Given below are the matching of the behavior with whether it is a Principle of Collaboration or Step of Consultation.
Client reviews the assessment and suggestion/solutions, and makes decision on whether to use them - Principle of Collaboration (A).Assess the problem at hand and develops potential suggestions and/or solutions - Step of Consultation (B).Establish a working relationship with the client, utilizing a written contract - Principle of Collaboration (A).Provide a written report on the assessment and suggestions/solutions - Step of Consultation (B).Hence, the correct option is:Client reviews the assessment and suggestion/solutions, and makes decision on whether to use them - Principle of Collaboration (A).Assess the problem at hand and develops potential suggestions and/or solutions - Step of Consultation (B).Establish a working relationship with the client, utilizing a written contract - Principle of Collaboration (A).Provide a written report on the assessment and suggestions/solutions - Step of Consultation (B).
To know more about Consultation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31359131
#SPJ11
Philosophy
Write 200-400 essay to Describe and critically assess how
Descartes and Immanuel Kant differ with Hans Georg Gadamer over the
role of prejudice in acquiring knowledge.
Descartes and Kant prioritize objectivity and bias elimination, while Gadamer values the role of prejudice in interpretation.
Gadamer, Kant and Descartes all have different opinions on the contribution that prejudice makes to knowledge. Descartes stresses skepticism and the need to get rid of prejudices in order to acquire objective knowledge. While acknowledging biases, Kant makes the case for overcoming them using logic and general truths. Gadamer in contrast, emphasizes the fusion of horizons between the interpreter and the subject and views prejudice as essential to interpretation.
He appreciates how understanding is both subjective and contextual. Gadamer advocates a more open-minded and dialogical approach, in contrast to Descartes and Kant who seek objectivity. When evaluating these perspectives critically, one must take into account each viewpoint's advantages and disadvantages while also emphasizing the significance of rationality and the contextual embedding of knowledge.
Learn more about prejudice at:
brainly.com/question/31431721
#SPJ4
the man in this fresco shown is portrayed as much larger than his daughter (who is between his legs) and his wife (to his right) because of ancient egyptian conventions related to what element?
The man in the fresco is portrayed as much larger than his daughter and wife due to ancient Egyptian conventions related to hierarchy and importance.
In ancient Egyptian art, size and scale were used to convey the social status and significance of individuals. The larger the figure, the more important they were perceived to be. This convention was known as "hieratic scale" and was commonly used in Egyptian artwork, including frescoes. By depicting the man as significantly larger than his daughter and wife, the artist intended to emphasize his higher social standing and authority within the family.
Additionally, the use of hieratic scale served a symbolic purpose in ancient Egyptian art. It represented the concept of "divine proportion," where the size of an individual reflected their divine or spiritual status. The man, being the head of the household, would be associated with a higher divine presence and thus depicted in a larger scale. This artistic convention not only highlighted the man's role as the dominant figure but also conveyed the idea of his connection to the divine realm.
In summary, the man's larger portrayal in the fresco is a result of ancient Egyptian conventions related to hierarchy, importance, and the symbolic representation of divine proportion.
To learn more about spiritual Click Here: brainly.com/question/1024343
#SPJ11