Answer:
1. $6>0
2. Yes
Explanation:
Let us assume x for the net gain arise from the purchase
1. The expected gain is
= $75(0.40) - $15(0.30) - $65(0.30)
= 30 - 4.5 - 19.5
= $6
Hence, the expected gain is $6>0
2. So it is a good idea to go with the purchase
these are the choices fill in the blanks.
asset backed security.
bank run
credit default swap.
capital
bond.
credit
common stock.
credit crunch
mortgage-backed securities.
debt
mutual fund.
default
option.
equity
futures contract.
foreclosure
subprime mortgage.
leverage
central bank.
liquidity
commercial bank.
liquidity risk
hedge fund.
moral hazard
investment bank.
mortgage
fannie mae/ freddie mac.
nationalization
federal deposit insurance corporation.
regulation
federal reserve system.
return
private equity fund
risk
securitization
Selected information from Peridot Corporation's accounting records and financial statements for 2021 is as follows ($ in millions): Cash paid to acquire machinery $ 35 Reacquired Peridot common stock 56 Proceeds from sale of land 97 Gain from the sale of land 55 Investment revenue received 72 Cash paid to acquire office equipment 84 In its statement of cash flows, Peridot should report net cash outflows from investing activities of:
Answer:
Peridot should report net cash outflows from investing activities of $22 million.
Explanation:
Peridot corporation
Statement of cash flows
$ in millions
Purchase of machinery
($35)
Proceeds from sale of land
$97
Cash paid to acquire office
($84)
Net cash outflows from investing activities
($22)
• We ignored required common stock because it belongs to financing activities section of cash outflows. Gain from sale of land and investment revenue is for operating activities section of the cash flow
Seth Erkenbeck, a recent college graduate, has just completed the basic format to be used in preparing the statement of cash flows (indirect method) for ATM Software Developers. All amounts are in thousands (000s).
ATM SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS Statement of Cash Flows For the year ended December 31, 2021
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash flows from operating activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash flows from investing activities
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash $1,725
Cash at the beginning of the period 8,215
Cash at the end of the period $9,940
Listed below in random order are line items to be included in the statement of cash flows.
Cash received from the sale of land $8,590
Issuance of common stock 12,925
Depreciation expense 5,435
Increase in account receivable 4,030
Decrease in account payable 1,730
Issuance of long-term notes payable 16,345
Purchase of equipment 39,715
Decrease in inventory 1,445
Decrease in prepaid rent 875
Payment of divivdends 6,310
Net income 11,800
Purchase of treasury stock 2,585
Required:
Prepare the statement of cash flows for ATM software developers using the indirect method. List cash outflows and any decrease in cash as negative amounts. Enter the answer in thousands.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Statement of cash flow for ATM SOFTWARE
• The figures seems to be in thousands already.
Cash flow from operating activities
Net income
$11,800
Increase in Account receivable
($4,030)
Decrease in Account payable
($1,730)
Depreciation expense
$5,435
Decrease in inventory
$1,445
Decrease in prepaid rent
$875
Net cash flow from operating activities
$13,795
Cash flow from investing activities
Sale of land
$8,590
Purchase of equipment
($39,715 )
Net cash flow from financing activities
($31,125)
Cash flow from financing activities
Issuance of stock
$12,925
Long term note payable
$16,345
Purchase of treasury stock
($2,585 )
Payments of dividends
($6,310)
Net cash flow from financing activities
$20,375
Net increase in cash
$1,725
Cash at the beginning
$8,215
Cash at the end
$9,940
The corporate charter of Alpaca Co. authorized the issuance of 10 million, $1 par common shares. During 2021, its first year of operations, Alpaca had the following transactions:
January 1 sold 8 million shares at $15 per share
June 3 retired 2 million shares at $18 per share
December 28 sold 2 million shares at $20 per share
What amount should Alpaca report as additional paid-in capital—excess of par, in its December 31, 2021, balance sheet?
A. $104 million
B. $6 million
C. $52 million
D. $208 million
Answer:
Alpaca Co.
The amount that Alpaca should report as additional paid-in capital, in excess of par, in its December 31, 2021 balance sheet is:
= $116 million
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Authorized share capital = 10 million, $1 par common shares
Transactions during the year:
Date Number of shares issued Price Common Stock Additional
January 1 sold 8 million shares at $15 $8 million $112 million
June 3 retired 2 million shares at $18 (2 million) (34 million)
December 28 sold 2 million shares $20 2 million 38 million
Total $10 million $116 million
b) Additional paid-in capital represents the excess capital that is received above the par value of the shares issued. When the retired shares (treasury stock) are accounted for using the cash method, the additional capital is stated less the treasury stock's excess issue value. When the par value method is used, a treasury stock account is created separately so that the two adjustments to the treasury stock account are reflected differently.
g Buyers would pay exactly $175 per acre for the teak today. In one year, however, that wood will be perfectly matured. Buyers will be willing to pay $220 per acre. The trees will be past their peak after that and will start to lose their value. From now until one year from now, theoakwill have the exact same value per acre as the teak. The difference is that the oak will continue to increase in value by $10 per acre per year for the next 30 years. To be clear, an acre of oak is worth $175 today, $220 in a year, $230 in two years, and so on.
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question
Answer:
a) $200
b) $285.70
Explanation:
part A
The most Maria is willing to pay per case for an acre of teak
cash flow = $220 per acre
for year 1
considering the discounting factor of 10% = 0.9091
Hence the most Maria is willing to pay per case for an acre of teak = ( 0.9091 * cash flow )
= 0.9091 * 220 = $200
Part B
Th most Maria is willing to pay per case for an acre of Oak
For year 1 :
cash flow = $220 , discounting factor = 0.9091 , present cash flows = 200
For years 2 - 31 :
cash flow = $10 , discounting factor = 8.5699
hence present cash flow = ( 10 * 8.5699 ) = $85.70
Total present cash flow = $200 + $85.7 = $285.70
The Field Detergent Company sold merchandise to the Abel Company on June 30, 2016. Payment was made in the form of a noninterest-bearing note requiring Abel to pay $85,000 on June 30, 2018. Assume that a 10% interest rate properly reflects the time value of money in this situation.
Required: Calculate the amount at which Field should record the note receivable and corresponding sales revenue on June 30, 2016.
Answer:
$70,248
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount at which Field should record the note receivable and corresponding sales revenue on June 30, 2016
Using financial calculator to determine the PV of Note
Using this formula
PV of Note = Future value x PVF (i%, n)
Where,
Future value=85,000
n=2 year(2016-2018)
i= 10%
Let plug in the formula
PV Note= 85,000 x PVF (10%, 2)
PV Note= 85,000 x 0.82645
PV Note= $70,248
Therefore the amount at which Field should record the note receivable and corresponding sales revenue on June 30, 2016 is $70,248
Fleet, Inc. manufactured 700 units of Product A, a new product, in 20Xl. Product Xs variable and fixed manufacturing costs per unit were $6.00 and $2.00, respectively. The inventory of Product A on December 31, 20Xl consisted of 100 units. There was no inventory of Product A on January 1, 20Xl. Required: What would be the change in the dollar amount of inventory on December 31, 20Xl if the variable costing method was used instead of the absorption costing method
Answer:
The change in the dollar amount of inventory is $200 due to change in the inventory costing method.
Explanation:
The variable cost per unit is $6.00 while the fixed cost per unit is $2.00
Variable cost per unit = $6.00
Absorption cost pet units = $8.00
Total cost under absorption costing = Absorption cost per unit / number of units in ending inventory
Total absorption cost = $8.00 × 100 = $800
Total cost under variable cost = Variable cost per unit × number of units in ending inventory
Total variable cost = $6.00 × 100 = $600
Change in cost = Total absorption cost - Total variable cost
Change in cost = $800 - $600 = $200
Jayden has one hour for his part of customer service training for new employees. Which is the best way to reinforce the learning? Have a quiz at the end of the session. Have a quiz at the end of the session. Use PowerPoint slides for each separate concept. Use PowerPoint slides for each separate concept. Put the sales associates on the floor for one hour. Put the sales associates on the floor for one hour. Set aside some partnered role play time with employees.
Answer:
Have a quiz at the end of the session.
Explanation:
Crowding-out is the notion that:_________
a. Since tax revenues vary directly with GDP, a rise in the level of GDP will increase the budget surplus and limit expansion
b. Deficit financing will increase the demand for money, increase the interest rate, and reduce the level of investment spending in the economy
c. The standardized budget is the best indicator of whether a budget deficit crowds out investment
d. The actual budget is the best indicator of whether a budget deficit crowds out saving
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The theory of crowding out is that as government spending and borrowing increases, the demand for money would increase. This would lead to an increase in interest rate. As a result, the level of investment spending would decline. The theory submits that increased government spending would drive down private spending
Ann lives in Princeton, New Jersey, and commutes by train each day to her job in New York City (20 round trips per month). When the price of a round trip goes up from $10 to $20, she responds by consuming exactly the same number of trips as before, while spending $200 per month less on restaurant meals. Does the fact that her quantity of train travel is completely unresponsive to the price increase imply that Ann is not a rational consumer
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
You are interested in valuing a 2-year semi-annual corporate coupon bond using spot rates but there are no liquid strips available. However, you do find the following 4 comparable semi-annual bonds (below) maturing over the next 2 years. Using the bootstrap approach, calculate the 12-month spot rate.
Time remaining to maturity Coupon Bond price
6 months 0.000% 99.000
1 year 1.250% 98.000
18 months 1.500% 97.000
2 years 1.250% 96.000
a. 1.668%
b. 3.335%
c. 4.167%
d. 4.189%
e. 4.204%
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Assume that [tex]r_1[/tex] will be a 12-month for the spot rate:
[tex]\to 1.25 \% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to \frac{1.25}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(\frac{1.25}{100} \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to \frac{1.25}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(\frac{1.25}{2} +100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{( 0.625 +100)}{(\frac{2+r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{( 100.625)}{(\frac{2+r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}=98\\\\[/tex]
[tex]\to 0.61875 + \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 -98 = \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}\\\\\to -97.38125= \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}\\\\\to (2+r_1)^2= \frac{402.5}{ -97.38125}\\\\\to (2+r_1)^2= -4.13\\\\ \to r_1=3.304\%[/tex]
Assume that [tex]r_2[/tex] will be a 18-month for the spot rate:
[tex]\to 1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{3.300\%}{2})^2}+\frac{(1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to \frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+\frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(\frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\[/tex]
[tex]\to \frac{1.5}{2} \times 0.99+\frac{1.5}{2}\times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(\frac{1.5}{2} +100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 0.7425+0.75 \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(0.75 +100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4925 \times \frac{1}{(1+0.0165)^2}+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4925 \times \frac{1}{(1.033)}+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\[/tex]
[tex]\to 1.4925 \times 0.96+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4328+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4328-97= \frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}\\\\\to -95.5672= \frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}\\\\\to (1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3= -1.054\\\\\to r_2=3.577\%[/tex]
Assume that [tex]r_3[/tex] will be a 18-month for the spot rate:
[tex]\to 1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+\frac{3.300\%}{2})^2}+1.25\%\times\frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+\frac{3.577\%}{2})^3}+(1.25\% \times \frac{\frac{100}{2}+100}{(1+\frac{r_3}{2})^4})=96\\\\[/tex]
to solve this we get [tex]r_3=3.335\%[/tex]
Use the following data to calculate the current ratio.
Skysong, Inc. Balance Sheet December 31, 2017
Cash $65500 Accounts payable $131500
Accounts receivable 93000 Salaries and wages payable 17500
Inventory 148000 Mortgage payable 173000
Prepaid insurance 87500 Total liabilities $322000
Stock Investments 194500 Land 185500
Buildings $219500 Common stock $216500
Less: Accumulated depreciation (72500) 147000 Retained earnings 483500
Trademarks 101000 Total stockholders' equity $700000
Total assets $1022000 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $1022000
a. 2 : 1
b. 2.64 : 1
c. 2 : 1
d. 3 : 1
Answer:
b. 2.64 : 1
Explanation:
Current ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities
Current assets = Cash + Account Receivables + Inventory + Prepaid insurance
Current assets = $65500 + $93000 + $148000 + $87500
Current assets = $394,000
Current liabilities = Accounts payable + Salaries and wages payable
Current liabilities = $131500 + $17500
Current liabilities = $149,000
Hence, Current ratio = $394,000/$149,000
Current ratio = 2.644295
Current ratio = 2.64 : 1
Mark Brandt, an employee of Mueller Corp., earned 3 weeks of compensated vacation time during the current year, but only took 2 weeks of vacation. His employer permits that 1 week of vacation can be carried forward to the following year. Mark fully intends to remain at his current employer and plans to take his vacation during the following year. His current weekly salary is $2,000. Mueller Corp. expects to grant a general salary increase of 5% effective at the beginning of the next year. What amount should Mueller accrue during the current year relating to Mark Brandt's carried-forward vacation
Answer:
Mark Brandt of Mueller Corporation
The amount that Mueller should accrue during the current year relating to Mark Brandt's carried-forward vacation is:
= $2,100
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Current weekly salary = $2,000
Expected general salary increase = 5%
The amount that Mueller should accrue during the current year relating to Mark Brandt's carried-forward vacation is:
= $2,000 * 1.05
= $2,100
b) $2,100 is the amount that will be paid in cash for cash settlement of Mark Brandt's carried-forward vacation, assuming he does not take it the following year.
At December 31, 2020, the available-for-sale debt portfolio for Blossom, Inc. is as follows.
Security Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain (Loss)
A $17,900 $15,200 $(2,700)
B 11,000 15,000 4,000
C 24,000 26,500 2,500
Total $52,900 $56,700 3,800
Previous fair value adjustment balance—Dr. 400
Fair value adjustment—Dr. $3,400
On January 20, 2021, Blossom, Inc. sold security A for $15,300. The sale proceeds are net of brokerage fees. Blossom, Inc. reports net income in 2020 of $123,000 and in 2021 of $142,000. Total holding gains (including any realized holding gain or loss) equal $41,000 in 2021.
Prepare a statement of comprehensive income for 2020, starting with net income.
Prepare a statement of comprehensive income for 2021, starting with net income.
Answer:
a. Blossom Inc
Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
Particulars Amount
Net income $123,000
Other comprehensive income:
Add: Unrealized holding gain $3,400
Comprehensive income $126,400
b. Blossom Inc
Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
Particulars Amount
Net income $142,000
Other comprehensive income:
Total holding gains in 2021 $41,000
Add: Reclassification adjustment- $2,700
for loss included in net income $38,300
Comprehensive income $180,300
Note:
Particulars Amount
Net amount received from the sale of Security A $17,900
Less: Cost of Security A $15,200
Loss on the sale of Security A ($2,700)
Rinehart Corporation purchased from its stockholders 5,000 shares of its own previously issued stock for $255,000. It later resold 2,000 shares for $54 per share, then 2,000 more shares for $49 per share, and finally 1,000 shares for $43 per share.
Prepare journal entries for the purchase of the treasury stock and the three sales of treasury stock.
Answer:
Dr Treasury Stock $255,000
Cr Cash $255,000
Dr Cash $108,000
Cr Treasury Stock $98,000
Cr Additional paid-in-capital (treasury stock)$10,000
Dr Cash $98,000
Cr Additional paid-in-capital (treasury stock)$10,000
Cr Treasury Stock $88,000
Dr Cash $43,000
Cr Common Stock $43,000
Explanation:
Preparation of the journal entries for the purchase of the treasury stock and the three sales of treasury stock.
Purchase
Dr Treasury Stock $255,000
Cr Cash $255,000
(Being to record purchase from stockholders)
Sale 1
Dr Cash $108,000
(2000*54)
Cr Treasury Stock $98,000
(2000*49)
Cr Additional paid-in-capital (treasury stock)$10,000
($108,000-$98,000
(Being To record sales of shares at $54 per share.)
Sale 2
Dr Cash $98,000
Cr Additional paid-in-capital (treasury stock)$10,000
Cr Treasury Stock $88,000
($98,000-$10,000)
(Being to record sale of shares at 49 per share )
(2000*49)
Sale 3
Dr Cash $43,000
Cr Common Stock $43,000
(1,000 shares for $43 per share)
A firm is about to undertake the manufacture of a product, and it is weighing the process configuration options. There are two intermittent processes under consideration, as well as a repetitive focus. The smaller intermittent process has fixed costs of $3,000 per month and variable costs of $10 per unit. The larger intermittent process has fixed costs of $11,000 per month and variable costs of $5 per unit. A repetitive focus plant has fixed costs of $41,000 per month and variable costs of $1 per unit.
Required:
a. At what output does the large intermittent process become cheaper than the small one?
b. At what output does the repetitive process become cheaper than the larger intermittent process?
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Using this formula
Fixed cost of process B - fixed cost of process A ÷ unit variable cost of process A - unit variable cost of process B
a. Fixed cost = $11,000
Fixed cost = $3,000
Unit variable = $10
Unit variable = $5
Hence:
= ($11,000 - $3,000) / ($10 - $5)
= $7,000 / $5
= $1,400
This means that the larger intermittent process becomes cheaper than the small one by $1,400
b. Fixed cost = $41,000
Fixed cost = $11,000
Unit variable = $5
Unit variable = $1
= ($41,000 - $11,000) / ($5 - $1)
= $30,000 / $4
= $7,500
This means that the repetitive process become cheaper than the larger intermittent process by $7,500
What is the most likely reason a user would export data with the formatting in place
The fields will not have any errors.
The file will be much easier to read.
The file is automatically spellchecked.
O The columns are automatically alphabetized.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I got it right
Answer: the file will be much easier to read
Explanation:
chager Company purchased a computer system on January 1, 2019, at a cash cost of $25,000. The estimated useful life is 10 years, and the estimated residual value is $3,000. The company will use the double declining-balance depreciation method. What is the accumulated depreciation balance as of December 31, 2020? $9,000. $4,000. $7,920. $8,520.
Answer:
Accumulated depreciation= $7,920
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Buyng price= $25,000
Salvage value= $3,000
Number of years= 10
To calculate the depreciation expense, we need to use the following formula:
Annual depreciation= 2*[(book value)/estimated life (years)]
2019:
Annual depreciation= [(25,000 - 3,000) / 10]*2
Annual depreciation= $4,400
2020:
Annual depreciation= [(22,000 - 4,400) / 10]*2
Annual depreciation= $3,520
Accumulated depreciation= $7,920
Imagine that two goods are available to you: hamburgers (X) and hot dogs (Y). You like hamburgers and hot dogs equally well. If your fast food budget is $50 per month, the price of hamburgers is $6 per unit, and the price of hot dogs is $4 per unit, what is your optimal consumption of hot dogs
Answer:
5
Explanation:
The budget constraint = 6h + 4hd = 50
h = hamburger
hd = hot dogs
because you like both goods equally, the optimal consumption of hot dogs = 50 / 10 = 5
Henrietta, the owner of a very successful hotel chain in the Southeast, is exploring the possibility of expanding the chain into a city in the Northeast. She incurs $35,000 of expenses associated with this investigation. Based on the regulatory environment for hotels in the city, she decides not to expand. During the year, she also investigates opening a restaurant that will be part of a national restaurant chain. Her expenses for this are $53,000. She proceeds with opening the restaurant, and it begins operations on September 1. Determine the amount Henrietta can deduct in the current year for investigating these two businesses.
Answer:
Henrietta can deduct $35,000 for the expenses which she has incurred for the investigation.
Explanation:
Henrietta has incurred expenses for investigating the expenses about opening a new restaurant. She has incurred $35,000 of expense for the investigation about the expansion of its business. She can deduct this expense from her current business.
Grant Industries, a manufacturer of electronic parts, has recently received an invitation to bid on a special order for 20,500 units of one of its most popular products. Grant currently manufactures 41,000 units of this product in its Loveland, Ohio, plant. The plant is operating at 50% capacity. There will be no marketing costs on the special order. The sales manager of Grant wants to set the bid at $13 because she is sure that Grant will get the business at that price. Others on the executive committee of the firm object, saying that Grant would lose money on the special order at that price.
Units 41,000 61,500
Manufacturing costs:
Direct materials $123,000 $184,500
Direct labor 164,000 246,000
Factory overhead 328,000 430,500
Total manufacturing costs$615,000 $861,000
Unit cost $15 $14
Required:
1. What is the relevant cost per unit and the bid price?
2. What would the total opportunity cost be if by accepting the special order the company lost sales of 6,500 units to its regular customers?
Answer:
Missing word "What would the total opportunity cost be if by accepting the special order the company lost sales of 6,500 units to its regular customers? Assume the above facts plus a normal selling price of $24 per unit."
Variable factory overhead per unit = (430,500 - 328,000) / 20,500 = $5
Direct materials per unit = $123,000 / 41,000 = $3
Direct labor per unit = 164,000 / 41,000 = $4
1. Relevant cost per unit = Direct materials per unit + Direct labor per unit + Variable factory overhead
Relevant cost per unit = $5 + $4 + $3
Relevant cost per unit = $12
So, the bid price should be above $10 per unit
2. Total opportunity cost would be the total contribution margin lost for the lost sales to the regular customer
Total opportunity cost = Loss of regular sales revenue - Total relevant cost for lost sales
Total opportunity cost = (6,500*$24) - (6,500*$12)
Total opportunity cost = $156,000 - $78,000
Total opportunity cost = $78,000
1. The relevant cost per unit for Grant Industries is $7.00 ($123,000 + $164,000)/41,000 or ($184,500 + $246,000)/61,500.
2. The total opportunity cost of accepting the special order when the company lost sales of 6,500 units from its regular customers is $12,500.
What are the relevant costs and opportunity costs?The relevant costs describe the avoidable costs that could be stopped if a decision is taken.
For example, if Grant Industries decides to take the special order, the relevant decision-making cost is $7 per unit and not $14 per unit.
The opportunity costs are costs that are not incurred based on taking an alternative decision. It also describes the lost revenue when some sales are lost for the special order.
For example, the total opportunity costs incurred by Grant Industries for taking the special order instead of attending to the regular customers with 6,500 units demand is $12,500.
Data and Calculations:Special order = 20,500 units
Current production = 41,000 units
Current operational capacity = 50%
Total capacity = 82,000 (41,000/50%)
Bid price = $13 per unit
New production based on special order = 61,500 (41,000 + 20,500)
Production Data Per Unit Per Bid
Units 41,000 61,500
Manufacturing costs:
Direct materials $123,000 $184,500
Direct labor 164,000 246,000
Factory overhead 328,000 430,500
Total manufacturing costs $615,000 $861,000
Unit cost $15 $14
Question 2 Completion:Assume the above facts plus a normal selling price of $24 per unit."
The opportunity cost of lost sales:Lost sales units = 6,500
Contribution per unit = $17 ($24 - $7)
Total contribution margin = $110,500 ($6,500 x $17)
Contribution margin from special order = $123,000 ($13 - $7 x 20,500)
Thus, the opportunity cost of lost sales is $12,500 ($123,000 - $110,500).
Learn more about relevant and opportunity costs at https://brainly.com/question/14184614 and https://brainly.com/question/8846809
On the basis of the following production possibilities tables for two countries, North Cantina and South Cantina.
North Cantina Production Possibilities
A B C D E F
Capital Goods 5 4 3 2 1 0
Consumer Goods 0 10 18 24 28 30
South Cantina Production Possibilities
A B C D E F
Capital Goods 5 4 3 2 1 0
Consumer Goods 0 8 15 21 25 27
Refer to the tables. Suppose that resources in North Cantina and South Cantina are identical in quantity and quality. We can conclude that:_____.
A. North Cantina has better technology than South Cantina in producing consumer goods but not capital goods.
B. South Cantina has better technology than North Cantina in producing both capital and consumer goods.
C. North Cantina has better technology than South Cantina in producing both capital and consumer goods.
D. North Cantina is growing more rapidly than South Cantina.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The Production possibilities frontiers is a curve that shows the various combination of two goods a company can produce when all its resources are fully utilised.
The PPC is concave to the origin. This means that as more quantities of a product is produced, the fewer resources it has available to produce another good. As a result, less of the other product would be produced. So, the opportunity cost of producing a good increase as more and more of that good is produced.
To determine which country has a better technology in production, the opportunity cost has to be calculated. The country with the lower opportunity cost has the better technology
At point B for North Cantina:
The opportunity cost of producing one 4 units of capital good = 10/4 = 2.5 units of consumer goods
The opportunity cost of producing 10 units of consumer good = 4/10 = 0.4 units of capital goods
At point B for South Cantina
The opportunity cost of producing one 4 units of capital good = 8/4 = 2units of consumer goods
The opportunity cost of producing 8 units of consumer good = 4/8 = 0.5 units of capital goods
South Cantina has a lower opportunity cost in the production of capital goods while North Cantina has a lower opportunity cost in the production of consumer goods
Hull Company reported the following income statement information for the current year: Sales $ 423,000 Cost of goods sold: Beginning inventory $ 151,500 Cost of goods purchased 286,000 Cost of goods available for sale 437,500 Ending inventory 157,000 Cost of goods sold 280,500 Gross profit $ 142,500 The beginning inventory balance is correct. However, the ending inventory figure was overstated by $33,000. Given this information, the correct gross profit would be:
Answer:
$109,500
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the correct gross profit would be:
Sales $ 423,000
Less: Corrected Cost of goods sold:($313,500)
(280,500 + $33,000)
Gross Profit $109,500
Therefore the correct gross profit would be:$109,500
Which one of the following statements is correct concerning the relationship between a levered and an unlevered capital structure? Assume there are no taxes.
a. At the break-even point, there is no advantage to debt.
b. The earnings per share will equal zero when EBIT is zero for a levered firm.
c. The advantages of leverage are inversely related to the level of EBIT.
d. The use of leverage at any level of EBIT increases the EPS.
e. EPS are more sensitive to changes in EBIT when a firm is unlevered
Answer:
a. At the break-even point, there is no advantage to debt.
Explanation:
In the case when we concerned about the relationship between the levered and an unlevered capital structure also there is no taxes so the statement i.e. correct is at the break even point we dont have an advantage with respect to the debt
Therefore the first option is correct
The statement about the relationship between a levered and an unlevered capital structure is valid in that debt has no advantage at the break-even point.
What is a break-even point?Break-even point is the market condition where there is no profit and no loss to the company.
Here, the total revenue and the total cost of the firm equals.
When it comes to the relationship between a levered and an unlevered capital structure, there are no taxes, hence the statement, i.e., correct, is that at the break-even point, we don't have a debt advantage.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about the break-even point, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15356272
On September 12, Vander Company sold merchandise in the amount of $3,950 to Jepson Company, with credit terms of 2/10, n/30. The cost of the items sold is $2,725. Vander uses the periodic inventory system and the gross method of accounting for sales. On September 14, Jepson returns some of the merchandise. The selling price of the merchandise is $340 and the cost of the merchandise returned is $240. Jepson pays the invoice on September 18, and takes the appropriate discount. The journal entry that Vander makes on September 18 is:
Answer:
Date Account Debit Credit
September 18 Cash $3,537.80
Sales discount $ 72.20
Accounts Receivable $3,610
Explanation:
Net merchandise sold = 3,950 - 340
= $3,610
Sales discount is 2% if paid in 10 days which Jepson did.
= 2% * 3,610
= $72.20
Cash = Net sales - discount
= 3,610 - 72.20
= $3,537.80
Adams Company manufactures two products. The budgeted per-unit contribution margin for each product follows: Super Supreme Sales price $ 95 $ 124 Variable cost per unit (58 ) (74 ) Contribution margin per unit $ 37 $ 50 Adams expects to incur annual fixed costs of $227,880. The relative sales mix of the products is 60 percent for Super and 40 percent for Supreme. Required Determine the total number of products (units of Super and Supreme combined) Adams must sell to break even. How many units each of Super and Supreme must Adams sell to break even
Answer:
Expected contribution as per sales mix = $37*0.60 + $50*0.40
= $22.20 + $20
= $42.20 per unit
Total number of products in total at break even point = Total fixed cost / Contribution per unit
= $227,880 / $42.20 per unit
= 5,400 units
How many units each of Super and Supreme must Adams sell to break even?
According to sales mix:
Super = 5,400 * 60% = 3,240 units
Supreme = 5,400 * 40% = 2,160 units.
The Thomlin Company forecasts that total overhead for the current year will be $11,415,000 with 180,000 total machine hours. Year to date, the actual overhead is $7,948,000 and the actual machine hours are 88,000 hours. If the Thomlin Company uses a predetermined overhead rate based on machine hours for applying overhead, as of this point in time (year to date), the overhead is Round the factory overhead rate to the nearest dollar before multiplying by the number of hours.
a. $1,000,000 over
b. $1,000,000 under
c. $500,000 over
d. $500,000
Answer:
Underapplied overhead = $2,367,040
Explanation:
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated overhead / Estimated activity
Predetermined overhead rate = $11,415,000 / 180,000
Predetermined overhead rate = $63.42 per MH
Applied overhead = Actual activity * Overhead rate
Applied overhead = 88,000 * $63.42 per MH
Applied overhead = $5,580,960
Overapplied/ (underapplied) = Actual overhead - Applied overhead
Underapplied overhead = $7,948,000 - $5,580,960
Underapplied overhead = $2,367,040
Plant-wide, department, and activity-cost rates. Acclaim Inc. makes two styles of trophies, basic and deluxe, and operates at capacity. Acclaim does large custom orders. Acclaim budgets to produce 10,000 basic trophies and 5,000 deluxe trophies. Manufacturing takes place in two production departments: forming and assembly. In the forming department, indirect manufacturing costs are accumulated in two cost pools, setup and general overhead. In the assembly department, all indirect manufacturing costs are accumulated in one general overhead cost pool. The basic trophies are formed in batches of 200 but be-cause of the more intricate detail of the deluxe trophies, they are formed in batches of 50.
The controller has asked you to compare plant-wide, department, and activity-based cost allocation.
Forming Department Basic Delux Total
$60,000 $35,000 $95,000
Direct manufacturing labor $30,000 $20,000 $50,000
Overhead costs Setup $48,000
General overhead $32,000
Assembly Department Basic Delux Total
Direct materials $50,000 $10,000 $15,000
Direct manufacturing labor 15,000 25,000 40,000
Overhead costs Setup
General overhead 40,000
Required:
a. Calculate the budgeted unit cost of basic and deluxe trophies based on a single plant-wide overhead rate, if total overhead is allocated based on total direct (Don't forget to include direct material and direct manufacturing labor cost in your unit cost calculation.)
b. Calculate the budgeted unit cost of basic and deluxe trophies based on departmental overhead rates, where forming department overhead costs are allocated based on direct manufacturing labor costs of the forming department and assembly department overhead costs are allocated based on total direct manufacturing labor costs of the assembly department
c. Calculate the budgeted unit cost of basic and deluxe trophies if Acclaim allocates overhead costs in each department using activity-based costing, where setup costs are allocated based on number of batches and general overhead costs for each department are allocated based on direct manufacturing labor costs of each department.
d. Explain briefly why plant-wide, department, and activity-based costing systems show different costs for the basic and deluxe trophies. Which system would you recommend and why?
Answer:
Acclaim Inc.
Basic Trophies Deluxe Trophies
Budgeted unit cost:
a. using single-plant o/h rate $17.60 $28.80
b. using departmental rates $17.42 $29.16
c. using ABC $18.26 $27.48
d. They show different costs because the overhead rates are based on different parameters.
I recommend ABC system. It is more fair because the overhead rates are based on product line's activity usage instead of an arbitrary figure.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Basic Trophies Deluxe Trophies Total
Budgeted production 10,000 5,000 15,000
Batches 200 50 250
Basic Trophies Deluxe Trophies Total
Forming Department $60,000 $35,000 $95,000
Direct manufacturing labor $30,000 $20,000 $50,000
Assembly
Direct materials $5,000 $10,000 $15,000
Direct manufacturing labor 15,000 25,000 40,000
Total direct costs $110,000 $90,000 $200,000
Overhead costs 66,000 54,000 120,000
Total production costs $176,000 $144,000 $320,000
Budgeted production 10,000 5,000
Budget unit costs $17.60 $28.80
Overhead rate
Total overhead/total direct costs = $120,000/$200,000 = $0.60
Basic Deluxe Total
Trophies Trophies
Forming department:
Overhead costs Setup $48,000
General overhead $32,000
Total overhead costs $80,000
Overhead rate = $80,000/$145,000 = $552
Assembly department
General overhead $40,000/$55,000 = $0.727
Basic Trophies Deluxe Trophies Total
Forming Department $60,000 $35,000 $95,000
Direct manufacturing labor $30,000 $20,000 $50,000
Total direct costs $90,000 $55,000 $145,000
Overhead costs 49,680 30,360 80,040
Total departmental costs $139,680 $85,360 $225,040
Assembly
Direct materials $5,000 $10,000 $15,000
Direct manufacturing labor 15,000 25,000 40,000
Total direct costs $20,000 $35,000 $55,000
Overhead costs 14,540 25,445 39,985
Total departmental costs $34,540 $60,445 $94,985
Total production costs $174,220 $145,805 $320,025
Budgeted production 10,000 5,000
Budget unit costs $17.42 $29.16
Basic Trophies Deluxe Trophies Total
Forming Department $60,000 $35,000 $95,000
Direct manufacturing labor $30,000 $20,000 $50,000
Assembly
Direct materials $5,000 $10,000 $15,000
Direct manufacturing labor 15,000 25,000 40,000
Total overhead allocated $72,600 $47,400 $120,000
Total production costs $182,600 $137,400 $320,000
Budgeted production 10,000 5,000
Budget unit costs $18.26 $27.48
Overhead costs allocation:
Basic Deluxe Total
Trophies Trophies
Forming department:
Overhead costs Setup $48,000/250 $38,400 $9,600 $48,000
General overhead $32,000/$50,000 19,200 12,800 32,000
Assembly department
General overhead $40,000/$40,000 15,000 25,000 40,000
Total overhead allocated $72,600 $47,400 $120,000
Fedoras (F)
Very Very Bad-inators (B)
Perry
6/hr
4/hr
Dr. Doofenshmirtz
2/hr
10/hr
Graph the production possibilities frontier per hour for both Perry’s and Dr. Doofenshmirtz’s. (4 points)
Perry’s PPF
Dr. Doofenshmirtz’s PPF
Based on production per hour calculated in b., determine per unit opportunity costs of producing Fedoras and Bad-inators. Show your calculations for both Perry’s and Dr. Doofenshmirtz’s.
Who has comparative advantage in F? (1 point)
Determine a price range that is suitable for trade for both Fedoras and Bad-inators. (4 points)
Price range for Fedoras: 1F = ( , )
Price range for Bad-inators: 1 B = ( , )
If the trade price is 1F = 1B do both Perry and Dr. Doofenshmirtz gain from trade? Why?
(4 points)
Determine the new consumption possibilities frontier (CPF) with trade at the trade price of 1F = 1S for both Perry’s and Dr. Doofenshmirtz’s. Show the area of gains from trade in your graphs if it exists. (6 points)
Some people know how it works but 1+1 is 5
The manager at Jerome Mobility, Inc. reported the following information for 2019: Actual Results Static Budget Units sold 1,700 units 1,500 units Revenues $221,000 $195,000 Variable costs Direct materials 70,000 60,000 Direct manufacturing labor 36,500 31,500 Variable manufacturing overhead 16,000 13,500 Total variable costs 122,500 105,000 Contribution margin 98,500 90,000 Fixed costs 51,000 50,000 Operating income $47,500 $40,000 What is the static-budget variance for operating income for Jerome Mobility Inc. for 2019
Answer:
$7,500 F
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the static-budget variance for operating income for Jerome Mobility Inc. for 2019
Using this formula
2019 Static budgeted variance for operating income = Actual result - Static budget amount
Let plug in the formula
2019 Static budgeted variance for operating income= $47,500 - $40,000
2019 Static budgeted variance for operating income= $7,500 F
Therefore the static-budget variance for operating income for Jerome Mobility Inc. for 2019 will be $7,500 F