Answer:
In this sentence, unnoticeable is a(n) synonym of unobtrusive.
In this sentence, authorize is a(n) synonym of permit.
In this sentence, included is a(n) antonym of excluded.
Explanation:
Synonyms are different words that possess the same or, at least, very similar meanings. In the sentences we are analyzing here, unnoticeable and unobtrusive convey very similar ideas. They describe someone who is not conspicuous, who does not attract attention to himself. The same goes for permit and authorize. They are synonyms because they both convey the idea of allowing someone to do something.
Antonyms, on the other hand, are words that possess opposite meanings or that convey ideas that contradict each other. That is what we have with include and exclude. If you include someone, that means you are counting that person in; it means the person is participating. If you exclude someone, that person cannot participate.
Answer:
The person above me is right
Explanation:
Which one
Is it answerrrrrrrrrrrrr
Answer:
Try taking out the spaces between the underscore and the words.
Explanation:
helppepepeppepepepep
Answer:
located near the Atlantic ocean
help plz ASAP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
C is your answer
Explanation:
What is the complete predicate of the sentence?
prepare for the holiday
prepare for the holiday by decorating their homes with symbols of springtime
X decorating their homes with symbols of springtime
symbols of springtime
Intro
How does society Affect the individuals thoughts ?
hi guys please answer these questions thank you:)
Answer:
23=
24=
25=c
26=b
Explanation:
I just knew only this much sorry
I've been making a cake
Answer:
Explanation:
What kind of cake?
Answer:
How's it taste? Did you do it right?
would a charitable person be celebrated by a community in need?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
If you are charitable you give your stuff to people willingly because you a selfless. If a community is in need and this person is willing to give a lot it is very kind and helpful to the people in that community! Hope this helps!! :)
True or False.
During your lifetime, you will produce enough saliva to fill two swimming pools ♀️.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The average human produces 25,000 quarts of saliva or spit in a lifetime. That's enough saliva to fill 2 swimming pools
What are the parts of speech for this sentence
This is an unbelievably giant cat everyone should be afraid of it
Answer:
This - pronoun
is - verb
unbelievably giant - adjective
cat - noun
everyone - pronoun
should be - verb
afraid - adjective
of - preposition
it - pronoun
Explanation:
Parts of speech are defined as the different types of words that are linked together to give meaning to the sentence. Nouns are defined as the referral words to denote a person, place, or thing while the pronouns function to replace the noun. The nouns and pronouns primarily function as the subjects or objects in the sentence. The verb functions to denote the being or action performed by the subject in the sentence. Adjectives are defined as the words that qualify a noun or pronoun. While prepositions function to connect the words of phrases or show relationship between them.
Describe a time when you showed unexpected courage.
Answer:
When someone told me recently that they thought I was very brave, I dismissed the comment. To me, having courage means overcoming extraordinary challenges, like climbing Mount Everest or running with the bulls. It never dawned on me that I demonstrate bravery every day, yet we all do. In fact, even though we aren’t necessarily facing tough physical challenges like climbing a mountain, we deal with a variety of obstacles and a multitude of fears as a part of our daily lives. And for the most part, we dismiss our ability to overcome these as not worthy of acknowledgement.
Is the bee buzzed against the window an oxymoron?
Answer:
he's rite tho it is a
Explanation:
How does this confrontation advance the plot?
The concept of revenge is introduced for the first time in the play.
The play’s action reaches a climax as Laertes exacts revenge.
The suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal.
The play's action is resolved as Claudius and Laertes make peace.
The confrontation advanced the plot as C. The suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal.
In a literary work, a plot simply means the sequence of events where a particular event causes another event or occurrence. It is used by writers to structure what happens in a story.
From the story, it can be deduced that the confrontation advanced the plot as the suspense builds as Claudius clarifies Laertes's goal. This was vital in conveying the theme of the story to the readers.
Learn more about plots on:
https://brainly.com/question/20726607
Answer:The answer is C
Explanation: Got the question right on edge.
Is there any one who read Tom's Miserable Morning story is there any one who tell me break mu old heart explain the phase and tell me please
Answer:
i havent but lemme help you cause not lots of ppl answer these types of questions
Explanation:
go to spark notes its a site where it summarizes books you can even read the summarys paragraph by paragraph just search up your book :)
hope this helps!
`brianna/edgumacation
lol looks like someone is drowning
Answer:
I told you my lifeboat all the way.
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure im the one drowning, in my own loneliness-
Read this sentence from paragraph 2 of the story. “It seemed almost mystical, like turning straw into gold, and Mr. Pollock was a master. ”How does the author’s allusion to “turning straw into gold” from the folktale “Rumpelstiltskin” contribute to your understand of Ben’s feelings about abstract art and artists?
a .It expresses his beliefs that modern painting techniques produce bright, colorful art
.b .It stresses Ben’s desire to turn himself into a famous abstract artist when he gets older .c.It emphasizes Ben’s sense of the magical nature of the artistic process. d. It reveals his admiration for Mr. Pollock’s ability to create valuable art from simple paints.
Answer:
It reveals his admiration for Mr. Pollock’s ability to create valuable art from simple paints.
Explanation:
lol
It reveals his admiration for Mr. Pollock’s ability to create valuable art from simple paints is the author’s allusion to “turning straw into gold” from the folktale “Rumpelstiltskin” to contribute to the understanding of Ben’s feelings about abstract art and artists. Hence, option D is correct.
What is abstract art?Instead of aiming to correctly describe a visual reality, abstract art uses shapes, colors, forms, and gestural strokes to achieve its impression. Wassily Kandinsky Cossacks Tate.
In a technical sense, the word "abstract" describes the process of taking something away from another object. The 1937 oil painting Guernica by Pablo Picasso is one of the most well-known works of abstract art. Others include Wassily Kandinsky's Composition X and Composition II in Red.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about abstract art, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13451940
#SPJ2
This shows that money does not always benefit society because of why
Answer: Hope this helps
Explanation: 1. Economic inequality can give wealthier people an unacceptable degree of control over the lives of others.
If wealth is very unevenly distributed in a society, wealthy people often end up in control of many aspects of the lives of poorer citizens: over where and how they can work, what they can buy, and in general what their lives will be like. As an example, ownership of a public media outlet, such as a newspaper or a television channel, can give control over how others in the society view themselves and their lives, and how they understand their society.
2. Economic inequality can undermine the fairness of political institutions.
If those who hold political offices must depend on large contributions for their campaigns, they will be more responsive to the interests and demands of wealthy contributors, and those who are not rich will not be fairly represented.
3. Economic inequality undermines the fairness of the economic system itself.
Economic inequality makes it difficult, if not impossible, to create equality of opportunity. Income inequality means that some children will enter the workforce much better prepared than others. And people with few assets find it harder to access the first small steps to larger opportunities, such as a loan to start a business or pay for an advanced degree.
None of these objections is an expression of mere envy. They are objections to inequality based on the effects of some being much better off than others. In principle, these effects could avoided, without reducing economic inequality, through such means as the public financing of political campaigns and making high-quality public education available to all children (however difficult this would be in practice).
A fourth kind of objection to inequality is more direct. In Paul Krugman’s review of Capital in the 21st Century by Thomas Piketty, he mentions these stats from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics: “Real wages for most U.S. workers have increased little if at all since the early 1970s, but wages for the top 1 percent of earners have risen 165 percent, and wages for the top 0.1 percent have risen 362 percent.” (Krugman calls those “supersalaries.”) Again, the idea that this is objectionable is not mere envy. It rests, I believe, on this idea, my fourth point:
4. Workers, as participants in a scheme of cooperation that produces national income, have a claim to a fair share of what they have helped to produce.
What constitutes a fair share is of course controversial. One answer is provided by John Rawls’ Difference Principle, according to which inequalities in wealth and income are permissible if and only if these inequalities could not be reduced without worsening the position of those who are worst-off. You don’t have to accept this exact principle, though, in order to believe that if an economy is producing an increasing level of goods and services, then all those who participate in producing these benefits — workers as well as others — should share in the result.
No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others.
Peter Singer’s powerful argument for altruistic giving draws on one moral relation we can stand in to others: the relation of being able to benefit them in some important way. With respect to this relation, to “matter morally” is to be someone whose welfare there is reason to increase.
But the objections to inequality that I have listed rest on a different moral relation. It’s the relation between individuals who are participants in a cooperative scheme. Those who are related to us in this way matter morally in a further sense: they are fellow participants to whom the terms of our cooperation must be justifiable.
In our current environment of growing inequality, can such a justification be given? No one has reason to accept a scheme of cooperation that places their lives under the control of others, that deprives them of meaningful political participation, that deprives their children of the opportunity to qualify for better jobs, and that deprives them of a share in the wealth they help to produce.
These are not just objections to inequality and its consequences: they are at the same time challenges to the legitimacy of the system itself. The holdings of the rich are not legitimate if they are acquired through competition from which others are excluded, and made possible by laws that are shaped by the rich for the benefit of the rich. In these ways, economic inequality can undermine the conditions of its own legitimacy.
As Singer shows, the possibility of improving the lot of the poor is a powerful reason for redistribution. But it is important to see that the case for equality is powerful in a different way.
What type of sentence is below?
Aimee didn't eat popcorn or drink soda.
O complex
O compound
O simple
Can someone tell me the word lll
Answer:
match
Explanation:
the boys are matching and the second pic is a ligit match
Answer:
Fire Sweater (design)/Match (matching clothes/match)
Pls, give me Brainlist if I'm correct! :3
can someone write me a 3 paragraph essay on Gatsby and The American Dream? I haven’t read it
They believed being wealthy translated to living the American dream. Gatsby, Myrtle, and Daisy failed to live the American dream due to lack of knowledge. The wrong factors motivate most people in search of the American dream. Myrtle was driven by the desire to lead a wealthy and luxurious life.
Answer:
Gatsby is a clear embodiment of the American Dream: he was born poor and rose to achieve a higher wealth and social status. ... The American Dream is the hope that anyone can earn success if they work hard enough. Gatsby's love for Daisy led him to achieve extravagant wealth.
Explanation:
hope this helps with the essay YOU ARE going to write! :)
Read the passage from an argumentative essay. (1) Bernie Sanders has argued that no one should have to pay tuition to go to college. (2) This will only increase the tax burden on the middle classes. To improve the relationship between ideas, the writer should revise sentence 2 by explaining the concept of a tax burden. adding "however" to the beginning of the sentence. placing "therefore" at the beginning of the sentence. connecting it to the preceding sentence with "and."
Answer:
Answer: by adding "however" to the beginning of a sentence.
Explanation:
:)
The best way to revise the passage from the argumentative sentence is by adding "however" to the beginning of the second sentence, as expressed in option B.
Why should we add "however"?The word "however" is used to create contrast between the ideas expressed in different sentences. It is usually placed at the beginning of the second sentence to show that its idea will differ from the previous one.
Here, we have two contrasting ideas. The first one is that going to college should be free, which is good. The second one is that the middle classes would end up paying for that, which is bad.
Therefore, to show that one idea is good and the other is bad, that is, that they are contrasting, we should add "however" to the beginning of the second sentence.
Learn more about revising sentences here:
https://brainly.com/question/8823021
#SPJ5
Genetics is a science which attempts to understand:
pick all that apply
Genesis
ecology
inheritance
reproduction
astronomy
zoology
Answer:
Explanation:
Genetics is a science which attempts to understand:
Genesis
ecology
inheritance
reproduction
astronomy
zoology
Two father and two sons walk into a shop. They each buy something for $1 but they only spent $3. How is that possible?
Answer:
they both have $1.50 to spend
Explanation:
1.50+ 1.50= 3.00
The scenario you described is a classic riddle. In this case, there are two fathers and two sons who enter a shop and each of them buys something for $1, but they only spend a total of $3.
1. Two fathers and two sons enter the shop. This means there are a total of three people: two fathers and one son. It's important to note that one of the fathers is also a son.
2. They each buy something for $1. So, in total, they spend $3 (1 + 1 + 1 = 3).
Now, the trick to understanding this riddle lies in the relationship between the people involved.
In this scenario, there are two fathers (Father A and Father B) and one son (Son A). Father A is also a son because he has a father, which makes him both a father and a son.
So, the breakdown of the people and their purchases is as follows:
- Father A buys something for $1.
- Father B buys something for $1.
- Son A buys something for $1.
Now, if we think about the total amount spent, Father A spent $1, Father B spent $1, and Son A spent $1. This adds up to $3, which is the total amount spent.
So, in summary, the riddle is based on the fact that one of the fathers is also a son. This means that when we count the total number of people and their purchases, we count the father-son as two separate individuals, resulting in the perception that they only spent $3 when, in reality, they each spent $1.
To know more about riddle:
https://brainly.com/question/478260
#SPJ4
what do immense majestic and numerous have in common? (Please answer now)
Answer: both mean great
Explanation:
Immense majestic and Numerous, are similar to each other as both mean both can be stated in the place of grand, where there is something grandiose or big then it is meant to be numerous in nature, more often than not.
What is a Common Noun?A Noun can be defined as the part of speech that is used to name a place, an animal, or a thing. There are many different kinds of nouns - Common Noun, Proper Noun, Collective Noun, Abstract Noun, and Concrete Noun.
A Common Noun can be defined as the type of noun which enumerates or encompasses the things, places, or names that are common to all. For example - A book, A pen.
A Proper Noun can be defined as the type of noun that addresses a specific kind of thing or we can say that the kind which mentions non-generic things, names, etc. example - Trimax Pen or Tess of the d'Urbervilles.
Hence, the Grand is a common link between Immense majestic and Numerous.
To know more about Common Noun, refer to - https://brainly.com/question/20292103
#SPJ2
SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
Society sometimes makes a person feel less important when __________________________. When that happens, individuals have to fight back because_______________.
Answer:
Society sometimes makes a person feel less important when they are overweight or obese. When that happens, individuals have to fight back because beauty is on the inside.
Society sometimes makes a person feel less important when they are a different color than someone else. When that happens, individuals have to fight back because everyone is valuable.
Society sometimes makes a person feel less important when they are poor. When that happens, individuals have to fight back because we all do our very best in these trying times.
I really hope that your question did not actually say that people should have to "fight back" because....
There is already too much violence in this world, so if this is a question from one of your teachers, remind them that we really need some peace right now.
Explanation:
How does social media play a part in cyber bullying?
Answer:
Social media plays a big part in cyber bullying. For example, in social media, you can post pictures of your face, and usually jealous people can pick apart your body and tell you what they think is "ugly" about it. In other cases, on social media, you could simply be stating some of your opinions about things. While it's ok for people to disagree with your opinions, they can be extremely rude and hate on you just for speaking out and stating how you feel about something.
Hope this helped with whatever your doing. Completely original I promise.
Match the parts of an argument with their examples.
conclusion
We should not close the library on
Saturdays.
counterclaim and rebuttal
evidence
Some people cannot get to the library
on any other day.
If we cannot afford to keep the library
open, a small tax can pay for it.
A survey from last year showed that
Saturday is the library's busiest day.
claim
reason
Therefore, I urge you to vote to keep the
library open on Saturday
Answer: look at attached -
Explanation:
*urgent* help please
Answer:
How can we answer this without seeing the passage?
Explanation:
What information does setting provide the reader? Why is that information important?
Answer: The setting of a story is important because it gives the reader a sense of the time, location, and atmosphere in which the story takes place. It is also important because it enhances the experience of the reader and adds plot, atmosphere, and characters to the production of the story.
The dramatic structure of monster.
Answer: If it's the movie Monster it shows how people around Steve when he is acting.
Explanation: