Not sure about this.. please help!!

Answer:

$26,096

Step-by-step explanation:

property taxes = 31 January + 28 February + 31 March + 30 April + 31 May + 4 June = 155 days

property taxes = (155 days/365 days) x $5,309 = $2,254

agent's commission = 7% x $547,000 = $38,290

seller's net = $547,000 - $480,000 (mortgage) - $38,290 (agent's commission) - $360 (home warranty) - $2,254 (property taxes) = $26,096

Answer:

26,096

Step-by-step explanation:

Proration using 365-day method:

Buyer days are June - December 210 days (June 30 + July 31 + August 31 + September 30 + October 31 + November 30 + December 31 - June 4 days)

Seller days are January - June 155 days (January 31 + February 28 + March 31 + April 30 + May 31 + June 30 - June 26 days)

Formula with closing day to buyer: 210/365 x $5,309 = $3,054.49 --> $5,309 - $3,054.49 = $2,254.51 property taxes

Commission:

$547,000 sale price x .07 commission fee = $38,290 commission

Seller Net:

$547,000 sale price - $480,000 mortgage = $67,000 - $38,290 commission = $28,710 - $360.00 home warranty = $28,350 - $2,254.51 = $26,096

Answer:

a) The sample mean is M=200.

The sample standard deviation is s=13.19.

b) Right-tailed. The null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=195\\\\H_a:\mu> 195[/tex]

c) At a significance level of 0.01, there is  notenough evidence to support the claim that the arrival rate is significantly higher than 195.

Step-by-step explanation:

We start by calculating the sample and standard deviation.

The sample size is n=30.

The sample mean is M=200.

The sample standard deviation is s=13.19.

[tex]M=\dfrac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\,x_i\\\\\\M=\dfrac{1}{30}(210+215+200+. . .+221)\\\\\\M=\dfrac{6000}{30}\\\\\\M=200\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n\,(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{29}((210-200)^2+(215-200)^2+(200-200)^2+. . . +(221-200)^2)}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{5048}{29}}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{174.07}=13.19\\\\\\[/tex]

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the arrival rate is significantly higher than 195.  As we are interested in only the higher tail for a significant effect, this is a right-tailed test.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=195\\\\H_a:\mu> 195[/tex]

The significance level is 0.01.

The standard deviation of the population is known and has a value of σ=13.

We can calculate the standard error as:

[tex]\sigma_M=\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{13}{\sqrt{30}}=2.373[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{M-\mu}{\sigma_M}=\dfrac{200-195}{2.373}=\dfrac{5}{2.373}=2.107[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>2.107)=0.018[/tex]

As the P-value (0.018) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.01, there is  notenough evidence to support the claim that the arrival rate is significantly higher than 195.

Answer: 144

Step-by-step explanation:

ABD plus DBC makes up ABC so when you add the two it will give you a whole (76+68).

Answer:

x > -2

Step-by-step explanation:

2(3x–1)>4x–6

Divide each side by 2

2/2(3x–1)>4x/2–6/2

3x-1 > 2x-3

Subtract 2x from each side

3x-2x-1 > 2x-3-2x

x-1 > -3

Add 1 to each side

x-1+1 > -3+1

x > -2

Answer:

4(3x-2)+6x(2x-1)

12x-8+12^2x-6x

12x-6x +12^2x-8

6x+12^2x-8

Answer:

the first step in simplifying 4(3x-2)+6x(2-1) is to do subtract 1 from 2 in the second set of parenthesis.  That will get you 4(3x-2)+6x(1)

The equation completely simplified is 18x-8

-look in the step-by-step explanation if you want to know all the steps to simplifyinh the equation

Step-by-step explanation:

Now if you want to know the rest here it is:

Then use the Distributive Property:

-distribute the 4 into (3x-2) to get 12x-8

-then distribut the 6x into (1) to get 6x

Your equation is now 12x-8+6x

Finally, add 12x and 6x to simplify the equation as much as you can

you get 18x-8 as you final, most simplified answer

Answer:

95 ft²

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

regular pyramid with,

Square base of side length (s) = 5 ft

Slant height (l) = 7 ft

Required:

Surface area

Solution:

Surface area of a regular pyramid = ½*P*l + B

Where,

P = perimeter of the square base = 4(s) = 4(5) = 20 ft

l = slant height = 7 ft

B = area of base = s² = 5² = 25 ft²

Surface area = ½*20*7 + 25

= 10*7 + 25

= 70 + 25

Surface area of regular pyramid = 95 ft²

Answer:

(C) 4,5,8

Step-by-step explanation:

Since 4+5 = 9 and 9 is bigger than 8, that means that the side 8 can fit into the triangle without there being an open space.

Answer:

Option C { 4,5,8 }

Step-by-step explanation:

By the Triangle Inequality Theorem, the length of two sides together must be greater than the length of the remaining side. Respectively their difference must be less than the length of the another side.

* I like to memorize this concept by thinking about a door. The more you open the door, the greater the distance between the door and the wall - as they are proportional. That is how we concluded this theorem.

______

{ 2, 2, 4 } is our first option. The difference of 4 and 2 is equal to the remaining length, 2. { 3, 4, 7 } is not applicable as well, considering that the addition of 3 and 4 is equivalent to the length of the 3rd side, 7. However, the lengths { 4, 5,8 } have no such " errors. " It could be the side lengths of a possible triangle.

______

Solution = { 4,5,8 }

Answer:

a) 2, 3, 5

Step-by-step explanation:

2, 3, 5

All numbers are prime.

7, 17, 63, 67

63 is not a prime number.

3, 11, 63, 67

63 is not a prime number.

1, 3, 11, 23

1 is not a prime number.

Answer:

The probability that at least one of the 5 donors has Group O blood type is 0.9497.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can model this as a binomial random variable, with n=5 (the sample size) and p=0.45.

The probability that exactly k donors have Group O blood type in the sample can be written as:

[tex]P(x=k) = \dbinom{n}{k} p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}\\\\\\P(x=k) = \dbinom{5}{k} 0.45^{k} 0.55^{5-k}\\\\\\[/tex]

We have to calculate the probability P(x≥1). In this case it easy to substract from 1 the probabitity that x is exactly 0:

[tex]P(X\geq1)=1-P(x=0)\\\\\\P(x=0) = \dbinom{5}{0} p^{0}(1-p)^{5}=0.55^5=0.0503\\\\\\P(x\geq1)=1-0.0503=0.9497[/tex]

Answer:

  [tex]\dfrac{2y^2 +12y -8}{y^3-3y+2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

It usually works to factor the denominators, so you can determine the least common denominator.

  [tex]\dfrac{2y}{y^2-2y+1}+\dfrac{8}{y^2+y-2}=\dfrac{2y}{(y-1)^2}+\dfrac{8}{(y-1)(y+2)}\\\\=\dfrac{2y(y+2)}{(y-1)^2(y+2)}+\dfrac{8(y-1)}{(y-1)^2(y+2)}=\dfrac{2y^2+4y+8y-8}{(y-1)^2(y+2)}\\\\=\boxed{\dfrac{2y^2 +12y -8}{y^3-3y+2}}[/tex]

Answer: 4 to 10 then it’s 6 to 20 then it’s 8 to 25   Then it’s 10 to 30 then it’s 12 to 35  I hope this is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Ava is walking at a constant rate of 5 feet each 2s so :

We should keep adding 2s in the time and 5 feet in the distance

Let's complete the chart:

8x + 3 > 2x - 15

8x - 2x > -15 - 3

6x > -18

x > -3

Answer:

x > -3

Step-by-step explanation:

8x + 3 > 2x - 15​

Add -3 and -2x on both sides.

8x - 2x > -15 - 3

6x > -18

Divide 6 into both sides.

x > -18/6

x > -3

Answer:

7,273 Pesos

Step-by-step explanation:

1 Peso = $0.055

The formula below converts pesos to dollars:

1 Peso x 0.055 = $1

The formula below converts dollars to pesos:

$1/0.055= 1 Pesos

We use the second formula because we are coverting

from dollars to pesos.

$400/0.055=7,273 Pesos

Answer:

22

Step-by-step explanation:

If one Mexican peso is .055 U.S dollars that means it has a greater value than the dollar so we can make the following ratio 1:.055. But if the .055 is a 400 1:400 we just multiply to get 22.

1 - complementary =  90- 30 = 60

    suplementary = 180- 30 = 150

2 - area = hb/2 = 360 = hb/2 =  h = 72

3 - similar

4- see number 3

5 - asa, ssa, sas

6 - polygon that had all equal angle measures and sides (equiangular and equilateral)

7 - length x width = area so

   240 / 24 = 10

8 - line

9 - triangle

10 - 180, as see in question 1

vote me brainliest ):>

I'm not sure what exactly you did wrong, but I agree with you that the sample size is too small, so the correct answer will probably be the fourth options. Hope that this gives you some confidence, and 'm sorry not to be able to help you any further...

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation is v-1 = -3

Here is the graph :

Answer:

Domain is all real numbers or (negative infinity, positive infinity)

Step-by-step explanation:

Domain is all values of x (inputs) that will work with the function. Since a parabola has no limits for x, and all numbers work for x, then the domain can be any number. That leaves us with All Real Numbers as our answer.

Answer:

We conclude that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than 3% at 10% significance level.

We conclude that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is 3% at 5% significance level.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given a random sample of soil specimens was obtained, and the amount of organic matter (%) in the soil was determined for each specimen;

1.10, 5.09, 0.97, 1.59, 4.60, 0.32, 0.55, 1.45, 0.14, 4.47, 1.20, 3.50, 5.02, 4.67, 5.22, 2.69, 3.98, 3.17, 3.03, 2.21, 0.69, 4.47, 3.31, 1.17, 0.76, 1.17, 1.57, 2.62, 1.66, 2.05.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = true average percentage of organic matter

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 3%      {means that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is 3%}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu \neq[/tex] 3%      {means that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than 3%}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about the population standard deviation;

                         T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean percentage of organic matter = 2.481%

             s = sample standard deviation = 1.616%

            n = sample of soil specimens = 30

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{2.481-3}{\frac{1.616}{\sqrt{30} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_2_9[/tex]

                                     =  -1.76

The value of t-test statistics is -1.76.

(a) Now, at 10% level of significance the t table gives a critical value of -1.699 and 1.699 at 29 degrees of freedom for the two-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics doesn't lie within the range of critical values of t, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than 3% at 10% significance level.

(b) Now, at 5% level of significance the t table gives a critical value of -2.045 and 2.045 at 29 degrees of freedom for the two-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is 3% at 5% significance level.

Answer:

It's (D) 8 cm and 9 cm. Hope this helps you!

Step-by-step explanation:

The other 2 sides added have to be greater than 13.

Answer:

8 and 9

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle inequality states that the sum of the two shortest sides must be greater than the longest side.

Let's check the first one. 5 + 8 > 13 → 13 > 13 which is false.

6 + 7 > 13 → 13 > 13 which is false.

7 + 2 > 13 → 9 > 13 which is false.

8 + 9 > 13 → 17 > 13 which is true.

Answer:

5.33

Step-by-step explanation:

Move your numbers so that they're separate from the variables. You should now have x = -2.67 + 8; x = 5.33

Answer:

x=5.33

Step-by-step explanation:

7+x-15=-2.67

7-15+x=-2.67

Add 7 and -15

-8+x=-2.67

Add 8 on both sides

which equal to 5.33

x=5.33

Answer:

The margin of error  = 2.13

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given random sample size 'n' =19

mean of the sample(x⁻) = 55 applicants

Given standard deviation of the Population(S.D)  = 4

Given confidence intervals are

((52.87.57.14)

we know that The Margin of error is determined by

[tex]M.E = Z_{\alpha } \frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

The confidence intervals are determined by

(x⁻ - M.E , x⁻+ M.E)

Step(ii):-

Given confidence intervals are

((52.87.57.14)

Now equating

(x⁻ - M.E , x⁻+ M.E) = ((52.87  , 57.14)

Given mean of the sample x⁻ = 55

( 55 - M.E , 55 + M.E) =((52.87.57.14)

   Equating

                55 - M.E = 52.87

                M.E = 55 - 52.87

                M.E = 2.13

Final answer:-

The margin of error  = 2.13

Answer:

-7

Step-by-step explanation:

4 + (−3 − 8)

PEMDAS

Parentheses first

4 + (-11)

Add and subtract next

-7

Answer:

first I'm using BODMAS

4+(-11)

= -7

hope it helps

Answer:

i think this person answered but idrk perseusharrison79

Step-by-step explanation:

For 2 parallelograms, the corresponding side lengths are 1 inch and x inches, and 2 inches and 6 inches.

Not drawn to scale

StartFraction 1 over x EndFraction = StartFraction 2 over 6 EndFraction

StartFraction 1 over x EndFraction = StartFraction 6 over 2 EndFraction

StartFraction 1 over 6 EndFraction = StartFraction 2 over x EndFraction

One-half = StartFraction 6 over x EndFraction

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Given  

y

=

2

x

2

−

4

x

+

3

The y-intercept is the value of  

y

when  

x

=

0

XXX

y

=

2

(

0

)

2

−

4

(

0

)

+

3

=

3

For a quadratic in the general form:

XXX

y

=

a

x

2

+

b

x

+

c

the determinant  

Δ

=

b

2

−

4

a

c

indicates the number of zeros.

Δ

⎧

⎪

⎨

⎪

⎩

<

0

==⇒  

no solutions

=

0

==⇒  

one solution

>

0

==⇒  

two solutions

In this case

XXX

Δ

=

(

−

4

)

2

−

4

(

2

)

(

3

)

<

0

so there are no solutions (i.e. no values for which the expression is equal to zero).

This can also be seen from a graph of this equation:

graph{2x^2-4x+3 [-6.66, 13.34, -0.64, 9.36]}

Answer link

Vinícius Ferraz

Nov 13, 2015

(

0

,

3

)

Explanation:

x

=

0

⇒

y

=

0

−

0

+

3

y

=

0

⇒

x

=

−

b

±

√

b

2

−

4

a

c

2

a

a

=

2

,

b

=

−

4

,

c

=

3

But  

Δ

< 0, then there is no real root  

(

x

0

,

0

)

.

Answer:

it has 2

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

b. 11 apples; 1 orange

Step-by-step explanation:

We test each option, and see if the total is $3.50(what you spend). If the result is different, it is not a possible solution.

a. 1 apple; 11 oranges

1 apple for $0.20

11 oranges for $0.30 each

0.20 + 11*0.30 = $3.50

Possible solution

b. 11 apples; 1 orange

11 apples for $0.20 each

1 orange for $0.30

11*0.2 + 0.3 = 2.5

Not $3.5, so this is not a possible solution.

This is the answer

c. 7 apples; 7 oranges

7*0.2 + 7*0.3 = $3.5

Possible

d. 4 apples; 9 oranges

4*0.2 + 9*0.3 = $3.5

Possible

Answer:

B. [tex]4^2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]4^7 \times 4^{-5}[/tex]

Apply rule (if bases are same) : [tex]a^b \times a^c = a^{b + c}[/tex]

[tex]4^{7 + -5}[/tex]

Add exponents.

[tex]=4^2[/tex]

Answer:

Step by step explanation

[tex] {4}^{7} \times {4}^{ - 5} [/tex]

Use product law of indices

i.e

[tex] {x}^{m} \times {x}^{n} = {x}^{m + n} [/tex]

( powers are added in multiplication of same base)

[tex] = {4}^{7 + ( - 5)} [/tex]

[tex] = {4}^{7 - 5} [/tex]

[tex] = {4}^{2} [/tex]

Hope this helps...

Best regards!

Answer:

The original digit is 62

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the Tens be represented with T

Let the Units be represented with U

Given:

Unknown Two digit number

Required:

Determine the number

Since, it's a two digit number, then the number can be represented as;

[tex]T * 10 + U[/tex]

From the first sentence, we have that;

[tex]T = 4 + U[/tex]

[tex]T = 4+U[/tex]

Interchanging the digit, we have the new digit to be [tex]U * 10 + T[/tex]

So;

[tex](U * 10 + T) + (T * 10+ U) = 88[/tex]

[tex]10U + T + 10T + U= 88[/tex]

Collect Like Terms

[tex]10U + U + T + 10T = 88[/tex]

[tex]11U + 11T = 88[/tex]

Divide through by 11

[tex]U + T = 8[/tex]

Recall that [tex]T = 4+U[/tex]

[tex]U + T = 8[/tex] becomes

[tex]U + 4 + U = 8[/tex]

Collect like terms

[tex]U + U = 8 - 4[/tex]

[tex]2U = 4[/tex]

Divide both sides by 2

[tex]U = 2[/tex]

Substitute 2 for U in [tex]T = 4+U[/tex]

[tex]T = 4 + 2[/tex]

[tex]T = 6[/tex]

Recall that the original digit is [tex]T * 10 + U[/tex]

Substitute 6 for T and 2 for U

[tex]T * 10 + U[/tex]

[tex]6 * 10 + 2[/tex]

[tex]60 + 2[/tex]

[tex]62[/tex]

Hence, the original digit is 62

Answer:

7). y = 140

8). x = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Question (7).

All-right pencil factory will produce the graphite pencils, table formed will represent a linear graph.

Three points on the graph are (12, 42) and (18, 63), (40, y)

Slope of the line passing through these points = [tex]\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

m = [tex]\frac{63-42}{18-12}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y-42}{40-12}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{21}{6}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y-42}{40-12}[/tex]

3.5 = [tex]\frac{y-42}{40-12}[/tex]

98 = y - 42

y = 140

Question (8),

If a bicyclist rides at a constant rate, table formed will represent a linear graph.

Slope of a line passing through three points (2, 25), (5, 62.5) and (x, 112.5) given in the table,

m = [tex]\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{62.5-25}{5-2}=\frac{112.5-62.5}{x-5}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{37.5}{3}=\frac{50}{x-5}[/tex]

37.5x - 187.5 = 150

37.5x = 337.5

x = 9

Answer:

2 hours and 24 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

2 hours at 60 km/h means you have travelled 2*60=120 km

120 km at 50 km/h takes 120/50 = 2.4 hours

2.4 hours is 2 hours and 0.4*60 = 24 minutes.