win the war, but at a large cost. It was forced to liquidate many of its overseas investments, and even to give 99-year leases for military bases on its colonies in North America to the United States. It has lost all of its Great Power status. Its economy has suffered from gradual decline – so much so that Great Britain is now one of the poorest industrialized countries in the world. In fact 12 years ago, even Italy surpassed Britain’s per capita income.

After the war, the Cold War developed, and the initiative in foreign policy passed from Great Britain to the United States. So did the stigma of Munich, which helped to intensify the Cold War during the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Every time a President wanted to decrease the tension, he has been attacked for being an “appeaser.” For example, when the Berlin Wall was built in 1961, John F. Kennedy received, among other things, an umbrella from students at the Free University (in West Berlin). The point: don’t give in to the Soviets.

He got the “lesson” and in the following year brought the United States the closest it’s ever been to nuclear holocaust in the Cuban Missile Crisis. He and President Lyndon Johnson escalated the most unwinnable war in American history: Vietnam. During the 1970s, Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter attempted to reach a detente (or understanding) with the Soviets. But this policy was never attempted seriously, as the Soviet Union was still deeply distrusted. By the late 1970s, it was abandoned when President Carter, to retaliate against the Soviet invasion of Afganistan, launched a grain embargo and boycotted the (Moscow) Olympics.

Then Ronald Reagan was elected President. During his first term, he increased military spending by a significant amount, did not meet with any Soviet (“Evil Empire”) leader, and made the ill-quoted 1983 remark “We start bombing in five minutes.” He followed a policy diametrically opposed to appeasement. Perhaps as a result, America won the cold war, perhaps not. In any event, that’s not my purview.

Even today, when the United States is dealing with such leaders as Bashar al-Assad, it has to act tough, as if, if it doesn’t, Munich will reoccur. It was 70 years this September that Chamberlain flew to Munich, and “dishonoured his nation.” Seventy years is a long time, but it is interesting to note that that conference is still very much with us today.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached or further references we can say the following.

Rob DeSalle studies genes and DNA. According to him, genes determine how complex living things are in that these genes specifically characterize every single living being on planet Earth.

For Rob DeSalle, the number of genes does not determine if you are a better species than others. Or the wrong idea that if some species have different amounts of genes this means that it has better DNA or is a superior species.

Desalle indicates that some amoebas have more DNA in their cells, compared to humans. For him, the key lies in how the species uses its DNA in order to determine its complex life.

Answer:

The isreal treaty i believe

Explanation:

Answer:

The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns' invasion of Europe in the late fourth century.

  Era una casa grande donde convivían nobles y caballeros.

Answer:

its B:)

Explanation:

what are you saying?

Answer:

The Erie Canal opened up trade opportunities from the East Coast to the Midwest

Explanation:

The map in the question shows the Erie Canal, a water route from New York to the midwest in the United States. It serves as a mess of transporting commodities, mainly commercial quantities, and agricultural produce. It also serves as migrating routes for many people moving from New York to less populated places in the Midwest, such as Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Chicago, and other areas in the West.

Answer:

The New Policies (Chinese: 新法; pinyin: xīnfǎ), also known as Xining Reform (熙宁变法), Xifeng Reform (熙丰变法) or Wang Anshi Reform (王安石变法), were a series of reforms initiated by the Northern Song dynasty reformer Wang Anshi when he served as minister under Emperor Shenzong from 1069–1076.

Explanation:

Answer:

“No.

And it wasn't necessary either. Militarily Japan was finished (as the Soviet invasion of Manchuria that August showed). Further blockade and urban destruction would have produced a surrender in August or September at the latest, without the need for the costly anticipated invasion or the atomic bomb.

Explanation:

Answer:

King Henry would most likely feel a bit of guilt for locking her in the tower to her death. While he was very determined to produce a male heir, he was still a Christian with Christian morals. As to his response, I'm not sure if a response is truly necessary since the letter was more of a "please don't forget me, and you are condemned to dam,nation for this" declaration. If he did respond it would probably be a senseless justification for her imprisonment and perhaps an apology.

Explanation:

Answer:

the lack of food

Explanation:

they were starved