Read the sentence. Crafts once fulfilled useful purposes, now crafts are used mainly for decoration. Which revision most effectively corrects the comma splice? Crafts once fulfilled useful purposes, even now crafts are used mainly for decoration. Crafts once fulfilled useful purposes now crafts are used mainly for decoration. Crafts once fulfilling useful purposes but now used mainly for decoration. Crafts once fulfilled useful purposes, but now crafts are used mainly for decoration.

Answer:

[tex]3x+3[/tex]

Explanation:

[tex](5x+2)-(2x+1)=\\5x+2-2x+1=\\5x-2x+2+1=\\3x+2+1=\\3x+3[/tex]

Answer: 3x+1

Explanation:

Distribute the Negative Sign:

=5x+2+−1(2x+1)

=5x+2+−1(2x)+(−1)(1)

=5x+2+−2x+−1

Combine Like Terms:

=5x+2+−2x+−1

=(5x+−2x)+(2+−1)

=3x+1

Answer:

Explanation:

pose a thought-provoking question share a related quotation name the topic of the presentation tell a related joke or personal story state evidence that supports a claim summarize the main points.

Answer:

The author should state what the presentation is about and maybe some mystery or some tension.

Explanation:

You should do this because a lot of people like to think about what might happen next. People like a lot of mystery and tension in some presentation.

I hope this helps. I'm sorry if this wrong.

Answer:

It simply means that Thoreau sought for a way to catch the people's attention. The bell not making any sound is similar to nobody paying attention to him.

Explanation:

He laments, ""How do we make a sound? How do we break the silence?" He was simply asking for a way to catch the attention of the people.

"The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail” is a two-act American play. The play was written by Robert E. Lee and Jerome Lawrence written in 1969 and first published in 1971.

The story recalls how Henry David Thoreau found himself in prison for not paying taxes.

Answer:

D. Central Characters

Explanation:

Other central characters found in Gilbert's play are King Claudius and Queen Gertrude of Denmark, their son Prince Hamlet, and Ophelia.

In Gilbert's play, Rosencrantz and his friend Guildenstem conspires to terminate Hamlet. Their goal is so that Rosencrantz can marry Ophelia. Rosencrantz and Guildenstem plans to make Hamlet perform King's Claudius play. Hamlet did and incurred the King's wrath and was eventually banished. As a result, Rosencrantz and Ophelia can now get married.

Answer:

D ✔️

Explanation:

"

Central characters"

Answer:

D.  Conflict.

Explanation:

Conflict in a story or plot happens when there are contrasting issues pressing against each other. This leads to a dilemma in the character, with his interests clashing with one another.

The given passage presents a conflict in the character for he had to change his plans. His original plan was to reach the camp by 6 o'clock but with the recent activity of him plunging into the ice-cold water. He knows he has to get to the camp as soon as possible but he also knows he has to take care of his wet clothes so as not to freeze himself to death. So, he is presented with two choices, either to move on or to delay his journey and first dry himself with fire.

Thus, the correct answer is option D.

Answer:

there are clear-cut procedures for fact-checking and consequences for breaking these rules

Answer:

B. Sequential :)

Explanation:

Answer:

The answers are Napoleon talks to the animals through Squealer.

Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe Napoleon’s tactics

Explanation:

Through Squealer, Napoleon communicates with the animals, and Squealer describes Napoleon's strategies in glitzy generalizations are examples of propaganda. Thus, option B and D are correct.

A certain goal or vantage point is promoted through the employment of propaganda, a communication technique. It can be applied to motivational interviewing or opinion manipulation.

Untruths and misrepresentation are frequently used in propaganda, which may be quite powerful at swaying social views.

Napoleon picked Squealer because he is prejudiced. Although the other creatures are aware that Napoleon originally challenged the construction of a said windmill, Squealer praises Napoleon using the adjective tactics and claims that they actually the person who created the turbine.

Therefore, option B and D are the correct options.

Learn more about propaganda, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28029535

#SPJ6

The question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Read the passage from Animal Farm. On the third Sunday after Snowball's expulsion, the animals were somewhat surprised to hear Napoleon announce that the windmill was to be built after all. He did not give any reason for having changed his mind, but merely warned the animals that this extra task would mean very hard work, it might even be necessary to reduce their rations. The plans, however, had all been prepared, down to the last detail. A special committee of pigs had been at work upon them for the past three weeks. The building of the windmill, with various other improvements, was expected to take two years. That evening Squealer explained privately to the other animals that Napoleon had never in reality been opposed to the windmill. On the contrary, it was he who had advocated it in the beginning, and the plan which Snowball had drawn on the floor of the incubator shed had actually been stolen from among Napoleon's papers. The windmill was, in fact, Napoleon's own creation. Why, then, asked somebody, had he spoken so strongly against it? Here Squealer looked very sly. That, he said, was Comrade Napoleon's cunning. He had seemed to oppose the windmill, simply as a maneuver to get rid of Snowball, who was a dangerous character and a bad influence. Now that Snowball was out of the way, the plan could go forward without his interference. This, said Squealer, was something called tactics. He repeated a number of times, "Tactics, comrades, tactics!" skipping round and whisking his tail with a merry laugh. The animals were not certain what the word meant, but Squealer spoke so persuasively, and the three dogs who happened to be with him growled so threateningly, that they accepted his explanation without further questions.

Which examples of propaganda are found in this

passage? Select two options.

Snowball is used as a scapegoat.

Napoleon talks to the animals through Squealer.

Squealer targets his message to emphasize plain folks.

Squealer uses glittering generalities to describe

Napoleon's tactics.

Napoleon uses name-calling to differentiate the pigs

from the other animals.

The correct answer is A. Verb + -ed

Explanation:

The function of the Simple Past Tense is to indicate an action is completed and belongs to the past; for example, actions that occurred yesterday and were completed should be in this tense. Besides this, the simple past tense is mainly indicated by the verb because this should be in past form; this in most cases means the verb needs to end in -ed (suffix that indicates past) as in the verbs talked, called, or watched. However, in the case of irregular verbs, this rule does not apply, this includes verbs in past such as wrote (write), ran (run), or bought (buy). Thus, the formula used to indicate the simple past in most cases is verb+ed.

Answer:

We could alternate the language and adapt it to reflect cutting-edge English we use nowadays. That would make the play more understandable, specifically for young people, and wake up their interest inside the theatre.  

We could alternate the setting, that is, time and location of a few performs and adapt it to present day surroundings, without converting the subject of the plays, as Shakespearean issues and inner struggles are nevertheless present inside the twenty first century, handiest in one of a kind ways.

For example, we could alternate the characters' professions or some situations without changing the plot of the story. Or, perhaps, try to represent a few contemporary circle of relatives issues, through readapting Hamlet into a boy who is fighting against his stepfather

please mark me brainliest :)

Answer:

I have no idea on what I am about to write

Explanation:

Of course, new cars should have speed limits

Question:

Study the poster showing characters from the movie Star  Wars and created by the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1977.

How does the poster (attached) most likely demonstrate the use of the testimonial technique?  

A) The photograph shows fictional film characters, used to sell immunization.

B) The text references the health department, a revered government institution.  

C) The phrase "call your doctor" adds a reference to an esteemed authority D) The phrase -parents of Earth" reminds the audience of the importance of parenting.    

Answer:

The correct answer is A

Explanation:

The Testimonial Technique is a form of strategy in advertising that features a famous and or authoritative brand recommending vouching for and recommending a product.

This technique relies on the psychology that the target audience would most likely want to relate to the opinion of the super figures endorsing the product. In cases where music stars or football stars are used, their fans who are already evangelists of the star's brand take in on themselves to explore as well as encourage others to purchase whatever product the starts are endorsing in the advert.

The most authoritative brand or person in the poster are the Star Wars Characters. Star Wars movie was released on May 25, 1977, in the USA. It did so well that it grossed a total of $775 Million in sales and was packaged for presentation to a much bigger and wider audience.

Riding on the popularity of the film and its characters, the Ministry of Health released the advert using the characters to draw the attention as well as influence the decision of parents with regard to immunisation.

Cheers!

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

I think it would be C.

often characterized by the similar themes discussed in their work, such as disillusionment in the post-World War I society, loss of identity and tradition,

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Lost Generation, a group of American writers who came of age during World War I and established their literary reputations in the 1920s. The term is also used more generally to refer to the post-World War I generation.

Answer: A

Explanation:

Answer:

an iceberg falls over on the ship

Explanation:

the accident that endangers the nautilus and all on board is that an iceberg falls over on the ship

Answer:

It reached its muzzle forward and rubbed Lutra's hand amiably.

The reason this is the answer because this is not one of those myths they had heard from people.

Explanation:

Answer:

it reached its muzzle forward and rubbed lutra's hand amiably

Explanation:

Answer:

a. Exponential growth curves are common for R-selected species.

Explanation

Exponential growth looks like J shaped curve which is representative of R-selected species. R-selected species have tons of offspring with short life expectancy (or in unstable conditions) such as mice, rabbits etc.

Answer:

A.

Exponential growth curves are common for R-selected species.

Explanation:

The scenario which is the best example of a paradox is D. A rich girl has everything she could ever want and is very happy.

A paradox is an announcement that could appear contradictory but may be true (or as a minimum make an experience). This makes them stand out and play an essential function in literature and normal lifestyles. beyond that, they can simply be interesting brain teasers. man status in a subject using iPad as examples of paradox.

It is a statement this is reputedly contradictory or opposed to not unusual experience and is possibly true. if you nonetheless haven't any clue of what we are speaking approximately perhaps you'll sincerely recognize yourself in the sort of paradoxical statements: – you like to trade and you like habitual.

Learn more about Paradox at https://brainly.com/question/17731343

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explanation:

They asked people to stay 2 meters apart from everyone

There was an app released in a country

People were asked to wear gloves and face masks to prevent the spread

Answer:

The Ball Poem” is a very subtle and beautiful poem about a little boy’s growing up. The poet sees this little boy one day when he has just lost his ball. The loss of his ball is teaching him that in life, we often lose things and they cannot be easily replaced. Such lessons are a part of growing up, and everyone has to learn them at some point in time or the other. However, it is painful for the poet to watch the boy in his sad state. He is sure that the ball, as well as the person who whistles by the boy, feels the same way as he does.

Answer:

I think it is A

Explanation:

Answer:

Non sequitur (fallacy), an invalid argument whose conclusion is not supported by its premises. Non sequitur (literary device), an irrelevant, often humorous comment to a preceding topic or statement.

Explanation:

HAVE A GOOD DAY!

Answer:

It's half on one or two dozen of another

     Hope this helps :)

Explanation:

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

bc

Answer:

Event #1: After the Capulets’ ball, Romeo hides from Mercutio and Benvolio and goes looking for Juliet.

Event #2: Romeo and Juliet declare their love for each other at Juliet’s balcony and make plans to get married.

Event#3:  Romeo leaves Juliet to find Friar Laurence and convince him to help them get married in secret.

Event #4: Romeo is joking around with Mercutio and Benvolio when Juliet’s nurse arrives to find out about his plans.

Event #5: Juliet’s nurse conveys Romeo’s message and helps Juliet secretly go to Friar Laurence’s cell.

Event #6: Juliet arrives at Friar Laurence’s cell, and he marries the young couple in the hope that their love will end their families’ feud.

Explanation:

Answer:

Literary criticism is referred to as the learning, assessment, and analysis of literary works. Contemporary literary criticism often depends on the literary theory, which is the idealistic discussion of literature's objectives and techniques.

A critic is the one who offers a thorough review of arts or ethnicity and can focus on one of a variety of genres in the vast gamut of literature. These evaluations can emerge in the media, newspapers, or online. Moreover, a literary critic can be called audiences’ advocate, who provides readers with information about a new creation or book.

A critic evaluates for the general public and cannot suggest biased statements to prove his/her theory. He also has nothing to do with the financial progress made by a book.

So, the correct answer here, considering the role of a critic is:  as a social commentator, who explains what a book says about people in general.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

In the beginning,  Elisa presents herself as a rigid and reserved woman, educated and kind. By the end of the story, her husband notes that she is different, with more confidence, strength, and even happiness. But at the same time, for herself,  sad for not feeling understood by men.

The change is the talk she has with the stranger, believing that the man had an interest in her garden but in the end, she realizes that he was a liar and that distresses her.

" In a moment it was over. The thing was done. She did not look back" (When she notices the man throws her chrysanthemums)

Answer:

In the beginning,  Elisa presents herself as a firm and quiet woman, educated and kind. By the end of the story, her husband notes that she is different, with more confidence, strength, and even happiness. But at the same time, for herself, she feels sad for not feeling understood by men. The change is because of the talk she has with the stranger, believing that the man had an interest in her garden but in the end, she realizes that he was a liar and that hurts her. "In a moment it was over. The thing was done. She did not look back" (Elisa when she notices the man throws her chrysanthemums in the road)

Explanation:

The answer above is correct, I just modified it to fit my level of vocabulary :)

Answer:

Within an Ancient Roman city, dwellings owned by aristocratic or wealthy people could be very extensive and luxurious. Such mansions on one hill in Rome became so extensive that the term palatial was derived from the name Palatine hill and is the etymological origin of "palace".[1] Mansions of considerable size and state significance are called palaces.

Renaissance villas such as Villa Rotonda near Vicenza were an inspiration for many later mansions, especially during the industrialisation.

Following the fall of Rome, the practice of building unfortified villas ceased. Today, the oldest inhabited mansions around the world usually began their existence as fortified houses in the Middle Ages. As social conditions slowly changed and stabilised fortifications were able to be reduced, and over the centuries gave way to comfort. It became fashionable and possible for homes to be beautiful rather than grim and forbidding allowing for the development of the modern mansion.

In British English, a mansion block refers to a block of flats or apartments designed for the appearance of grandeur. In many parts of Asia, including Hong Kong and Japan, the word mansion also refers to a block of apartments. In modern Japan, a "manshon" (マンション), stemming from the English word "mansion", is used to refer to a multi-unit apartment complex or condominium.

In Europe, from the 15th century onwards, a combination of politics and advancements in modern weaponry negated the need for the aristocracy to live in fortified castles. As a result, many were transformed into mansions without defences or demolished and rebuilt in a more modern, undefended style. Due to intermarriage and primogeniture inheritance amongst the aristocracy, it became common for one noble to often own several country houses. These would be visited rotationally throughout the year as their owner pursued the social and sporting circuit from country home to country home.[2] Many owners of a country house would also own a town mansion in their country's capital city. These town mansions were referred to as 'houses' in London, 'hôtels particuliers' in Paris, and 'palaces' in most European cities elsewhere. It might be noted that sometimes the house of a clergyman was called a "mansion house" (e.g., by the Revd James Blair, Commissary in Virginia for the Bishop of London, 1689–1745, a term related to the word "manse" commonly used in the Church of Scotland and in Non-Conformist churches. H.G. Herklots, The Church of England and the American Episcopal Church).

Harlaxton Manor, England, a 19th-century meeting of Renaissance, Tudor and Gothic architecture produced Jacobethan – a popular form of historicist mansion architecture.

As the 16th century progressed and the Renaissance style slowly spread across Europe, the last vestiges of castle architecture and life changed; the central points of these great houses became redundant as owners wished to live separately from their servants, and no longer ate with them in a Great hall. All evidence and odours of cooking and staff were banished from the principal parts of the house into distant wings, while the owners began to live in airy rooms, above the ground floor, with privacy from their servants, who were now confined, unless required, to their specifically delegated areas—often the ground and uppermost attic floors. This was a period of great social change, as the educated prided themselves on enlightenment.[3]

The uses of these edifices paralleled that of the Roman villas. It was vital for powerful people and families to keep in social contact with each other as they were the primary moulders of society. The rounds of visits and entertainments were an essential part of the societal process, as painted in the novels of Jane Austen. State business was often discussed and determined in informal settings. Times of revolution reversed this value. During July/August 1789, a significant number of French country mansions (chateaux) were destroyed by the rural population as part of the Great Fear—a symbolic rejection of the feudal rights and restraints in effect under the Ancien Régime.[4]

Until World War I it was not unusual for a moderately sized mansion in England such as Cliveden to have an indoor staff of 20 and an outside staff of the same size,[citation needed] and in ducal mansions such as Chatsworth House the numbers could be far higher. In the great houses of Italy, the number of retainers was often even greater than in England; whole families plus extended relations would often inhabit warrens of rooms in basements and attics. Most European mansions were also the hub of vast estates.

Answer:

Explanation:

I felt a weird sensation a feeling like I wasn't supposed to be here despite my anxiety I pressed forwards... And there before me I saw it... The towering mansion, it looked as if it were here since the age of the vampires! I slowly walked towards the giant of a house only until i walked closer could I see the horror that lurked beneath... Cobwebs decorated the windows like some kind of out-dated curtains, the wood I walked on creaked beneath my frozen feet... I was frozen in place. I decided to turn back.. and leave it in my past...

Answer:

The response that most accurately explains how the author helps the reader understand the full meaning of the phrase "pursuit of happiness" is, He provides historical context by explaining that happiness was regarded as one’s birthright and should be protected from others who may impinge upon it

Explanation:

From the passage, the author tries to describe what happiness means and how fundamental happiness is to everyone.

He uses historical context to explain the importance of happiness and how happiness should be protected from others that may want to make one unhappy.

Answer:

make sure to put it in your own words!!!!↑

Explanation:

Since the question talks of a lion and an antelope in Rousseau's painting, it is safe to assume it is regarding the painting "The Hungry Lion Throws Itself on the Antelope".

Answer and Explanation:

Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game" and Rousseau's painting "The Hungry Lion Throws Itself on the Antelope" both concern the conflict between a hunter and a prey. However, there is an interesting distinction between them. The painting shows an animal hunting another animal. The lion, as a carnivore, is supposed to hunt to feed itself and its cubs. The antelope, as a herbivore, is below the lion in the food chain and is supposed to serve as food for the predator. Therefore, there is no other way for things to go, no other way for them to function. The lion will never become a herbivore, for instance. However, in Connell's story, what we have is an abomination. Man hunting man, solely for fun. The following dialog between Rainsford and Zaroff is evidence of that:

"But they are men," said Rainsford hotly.

"Precisely," said the general. "That is why I use them. It gives me pleasure. They can reason, after a fashion. So they are dangerous."

In the plot, general Zaroff is a hunter who has grown tired of killing beasts. Irrational animals no longer represent a challenge. He wants to feel some sort of thrill during the hunt, which is why he has started to hunt other men. They can reason; they can think of traps; they represent a challenge. If we were to compare this character to the painting, he would most likely be the lion. He is the ultimate hunter, the most skillful and analytical predator, who does not see his activity as murder, but as a mere link in the chain of life.

Rainsford, on the other hand, was once a lion as well, but is now an antelope. Rainsford is also a hunter. Just like Zaroff, he had no mercy when it came to the beasts he killed. But now the tables have turned and he is the prey, hunted by Zaroff. He will now understand the fear the hunted beasts feel upon being chased and shot at. However, in the end, he will go back to being a lion. He will defeat Zaroff. Still, he will never be the same. Unlike a real, natural lion, who has no choice but to do what it does, Rainsford's attitude towards hunting will most likely change. He will probably grow from the experience now that he knows what it feels like to be on the other side of it. At the beginning of the story, fear was beyond his imagination:

"Even so, I rather think they understand one thing--fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death."

"Nonsense," laughed Rainsford. "This hot weather is making you soft, Whitney. Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and I are hunters. Do you think we've passed that island yet?"

The painting also shows a couple of other animals watching as the lion attacks the antelope. In regards to the story, the other animals may be the other men who were trapped in Zaroff's island. Instead of being hunted themselves, they were spared. The lion was too focused on the antelope - Zaroff was busy hunting Rainsford -, which allowed them to breathe and rest, knowing they would not be the ones running for their lives.