The unlevered beta (βU) calculated using Hamada's equation with the given values of levered beta (βE), weight of debt (D), and tax rate (t) is approximately 0.6384.
To find the unlevered beta (βU), we can use Hamada's equation, which considers the impact of a company's capital structure on its beta. The levered beta (βE) represents the risk of the company's equity, while the weight of debt (D) and the tax rate (t) represent the company's capital structure and the tax advantage of debt, respectively. By plugging in the given values into the equation, we can calculate the unlevered beta. In this case, the levered beta (βE) is 0.92, the weight of debt (D) is 37.00%, and the tax rate (t) is 25.00%. After substituting these values and simplifying the equation, we find that the unlevered beta (βU) is approximately 0.6384.
The unlevered beta (βU) calculated using Hamada's equation with the given values of levered beta (βE), weight of debt (D), and tax rate (t) is approximately 0.6384. This value represents the systematic risk of the company's assets, independent of its capital structure.
To know more about the unlevered beta visit:
brainly.com/question/2279630
#SPJ11
"Heart Limited has one bond in issue expiring in eight years, paying 0 coupon and has a face value of $1000. It is currently traded at $720, Beta =1.2, risk free rate is 2%, historic market risk premium is 5.5%. Assume the ratio of debt to equity is 2:1, and corporate tax rate is 20%." (c) Determine the WACC for Heart Limited.
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for Heart Limited is 5.73%.
1. Calculate the cost of equity (Ke):
Ke = Risk-Free Rate + Beta * Market Risk Premium
Ke = 2% + 1.2 * 5.5% = 8.6%
2. Calculate the cost of debt (Kd):
Since the bond pays no coupon and is currently traded at a discount, the yield to maturity (YTM) can be used as the cost of debt.
Given that the bond has a face value of $1000 and is currently traded at $720, the discount is $1000 - $720 = $280.
The YTM can be calculated using the bond's discount and time to maturity:
YTM = (Discount / Purchase Price) * (1 / Time to Maturity)
YTM = ($280 / $720) * (1 / 8) = 0.0486 or 4.86%
3. Calculate the weights of equity (We) and debt (Wd):
Since the debt-to-equity ratio is 2:1, the weights can be calculated as follows:
We = 2 / (2 + 1) = 0.6667 or 66.67%
Wd = 1 / (2 + 1) = 0.3333 or 33.33%
4. Calculate the WACC:
WACC = (We * Ke) + (Wd * Kd)
WACC = (0.6667 * 8.6%) + (0.3333 * 4.86%)
WACC = 5.73%
Therefore, the WACC for Heart Limited is 5.73%.
To know more about WACC refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/33116653?#
#SPJ11
CC Rainger is a business to business distributor of MRO (maintain, repair and operate) products. They have more than 300 retail stores that they serve from a central warehouse. The company uses a 98% service level calculated on the proportion that can be satisfied directly from stock (demand fill rate). The cost for placing an order is $100 and the annual holding cost is 20%. They work 365 days/year.
Item propertyData valueLead time from supplier14 daysLead time to Retailer3 daysInternal price$25Daily demand75 unitsσ, Standard deviation during lead time103 unitsInventory carrying cost20 %
Tables that might be useful for answering the questions (click to open):
Normal Distribution function table
Service loss function table
1a. What is the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)?
Enter the correct value in the input field. Round off to the closest 10 units.
units incorrect
1b. What Safety Stock level does the company need to reach the desired service level?
Enter the correct value in the input field. Round off to the closest 10 units.
units incorrect
1c. What Re-Order Point (ROP) level does the company need to reach the desired service level?
Enter the correct value in the input field. Round off to the closest 10 units, if needed.
The economic order quantity (eoq) is approximately 2,340 units.1b.
1a. the economic order quantity (eoq) can be calculated using the following formula:
eoq = √[(2 * annual demand * ordering cost) / holding cost]
given:
- annual demand: 75 units/day * 365 days = 27,375 units
- ordering cost: $100
- holding cost: 20%
plugging these values into the formula:
eoq = √[(2 * 27,375 * 100) / 0.2] = √(5,475,000) ≈ 2,340 units to determine the safety stock level, we need to calculate the standard deviation during the lead time (σl) using the formula:
σl = σ * √(lead time)
given:
- standard deviation during lead time (σl): 103 units
- lead time from supplier: 14 days
plugging these values into the formula:
σl = 103 * √(14) ≈ 435 units
next, we can use the service loss function table to find the corresponding value for a 98% service level, which is 2% service loss. from the table, we find that the value closest to 2% service loss is 2.05.
safety stock = σl * service loss factor
safety stock = 435 * 2.05 ≈ 892 units
Learn more about stock here:
https://brainly.com/question/31940696
#SPJ11
You are thinking of building a new machine that will save you $5,000 in the first year. The machine will then begin to wear out so that the savings decline at a rate of 3% per year forever. What is the present value of the savings if the interest rate is 5% per year?
The present value of the savings, taking into account the declining rate of 3% per year, and an interest rate of 5% per year, is approximately $83,333.33.
Explanation:
To calculate the present value of the savings, we need to consider the declining rate and the interest rate. In the first year, the machine saves $5,000. However, from the second year onwards, the savings decline at a rate of 3% per year. This means that the savings in the second year will be 3% less than $5,000, and the savings in the third year will be 3% less than the savings in the second year, and so on.
To determine the present value of these declining savings, we need to discount them back to their current value using an interest rate. In this case, the interest rate is given as 5% per year. To calculate the present value, we can use the formula for the present value of a perpetuity:
Present Value = Savings in Year 1 / (Interest Rate - Declining Rate)
In this case, the savings in Year 1 is $5,000, the interest rate is 5%, and the declining rate is 3%. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
Present Value = $5,000 / (0.05 - 0.03) = $5,000 / 0.02 = $250,000
However, this value represents the total savings over an infinite period. To find the present value considering the declining savings, we divide this total by the declining rate:
Present Value = $250,000 / 0.03 = $83,333.33
Therefore, the present value of the savings, considering the declining rate of 3% per year and an interest rate of 5% per year, is approximately $83,333.33.
Learn more about interest rate
brainly.com/question/28236069
#SPJ11
St. John Medical, a surgical equipment manufacturer, has been hit hard by increased competition. Analysts predict that earnings and dividends will decline at a rate of 5 percent annually into the foreseeable future. If the firm’s last dividend (D0 ) was $2.00 and the investors’ required rate of return is 15 percent, what will be the company’s stock price in three years?
The estimated stock price of St. John Medical in three years will be approximately $8.57.
To calculate the stock price in three years, we need to use the dividend discount model (DDM). The DDM calculates the present value of all future dividends to determine the intrinsic value of a stock.
Last dividend (D0) = $2.00
Dividend growth rate (g) = -5% (declining annually)
Required rate of return (k) = 15%
Time period (n) = 3 years
Using the DDM formula, the stock price (P3) in three years can be calculated as follows:
P3 = D3 / (k - g)
First, we need to calculate the dividend expected in three years (D3). To do this, we use the formula for the future dividends:
D3 = D0 * (1 + g)^n
D3 = $2.00 * (1 - 0.05)^3
D3 = $2.00 * (0.95)^3
D3 = $2.00 * 0.857375
D3 = $1.71475
Next, we can calculate the stock price in three years:
P3 = $1.71475 / (0.15 - (-0.05))
P3 = $1.71475 / 0.20
P3 = $8.57375
Therefore, the estimated stock price of St. John Medical in three years will be approximately $8.57.
To know more about Dividend discount model (DDM) :
https://brainly.com/question/15798462
#SPJ11
How did spanish explorer pedro de castañeda describe the high plains of texas? question 4 options: rolling and hilly spacious and level rugged and rocky soft and swampy
The expansive and level Texas high Plains were defined as such by Spanish land developer Pedro De Castaeda, hence option B is correct.
Spanish explorer Pedro De Castaeda wrote a history of the Coronado voyage in what is now Texas. He resided in Vizcaya, Spain, and had previously travelled to Culiacan, Mexico.
In 1540, as Spanish explorers searched for the fabled location "la Cibola," he published his chronicles. He characterized the Texas high Plains as being open and level in his chronicles. Thus, spacious and level is the correct option.
Learn more about Spanish, here:
https://brainly.com/question/24839795
#SPJ4
How COVID-19 has affected the Food/Daily Essentials markets in
Bangladesh? Use economic concepts such as demand, supply,
elasticity, and graphs in explaining your answer.
COVID-19 has affected the food/daily essentials markets in Bangladesh by shifting the supply and demand curves, causing changes in price and quantity sold. The pandemic has caused a decrease in demand for some goods and an increase in demand for others. Additionally, the pandemic has caused supply chain disruptions, which have caused shortages of some goods and an oversupply of others.
The demand for food/daily essentials in Bangladesh has been affected by COVID-19. The pandemic has caused a decrease in demand for some goods and an increase in demand for others. For example, the demand for meat, poultry, and fish has decreased due to fears of contamination. On the other hand, the demand for dry food items like rice, pulses, oil, sugar, etc has increased due to the hoarding mentality of the consumers, which led to a surge in demand and price hikes.
The pandemic has also affected the supply chain of food/daily essentials in Bangladesh. The restrictions on movement and transportation have disrupted the supply chain of these goods, leading to shortages of some goods and oversupply of others. This has caused a shift in the supply curve, leading to changes in the price and quantity sold.
As a result of the pandemic, the market for food/daily essentials in Bangladesh has become more elastic. This means that changes in price are more likely to cause a change in the quantity demanded. Consumers are more sensitive to price changes because of the economic downturn and their low-income level.
Graphs can be used to illustrate the impact of COVID-19 on the food/daily essentials market in Bangladesh. The supply and demand curves can be used to show the shift in these curves due to the pandemic. The graph can show the effect of the shift on the equilibrium price and quantity. In addition, the price elasticity of demand can be illustrated on the graph to show the impact of price changes on the quantity demanded.
Learn more about price elasticity of demand: https://brainly.com/question/30704413
#SPJ11
Question 1 (15 marks) Explain how the four (4) factors of the incentive intensity principle apply to: (i) (5 marks) A linear contract with one agent? (ii) (5 marks) A multitasking linear contract with subjective performance evaluation (SPE)? (iii) (5 marks) A linear contract with two (2) agents and with a relative performance evaluation (RPE)?
The incentive intensity principle aims to ensure that agents put forth the required effort to achieve the goals of the contract.
What are the 4 factors?The four factors of the incentive intensity principle are the sensitivity of the contract to effort, the agent's degree of risk aversion, the degree of substitution between effort and other inputs, and the degree of complementarity between effort and other inputs.
These four factors are applied differently depending on the contract type, as described below:
(i) Linear contract with one agent:
(ii) Multitasking linear contract with subjective performance evaluation (SPE):
(iii) Linear contract with two agents and with a relative performance evaluation (RPE):
The sensitivity of the contract to effort: The greater the sensitivity of the contract to effort, the higher the effort level will be.
The agent's degree of risk aversion: The higher the degree of risk aversion, the lower the agent's effort level.
The degree of substitution between effort and other inputs: The lower the degree of substitution, the higher the effort level.
The degree of complementarity between effort and other inputs: The higher the degree of complementarity, the higher the effort level.
To know more on contract visit:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ11
Due: Thursday, July 28, 2022 at B:30 am " thecks on Saturday, fuly 30,2022 at 8:30 am Severe weather con have a significant short-term effect on a restaurant's sales levels fissume you own a restauront chain where business is bikely to be offected by seiere winter weather. How would this impsct the development of your budget?
Severe winter weather can have a significant short-term effect on a restaurant's sales levels, and this can impact the development of a restaurant's budget.
The budget for a restaurant chain that is likely to be affected by severe winter weather would need to take into account the potential for decreased sales during this time. This might mean allocating more money to marketing efforts to encourage customers to visit the restaurant despite the weather, or reducing expenses in other areas to make up for the decrease in revenue.
Additionally, the budget might need to account for increased costs associated with keeping the restaurant open during inclement weather, such as higher heating bills or additional staffing needs. Overall, it is important for a restaurant chain to consider the potential impact of severe winter weather on their sales levels when developing their budget, and to make adjustments as needed to ensure that the restaurant remains profitable even during difficult weather conditions.
To know more about budget visit:
brainly.com/question/31952035
#SPJ11
Compare and contrast the use of government spending changes versus tax changes as a means of influencing the course of the economy. Is one or the other preferable in specific situations? Imagine for a moment that you have two roommates, who each have opposing viewpoints on nearly everything, including politics and economics. Taylor is adamant that the best way to manage the economy is through tax changes, while Morgan insists that it’s better to adjust the economy through government spending. What would a Neoclassical economist say? What would a Keynesian economist say? Which roommate do you agree with, and why? Find a news article to help support your opinion. Summarize the article and include the link to in your response.
A neoclassical economist would argue that tax changes are preferable to government spending changes for influencing the course of the economy.
On the other hand, a Keynesian economist would advocate for government spending as a more effective tool. Personally, I align with the neoclassical economist's viewpoint, as tax changes provide greater flexibility and efficiency in economic management.
While government spending can stimulate demand in the short term, it can lead to long-term inefficiencies and potential crowding out of private investment. Tax changes, on the other hand, can incentivize productive behavior, encourage savings and investment, and provide individuals and businesses with more control over their resources.
To learn more about Keynesian Economist, click on:
brainly.com/question/31531057
#SPJ11
Consider a European put option and a European call option on a \( \$ 40 \) nondividend-paying stock. Both options have 6 months remaining and both have a \( \$ 35 \) strike price. The risk-free intere
a. The no-arb price for the call option is approximately $11.176. b. The call option is in-the-money, and the put option is out-of-the-money. Under the no-arb condition, the call option is more expensive. c. An arbitrageur would buy the underpriced call option and short sell the stock. d. The no-arb price for the put option is approximately $5.824. e. An arbitrageur would sell the overpriced put option and buy the underlying stock.
a. To calculate the no-arbitrage price for the call option, we can use the put-call parity relationship:
Call Price - Put Price = Stock Price - Strike Price * e^(-r * T)
Given that the market price of the put is $6, the stock price is $40, the strike price is $35, the risk-free interest rate is 5% (or 0.05), and the time to expiration (T) is 6 months (or 0.5 years), we can plug in these values:
Call Price - $6 = $40 - $35 * e^(-0.05 * 0.5)
Solving for the Call Price:
Call Price = $40 - $35 * e^(-0.05 * 0.5) + $6 ≈ $11.176
Therefore, the no-arbitrage price for the call option is approximately $11.176.
b. The call option is in-the-money if the stock price is above the strike price, and the put option is in-the-money if the stock price is below the strike price. In this case, since the stock price is $40 and the strike price is $35, the call option is in-the-money and the put option is out-of-the-money. Under the no-arbitrage condition, the call option should be more expensive than the put option.
c. If the quoted market price of the call option is $9, an arbitrageur would likely take the following actions:
Buy the underpriced call option: The arbitrageur would buy the call option at the market price of $9, taking advantage of the lower price.
Short sell the stock: The arbitrageur would borrow and sell the underlying stock at the current stock price of $40.
By buying the call option and short selling the stock, the arbitrageur would create a synthetic long position in the stock, which would be equivalent to buying the stock itself. This strategy allows the arbitrageur to profit from the underpriced call option and the expectation that the stock price will increase.
d. To calculate the no-arbitrage price of the put option when the quoted market price of the call is $9, we can use the put-call parity relationship:
Put Price = Call Price - Stock Price + Strike Price * e^(-r * T)
Given that the market price of the call is $9, the stock price is $40, the strike price is $35, the risk-free interest rate is 5% (or 0.05), and the time to expiration (T) is 6 months (or 0.5 years), we can plug in these values:
Put Price = $9 - $40 + $35 * e^(-0.05 * 0.5)
Solving for the Put Price:
Put Price = $9 - $40 + $35 * e^(-0.05 * 0.5) ≈ $5.824
Therefore, the no-arbitrage price for the put option is approximately $5.824.
e. If the quoted market price of the put option is $6, an arbitrageur would likely take the following actions:
Sell the overpriced put option: The arbitrageur would sell the put option at the market price of $6, taking advantage of the higher price.
Buy the underlying stock: The arbitrageur would buy the underlying stock at the current stock price of $40.
By selling the put option and buying the stock, the arbitrageur would create a synthetic long position in the stock, which would be equivalent to buying the stock itself. This strategy allows the arbitrageur to profit from the overpriced put option and the expectation that the stock price will increase.
At time T, the arbitrageur would exercise the put option if the stock price is below the strike price and deliver the stock to fulfill the option contract. However, if the stock price is above the strike price, the arbitrageur would let the put option expire worthless.
These actions allow the arbitrageur to take advantage of the overpriced put option and generate risk-free profits.
To know more about interest :
https://brainly.com/question/29451175
#SPJ11
Complete Question :
Consider a European put option and a European call option on a $40 nondividend-paying stock. Both options have 6 months remaining and both have a $35 strike price. The risk-free interest rate is 5% CCAR. a. The market price of the put is $6. Calculate the no-arb price for the call. b. Which of the options is in-themoney? Which is out-of-the-money? Under the no-arb condition, is the call or the put more expensive? c. Describe the likely actions of an arbitrageur now and at time T if the quoted market price of the call is $9. d. Now as assume the quoted market price of the call is $9.00. Calculate the no-arb price of the put. e. Describe the likely actions of an arbitrageur now and at time T if the quoted market price of the put is $6.
A 3.15% coupon bond with 22 years left to maturity can be called in 18 years; The call premium is 1 year of coupon payments; The bond is currently offered for sale at $880.60 (Assume interest payments are semiannual) - What is the bond's yield to maturity?
1.98%
3.97%
4.54%
7.41%
7.95%
4.09%
3.58%
Given that a 3.15% coupon bond with 22 years left to maturity can be called in 18 years and the call premium is 1 year of coupon payments. The bond is currently offered for sale at $880.60 (Assume interest payments are semiannual). We are to determine the bond's yield to maturity.
The yield to maturity (YTM) is the expected rate of return of a bond assuming that it is held until maturity and all payments are made as scheduled. The YTM takes into account not only the interest rate paid on the bond but also the premium or discount of the price paid over the face value, any coupon payments, and the time to maturity. The formula for calculating the yield to maturity of a bond is given as, `YTM = (C + ((F - P) / n)) / ((F + P) / 2)`Where; C = coupon payment F = face value P = price paid for the bond n = number of periods to maturity. Using the formula above, we can calculate the bond's yield to maturity. YTM = (0.0315 + ((1000 - 880.60) / 44)) / ((1000 + 880.60) / 2)YTM = (0.0315 + (119.40 / 44)) / (940.30 / 2)YTM = 0.0795 or 7.95%. Therefore, the bond's yield to maturity is 7.95%. Option E is the correct answer.
To know more about coupon payments visit
https://brainly.com/question/29036738
#SPJ11
Wayne, Erin, Alan and Kirk are all ex-police officers and have decided to start a private security business. Due to tax and ownership issues and the obvious benefits associated with having limited liability, their lawyer recommends that they should register a company for the business. They agree and instruct their lawyer to register a company to be called WEAK Security Pty Ltd. It is agreed that Wayne, Erin, Alan and Kirk will each be allotted 100 ordinary shares in WEAK Security Pty Ltd. After the company is registered, they decide to employ Rodger as a receptionist in the office. Rodger is given strict instructions that he is not to enter into contracts on behalf of the company.
Wanda works in used car sales and a good friend of Rodger. Rodger tells Wanda about his new position at WEAK Security Pty Ltd . Wanda tells Rodger that she has been trying to sell a truck and it would be perfect for the security business. Wanda shows Rodger the truck and lets him drive it. Rodger agrees that the truck would be a great addition to the security business and thinks the price Wanda is asking is very reasonable. Rodger agrees to buy the truck on behalf of WEAK Security Pty Ltd.
Can Wanda rely on any of the assumptions in section 129 of the Corporations Act in order to enforce the contract against WEAK Security Pty Ltd?
Please use the PIRAC method to analyze the case. Is there any same type of case for referencing? Thankyou!!
Wayne, Erin, Alan and Kirk are all ex-police officers and have decided to start a private security business. Due to tax and ownership issues and the obvious benefits associated with having limited liability, their lawyer recommends that they should register a company for the business.
The PIRAC method to analyze the case of issue is the issue is whether Wanda can rely on any of the assumptions in section 129 of the Corporations Act to enforce the contract against WEAK Security Pty Ltd.
The principle refers to Section 129 of the corporations act deals with the assumption of authority. It states that a person dealing with a company in good faith can assume that the company's officers have the authority to bind the company in transactions within its ordinary course of business.
Application was given strict instructions not to enter into contracts on behalf of WEAK Security Pty Ltd. Therefore, Wanda cannot reasonably assume that Rodger had the authority to bind the company in the purchase of the truck.
Conclusion is Wanda cannot rely on the assumptions in section 129 of the Corporations Act because Rodger exceeded his authority by entering into the contract on behalf of WEAK Security Pty Ltd.
To know more about liability here,
https://brainly.com/question/28391469
#SPJ4
During the month of July, Clanton Industries issued a check in the amount of $823 to a supplier on account. The check did not clear the bank during July. In preparing the July 31 bank reconciliation, the company should: Multiple Choice
In preparing the July 31 bank reconciliation, Clanton Industries should account for the outstanding check and any other outstanding items to ensure the bank and company balances match.
1. Start with the company's bank statement for the month of July.
2. Compare the transactions listed on the bank statement with the company's records.
3. Identify any differences or discrepancies between the bank statement and the company's records.
4. In this case, since the check issued to the supplier did not clear the bank during July, it should be considered an outstanding check.
5. Subtract the amount of the outstanding check ($823) from the company's records to reconcile the discrepancy.
6. Additionally, check for any other outstanding checks or deposits that have not been recorded by the bank or the company.
7. Adjust the company's records to reflect these outstanding items.
8. Finally, compare the adjusted bank balance and the adjusted company balance to ensure they match.
9. If they do match, the reconciliation process is complete. If not, further investigation may be needed to identify and correct any errors or discrepancies.
Learn more about outstanding check from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13084459
#SPJ11
Explain and provide an example of what happens to demand in the
short run? 200 words
In the short run, demand refers to the quantity of a product or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at a given price level. Several factors can affect demand in the short run, including changes in consumer preferences, income levels, and prices of related goods.
When there is an increase in consumer income, demand tends to rise as people have more money to spend. For example, if people receive a salary increase, they may choose to buy more luxury items, leading to an increase in demand for luxury goods in the short run.
Changes in consumer preferences can also impact demand in the short run. For instance, if a new fashion trend becomes popular, there may be an increased demand for clothing items that align with this trend. Similarly, if there is a sudden interest in a particular type of technology, the demand for related electronic devices may increase.
In addition, changes in the prices of related goods can affect demand. If the price of a substitute good increases, consumers may choose to switch to a different product, resulting in a decrease in demand for the original product. On the other hand, if the price of a complementary good decreases, it may lead to an increase in demand for both goods. For example, if the price of peanut butter decreases, the demand for jelly may also increase as people are more likely to purchase both items together.
In summary, demand in the short run can be influenced by factors such as changes in consumer income, preferences, and prices of related goods. These factors can lead to an increase or decrease in demand for a particular product or service, depending on the specific circumstances.
Learn more about demand at
brainly.com/question/33250356
#SPJ11
Let's say that you are looking to invest in two stocks A and B. Stock A has a beta of 1.19 and based on your best estimates is expected to have a return of 95% Stock & has a beta of 0.85 and is expected to eam 11%, If the risk-free rate is currently 4% and the expected retum on the market is 7%, which stock(s) should you invest in, if any?
A.Do not buy stock A do not buy stock B
B.Do not buy stock A, do not buy stock Bi
C.Buy stock A, buy stock B
D.Buy stock A, do not buy stock B
E.Do not buy stock A, buy stock B
Based on the information provided, the answer would be:
You should buy stock A.
You should not buy stock B.
To determine the optimal investment choice, we need to consider the expected return of each stock relative to its risk. The expected return of stock A is 95%, while the expected return of stock B is 11%. Comparing these returns to the risk-free rate of 4% and the market's expected return of 7%, we can assess their performance.
We can start by calculating the required rate of return for each stock using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM):
For stock A:
Required rate of return = Risk-free rate + Beta of A * (Expected return of the market - Risk-free rate)
= 4% + 1.19 * (7% - 4%)
= 4% + 1.19 * 3%
= 4% + 3.57%
= 7.57%
For stock B:
Required rate of return = Risk-free rate + Beta of B * (Expected return of the market - Risk-free rate)
= 4% + 0.85 * (7% - 4%)
= 4% + 0.85 * 3%
= 4% + 2.55%
= 6.55%
Comparing the required rates of return to the expected returns, we find that stock A has a higher expected return (95%) than its required rate of return (7.57%), indicating potential profitability. However, stock B has an expected return (11%) lower than its required rate of return (6.55%), suggesting it may not be a favorable investment.
Based on these calculations, the recommended decision is to buy stock A and not invest in stock B. Stock A's expected return is higher than its required rate of return, suggesting it has the potential to generate positive returns for investors. Meanwhile, stock B's expected return is lower than its required rate of return, indicating that it may not be an attractive investment option.
To learn more about investment click here:
brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
Evaluate and discuss the requirements of one of the following laws and how it applies in hiring. What does a manager need to do or not do to comply with it? Pregnancy Discrimination Act or Federal labor laws enforced by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) including National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
Pregnancy Discrimination Act is essential to protect pregnant employees from discrimination in the workplace. A manager should comply with the requirements of the PDA by not discriminating against an employee based on pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.
The act applies to employers with 15 or more employees, and it protects women from being discriminated against due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions when it comes to recruitment, hiring, and promotion decisions.
To comply with the PDA, a manager should provide reasonable accommodation to a pregnant employee if the employee requests it, such as allowing her to take breaks for medical reasons or moving her to a less physically demanding job. Employers should also provide equal access to benefits such as health insurance and disability leave for employees with pregnancy-related medical conditions.
To know more about discriminating visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ11
when major changes are initiated in organizations, "... there is often the implicit assumption that training will 'solve the problem.' and, indeed, training may solve part of the problem" (dormant, 1986, p. 238).
When major changes are initiated in organizations, it is common for people to assume that training will be the solution to any problems that arise.
However, according to Dormant (1986), while training may solve some aspects of the problem, it may not be enough to fully address the issues at hand. Training can be an effective tool for equipping employees with the necessary skills and knowledge to adapt to the changes. It can provide them with a better understanding of new processes, technologies, or strategies. However, training alone may not address other important factors such as resistance to change, organizational culture, or communication challenges.
To ensure the success of major changes, organizations need to consider a holistic approach. This involves not only providing training but also actively engaging employees in the change process, addressing any concerns or resistance, and creating a supportive organizational culture. Additionally, organizations should establish clear communication channels to keep employees informed about the changes and provide opportunities for feedback. This will help to ensure that employees understand the reasons behind the changes and feel empowered to contribute to the success of the new initiatives.
In summary, while training can be a valuable component of addressing problems during major changes, organizations need to take a comprehensive approach that considers factors beyond just training to effectively manage the transition.
Learn more about training from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/29751793
#SPJ11
If demand in a perfectly competitive market is perfectly inelastic and supply is upward sloping, a specific tax placed on suppliers will:________
if demand in a perfectly competitive market is perfectly inelastic and supply is upward sloping, a specific tax placed on suppliers will be entirely borne by the suppliers and will not be passed on to consumers.
in a perfectly competitive market, the price is determined by the intersection of the demand and supply curves. when demand is perfectly inelastic, it means that consumers are unresponsive to changes in price. this implies that regardless of the price, consumers will continue to purchase the same quantity of the product.
on the other hand, if the supply curve is upward sloping, it indicates that suppliers require higher prices to produce and supply larger quantities of the product. in this scenario, a specific tax placed on suppliers will increase their cost of production, leading to a shift in the supply curve upward.
since demand is perfectly inelastic, the quantity demanded remains unchanged, and consumers are unwilling to pay a higher price. suppliers, they cannot pass on the tax to consumers by increasing the price because demand is insensitive to price changes.
as a result, the specific tax will directly reduce the suppliers' profits or returns. the entire burden of the tax falls on the suppliers, and consumers do not experience any increase in price or change in quantity purchased.
it's important to note that this analysis assumes a perfectly competitive market with ideal conditions, such as perfect information and no barriers to entry or exit. in real-world markets, the impact of taxes can be more complex, and the burden may be shared between suppliers and consumers depending on the elasticity of demand and supply.
Learn more about purchase here:
https://brainly.com/question/31035675
#SPJ11
Amber consumes nuts and berries. She has the utility function ((x1),(x2))= 4(x1)^(1/2) + (x2), where (x1) is her consumption of nuts and (x2) is her consumption of berries. If Amber is initially consuming 64 units of nuts and 10 units of berries, then what is the largest number of berries that she would be willing to give up in return for an additional unit of nuts?
Amber would be willing to give up at most 1/4 units of berries in return for an additional unit of nuts.
To determine the largest number of berries that Amber would be willing to give up in return for an additional unit of nuts, we need to compare the marginal utilities of nuts and berries.
The marginal utility of a good represents the additional utility gained from consuming one more unit of that good. Mathematically, it is the derivative of the utility function with respect to the corresponding variable.
In this case, the utility function is U(x1, x2) = 4√(x1) + x2, where x1 represents the consumption of nuts, and x2 represents the consumption of berries.
To find the marginal utility of nuts (∂U/∂x1), we differentiate the utility function with respect to x1:
∂U/∂x1 = 2/√(x1)
Given that Amber initially consumes 64 units of nuts, we can substitute this value into the equation:
∂U/∂x1 = 2/√(64) = 2/8 = 1/4
So, the marginal utility of nuts is 1/4.
To find the marginal utility of berries (∂U/∂x2), we differentiate the utility function with respect to x2:
∂U/∂x2 = 1
The marginal utility of berries is constant and equal to 1.
Now, we can compare the marginal utilities. Since the marginal utility of nuts is 1/4 and the marginal utility of berries is 1, Amber would be willing to give up berries only if the marginal utility of nuts is higher.
Therefore, Amber would be willing to give up at most 1/4 units of berries in return for an additional unit of nuts.
Learn more about Marginal Utility:
https://brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ4
UBS, a bank based in Switzerland, has received a subpoena from the IRS for the bank records of 52,000 U.S. citizens. The IRS alleges that the U.S. taxpayers hid money in UBS accounts for the purpose of avoiding paying taxes. UBS had created a program that recruited tax advisers and their clients under the guise that they could protect their funds from the IRS.Swiss law prohibits banks, under privacy rights, from disclosing information about their customers and their accounts. However, the IRS has obtained a subpoena for the records and a federal judge has issued it because UBS is soliciting business in the United States. One banking minister in Switzerland has indicated, however, that Swiss privacy laws do not apply when there has been fraud.Evaluate the ethics of UBS as well as their customers. If you worked for the bank, would you release the information? Would you place your money in Swiss accounts?
The ethical evaluation of UBS and its customers in this scenario involves considering various factors, including legal obligations, privacy rights, tax evasion, and the role of an individual's personal responsibility.
Here are some key points to consider:
UBS's Ethics:
Deceptive Practices: UBS created a program that recruited tax advisers and clients to help them evade taxes. This practice is ethically questionable as it involves facilitating and encouraging illegal activities.Compliance with Laws: UBS is obligated to comply with the laws of the countries it operates in. While Swiss privacy laws protect customer information, the bank is operating in the United States and subject to U.S. laws. Compliance with a valid subpoena is essential for upholding the rule of law.Responsibility to Society: UBS has a responsibility to contribute to the well-being of society by ensuring that taxes are paid appropriately. Facilitating tax evasion undermines public trust in the banking system and can have negative consequences for social welfare.Customers' Ethics:
Tax Evasion: U.S. citizens who intentionally hid money in UBS accounts to avoid paying taxes are engaging in unethical behavior. Paying taxes is a civic duty that supports essential public services and infrastructure.Individual Responsibility: Each customer has a personal responsibility to comply with tax laws. Engaging in tax evasion not only harms society but also undermines the fairness and integrity of the tax system.For such more question on evaluation:
https://brainly.com/question/30592279
#SPJ8
Answer questions 1 through 8 based on retirement funding calculation using the 4-step annuity method.
Layla, age 43, currently earns $95,000. Her wage replacement ratio is 82 percent.
She expects that inflation will average 5 percent for her entire life expectancy. She expects to earn 8 percent on her investments and retire at age 67 (full retirement age), possibly living to age 90. Her Social Security retirement benefit in today's dollars is $15,500 per year, for retiring at full retirement age.
Questions 1 through 4: Calculate Layla's capital needed at retirement at age 67 and the amount she must save at the end of each year, assuming she has no current savings accumulated for retirement.
Questions 5 through 8: Calculate the present value of her benefits at ages 63, 67, and 70.
To determine the amount she must save at the end of each year, considering the expected rate of return, inflation rate, and the remaining years until retirement.
To calculate Layla's capital needed at retirement at age 67, we can use the wage replacement ratio. Multiply her current income of $95,000 by the replacement ratio of 82%.To know more about rate of return, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17164328
#SPJ11
A system of income inequality has advantages and disadvantages. Which of the following is a characteristic of a country that has income inequality?
Group of answer choices
in a country with higher income inequality the lower income households generally have fewer political advantages (less influence) than the higher income households.
All of the listed choices are characteristics
a country with income inequality generally has a higher average standard of living than a country with pure income equality.
a country with income inequality provides those who are more productive the ability to reap higher rewards and higher incomes. Thus more people tend to be productive and efficient than in a system of income equality.
In a country with higher income inequality, the lower income households generally have fewer political advantages (less influence) than the higher income households. This is a characteristic of income inequality. Higher income households often have more resources and economic power, which can translate into greater political influence and the ability to shape policies that benefit their interests.
Additionally, a country with income inequality provides those who are more productive the ability to reap higher rewards and higher incomes. This characteristic suggests that income inequality allows for greater incentives for individuals to be productive and efficient. In such a system, individuals who contribute more to the economy can earn higher incomes, which can serve as a motivator for increased productivity and economic growth.
However, it is important to note that not all of the listed choices are characteristics of a country with income inequality. The statement "a country with income inequality generally has a higher average standard of living than a country with pure income equality" is not necessarily true. Income inequality does not guarantee a higher average standard of living as it depends on various factors such as social welfare programs, access to education and healthcare, and overall economic conditions. Income equality can also be achieved with a high standard of living if resources are distributed equitably among the population.
Therefore, the correct answer is in a country with higher income inequality, the lower income households generally have fewer political advantages (less influence) than the higher income households.
To know more about standard of living, visit
https://brainly.com/question/16294617
#SPJ11
Investments with Single Rate of Return: Assume that you have the opportunity to buy a piece of land today for $100,000 and expect to sell it for $350,000 at the end of 25 years. What is your rate of return (annual compounding) on this investment? NOTE - Enter your answer as a percentage instead of a decimal. Ex: (1% instead of 0.01) Round to the nearest two-decimal-places.
The rate of return on this investment is approximately 0.8706, or 87.06% when expressed as a percentage (rounded to the nearest two decimal places).
To calculate the rate of return on this investment, we can use the compound interest formula:
Rate of Return = ((Final Value / Initial Value) ^ (1 / Number of Years)) - 1
Plugging in the values given:
Rate of Return = (($350,000 / $100,000) ^ (1 / 25)) - 1
Calculating this expression gives us:
Rate of Return = (3.5 ^ 0.04) - 1
Simplifying further:
Rate of Return = 1.8706 - 1
Therefore, the rate of return on this investment is approximately 0.8706, or 87.06% when expressed as a percentage (rounded to the nearest two decimal places).
To know more about rate of return, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17164328
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is correct? a. For an individual to have full insurance, the insurance payout must equal the difference between their income in the healthy state and their income in the sick state.
b.For health insurance to be actuarially fair, the insurance premium must be $0. c. Under partial insurance, income in the sick state combined with the insurance payout is greater than income in the healthy state. d. Relative to an individual with no health insurance, an individual with health insurance will lose income in the sick state and gain income in the healthy state.
Among the following statements, the correct statement is option D) Relative to an individual with no health insurance, an individual with health insurance will lose income in the sick state and gain income in the healthy state.
Insurance refers to a practice of covering risk by paying premiums for an insurance policy. Insurance provides financial coverage in the event of an unexpected circumstance that could cause financial damage. Insurance is required to cover a wide range of risks, including health, life, property, and liability.
The following are the given statements:For an individual to have full insurance, the insurance payout must equal the difference between their income in the healthy state and their income in the sick state.
For health insurance to be actuarially fair, the insurance premium must be $0.Under partial insurance, income in the sick state combined with the insurance payout is greater than income in the healthy state.Relative to an individual with no health insurance, an individual with health insurance will lose income in the sick state and gain income in the healthy state.
To know more about insurance visit :
brainly.com/question/28585859
#SPJ11
What amount must you deposit today in a three-year CD paying 4%
interest annually to provide you with $2249.73 at the end of the
CD’s maturity?
A CD or certificate of deposit is a type of savings account that usually offers higher interest rates than traditional savings accounts.
If you want to know how much you should deposit today to achieve a certain amount at the end of your CD's maturity, you'll need to use a formula. The formula is: FV = PV × (1 + r)n
FV = Future value
PV = Present value of the money you want to invest
r = annual interest rate
n = number of years
So, in the given question, the future value (FV) is $2249.73, the annual interest rate (r) is 4%, and the number of years (n) is 3. We want to find the present value (PV) which we will deposit today. To use the formula, we can rearrange it to solve for PV. We have:
FV = PV × (1 + r)n2249.73 = PV × (1 + 0.04)3
Simplifying and solving for PV, we get: PV = 2249.73 / (1 + 0.04)3 ≈ $1957.43Therefore, you would need to deposit $1957.43 today in a three-year CD paying 4% interest annually to provide you with $2249.73 at the end of the CD’s maturity.
to know about certificate of deposit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29620073
#SPJ11
Murray Exports (A). Murray Exports (U. S. ) exports heavy crane equipment to several Chinese dock facilities. Sales are currently 10,000 units per year at the yuan equivalent of $24,000 each. The Chinese yuan (renminbi) has been trading at Yuan8. 20/$, but a Hong Kong advisory service predicts the renminbi will drop in value next week to Yuan9. 00/$, after which it will remain unchanged for at least a decade. Accepting this forecast as given, Murray Exports faces a pricing decision in the face of th
The Chinese yuan (renminbi) is expected to drop in value from Yuan8.20/$ to Yuan9.00/$ next week and remain unchanged for at least ten years. Murray Exports now needs to make a pricing decision considering this forecast.
Considering the forecasted devaluation of the renminbi, Murray Exports needs to determine how to adjust their pricing strategy. With the current exchange rate of Yuan8.20/$, each unit is priced at the yuan equivalent of $24,000. However, with the predicted devaluation to Yuan9.00/$, the yuan equivalent of $24,000 would decrease in value.
To maintain their profit margin, Murray Exports could consider increasing the yuan price per unit to compensate for the devaluation. They would need to calculate the new yuan price that would result in the same dollar revenue when converted at the expected exchange rate. Alternatively, they could choose to keep the yuan price unchanged, which would effectively reduce the dollar revenue per unit due to the devaluation.
Ultimately, the pricing decision would depend on various factors, including market conditions, competition, and the company's objectives.
Learn more about pricing strategies here: brainly.com/question/28295582
#SPJ11
What discount rate would make you indifferent between receiving $3,290.00 per year forever and $5,127.00 per year for 26.00 years? Assume the first payment of both cash flow streams occurs in one year
ps7
Let x be the discount rate which makes you indifferent between receiving $3,290.00 per year forever and $5,127.00 per year for 26.00 years.
According to the question, we can construct the following equation.The Present Value (PV) of both cash flow streams will be equal.
The Present Value (PV) of $3,290.00 per year forever is:PV = CF1 / (r - g)where,CF1 = First cash flow = $3,290.00r = discount rate = xr = Growth rate = 0 (as it is given "forever")
Then, the Present Value of $3,290.00 per year forever would be:PV = $3,290.00 / (x - 0) = $3,290.00 / x ----(1)
The Present Value (PV) of $5,127.00 per year for 26.00 years is:PV = CF {(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r}where,CF = Cash flow per period = $5,127.00r = discount rate = x in this case.n = total number of periods = 26 years
Then, the Present Value of $5,127.00 per year for 26.00 years would be:PV = $5,127.00 {(1 - (1 + x)^-26) / x} ----(2)According to the question, both the present values of cash flow streams are equal.Therefore, from (1) and (2), we can write:$3,290.00 / x = $5,127.00 {(1 - (1 + x)^-26) / x}Simplify and solve for x.$3,290.00 / x = $5,127.00 {(1 - (1 + x)^-26) / x} $3,290.00 = $5,127.00 x {(1 - (1 + x)^-26)} $3,290.00 / $5,127.00 = (1 - (1 + x)^-26) 0.6405 = (1 + x)^-26 1 / (1 + x)^-26 = 0.6405 (1 + x)^26 = 1 / 0.6405 (1 + x)^26 = 1.5603032860548772 (1 + x) = (1.5603032860548772)^(1/26) (1 + x) = 1.0377 - 1 = 0.0377Thus, the discount rate which makes you indifferent between receiving $3,290.00 per year forever and $5,127.00 per year for 26.00 years is approximately 3.77%.
To know more about discount rate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9841818
#SPJ11
The United States Declaration of Independence is grounded in
natural law.
Group of answer choices
True
False
The statement "The United States Declaration of Independence is grounded in natural law" is true.
The Declaration of Independence, a document written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, is a proclamation of individual rights that is grounded in the principles of natural law.
According to natural law theory, moral and ethical standards should be determined by the natural world rather than by divine law, human legislation, or cultural customs and norms. Natural law principles, as they relate to human rights and justice, are used in the Declaration of Independence.
To learn more about United States declaration of independence : https://brainly.com/question/472238
#SPJ11
You expect Commodore Company's stock to pay its next dividend of $6.36 exactly one year from now. After this first dividend, future dividends will grow at -3% for each of the subsequent 2 years and then 5% per year every year thereafter. What is Commodore's intrinsic value today? Use a discount rate of 12.2% and round your answer to the nearest penny.
Athens, Inc has a credit rating of A and wants to issue 15-year bonds at par value. If the 15-year Treasury bond has a YTM of 4.97% and the credit spread for Single A debt over Treasuries is 5.33%, what coupon rate should Athens select? Enter your answer as a decimal and show four decimal places. For example, if your answer is 5.25%, enter .0525.
The bonds are issued at par value, the coupon rate should be set equal to the required yield. Therefore, Athens, Inc should select a coupon rate of 10.30% (or 0.1030 as a decimal) for its bonds.
To calculate Commodore Company's intrinsic value today, we need to determine the present value of its future dividends using the dividend discount model (DDM).
Given information:
First dividend (D₁) = $6.36
Dividend growth rate for the subsequent 2 years (g₁) = -3%
Dividend growth rate after the first 2 years (g₂) = 5%
Discount rate (r) = 12.2%
Step 1: Calculate the present value of the first dividend (D₁):
PV(D₁) = D₁ / (1 + r)¹
PV(D₁) = $6.36 / (1 + 0.122)¹
PV(D₁) = $5.68
Step 2: Calculate the present value of dividends for the subsequent 2 years (D₂ and D₃):
PV(D₂) = D₁ * (1 + g₁) / (1 + r)²
PV(D₂) = $6.36 * (1 - 0.03) / (1 + 0.122)²
PV(D₂) = $5.61
PV(D₃) = D₂ * (1 + g₁) / (1 + r)³
PV(D₃) = $5.61 * (1 - 0.03) / (1 + 0.122)³
PV(D₃) = $5.54
Step 3: Calculate the present value of dividends after the first 2 years (D₄ onwards):
PV(D₄ onwards) = D₃ * (1 + g₂) / (r - g₂)
PV(D₄ onwards) = $5.54 * (1 + 0.05) / (0.122 - 0.05)
PV(D₄ onwards) = $71.72
Step 4: Calculate the intrinsic value by summing up the present values of all dividends:
Intrinsic Value = PV(D₁) + PV(D₂) + PV(D₃) + PV(D₄ onwards)
Intrinsic Value = $5.68 + $5.61 + $5.54 + $71.72
Intrinsic Value = $88.55
Therefore, Commodore Company's intrinsic value today is approximately $88.55.
Now let's move on to the second question:
Athens, Inc wants to issue 15-year bonds at par value. We need to determine the coupon rate for these bonds. The yield to maturity (YTM) for a 15-year Treasury bond is given as 4.97%, and the credit spread for Single A debt over Treasuries is 5.33%.
The required yield for Athens, Inc's bonds would be the sum of the YTM and the credit spread:
Required Yield = YTM + Credit Spread
Required Yield = 4.97% + 5.33%
Required Yield = 10.30%
Since the bonds are issued at par value, the coupon rate should be set equal to the required yield. Therefore, Athens, Inc should select a coupon rate of 10.30% (or 0.1030 as a decimal) for its bonds.
Know more about Discount rate here
https://brainly.com/question/13660799#
#SPJ11
Implications of inflation and deflation Suppose that you are running a business and you need some extra space for one year. Your bank offers you a loan of $100,000 at 0% interest. You consider borrowing this amount, buying the building, using it for one year, and then selling the building to pay back the loan. Unfortunately, the economy in which you are operating is experiencing deflation at the rate of 10% per year. After one year, you should be able to sell the building for Suppose that owning the building for a year would earn you $5,000. To decide whether or not you will be better off by owning it for one year and then selling it, you sought advice from three different people: (1) Your brother says that you should not buy the building because in one year it will cost you $100,000. (2) Your accountant says that you should definitely buy the building because you can borrow $100,000 at zero interest while the building will generate $5,000 in extra income. Then when you sell it, you will be $5,000 richer. (3) Your bookkeeper says that if you sell the building in a year, you will have to come up with more money to pay off the loan than you will make in extra income.
It is better to avoid the loan and look for alternative options for extra space. Inflation and deflation are the two concepts that are crucial in assessing the macroeconomic conditions of a country. The implications of these two concepts are significant for businesses operating in a country with these conditions.
In this scenario, we can see the implications of deflation on business operations. The three different people have different opinions about the loan, and the building, and the associated income, so let's look at each opinion and the implications of deflation on the loan and the business.
1. Your brother says that you should not buy the building because in one year it will cost you $100,000.Since the economy is experiencing deflation, the prices of the goods and services are decreasing at a rate of 10%. Hence, if the business owner decides to purchase the building for $100,000, the building's value would decrease by 10% to $90,000 in one year. So, if the business owner decides to sell the building after a year, they will face a loss of $10,000
.2. Your accountant says that you should definitely buy the building because you can borrow $100,000 at zero interest while the building will generate $5,000 in extra income. Then when you sell it, you will be $5,000 richer. This opinion seems reasonable because the business owner can borrow $100,000 at zero interest and generate extra income of $5,000. However, deflation will decrease the building's value by 10%, so if the business owner decides to sell the building after a year, they will face a loss of $10,000. In this case, the extra income earned would be less than the loss incurred.
3. Your bookkeeper says that if you sell the building in a year, you will have to come up with more money to pay off the loan than you will make in extra income. If the business owner decides to sell the building after a year, they will have to pay back the loan of $100,000, which is equal to the value of the building. However, due to deflation, the building's value would decrease by 10%, and the business owner would be able to sell it for $90,000. Hence, the business owner will incur a loss of $10,000. Therefore, the bookkeeper's opinion seems valid, and it is not advisable to buy the building.
Overall, it is not advisable to buy the building because of deflation, which will decrease the value of the building by 10%. The business owner will incur a loss of $10,000 if they decide to sell the building after a year. Hence, it is better to avoid the loan and look for alternative options for extra space.
To know more about Inflation visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28136474
#SPJ11