Answer:
Reasons:
1. deforestation,2. drought, 3. improper agriculture.
Prevention:
Farmers can stop it by carefully managing their land.
Farmers can use crop residues
They can stop overgrazing
Explanation:
Suppose your parents or close friends announce that retirement is only 5 years away. They have invested in stocks and saved a substantial nest egg. What advice would you give them with regard to the steps they should take now to plan for their retirement years?
Answer:
He should invest in stock as well as in other business.
Explanation:
My advice is they should invest the money in stock as well as in other business because there is high risk in investing money in stocks so some amount of money is also invested in other business such as poultry or dairy farming because there is low risk in these business and high profit should be earned from them. In stocks, there is a possibility that the invested money should be lost completely if the stock market crashed due to certain reasons.
The president vetoing congressional legislation best illustrates the importance of judicial review. the concept of checks and balances. the supremacy of the federal government over state governments. the concept of separation of powers. the wisdom of the Connecticut Compromise
Answer:
The concept of checks and balances.
Explanation:
All three sides of the government have a way to curb the power of the other 2 sides. This refers to checks and balances. The exec. branch has the veto and pardon, congress has the impeachment, and the supreme court has the right to remove congression acts.
During the excitement and stimulation of a large Mardi Gras street party, normally circumspect, law-abiding citizens wearing masks engage in uninhibited and even illegal behavior. This BEST reflects the social psychological phenomenon of:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.
During the excitement and stimulation of a large Mardi Gras street party, normally circumspect, law-abiding citizens wearing masks engage in uninhibited and even illegal behavior. This BEST reflects the social psychological phenomenon of anonymity.
These people have masks that cover their true identity, so in theory, nobody can recognize them. That is why they act in strange ways or their behavior is questioned. These can be ordinary, decent people that have families and jobs. But when they appear in public places in anonymity, they transform themselves. And more, if they are drunk because they are attending a Mardi Gras street party, they indeed can act in very strange ways under the influence of alcohol.
In Festinger and Carlsmith's (1959) classic study on cognitive dissonance, participants who were paid $20 for doing a boring task, in contrast to those who were paid $1 for doing the same task, __________.
Answer:
In Festinger and Carlsmith's (1959) classic study on cognitive dissonance, participants who were paid $20 for doing a boring task, in contrast to those who were paid $1 for doing the same task, did not experience cognitive dissonance and rated the task as boring when alone.
Explanation:
In Festinger and Carlsmith's study, participants were asked to do a boring task for an hour. Then, some of them were paid $1 while others were paid $20 to lie to someone else by telling that person the activity was fun and enjoyable.
People who were paid only $1 later rated the task as fun, even though they no longer needed to lie. The reason for that is that they experienced cognitive dissonance - a discomfort caused when our beliefs and our actions are not aligned. They did a boring task, lied about it, and only got paid $1. In order to not feel uncomfortable about that fact, they would internalize the attitude they had been forced to express. In other words, they would convince themselves that the activity has indeed been fun.
On the other hand, people who were paid $20 did not experience cognitive dissonance. The higher amount of money actually made lying worth their while. Later, when rating the task by themselves, they did not rate it as fun. They did not feel the need to convince themselves that the task was not boring. The money was reward enough.
Based on research studies, the Festinger and Carlsmith's (1959) classic study on cognitive dissonance, participants who were paid $20 for doing a boring task, in contrast to those who were paid $1 for doing the same task, tell the truth about the tedious nature of the work.
However, the participants who were paid $1 rated the task significantly more enjoyable and exciting than subjects who were paid $20.
The research was conducted to prove the existence of cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance is a phenomenon in which an individual rejects new evidence that differs from his existing beliefs.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that cognitive dissonance exists.
Learn more about cognitive dissonance here: https://brainly.com/question/16059585