Nika baked three loaves of zucchini bread. Each cake needed StartFraction 17 over 4 EndFraction cups of flour. Which expression shows the best estimate of the number of cups of flour that Nika used? ASAP Answer choices: 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 4 + 4 + 4 = 16 17 + 17 + 17 = 51

Answer:

P(B1) = (11/15)

P(B2) = (4/15)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = (5/7)

P(B2|A) = (2/7)

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 11 red chips and 4 blue chips in a box. Two chips are selected one after the other at random and without replacement from the box.

B1 is the event that the chip removed from the box at the first step of the experiment is red.

B2 is the event that the chip removed from the box at the first step of the experiment is blue. A is the event that the chip selected from the box at the second step of the experiment is red.

Note that the probability of an event is the number of elements in that event divided by the Total number of elements in the sample space.

P(E) = n(E) ÷ n(S)

P(B1) = probability that the first chip selected is a red chip = (11/15)

P(B2) = probability that the first chip selected is a blue chip = (4/15)

P(A) = probability that the second chip selected is a red chip

P(A) = P(B1 n A) + P(B2 n A) (Since events B1 and B2 are mutually exclusive)

P(B1 n A) = (11/15) × (10/14) = (11/21)

P(B2 n A) = (4/15) × (11/14) = (22/105)

P(A) = (11/21) + (22/105) = (77/105) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = probability that the first chip selected is a red chip given that the second chip selected is a red chip

The conditional probability, P(X|Y) is given mathematically as

P(X|Y) = P(X n Y) ÷ P(Y)

So, P(B1|A) = P(B1 n A) ÷ P(A)

P(B1 n A) = (11/15) × (10/14) = (11/21)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B1|A) = (11/21) ÷ (11/15) = (15/21) = (5/7)

P(B2|A) = probability that the first chip selected is a blue chip given that the second chip selected is a red chip

P(B2|A) = P(B2 n A) ÷ P(A)

P(B2 n A) = (4/15) × (11/14) = (22/105)

P(A) = (11/15)

P(B2|A) = (22/105) ÷ (11/15) = (2/7)

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write out the expression

x + 2x = 24

Step 2: Combine like terms

3x = 24

Step 3: Isolate x

x = 8

And we have our final answer!

Answer:

X=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

india

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x=\frac{cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3} ,x=\frac{2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: [tex]2 cos(3x)=0.9[/tex]

To find: solutions of the given equation

Solution:

Triangle is a polygon that has three sides, three angles and three vertices.

Trigonometry explains relationship between the sides and the angles of the triangle.

Use the fact: [tex]cos x=a[/tex]⇒[tex]x=cos^{-1}(a)+2n\pi,x=2\pi-cos^{-1}(a)+2n\pi[/tex]

[tex]2 cos(3x)=0.9[/tex]

Divide both sides by 2

[tex]cos(3x)=\frac{0.9}{2}=0.45[/tex]

[tex]3x=cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi,3x=2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi[/tex]

So,

[tex]x=\frac{cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3} ,x=\frac{2\pi- cos^{-1}(0.45)+2n\pi}{3}[/tex]

Answer:

For a sample size of n = 609.

Step-by-step explanation:

Central limit theorem for proportions:

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

In this question:

We have that p = 0.58.

We have to find n for which s = 0.02. So

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.02 = \sqrt{\frac{0.58*0.42}{n}}[/tex]

[tex]0.02\sqrt{n} = \sqrt{0.58*0.42}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{\sqrt{0.58*0.42}}{0.02}[/tex]

[tex](\sqrt{n})^{2} = (\frac{\sqrt{0.58*0.42}}{0.02})^{2}[/tex]

[tex]n = 609[/tex]

For a sample size of n = 609.

Answer:

-1/4 is the slope and the y intercept is -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for y

x +4y = -16

Subtract x

4y = -x-16

Divide by 4

4y/4 = -x/4 -16/4

y = -1/4 x -4

This is in slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

-1/4 is the slope and the y intercept is -4

Answer:

Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Before a researcher specifies the relationship among variables he must have an inventory of propositions/constructs which are mostly stated in a declarative form. These are then tested by examining the relationships between measurable variables of this constructs/propositions.

Answer:

Test statistic z = 2.3839.

P-value = 0.0086.

At a signficance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the percentage of residents who favor construction is above 56%.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the percentage of residents who favor construction is above 56%.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi=0.56\\\\H_a:\pi>0.56[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=900.

The sample proportion is p=0.6.

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.56*0.44}{900}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000274}=0.017[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.6-0.56-0.5/900}{0.017}=\dfrac{0.039}{0.017}=2.3839[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>2.3839)=0.0086[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0086) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is  significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the percentage of residents who favor construction is above 56%.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.60 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{340}}}=-1.933[/tex]  

The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.933)=0.0532[/tex]  

For this case is we use a significance level of 5% we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion is different from 0.65 or 65%. We need to be careful since if we use a value higher than 65 for the significance the result would change

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=340 represent the random sample taken

[tex]\hat p=0.60[/tex] estimated proportion of readers owned a laptop

[tex]p_o=0.65[/tex] is the value that we want to test

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v{/tex} represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to check if the true proportion of readers owned a laptop if different from 0.65

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.65[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.65[/tex]  

The statistic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.60 -0.65}{\sqrt{\frac{0.65(1-0.65)}{340}}}=-1.933[/tex]  

The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.933)=0.0532[/tex]  

For this case is we use a significance level of 5% we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion is different from 0.65 or 65%. We need to be careful since if we use a value higher than 65 for the significance the result would change

Answer:

For this case they want to proof if the proportion of readers own a Rolls royce is less than 0.29 and that wuld be the alternative hypothesis. The complement would represent the null hypothesis. Then the system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex] p \geq 0.29[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]p< 0.29[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case they want to proof if the proportion of readers own a Rolls royce is less than 0.29 and that wuld be the alternative hypothesis. The complement would represent the null hypothesis. Then the system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex] p \geq 0.29[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]p< 0.29[/tex]

Answer:

[tex] 9.9676 - 2.326*0.5904 =8.594[/tex]

[tex] 9.9676 + 2.326*0.5904 =11.341[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Notation

[tex]\bar X[/tex] represent the sample mean

[tex]\mu[/tex] population mean (variable of interest)

s represent the sample standard deviation

n represent the sample size  

Solution to the problem

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]   (1)

For this case the 9% confidence interval is given by:

[tex] 8.8104 \leq \mu \leq 11.1248[/tex]

We can calculate the mean with the following:

[tex]\bar X = \frac{8.8104 +11.1248}{2}= 9.9676[/tex]

And we can find the margin of error with:

[tex] ME= \frac{11.1248- 8.8104}{2}= 1.1572[/tex]

The margin of error for this case is given by:

[tex] ME = t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} = t_{\alpha/2} SE[/tex]

And we can solve for the standard error:

[tex] SE = \frac{ME}{t_{\alpha/2}}[/tex]

The critical value for 95% confidence using the normal standard distribution is approximately 1.96 and replacing we got:

[tex] SE = \frac{1.1572}{1.96}= 0.5904[/tex]

Now for the 98% confidence interval the significance is [tex]\alpha=1-0.98= 0.02[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 = 0.01[/tex] the critical value would be 2.326 and then the confidence interval would be:

[tex] 9.9676 - 2.326*0.5904 =8.594[/tex]

[tex] 9.9676 + 2.326*0.5904 =11.341[/tex]

Answer:

the answer is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

The probability that Bronson gets just spinach is;

P = 1/7

or

P = 0.1429

Step-by-step explanation:

There are three possibilities;

- just one topping

- two topping

- three topping

For just one topping, the number of possible outcomes is;

N1 = 3C1 = 3!/(1!2!) = 3 possible outcomes

For two topping, the number of possible outcomes is;

N2 = 3C2 = 3!/(2!1!) = 3 possible outcomes

For three topping, the number of possible outcomes is;

N3 = 3C3 = 3!/3! = 1 possible outcomes

Total number of possible outcomes;

N = N1+N2+N3

N = 3+3+1 = 7

The probability that Bronson gets just spinach is;

Getting spinach is one out of seven possible outcomes, so;

P = 1/N = 1/7

P = 1/7 or 0.1429

Answer:

$38,645.7208

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

Principal = $70,000

Time = 20 years

Rate = 2.2%

The calculation of the amount of saving is shown below:-

[tex]=P(1+r)^t[/tex]

A = Future amount

P = Principal amount  

[tex]r = \frac{APR}{12}[/tex]  

[tex]r = \frac{0.022}{12}[/tex]

0.001833333

t = 20 years which is equals to 240 months

[tex]A=\$70,000\times (1+0.001833333)^{240}[/tex]

[tex]A=\$70,000\times 1.552081726[/tex]

= $108,645.7208

And, the loan amount for 20 years is $70,000

So,

He would save by paying off 9 years early is

= $108,645.7208  - $70,000

= $38,645.7208

Its $3644.67  since everyone couldn't find it solved it myself ;)

Answer:

The value of the sample mean resonance frequency is 112Hz

Step-by-step explanation:

A confidence interval has two bounds, a lower bound and an upper bound.

A confidence interval is symmetric, which means that the point estimate used is the mid point between these two bounds, that is, the mean of the two bounds.

In this problem, we have that:

Lower bound: 111.6

Upper bound: 112.4

Sample mean: (111.6 + 112.4)/2 = 112Hz

The value of the sample mean resonance frequency is 112Hz

The value of the sample mean resonance frequency is 112 Hz.

The value of the sample mean resonance frequency is equivalent to the average of the upper limit and the lower limit.

The sample mean resonance frequency = (lower limit + upper limit) / 2

(111.6 +112.4) / 2

= 224 / 2

= 112 Hz

To learn more about confidence interval, please check: https://brainly.com/question/15905477

Answer:

Is possible to make a Type I error, where we reject a true null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have a hypothesis test of a proportion. The claim is that the proportion of paid leave has significantly decrease from 2011 to january 2012. The P-value for this test is 0.0271 and the nunll hypothesis is rejected.

As the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, the only error that we may have comitted is rejecting a true null hypothesis.

The null hypothesis would have stated that there is no significant decrease in the proportion of paid leave.

This is a Type I error, where we reject a true null hypothesis.

Answer:

-8 * 5 = -40

a⁵ * a = a⁶

b⁶ * b³ = b⁹

Answer is -40a⁶b⁹

Answer:

root 61

Step-by-step explanation:

You can use the distance formula or draw a triangle with sides 5 and 6

Answer:

The value of y that would make O P parallel to L N = 36

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a question on similar triangles. Find attached the diagram obtained from the given information.

Given:

The length of O L = 14

the length of O M = 28

the length of M P = y

the length of P N = 18

Length MN = MP + PN = y + 18

Length ML = MO + OL = 28+14 = 42

For OP to be parallel to LN,

MO/ML = MP/PN

MO/ML = 28/42

MP/PN= y/(y+18)

28/42 = y/(y+18)

42y = 28(y+18)

42y = 28y + 18(28)

42y-28y = 504

14y = 504

y = 504/14 = 36

The value of y that would make O P parallel to L N = 36

Answer:

D-36

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A reflection and a dialation

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case a rotation is not nessasary, so I would suggest a reflection in the y-axis and a dialation to shrink the triangle to A'B'C'

So for the transformations that could have occurred to map ABC to A'B'C' you should choose the answer

a reflection and a dialation

The transformations that occurred to map ABC to A'B'C are: C. a reflection and a dilation

Thus, in the transformation shown, figure ABC was reflected over the y-axis and then dilated to give A'B'C'.

Therefore, the transformations that occurred to map ABC to A'B'C are: C. a reflection and a dilation

Learn more about transformation on:

https://brainly.com/question/1462871

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

functions include parabolas so yes!

Answer:

( 3.5 , -2 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

( 3.5 , -2)

Explanation:

On edge

Answer:

(C)Out of 5,000 randomly chosen children, 250 children carry the virus.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{Option A}: \dfrac{210}{5000}=0.042=4.2\% \\\text{Option B}: \dfrac{3}{60}=0.05=5\% \\\text{Option C}: \dfrac{250}{5000}=0.05=5\% \\\text{Option D}: \dfrac{1}{20}=0.05=5\%[/tex]

The higher the research sample, the more credible the results. In options A and C, the research sample was 5000. However, since the relative frequency of children carrying the virus is 5% in both, we take the result with a higher number of positives.

Option C is the correct option.

Answer:

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the amount of vitamin C in a tablet sample is different from 500 mg.

P-value = 0.166.

Step-by-step explanation:

We start by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the sample:

[tex]M=\dfrac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\,x_i\\\\\\M=\dfrac{1}{5}(490+502+505+495+492)\\\\\\M=\dfrac{2484}{5}\\\\\\M=496.8\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n\,(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}((490-496.8)^2+(502-496.8)^2+(505-496.8)^2+(495-496.8)^2+(492-496.8)^2)}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{166.8}{4}}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{41.7}=6.5\\\\\\[/tex]

Then, we can perform the hypothesis t-test for the mean.

The claim is that the amount of vitamin C in a tablet sample is different from 500 mg.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=500\\\\H_a:\mu< 500[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=5.

The sample mean is M=496.8.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=6.5.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{6.5}{\sqrt{5}}=2.907[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{496.8-500}{2.907}=\dfrac{-3.2}{2.907}=-1.1[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=5-1=4[/tex]

This test is a left-tailed test, with 4 degrees of freedom and t=-1.1, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(t<-1.1)=0.166[/tex]

As the P-value (0.166) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the amount of vitamin C in a tablet sample is different from 500 mg.

Answer:

24.5

Step-by-step explanation:

24 = 24

1/2 -->

convert to a decimal => 1 divided by 2

0.5

24+0.5 = 24.5

Hope this helps!

Answer:

I'm not completely sure what you mean by a, "single fraction," but I'm pretty sure the answer you are looking for is [tex]\frac{5-4}{a-b}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete. The complete question is:

The mean annual tuition and fees for a sample of 15 private colleges was $35,500 with a standard deviation of $6500. A dotplot shows that it is reasonable to assume that the population is approximately normal. You wish to test whether the mean tuition and fees for private colleges is different from $32,500. State the null and alternate hypotheses. A) H0: 4 = 32,500, H:4=35,500 C) H: 4 = 35,500, H7:35,500 B) H: 4 = 32,500, H : 4 # 32,500 D) H0:41 # 32,500, H : 4 = 32,500

Solution

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

H0: µ = 32500

For the alternative hypothesis,

Ha: µ ≠ 32500

This is a two tailed test.

Since the number of samples is small and the population standard deviation is not given, the distribution is a student's t.

Since n = 15,

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 15 - 1 = 14

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 35500

µ = population mean = 32500

s = samples standard deviation = 6500

t = (35500 - 32500)/(6500/√15) = 1.79

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p = 0.095

Assuming alpha = 0.05

Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.095, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Answer : The value of x is 4.1 cm.

Step-by-step explanation :

As we know that the perpendicular dropped from the center divides the chord into two equal parts.

That means,

AB = CB = [tex]\frac{15.6cm}{2}=7.8cm[/tex]

Now we have o calculate the value of x by using Pythagoras theorem.

Using Pythagoras theorem in ΔOBA :

[tex](Hypotenuse)^2=(Perpendicular)^2+(Base)^2[/tex]

[tex](OA)^2=(OB)^2+(BA)^2[/tex]

Now put all the values in the above expression, we get the value of side OB.

[tex](8.8)^2=(x)^2+(7.8)^2[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{(8.8)^2-(7.8)^2}[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{77.44-60.84}[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{16.6}[/tex]

[tex]x=4.074\approx 4.1[/tex]

Therefore, the value of x is 4.1 cm.