Please help meeeeeeeee

Answer:

It's written as

[tex]89.7 \times {10}^{9} [/tex]

Or

[tex]8.97 \times {10}^{10} [/tex]

Hope this helps you

Answer:

8.97 * 10 ^10

Step-by-step explanation:

We want one nonzero digit to the left of the decimal

8.97

We moved the decimal 10 places to the left

The exponent is positive 10 since we moved 10 places to the left

8.97 * 10 ^10

Answer:

4. ± 3.012

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Assuming that for both variables X₁ and X₂ n₁= n₂ = 16

You need to test at 1% if the variable is significant, this means, if the slope for X₁ is different from zero (β₁≠0) using the t-statistic and the critical value approach.

The hypotheses are:

H₀: β₁= 0

H₁: β₁≠ 0

α: 0.01

[tex]t= \frac{b_1-\beta_1}{Sb_1} ~t_{n_1-3}[/tex]

The degrees of freedom "n₁-3" are determined by the number of parameters that you estimate for the multiple regression, in this case there are three "β₁" "β₂" and "δ²e"

The rejection region for this test is two-tailed, the critical values are:

±[tex]t_{n-3;1-\alpha /2}= t_{13;0.995}= 3.012[/tex]

I hope this helps!

Answer: [tex]2\sqrt{1+tant}+C[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

To integrate means to find the antiderivative of the function. For this problem, we can use u-substitution.

[tex]\int\limits {\frac{dt}{cos^2t\sqrt{1+tant} } } \[/tex]

Let's first use our identities to rewrite the function. Since [tex]\frac{1}{cosx} =secx[/tex], we can use this identity.

[tex]\int\limits {\frac{sec^2t}{\sqrt{1+tant} } } \,[/tex]

[tex]u=\sqrt{1+tant}[/tex]

[tex]du=\frac{sec^2t}{2\sqrt{1+tant} } dt[/tex]

Now that we have u and du, we can plug them back in.

[tex]\int\limits {2} \, du[/tex]

[tex]\int\limits{2} \, du=2u[/tex]

Since we know u, we can plug that in.

[tex]2\sqrt{1+tant}[/tex]

This may seem like the correct answer, but we forgot to add the constant.

[tex]2\sqrt{1+tant}+C[/tex]

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

To begin with notice that  

        [tex]\displaymode{ \tan(x) = \frac{30}{10 + 30\cot(y)} }[/tex]

From that equation you get that

10 tan(x)  +  30tan(x) cot(x) = 30

therefore

tan(x) + 3 tan(x) cot(x) = 3

Answer:

620 comic books

2480 / 4 is 620.

620 x 3 is 1860.

1860 + 620 is 2480.

Done!

Answer:

3(7) + 2* |7 - 8| - 12 = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

3(7) + 2* |7 - 8| - 12

21 + 2* |-1| - 12

21 + 2* 1 - 12

21 + 2 - 12

23 - 12 = 11

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

the correct answer is 2x

Answer:

D. 2x

Step-by-step explanation:

20x² : 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, x

14x : 1, 2, 7, 14, x

The greatest common factor of the polynomial is 2x.

2x(10x² - 7)

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

If they were opposite, they would be equal.

But they are not, (on one of the spaces in between them is smaller and one is larger.)

Hope I have helped you, since it seems I haven't helped "other people" the last time :/

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  5

Step-by-step explanation:

Substitute the given values and do the arithmetic.

  [tex]0.3y+\dfrac{y}{z}=0.3\cdot 10+\dfrac{10}{5}=3+2=\boxed{5}[/tex]

Answer: (1 and 22/45)

Step-by-step explanation:

I guess that we are working with mixed numbers here, and we have the equation:

(8÷2 2/9) − (2 11/15)

first we solve: 8÷2 = 4.

Now, we can write this as:

(4 + 2/9) - (2 + 11/15)

(4 - 2) + (2/9 - 11/15)

now, 9*5 = 45

        15*3 = 45

then we can write the right side as: 2/9 - 11/5 = 10/45 - 33/45 = -23/45

2 - 23/45

But in mixed numbers we also need to work with a positive rational, then we have:

2 - 23/45 = 1 + 1 -23/45 = 1 + 45/45 - 23/45 = 1 + 22/45

then the solution is:

(1 and 22/45)

Answer:

12x/2 or 52/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, perimeter is length+length+width+width. 12x/2 and 52/2 could are probably the answers.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 9 possible outcomes for (Bill, Ben)'s cards:

  (4, 4) total 8; (4, 5) total 9; (4, 6) total 10;

  (5, 4) total 9; (5, 5) total 10; (5, 6) total 11;

  (6, 4) total 10; (6, 5) total 11; (6, 6) total 12.

Of these 9 outcomes, 4 have an odd total; 6 are less than 11.

 P(odd) = 4/9

  P(sum < 11) = 2/3

Answer:

Yup P is the right one having 62.26%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

We can set it up as

P = 33/53

Q = 20/48

R = 54/90

S = 44/83

This is because we are calculating the percent of yellow birds in the total amt. of birds in a specified park.

Now we calculate =>

P = 33/53 = around 0.62

Q = 20/48 = around 0.416

R = 54/90 = 0.6

S = 44/83 = around 0.53

We find that Park P has the greatest percentage and -->

Thus, Park P is our answer and yes, you are correct.

Answer:

d) 01-13 = Penguin, 14-34 = Iguana, 35-56 = Parrot, 57-99 & 00 = Turtle

Step-by-step explanation:

13 − 01 + 1 = 13

34 − 14 + 1 = 21

56 − 35 + 1 = 22

99 − 57 + 1 + 1 = 44

Answer:

(A) 1199.168

(B) 1503.372

(C) 159.17728

Step-by-step explanation:

(A) To determine the 30th percentile for the number of chocolate chips in the bag, we find the z-score for the 30th percentile.

Found using a z-table or z-calculator, the z-score for the 30th percentile is -0.524

The formula for finding X (the number of items in a given percentile) is:

X = M + Z(S.D.)

Where M is the mean, Z is the specific z-score of the sought percentile and S.D. is the standard deviation.

So for the 30th percentile,

X = 1261 + (-0.524)(118)

X = 1261 - 61.832 = 1199.168

(B) The number of chocolate chips that make up the middle 98% of chips in the bag is

X = 1261 + (2.054)(118)

X = 1261 + 242.372 = 1503.372

(C) For normal distributions, Interquartile range is Q3 - Q1, that is; 3rd quartile minus 1st quartile.

This is within 1.34896 standard deviations of the mean.

IQR = (1.34896)(118)

IQR = 159.17728

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y + 8 = 0(x - 0)

y + 8 = 0

y = -8

Answer:

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2

2¹³

13 x 13

Step-by-step explanation:

We simply find numbers that can multiply to 26 and write out the multiplication to get our answer.

Answer:

Null hypothesis = H₀ = There food preferences among vole species are independent of one another.

Alternate hypothesis = H₁ = There is a relationship between voles and food preference.

Expected meadow vole/apple slices = 29.983051

Expected common vole/apple slices = 28.016949

Expected meadow vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 31.016949

Expected common vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 28.983051

Chi-square value = χ² = 2.154239

Degree of freedom = 1

Critical value = 3.841

χ² < Critical value

We failed to reject H₀

We do not have significant evidence at the given significance level to show that there is a relationship between voles and food preference.

Step-by-step explanation:

He frequently traps the moles and has noticed what appears to be a preference for a peanut butter-oatmeal mixture by the meadow voles vs apple slices are usually used in traps, where the common voles seem to prefer the apple slices.

So he conducted a study where he used a peanut butter-oatmeal mixture in half the traps and the normal apple slices in his remaining traps to see if there was a food preference between the two different voles.

Null hypothesis = H₀ = There food preferences among vole species are independent of one another.

Alternate hypothesis = H₁ = There is a relationship between voles and food preference.

Data collected by Dr. Pagels:

                                              meadow voles     common voles      Row Total

apple slices                                     26                          32                      58

peanut butter-oatmeal                   35                          25                     60

Column Total                                   61                          57                     118

Where 118 is the grand total.

The expected number is given by

Expected = (row total)×(column total)/grand total

Expected meadow vole/apple slices = 58×61/118

Expected meadow vole/apple slices = 29.983051

Expected common vole/apple slices = 58×57/118

Expected common vole/apple slices = 28.016949

Expected meadow vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 60×61/118

Expected meadow vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 31.016949

Expected common vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 60×57/118

Expected common vole/peanut butter-oatmeal = 28.983051

The chi-square statistic value is given by

χ² = Σ(Observed - Expected)²/Expected

χ² = (26 - 29.983051)²/29.983051 + (32 - 28.016949)²/28.016949 + (35 - 31.016949)²/31.016949 + (25 - 28.983051)²/28.983051

χ² = 2.154239

The degrees of freedom is given by

DoF = (row - 1)×(col - 1)

For the given case, we have 2 rows and 2 columns

DoF = (2 - 1)×(2 - 1)

DoF = 1

The given level of significance = 0.05

The critical value from the chi-square table at α = 0.05 and DoF = 1 is found to be

Critical value = 3.841

Conclusion:

Reject H₀ If χ² > Critical value

We reject the Null hypothesis If the calculated chi-square value is more than the critical value.

For the given case,

χ² < Critical value

We failed to reject H₀

We do not have significant evidence at the given significance level to show that there is a relationship between voles and food preference.

Answer:

(CX3)+10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

c×3+10= j

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A) 95% confidence interval for the population mean PEF for children in biomass households = (3.214, 3.386)

95% confidence interval for the population mean PEF for children in LPG households

= (4.125, 4.375)

Simultaneous confidence interval for both = (3.214, 4.375)

B) The result of the hypothesis test is significant, hence, the true average PEF is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in LPG households.

C) 95% confidence interval for the population mean FEY for children in biomass households = (2.264, 2.336)

Simultaneous confidence interval for both = (2.264, 4.375)

This simultaneous interval cannot be the same as that calculated in (a) above because the sample mean obtained for children in biomass households here (using FEY) is much lower than that obtained using PEF in (a).

Step-by-step explanation:

A) Confidence Interval for the population mean is basically an interval of range of values where the true population mean can be found with a certain level of confidence.

Mathematically,

Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)

Margin of Error is the width of the confidence interval about the mean.

It is given mathematically as,

Margin of Error = (Critical value) × (standard Error of the mean)

Critical value will be obtained using the z-distribution. This is because although, there is no information provided for the population standard deviation, the sample sizes are large enough for the sample properties to approximate the population properties.

Finding the critical value from the z-tables,

Significance level for 95% confidence interval

= (100% - 95%)/2 = 2.5% = 0.025

z (0.025) = 1.960 (from the z-tables)

For the children in the biomass households

Sample mean = 3.30

Standard error of the mean = σₓ = (σ/√N)

σ = standard deviation of the sample = 1.20

N = sample size = 755

σₓ = (1.20/√755) = 0.0436724715 = 0.04367

95% Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± [(Critical value) × (standard Error of the mean)]

CI = 3.30 ± (1.960 × 0.04367)

CI = 3.30 ± 0.085598

95% CI = (3.214402, 3.385598)

95% Confidence interval = (3.214, 3.386)

For the children in the LPG households

Sample mean = 4.25

Standard error of the mean = σₓ = (σ/√N)

σ = standard deviation of the sample = 1.75

N = sample size = 750

σₓ = (1.75/√750) = 0.063900965 = 0.063901

95% Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± [(Critical value) × (standard Error of the mean)]

CI = 4.25 ± (1.960 × 0.063901)

CI = 4.25 ± 0.125246

95% CI = (4.12475404, 4.37524596)

95% Confidence interval = (4.125, 4.375)

Simultaneous confidence interval for both = (3.214, 4.375)

B) The null hypothesis usually goes against the claim we are trying to test and would be that the true average PEF for children in biomass households is not lower than that of children in LPG households.

The alternative hypothesis confirms the claim we are testing and is that the true average PEF is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in LPG households.

Mathematically, if the true average PEF for children in biomass households is μ₁, the true average PEF for children in LPG households is μ₂ and the difference is μ = μ₁ - μ₂

The null hypothesis is

H₀: μ ≥ 0 or μ₁ ≥ μ₂

The alternative hypothesis is

Hₐ: μ < 0 or μ₁ < μ₂

Test statistic for 2 sample mean data is given as

Test statistic = (μ₂ - μ₁)/σ

σ = √[(s₂²/n₂) + (s₁²/n₁)]

μ₁ = 3.30

n₁ = 755

s₁ = 1.20

μ₂ = 4.25

n₂ = 750

s₂ = 1.75

σ = √[(1.20²/755) + (1.75²/750)] = 0.07740

z = (3.30 - 4.25) ÷ 0.07740 = -12.27

checking the tables for the p-value of this z-statistic

Significance level = 0.01

The hypothesis test uses a one-tailed condition because we're testing in only one direction.

p-value (for z = -12.27, at 0.01 significance level, with a one tailed condition) = < 0.000000001

The interpretation of p-values is that

When the p-value > significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and when the p-value < significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

Significance level = 0.01

p-value = 0.000000001

0.000000001 < 0.01

Hence,

p-value < significance level

This means that we reject the null hypothesis, accept the alternative hypothesis & say that true average PEF is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in LPG households.

C) For FEY for biomass households,

Sample mean = 2.3 L/s

Standard error of the mean = σₓ = (σ/√N)

σ = standard deviation = 0.5

N = sample size = 755

σₓ = (0.5/√755) = 0.0182

95% Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± [(Critical value) × (standard Error of the mean)]

CI = 2.30 ± (1.960 × 0.0182)

CI = 2.30 ± 0.03567

95% CI = (2.264, 2.336)

Simultaneous confidence interval for both = (2.264, 4.375)

This simultaneous interval cannot be the same as that calculated in (a) above because the sample mean obtained for children in biomass households here (using FEY) is much lower than that obtained using PEF in (a).

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

segment I'm and segment ad

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Fraction of the figure shaded = [tex]\frac{13}{16}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Ratio of the areas of the given circles are 1 : 4 : 16

Then the radii of the circles will be in the ratio = [tex]\sqrt{1}:\sqrt{4}:\sqrt{16}[/tex]

                                                                             = 1 : 2 : 4

If the radius of the smallest circle = x units

Then the radius of the middle circle = 2x units

and the radius of the largest circle = 4x units

Area of the smallest circle = πx²

Area of the middle circle = π(2x)² = 4πx²

Area of the largest circle = π(4x)²= 16πx²

Area of the region which is not shaded in the middle circle = πx²(4 - 1)

                                                                                                  = 3πx²

Therefore, area of the shaded region = Area of the largest circle - Area of the region which is not shaded

= 16πx² - 3πx²

= 13πx²

Fraction of the figure which is not shaded = [tex]\frac{\text{Area of the shaded region}}{\text{Area of the largest circle}}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{13\pi x^{2} }{16\pi x^{2} }[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{13}{16}[/tex]

Using the Pythagorean theorem

Hypotenuse = sqrt( 11^2 + 7^2)

= sqrt( 121 + 39)

= sqrt( 160)

= 12.694

Answer:

the slope is 8

Step-by-step explanation:

The coefficient of x,  "m"  is the slope in the slope-intercept form:

y = mx + b

Answer:

85.4

Step-by-step explanation:

first you have to find the radius before you find the area. so given the height, the radius is 11.3 meters. then, you need to find the area behind the arc, which is 85.4 meters/

Answer:

2.26 repeating

Step-by-step explanation:

Convert the fraction to a decimal by dividing the numerator by the denominator.

hope this helpes

be sure to give brainliest