People were surveyed worldwide, being asked the question "How important is acquiring wealth to you?" of 1500 respondents in country A, 1185 said that it was of more than average importance. In country B, of 1302 respondents, 613 said it was of more than average importance.
1) (Round to three decimal places as needed):
a. The sample proportions for country A are: ___
b. The sample proportions for country B are: ___
2) What is the confidence interval for country A? Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer boxes within your choice.
a. The 90% confidence interval for country A is (__%, ___%) [Round to one decimal place as needed.]
b. The conditions for constructing a confidence interval are not satisfied.
3) Compare to the confidence interval for country B. Choose the correct answer below.
a. It is not possible to make a comparaison because the conditions for creating a confidence interval are not satisfied.
b. It appears that the proportion of adults who feel this way in country A is more than those in country B.
c. It appears that the proportion of adults who feel this way in country A is about the same as those in country B.
d. it appears that the proportion of adults who feel this way in country B is more than those in country A.

Answer:

(a) 2.81%

(b) 0.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following information from the statement:

P = 64 + - 0.9

(a) We know that the perimeter is:

P = 2 * pi * r

if we solve for r, we have to:

r = P / 2 * pi

We have that the formula of the area is:

A = pi * r ^ 2

we replace r and we are left with:

A = pi * (P / 2 * pi) ^ 2

A = (P ^ 2) / (4 * pi)

We derive with respect to P, and we are left with:

dA = 2 * P / 4 * pi * dP

We know that P = 64 and dP = 0.9, we replace:

dA = 2 * 64/4 * 3.14 * 0.9

dA = 9.17

The error would come being:

dA / A = 9.17 / (64 ^ 2/4 * 3.14) = 0.02811

In other words, the error would be 2.81%

(b) tell us that dA / A <= 0.01

we replace:

[P * dP / 2 * pi] / [P ^ 2/4 * pi] <= 0.01

solving we have:

2 * dP / P <= 0.01

dP / P <= 0.01 / 2

dP / P <= 0.005

Which means that the answer is 0.5%

Answer:

  340 square feet

Step-by-step explanation:

If we "unwrap" the painted surface from the shed, it will have the shape shown in the attachment. It is essentially a 40' by 8' rectangle with two 10' wide by 2' high triangles added.

The rectangle area is ...

  A = LW = (40 ft)(8 ft) = 320 ft²

The total area of the two triangles is ...

  A = 2(1/2)bh = (10 ft)(2 ft) = 20 ft²

Then the painted area is ...

  total area = 320 ft² +20 ft²

  total area = 340 ft²

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of rectangular menu

Length × breadth

3×2=6sq feet

Answer:

6 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

area of rectangle = length * width

area = 3 ft * 2 ft

area = 6 ft^2

Answer:

The probability that all three have type B​+ blood is 0.001728

Step-by-step explanation:

For each person, there are only two possible outcomes. Either they have type B+ blood, or they do not. The probability of a person having type B+ blood is independent of any other person. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

In which [tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

And p is the probability of X happening.

The probability that a person in the United States has type B​+ blood is 12​%.

This means that [tex]p = 0.12[/tex]

Three unrelated people in the United States are selected at random.

This means that [tex]n = 3[/tex]

Find the probability that all three have type B​+ blood.

This is P(X = 3).

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{3,3}.(0.12)^{3}.(0.88)^{0} = 0.001728[/tex]

The probability that all three have type B​+ blood is 0.001728

Answer:

D. e - 35

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that:

George earned e extra points.

Kate earned k extra points.

Kate earned 35 fewer extra credit points than George.

This means that k is e subtracted by 35, that is:

k = e - 35

So the correct answer is:

D. e - 35

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If we spin the spinner 11 times, 4 is the best prediction possible for the number of times it will land on pink.

To calculate the expected value of a random variable, simply multiply it with the respective probability and sum the respective products.

Given, total number of outcomes=11.

Total number of pink colored spin= 4

Probability of a spin resulting pink color=4/11

Expected number of spins of pink color= [tex]\sum xp(x)[/tex]

=(1×4/11)+(2×4/11)+(3×4/11)+(4×4/11)

=4/11(1+2+3+4)

=40/11

=3.63 ≈ 4

Thus, the best prediction possible for the number of times it will land on pink is 4.

Learn more about expected value, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28197299

#SPJ12

Incomplete:

Image of spinner is missing in the question, Therefore attaching it below:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Plotting a point A and tracing a point B at 4 units from A results in a circle.

▪The locus of a point at equal distance from a fixed point is a circle.

▪Point A is (5,5) and length of AB is 4 units

This implies that the radius of circle is 4 units.

▪The point B can be swirled around A keeping the distance AB constant.

▪The resulting figure is a circle.

▪This circle is plotted and attached below.

I hope this helped. I am sorry if you get it wrong

Answer:

This is the right answer for Edementum and Plato users

Like and Rate!

Answer:

We have to multiply P(A) and P(B) which is 0.0045 * 0.01 * 100 (to make it a percentage) = 0.0045%.

Answer:

122 in2

Step-by-step explanation:

area = (2*tri area) + (3*rec area)

area = (2*0.5*4*3.5) + (3*4*9)

area = 14 + 108 = 122 Squared in

Answer:

a) From the empirical rule we know that within 3 deviations from the mean we have 99.7% of the data

b) [tex] P(191.5<X<319.5)[/tex]

We can find the number of deviations from the mean for the limits using the z score formula given by:

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] z=\frac{191.5-255.4}{63.9}= -1[/tex]

[tex] z=\frac{319.3-255.4}{63.9}= 1[/tex]

So we have values within 1 deviation from the mean and using the empirical rule we know that we have 68% of the values for this case

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following properties for the random variable of interest "blood platelet counts"

[tex]\mu = 255.4[/tex] represent the mean

[tex]\sigma = 63.9[/tex] represent the population deviation

Part a

From the empirical rule we know that within 3 deviations from the mean we have 99.7% of the data

Part b

We want this probability:

[tex] P(191.5<X<319.5)[/tex]

We can find the number of deviations from the mean for the limits using the z score formula given by:

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] z=\frac{191.5-255.4}{63.9}= -1[/tex]

[tex] z=\frac{319.3-255.4}{63.9}= 1[/tex]

So we have values within 1 deviation from the mean and using the empirical rule we know that we have 68% of the values for this case

Answer:

  A) 10, -3.73, -6.035, -6.259 . . . cm/s

  B) -6.2832 cm/s

Step-by-step explanation:

A) For problems like this, where repeated evaluation of a function is required, I find a graphing calculator or spreadsheet to be an appropriate tool. The attached shows that we defined the position function ...

  p(t) = 2sin(πt) +5cos(πt)

and a function for computing the average velocity from t=1. For some time interval ending at t2, the average velocity is ...

  Va(t2) = Δp/Δt = (p(t2) -p(1))/(t2 -1)

Then, for example, for t2 = 2, the average velocity on the interval [1, 2] is ...

  Va(2) = (p(2) -p(1))/(2 -1) = ((2sin(2π) +5cos(2π)) -(2sin(π) +5cos(π)))/(1)

  = (2·0+5·1 -(2·0 +5·(-1)) = 10 . . . . matches the table value for x1 = 2.

Then the average velocity values for the intervals of interest are ...

  1) [1, 2]   Va = 10

  2) [1, 1.1]   Va = -3.73

  3) [1, 1.01]   Va = -6.035

  4) [1, 1.001]   Va = -6.259

__

B) Sometimes a better estimate is obtained when the interval is centered on the point of interest. Here, we can compute the average velocity on the interval [0.999, 1.001] as a better approximation of the instantaneous velocity at t=1. That value is ...

  [0.999, 1.001]   Va = -6.283175*

Our estimate of V(1) is -6.2832 cm/s.

The exact value is -2π ≈ -6.2831853... cm/s

__

* This is the average of the Va(0.999) and Va(1.001) values in the table.

Answer:

$783.46

Step-by-step explanation:

Compounded interest rate (quarterly) formula: A = P(1 + r/4)^4t

Simply plug in our known variables and solve:

910 = P(1 + 0.015/4)^4(10)

910 = P(1.00375)^40

910 = 1.16151P

P = 783.464

Answer: 783

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We want a line that passes through the point (4, 7/2)

and we have no other information of this line, so we can not fully find it, but we can find a general line.

We know that a line can be written as:

y = a*x + b.

Now we want that, when x = 4, we must have y = 7/2.

7/2 = a*4 + b

b = -a*4 + 7/2

Then we can write this line as:

y = a*x - a*4 + 7/2.

Where a can take any value, and it is the slope of our line.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

EASY!

Answer: 17/16 or 1 1/16

Step-by-step explanation:

BRO IT'S ELEMANTARY FRACTIONS!!!!

Answer:

a. P(x=0)=0.2967

b. P(x=1)=0.4444

c. P(x=2)=0.2219

d. P(x=3)=0.0369

Step-by-step explanation:

The variable X: "number of meals that exceed $50" can be modeled as a binomial random variable, with n=3 (the total number of meals) and p=0.333 (the probability that the chosen restaurant charges mor thena $50).

The probabilty p can be calculated dividing the amount of restaurants that are expected to charge more than $50 (5 restaurants)  by the total amount of restaurants from where we can pick (15 restaurants):

[tex]p=\dfrac{5}{15}=0.333[/tex]

Then, we can model the probability that k meals cost more than $50 as:

[tex]P(x=k) = \dbinom{n}{k} p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}\\\\\\P(x=k) = \dbinom{3}{k} 0.333^{k} 0.667^{3-k}\\\\\\[/tex]

a. We have to calculate P(x=0)

[tex]P(x=0) = \dbinom{3}{0} p^{0}(1-p)^{3}=1*1*0.2967=0.2967\\\\\\[/tex]

b. We have to calculate P(x=1)

[tex]P(x=1) = \dbinom{3}{1} p^{1}(1-p)^{2}=3*0.333*0.4449=0.4444\\\\\\[/tex]

c. We have to calcualte P(x=2)

[tex]P(x=2) = \dbinom{3}{2} p^{2}(1-p)^{1}=3*0.1109*0.667=0.2219\\\\\\[/tex]

d. We have to calculate P(x=3)

[tex]P(x=3) = \dbinom{3}{3} p^{3}(1-p)^{0}=1*0.0369*1=0.0369\\\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

2/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Seven employees can be arranged in 7! ways. n(S) = 7!

Two adjacent desks for married couple can be selected in 6 ways viz.,(1, 2), (2, 3), (3,4), (4, 5), (5,6),(6,7).

This couple can be arranged in the two desks in 2! ways. Other five persons can be arranged in 5! ways.

So, number of ways in which married couple occupy adjacent desks

= 6×2! x 5! =2×6!

so, the probability that the married couple will have adjacent desks

[tex]\frac{n(A)}{n(s)} =\frac{2\times6!}{7!} \\=\frac{2}{7}[/tex]

Given Information:

Population proportion = p =  0.55

Sample size 1 = n₁ = 30

Sample size 2 = n₂ = 100

Sample size 3 = n₃ = 1000

Required Information:

Standard error = σ = ?

Answer:

[tex]$ \sigma_1 = 0.091 $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_2 = 0.050 $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_3 = 0.016 $[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard error for sample proportions from a population is given by

[tex]$ \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } $[/tex]  

Where p is the population proportion and n is the sample size.

For sample size n₁ = 30

[tex]$ \sigma_1 = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_1} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_1 = \sqrt{\frac{0.55(1-0.55)}{30} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_1 = 0.091 $[/tex]

For sample size n₂ = 100

[tex]$ \sigma_2 = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_2} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_2 = \sqrt{\frac{0.55(1-0.55)}{100} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_2 = 0.050 $[/tex]

For sample size n₃ = 1000

[tex]$ \sigma_3 = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_3} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_3 = \sqrt{\frac{0.55(1-0.55)}{1000} } $[/tex]

[tex]$ \sigma_3 = 0.016 $[/tex]

As you can notice, the standard error decreases as the sample size increases.

Therefore, the greater the sample size lesser will be the standard error.

Answer:

[tex]\dfrac{15}{19}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The soccer player so far has made 15 penalty kicks in 19 attempts.

Therefore:

Total Number of trials =19

Number of Successes =15

Therefore, the relative frequency probability that she will make her next penalty​ kick is:

[tex]=\dfrac{\text{Number of Successes}}{\text{Total Number of Trials}} \\=\dfrac{15}{19}[/tex]

Answer:

There are 10 teams.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the question wants at least 48 swimmers so any numbers above 47 are counted.

In this diagram, there are 10 teams consisting 48 swimmers and above, 48, 52, 53, 63, 76, 79, 82, 84, 85 and 86.

Answer:

10 teams have 48 or more swimmers.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we look at stem 4 there is one team with 48 members.

So counting from there we  have:

1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 4

= 10 teams.

Answer:

Pillows:

Blankets:

Pet Beds:

Step-by-step explanation:

18 + 45 + 27 = 90 (there are 90 students)

18 out of 90 = 20%

45 out of 90 = 50%

27 out of 90 = 30%

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Option c

Step-by-step explanation:

Systematic sampling is a probability type of samplng method in which elements are picked from a large population at a random start point and then the others are picked by constant periodic intervals which is usually done by dividing the population size by the chosen sample size. Then do a random start between 1 and the sampling interval, then repeatedly add the sampling interval to select subsequent elements.

Step-by-step explanation:

Joe mama

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are not given the height of the trapezoid, we can split this into a triangle and a rectangle. We find the area of each and then add them together. In order to do so, we must use Pythagorean Theorem to find the missing length so that we can find the area.

a²+b²=c²

a²+4²=8²

a²+16=64

a²=48

a=√48

a=4√3

Now that we know the missing length of the triangle, we can find the area of the triangle and the rectangle.

Triangle

A=1/2bh

A=1/2(4)(4√3)

A=8√3

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rectangle

A=lw

A=7(4√3)

A=28√3

With our areas, we can add them together.

4√3+28√3=36√3 cm²

Answer: 90 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of the side = 15 x 18 = 270 sq. ft.

3 sq. ft take a minute to paint

270 sq. ft. will take 270 / 3

= 90 minutes

Answer:

Please the read the answer below

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the 95% confidence interval for the difference of the two populations, you use the following formula (which is available when the population size is greater than 30):

CI = [tex](p_1-p_2)\pm Z_{\alpha/2}(\sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}})[/tex]     (1)

where:

p1: proportion of one population = 52/9853 = 0.0052

p2: proportion of the other population = 41/11541 = 0.0035

α: tail area = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

Z_α/2: Z factor of normal distribution = Z_0.025 = 1.96

n1: sample of the first population = 52

n2: sample of the second population = 41

You replace the values of all parameters in the equation (1) :

[tex]CI =(0.0052-0.0035)\pm (1.96)(\sqrt{\frac{0.0052(1-0.0052)}{52}+\frac{0.0035(1-0.0035)}{41}})\\\\CI=0.0017\pm0.026[/tex]

By the result obtained in the solution, you can conclude that the sample is not enough, because the margin error is greater that the difference of proportion of each sample population.

Answer:

As the P-value (0.0107) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that listening to music while solving math problems will make a particular brain area more active.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that listening to music while solving math problems will make a particular brain area more active.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=35\\\\H_a:\mu> 35[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=1.

The sample mean is M=58.

The standard deviation of the population is known and has a value of σ=10.

We can calculate the standard error as:

[tex]\sigma_M=\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{10}{\sqrt{1}}=10[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{M-\mu}{\sigma_M}=\dfrac{58-35}{10}=\dfrac{23}{10}=2.3[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>2.3)=0.0107[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0107) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that listening to music while solving math problems will make a particular brain area more active.

Answer:

As the P-value is very low, we can conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that the survival rate is significantly higher when the seatbelt is used.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have a hypothesis test that compares the survival rate using the seatbelt versus the survival rate not using it.

The claim is that the survival rate (proportion) is significantly higher when the seatbelt is used.

Then, the null hypothesis is that the seatbelts have no effect (both survival rates are not significantly different).

The P-value is the probabilty of the sample we have, given that the null hypothesis is true. In this case, this value is 0.0001.

This is very low, what gives enough evidence to claim that the survival rate is significantly higher when the seatbelt is used.

Answer:

4,500 x 5 = 22,500

4,500 divided by 5 = 900

4,500 plus 5 = 4,505

4,500 minus 5 = 4,495

Step-by-step explanation:

it is either one of those that u have to choose from good luck

Answer:  b) they ARE similar because BRAD:KELY is 1:2

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for the shapes to be similar they must have congruent angles and proportional sides.

With the options a through d given, we can assume that their sides are proportional.  Since BRAD is smaller than KELY, BRAD would have the smaller number in the ratio.

Answer:

They are similar because Brad and Kelly are 1:2

Step-by-step explanation: