Treaty of Versailles please help and no links or I’m going to go crazy

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the program. Without the program, we do not know what its content is.

Although you forgot to attach the name and content of the program, we can help you to comment based on our knowledge of the topic.

Archeology can access to all people if the department of archeology and the government design proper courses and programs easy to understand so people can easily grab the importance of archeology and how important it is to understand the present in relation to the past.

These kinds of programs can be expanded to reach even more people depending on how easy can be designed so people could understand how the ancestors were determinant in the way people live in present times.

There could be guided visits to archeological sites. There, they can show a documentary and then guide visitors to a museum of the site so they can see archeological findings. If guides organize recreational activities to better understand the concepts, that could generate a lot of interest.

Answer:

the creation of tools such as the mechanical reaper, the cotton gin

anyways all of these made it so farming and manual labor was easier because it could be done with tools

Explanation:

Answer:

1st 3rd and 4

Explanation:

Answer:

Examples of secondary sources include:

journal articles that comment on or analyse research.

textbooks.

dictionaries and encyclopaedias.

books that interpret, analyse.

political commentary.

biographies.

dissertations.

newspaper editorial/opinion pieces.

Explanation:

“Secondary sources were created by someone who did not experience first-hand or participate in the events or conditions you're researching. For a historical research project, secondary sources are generally scholarly books and articles. A secondary source interprets and analyzes primary sources.”

Answer:

2

Explanation:

because thats where its at

Answer:

2

Explanation:

i looked it up and it said that the gobi desert is by mongolia.

Answer:

░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░

░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░

░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░

░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░

░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob

▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░

▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him onto all of ur brainly answers

░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take

░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over brainly

░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░

░░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌░░

░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█░

Explanation:

Answer: it is b “ state officials refused to enforce laws and court rulings made by the federal government“

Explanation:

Just took it on a p e x

Answer:

B. State officials refused to enforce laws and court rulings made by the federal government.

Explanation:

Took the quiz.

Answer:

Inflation

Explanation:

Germany printed more money than was currently circulating causing mass inflation devaluing the value of german marks.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Writings of 18th century Enlightenment philosophers, Montesquieu, Voltaire and Rousseau had their greatest impact on the authors of the U.S. constitution.

The Enlightenment Movement was a movement of intellectual ferment in the 13 colconies of America.

The Enlightenment movement started in the 18th to 19th century.

According to the enlightenment philosophers, every individuals have their natural and fundamental rights and the government should protect their rights.

The enlightenment philosphers believed in the separation of powers of the government and also the checks and the balances.

Their philosophies and the ideas impacted the framers of the American Constitution.

Learn more about "Enlightenment movement" here :

https://brainly.com/question/12481854

Answer:

false

Explanation:

false

Answer: D an African-American working as a sharecropper in Wilcox County

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

A “separate but equal” law school does not provide an equal education.

Explanation:

Answer:

I feel like its D) because they probably worked way more then 8h a day, were paid poorly and worked in unsafe environments

Answer:

C. President Gloria Arroyo

Answer:

Jacques Auguste de Thou was the grandson of Augustin de Thou, president of the parlement of Paris (d. 1544), and the third son of Christophe de Thou (d. 1582), premier président of the same parlement, who had had ambitions to produce a history of France. His uncle was Nicolas de Thou, Bishop of Chartres (1573–1598). With this family background, he developed a love of literature, a firm but tolerant piety, and a loyalty to the Crown.[1]

At seventeen, he began his studies in law, first at Orléans, later at Bourges, where he made the acquaintance of François Hotman, and finally at Valence, where he had Jacques Cujas for his teacher and Joseph Justus Scaliger as a friend. He was at first intended for the Church; he received the minor orders, and on the appointment of his uncle Nicolas to the episcopate succeeded him as a canon of Notre-Dame de Paris.[1]

During the next ten years he seized every opportunity for profitable travel. In 1573 he accompanied Paul de Foix on an embassy, which enabled him to visit most of the Italian courts; he formed a friendship with Arnaud d'Ossat (afterwards Bishop of Rennes, bishop of Bayeux and a cardinal), who was secretary to the ambassador. In the following year he formed part of the brilliant cortege which brought King Henry III back to France, after his flight from his Polish kingdom. He also visited several parts of France, and at Bordeaux met Michel de Montaigne. On the death of his elder brother Jean (5 April 1579), who was maître des requêtes to the parlement, his relations prevailed on him to leave the Church, and he entered the parlement and got married (1588). In the same year he was appointed conseiller d'état. He served faithfully both Henry III and Henry IV, because they both represented legitimate authority.[1]

Explanation:

Answer:

International Civil Rights: Walk of Fame - Thurgood Marshall. Thurgood Marshall, who became the first African-American Supreme Court Justice (1967-1991), knocked down legal segregation in America as a civil rights attorney.

Explanation:

Answer: 22

Explanation:

In his accession speech to Parliament, the 22-year-old monarch played down his Hanoverian connections.

Answer:1(he harmed enslaved people) 2(forced native american to be robed from there lands)3(caused thousands of deaths) 4(owned 161 slaves and whipped women)

Explanation:

He fits people description of him as a ruthless political bad should have never been president

Answer:

First. Allowed California to enter the Union as a free state.

Second. Divided to rest of the Mexican Cession into the territories of New Mexico and Utah.

Third. Ended the slave trade in Washington D.C., the nation's capital. ...

Fourth. Included a strict, fugitive slave law.

fi

Explanation:

Answer:

The most fundamental similarity between the African-American

and Native-American experiences was the lack of humanity that the

white establishment presumed each group to possess.8 Church officials, lawmakers, and legal minds intensely debated the relative humanity of each group. The fundamental philosophical and religious

question was whether African Americans and Indians were human beings, entitled to human rights protections like Euro-Americans, or inactively pursuing federal recognition, over fifty tribes have state recognition, and several

groups have been terminated by congressional enactment. See id. at 20-23.

5 See generally id. at 41-62 (discussing tribes' unique status as sovereign nations, as

opposed to minority groups, and the features that accompany this status).

6 See generally VINE DELORIA, JR. & RAYMOND J. DEMALLIE, 2 DOCUMENTS OF AMERICAN

INDIAN DIPLOMACY: TREATIES, AGREEMENTS, AND CONVEN-nONS, 1775-1979, at 745-49,

1018-19, 1084-86 (1999) (containing a brilliant cross-section of the diplomatic accords

negotiated and providing a detailed narrative accompanying these important documents).

7 See U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 3 (stating that the Congress shall have the power "To

regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and the Indian

Tribes").

8 This lack of humanity is easily identifiable in the African-American experience, as

their ancestors were first imported as slaves.

historical experiences of African Americans and Native Americans,

but history, law, politics, and culture suggest even greater substantive

differences between these two groups. The first and most obvious difference is that Native Americans are the indigenous inhabitants of the

United States. Of what significance is this obvious observation? The

preexistence and the nationhood that tribal nations, qua nations, possessed underlies the distinctive sovereign-to-sovereign relationships

that Native Americans still share with state and federal governments. 5

'

Unlike African individuals who involuntarily arrived as slaves, Native

Americans were present in America, inhabiting bounded homelands

with economic, cultural, and governing infrastructures, for millennia.

Thus, Native Americans continue to perceive themselves not only as

pre-constitutional polities, but as continuing extraconstitutional nations who deal with state and federal governments on a governmentto-government basis.

Second, the distinct sovereign status of tribal nations necessitated

the practice of negotiating treaties, political compacts, accords, and

alliances, first with one another, then with the various competing European states, and later with the United states.

                        from text book of cornell law review

Answer:

But the peoples of these continents had many things in common. Many considered themselves stewards of their ancestral homelands. African and Native groups also held similar ideas about animal spirits, the guiding presence of ancestors, oral traditions, a living world, and extended family relationships.

Explanation:

Answer:

America has industrialize over time.

Explanation:

If we go back in time, we can see the growth of the American people, we went from a hands on agricultural base economy to a machine based economy. We also see a change in women's rights and behavior during the 1920's. As time continues we run into a Great Depression and a Dust bowl causing problems for the rich and the poor. For a long time people of all classes struggle to make a living. Further down the road we have further knowledge of science and even send someone to the moon, this achievement could not have been accomplished back during the depression or even before that. Flash forward to the 2000's we can see all the changes in population and economic development. We have tractors to do the work in the fields, we have more people in charge of politics, we see a change in working classes, we want to send more kids to school to help further their knowledge vs back when women weren't able to go to school, there is a change in the rights people of color and women have, and with all of these changes the growth of America as a whole has changed drastically.

Explanation:

b imperialism follow me

Answer:

Apartheid.

Explanation:

After WW2 the Afrikaans speaking white community, descended from Dutch settlers, gained political power and introduced apartheid. This was institutionalized segregation based supposedly on the concept of separate but equal development.

In reality it was institutionalizing and attempting to legitimate the exploitation of the black community at the hands of the minority white regime. It also discriminated against the Asian community and those of mixed race, "coloureds".

Any form of protest was ruthlessly suppressed, e.g. Sharpeville in 1960. So it was inevitable that organized opposition would become more violent. The international community did little or nothing except pay lip service as South Africa was one of the most lucrative countries for foreign investment, specifically because of apartheid.

Mandela himself along with other leading opponents of apartheid were jailed for life in 1964.

Answer:

Women struggled for so long to gain the right to vote because men didn’t see them as equals, society’s expectations saw women as different than men, and legal barriers caused conflicts for them. Women were expected to work around the house and care for the family, instead of participating in politics and working. Some women that were a part of the Women’s Rights Movement didn’t even want women to be able to vote. They feared that it would ruin the support for other rights, considering men didn’t take the idea of Women’s suffrage seriously. It was also hard for women to convince people to consider women’s right to vote, which was a big obstacle. In 1827, Susan B. Jones and other women tried to vote but were arrested. It was considered a crime for women to vote which made it harder for women to achieve their goals.

Explanation:

Thank you to the first person who answered this. I just re-worded what they wrote, mostly.