Legend has it that Isaac Newton "discovered" gravity when an apple fell from a tree and hit him on


the head. A 0. 2 kg apple fell from a 7 m height before hitting Newton. What was the speed of the apple


as it struck Newton?

The maximum value of the absolute value parent function on the interval -10 ≤ x ≤ 10 is 10. B.

The absolute value parent function is defined as f(x) = |x| the absolute value of x is the distance between x and zero on the number line.

On the given interval of -10 ≤ x ≤ 10 can see that the maximum value of f(x) occurs at the endpoints of the interval x = -10 or x = 10.

The absolute value of x is 10, so f(x) = |x| = 10.

Thus, the maximum value of the absolute value parent function on the interval -10 ≤ x ≤ 10 is 10.

This means that the graph of the function will have a "peak" at x = -10 and x = 10 the function takes on its maximum value.

The minimum value of the absolute value parent function on this interval is 0 occurs at x = 0.

This is because the absolute value of any non-zero number is positive so f(x) can never be negative.

The maximum value of the absolute value parent function on the interval -10 ≤ x ≤ 10 is 10.

For similar questions on parent function

https://brainly.com/question/30285034

#SPJ11

To show that a C^2 function φ(x) defined on three-dimensional space, that vanishes outside some sphere, has a value of ∫ ∫ ∫ 1/|x| Δ4φ (x) dx/4π at the origin. This is done by applying second Green's identity on the region      Dc = R^3-B(0,e).

We start by applying the second Green's identity on the region Dc = R^3-B(0,e) with the scalar function f(x) = φ(x)/|x| and the vector field                 F(x) = x/|x|^3. Thus, we get:

∫∫S f(x)F(x)·dS = ∫∫∫Dc (fΔF - F·Δf) dx

Since φ(x) vanishes outside some sphere, it follows that f(x) and F(x) also vanish at infinity, hence the surface integral vanishes. Therefore, we have:

0 = ∫∫∫Dc (fΔF - F·Δf) dx = ∫∫∫Dc (φ/|x|) Δ(1/|x|^2 x) dx

Using the identity Δ(1/|x|^2) = -4πδ(x), where δ(x) is the Dirac delta function, and integrating by parts four times, we get:

∫∫∫Dc (φ/|x|) Δ(1/|x|^2 x) dx = -∫∫∫Dc Δφ/|x| dx/4π = φ(0)

Thus, we have shown that  φ(0) = ∫ ∫ ∫ 1/|x| Δ4φ (x) dx/4 π, as required.

Learn more about scalar function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30581467

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial probability formula. The binomial distribution is applicable here because we have a fixed number of trials (selecting 10 U.S. adults) and each trial has two possible outcomes (having very little confidence or not having very little confidence in newspapers).

The formula for the probability of obtaining exactly 'k' successes in 'n' trials, where the probability of success is 'p', is:

[tex]P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)[/tex]

where C(n, k) represents the number of combinations of 'n' items taken 'k' at a time.

(a) To find the probability of exactly five U.S. adults having very little confidence in newspapers, we substitute the values into the formula:

[tex]P(X = 5) = C(10, 5) * (0.64)^5 * (1 - 0.64)^(10 - 5)[/tex]

Calculating this expression will give us the probability.

(b) To find the probability of at least six U.S. adults having very little confidence in newspapers, we need to calculate the sum of probabilities for six, seven, eight, nine, and ten successes:

P(X ≥ 6) = P(X = 6) + P(X = 7) + P(X = 8) + P(X = 9) + P(X = 10)

(c) To find the probability of less than four U.S. adults having very little confidence in newspapers, we need to calculate the sum of probabilities for zero, one, two, and three successes:

P(X < 4) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)

Using the binomial probability formula and the appropriate combinations, we can calculate these probabilities.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30853716

#SPJ11

The probability that x is smaller than y is 1.

In Exercise 9.10, we are given the joint probability density function of two continuous random variables as:

f(x,y) = 2, for 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ 1

f(x,y) = 0, otherwise

To find the probability that x is smaller than y, we need to integrate the joint probability density function over the region where x is less than y:

p(x < y) = ∫∫R f(x,y) dA

where R is the region where x is less than y, which is the triangular region with vertices at (0,0), (1,0), and (1,1).

Therefore, the probability can be computed as:

p(x < y) = ∫∫R f(x,y) dA

= ∫0^1 ∫x^1 2 dy dx (using the limits of integration for R)

= ∫0^1 (2-2x) dx

= 2x - x^2 |0^1

= 1 - 0 - (2(0) - 0^2)

= 1

Hence, the probability that x is smaller than y is 1.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Therefore, the series is convergent.

We can use the limit comparison test to determine the convergence or divergence of the given series. Let's compare the given series to the series 1/n^5:

lim n→∞ [(n^5 − 1)/(n^6 + 1)] / (1/n^5)

= lim n→∞ (n^5 − 1) / (n^6 + 1) * n^5

= lim n→∞ (n^10 − n^5) / (n^6 + 1)

= ∞

Since the limit is greater than 0, and the series 1/n^5 converges (as it is a p-series with p > 1), we can conclude that the given series also converges by the limit comparison test. Therefore, the series is convergent.

Learn more about convergent here:

https://brainly.com/question/31756849

#SPJ11

A cube is a three-dimensional geometric shape that has six square faces of equal size, 12 straight edges, and eight vertices or corners. I

The statement to be proven is:

min(a^3) = (min(a))^3

To prove this statement, we need to show that the minimum value of the cube of any number in a set is equal to the cube of the minimum value in the same set.

Let's assume that the set A contains n numbers, a1, a2, ..., an. The minimum value in this set is min(a1, a2, ..., an) = m.

We need to show that the minimum value of the cube of any number in the set A is (min(a1^3, a2^3, ..., an^3)) = m^3.

First, we can observe that if x and y are two non-negative numbers, then x^3 ≤ y^3 if and only if x ≤ y. This is because the cube function is monotonically increasing on the non-negative real numbers.

Now, let's consider any number in the set A, say ai. We have:

ai ≤ m (since m is the minimum value of the set A)

Cubing both sides, we get:

ai^3 ≤ m^3

Thus, we have shown that ai^3 cannot be smaller than m^3 for any i, since ai^3 is non-negative. Therefore, we can conclude that the minimum value of the cube of any number in the set A is m^3, or:

min(a^3) = (min(a))^3

To learn more about number visit:

brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

The cancellation law for matrices states that if AB = AC, and A is an invertible matrix, then B = C. However, if A is not invertible, the cancellation law does not necessarily hold.

a)To determine the conditions on A, B, and C that guarantee the cancellation law, we must consider the rank of A.

If A has full rank (i.e., rank(A) = n), then the cancellation law holds. This is because a matrix with full rank has a trivial null space, and therefore, if AB = AC, we can left-multiply both sides by A-¹ to obtain B = C.

If A does not have full rank, then the cancellation law may not hold. In particular, if rank(A) < n, then there exist non-zero vectors x and y such that Ax = 0 and A(y+x) = Ay,

which implies that B(y+x) = C(y+x) and hence, B ≠ C.

Therefore, the condition for the cancellation law to hold is that the matrix A has full rank.

b)An example of matrices A,B and C for which the cancellation law does not hold is

A = [1 1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1]

B = [100  010  001]

C = [010  001  100]

We can verify that AB = AC, but B ≠ C.

AB = [1 1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1] [100 010 001] = [1 1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1]

AC = [1 1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1] [010 001 100] = [1 1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1]

However, B = [1 0 0  0 1 0  0 0 1] and C = [0 1 0  0 0 1  1 0 0] are not equal. Therefore, the cancellation law does not hold for these matrices.

Learn more about invertible matrix : https://brainly.com/question/30403440

#SPJ11

11 yards of fencing left.

Given that Edgar decided to add a second gate. He removes 2 yards of fencing from his section of 13 yards.

Therefore, the total length of the fencing was 13 yards.We have to remove 2 yards of fencing from the section.Therefore, the total fencing remaining will be=

Total fencing - Fencing Removed Fencing Removed = 2 yardsTotal fencing = 13 yards We can substitute the values in the above equation.Fencing remaining= 13 - 2 = 11 yards  In total, 11 yards of fencing are left.

Edgar had 13 yards of fencing. He had to remove 2 yards of fencing from it. Thus, he could not use the removed fencing for the gate. We need to calculate the remaining length of the fencing.Edgar had to remove 2 yards of fencing to add a second gate.

Therefore, the total fencing remaining will be= Total fencing - Fencing RemovedFencing Removed = 2 yardsTotal fencing = 13 yardsWe can substitute the values in the above equation.

Fencing remaining= 13 - 2 = 11 yards

Thus, Edgar has only 11 yards of fencing left to use. This will be less fencing available to Edgar to use for his purpose. With a smaller area to work with, Edgar will have to ensure that the fencing is placed appropriately.

Edgar had a total of 13 yards of fencing before removing 2 yards of fencing to add a second gate. Therefore, he had only 11 yards of fencing left.

To know more about length visit:

brainly.com/question/32060888

#SPJ11

Jason has saved $205 to buy a skateboard. We can see this from the equation 0.41X.

Let's assume that Jason needs to save $X to buy the skateboard.

If he has already saved 41% of that amount, then he has saved 0.41X dollars. So, the amount Jason has saved is 41% of what he needs to buy a skateboard.

Hence, we can express this as a fraction:41/100

We can write this as a decimal by dividing 41 by 100:0.41

Finally, to find out how much Jason has saved, we can multiply this decimal by the total amount he needs to save.

So, if Jason needs to save $500 to buy the skateboard, then he has saved:

0.41 x $500

= $205

Therefore, Jason has saved $205 to buy a skateboard. We can see this from the equation 0.41X

= $205, where X is the amount he needs to save.

To learn more about equations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Main Answer: Let X=a/b and y=c/d. Then, X*y = (a/b)*(c/d) = (ac)/(bd)

Explanation: Given X = a/b and y = c/d, we are to find the product of two rational numbers, X and Y. Using the definition of multiplication, we have: X * y = a/b * c/d. We can simplify this expression by multiplying the numerators together and the denominators together, as follows: X * y = ac/bd. Hence, the product of two rational numbers X and Y is given by (ac)/(bd).

In mathematics, any number that can be written as p/q where q 0 is considered a rational number. Additionally, every fraction that has an integer denominator and numerator and a denominator that is not zero falls into the category of rational numbers. The outcome of dividing a rational number, or fraction, will be a decimal number, either a terminating decimal or a repeating decimal.

Know more about rational number here:

https://brainly.com/question/24398433

#SPJ11

It is not possible to get a very strong correlation just by chance when there is no relationship between the two variables. False

Correlation measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. A high correlation coefficient indicates a strong relationship between the variables, while a low or near-zero correlation suggests a weak or no relationship.

A strong correlation implies that changes in one variable are associated with predictable changes in the other variable. Therefore, a high correlation cannot occur by chance alone without an underlying relationship between the variables.

Learn more about correlation at https://brainly.com/question/13879362

#SPJ1

Paulina will have 33 pesos saved on the Sunday of the fourth week.

The given problem is in Spanish language and it states that Paulina decided to save money to buy her dad a birthday present. She started saving on Monday and saved 3 pesos. From the following day, Tuesday, she started saving 5 pesos daily. We have to determine how much money Paulina will have saved on Thursday, the first Sunday, and the Sunday of the fourth week

Solution:

a) On Tuesday, she saves 5 pesos. Therefore, the total savings on Tuesday becomes 5 + 3 = 8 pesos .On Wednesday, she saves 5 pesos again. Therefore, the total savings on Wednesday becomes 5 + 8 = 13 pesos. On Thursday, she saves 5 pesos again. Therefore, the total savings on Thursday becomes 5 + 13 = 18 pesos. Hence, Paulina will have 18 pesos saved on Thursday.

b) Paulina has been saving 5 pesos per day from Tuesday. Since Tuesday, there have been six days, including Sunday. Therefore, Paulina will have saved 3 + (5 × 6) = 33 pesos on the first Sunday.

c) There are 28 days in February, so the Sunday of the fourth week will be the 28th day.  Monday, she saves 3 pesos. On Tuesday, she saves 5 pesos. On Wednesday, she saves 5 pesos. On Thursday, she saves 5 pesos. On Friday, she saves 5 pesos. On Saturday, she saves 5 pesos. On Sunday, she saves 5 pesos. Now, let us add up the savings:3 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 33 pesos.

Know more about savings here:

https://brainly.com/question/29274076

#SPJ11

We can set up a proportion to find the number of grams of bichloride in 250 mL:

(1 gram) / (0.5 liter) = (x grams) / (0.25 liter)

Cross-multiplying:

0.5x = 0.25

Dividing both sides by 0.5:

x = 0.25 / 0.5 = 0.5

Therefore, 250 mL will contain 0.5 grams of bichloride.

#SPJ11

If the product is known to be 13 effective then, the probability that the sample will contain less than 9 defectives is 0.058, or 5.8%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the binomial distribution formula, which calculates the probability of getting a certain number of successes in a fixed number of trials. In this case, the number of trials is the sample size (9 units), and the probability of success (i.e., getting a defective unit) is known to be 13%.

The formula for the probability of getting exactly k successes in n trials with probability p of success is:

P(k) = (n choose k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

where (n choose k) = n! / (k! * (n-k)!) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n items.

To find the probability that the sample will contain less than 9 defectives, we need to sum up the probabilities of getting 0, 1, 2, ..., 8 defectives:

P(0 or less) = P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + ... + P(8)

= (9 choose 0) * 0.13^0 * 0.87^9 + (9 choose 1) * 0.13^1 * 0.87^8 + (9 choose 2) * 0.13^2 * 0.87^7 + ... + (9 choose 8) * 0.13^8 * 0.87^1

= 0.034 + 0.135 + 0.264 + 0.288 + 0.200 + 0.097 + 0.032 + 0.007 + 0.001

= 0.058

Therefore, the probability that the sample will contain less than 9 defectives is 0.058, or 5.8%.

Learn more about probability :

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The number of cubic wooden blocks with a side length of 3 cm that can be cut from the rectangular block is approximately equal to 133 blocks (rounded to the nearest whole number).

The volume of the block is the product of its length, width and height. Using the given values, the volume of the block can be calculated as:volume = length × width × height = 15 cm × 12 cm × 20 cm = 3,600 cubic cm

The volume of each small wooden block that can be cut from the rectangular block is the product of its side length, width and height.Using the given value of the side length as 3 cm, the volume of each small wooden block can be calculated as:

volume of each small wooden block = side length × side length × side length = 3 cm × 3 cm × 3 cm = 27 cubic cm

The number of small wooden blocks that can be cut from the rectangular block is equal to the volume of the rectangular block divided by the volume of each small wooden block.

Therefore, the number of small wooden blocks that can be cut from the rectangular block is:total number of small wooden blocks = volume of rectangular block/volume of each small wooden block = 3,600 cubic cm/27 cubic cm = 133 1/3So, the number of cubic wooden blocks with a side length of 3 cm that can be cut from the rectangular block is approximately equal to 133 blocks (rounded to the nearest whole number).Therefore, the answer is 133.

Know more about volume here,

https://brainly.com/question/28058531

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval for the mean heart rate of Chicago Marathon finishers five minutes after completing the race is (128.74, 135.26) beats per minute for variance.

To find the 95% confidence interval for the mean heart rate of Chicago Marathon finishers five minutes after completing the race, we can use the following formula:

[tex]CI = x +- (t * (s / \sqrt{n} ))[/tex]

where:
- CI is the confidence interval
- x is the sample mean (132)
- t is the t-value corresponding to the 95% confidence level
- s is the square root of the sample variance (the sample standard deviation)
- n is the sample size (41)

Step 1: Calculate the sample standard deviation
[tex]s = \sqrt{s^2} = \sqrt{105}[/tex]≈ 10.25

Step 2: Find the t-value for a 95% confidence level with 40 degrees of freedom (n - 1)
Using a t-table or calculator, we find that the t-value is approximately 2.021.

Step 3: Calculate the margin of error
Margin of Error =[tex]t * (s / \sqrt{n} ) = 2.021 * (10.25 / \sqrt{4} )[/tex] ≈ 3.26

Step 4: Calculate the confidence interval
CI = x ± Margin of Error = 132 ± 3.26
CI = (128.74, 135.26)

So, the 95% confidence interval for the mean heart rate of Chicago Marathon finishers five minutes after completing the race is (128.74, 135.26) beats per minute.

If 44 people go on the trip, the cost per person is $22. If the number of people increases to 66, the cost per person will be approximately $14.67.

The problem states that the cost per person for the bus rental varies inversely as the number of people going on the trip. In other words, as the number of people increases, the cost per person decreases, and vice versa.
To find the cost per person when 66 people go on the trip, we can set up a proportion based on the inverse variation relationship. Let's denote the cost per person when 66 people go as x. The proportion can be written as:
44/22 = 66/x
To solve for x, we can cross-multiply and then divide:
44x = 22 * 66
x = (22 * 66) / 44
x ≈ 14.67
Therefore, if 66 people go on the trip, the cost per person will be approximately $14.67 when rounded to the nearest cent.

Learn more about cost per person here
https://brainly.com/question/13623970



#SPJ11

The required answer is  a regression with a higher r2 will always be preferable to one with a lower r2 IS TRUE.

True. A regression with a higher R2 value will generally be preferable to one with a lower R2 value because a higher R2 indicates that the regression model explains a greater proportion of the variance in the dependent variable.

It indicates a stronger correlation between the independent and dependent variables, and thus, a better fit for the model. However, it is important the sole criterion for evaluating a regression model, and other factors such as statistical significance and practical ..

The  regression analysis is a set of statistical processes for estimating the relationships between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables . The most common form of regression analysis is linear regression, in which one finds the line that most closely fits the data according to a specific mathematical criterion. For example, the method of ordinary least squares computes the unique line that minimizes the sum of squared differences between the true data and that line . For specific mathematical reasons , this allows the researcher to estimate the conditional expectation  of the dependent variable when the independent variables take on a given set of values. Less common forms of regression use slightly different procedures to estimate alternative location parameters because quantile regression or Necessary Condition Analysis or estimate the conditional expectation across a broader collection of non-linear models

However, it's important to consider other factors, such as the complexity of the model and its relevance to the research question, when evaluating the overall quality and suitability of a regression model.

To know more about regression  . Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/31735997

#SPJ11

The solution to the initial value problem is y = -3 / [tex](3x-x^{2} )^{3}[/tex] , where y = 0 when x = 0.

We can solve this initial value problem using separation of variables. First, we write the differential equation as:

dy/dx = [tex](3-2x)^{2}[/tex]

Next, we separate the variables by moving all the y terms to one side and all the x terms to the other side:

1/[tex]y^{2}[/tex] dy =  [tex](3-2x)^{2}[/tex]  dx

We integrate both sides with respect to their respective variables:

∫1/[tex]y^{2}[/tex] dy = ∫ [tex](3-2x)^{2}[/tex]  dx

Applying the power rule of integration on the left-hand side and simplifying the right-hand side by expanding the square, we get:

-1/y = [tex](3x-x^{2} )^{3}[/tex] /3 + C

where C is the constant of integration. We can solve for C using the initial condition y(0) = 0:

-1/0 = [tex](3(0)-0^{2} )^{3}[/tex]/3 + C

C = 0

Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is:

-1/y =  [tex](3x-x^{2} )^{3}[/tex]/3

Multiplying both sides by -1 and taking the reciprocal, we get:

y = -3/ [tex](3x-x^{2} )^{3}[/tex]

Correct Question :

Solve the given initial value problem for y = f(x). dy/dx = [tex](3-2x)^{2}[/tex] where y = 0 when x = 0.

To learn more about initial value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30487523

#SPJ4

For the first differential equation:

y' + 5y' + 2y = 0, y(0) = 1, y'(0) = 2

We can apply the Laplace transform to both sides of the equation:

L{y'} + 5L{y'} + 2L{y} = 0

Using the linearity property of the Laplace transform, we can write:

L{y'} = sY(s) - y(0)

L{y''} = s^2 Y(s) - sy(0) - y'(0)

L{y} = Y(s)

Substituting these expressions into the differential equation, we get:

sY(s) - y(0) + 5(sY(s) - y(0)) + 2Y(s) = 0

Simplifying and solving for Y(s), we get:

Y(s) = (y(0) s + y'(0)) / (s^2 + 5s + 2)

    = (1s + 2) / (s^2 + 5s + 2)

To solve for y(t), we can apply partial fraction decomposition to express Y(s) in terms of simpler fractions:

Y(s) = (1s + 2) / (s^2 + 5s + 2)

    = A / (s + α) + B / (s + β)

where α and β are the roots of the quadratic denominator, and A and B are constants to be determined.

The roots of s^2 + 5s + 2 = 0 can be found using the quadratic formula:

s = (-5 ± √(5^2 - 4(1)(2))) / (2(1))

 = (-5 ± √17) / 2

Therefore, we have:

α = (-5 + √17) / 2

β = (-5 - √17) / 2

Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write:

Y(s) = A / (s + α) + B / (s + β)

    = [A(s + β) + B(s + α)] / [(s + α)(s + β)]

Equating the numerators, we get:

1s + 2 = A(s + β) + B(s + α)

Substituting s = -α, we get:

-αA + βB = 1α + 2

Substituting s = -β, we get:

-βA + αB = 1β + 2

Solving for A and B by solving the system of linear equations:

A = (2 + α) / (√17)

B = (2 + β) / (-√17)

Substituting the values of A and B, we get:

Y(s) = [(2 + α) / (√17)] / (s + α) - [(2 + β) / (√17)] / (s + β)

Using the inverse Laplace transform, we can find y(t):

y(t) = [(2 + α) / (√17)] e^(-αt) - [(2 + β) / (√17)] e^(-βt)

For the second differential equation:

y''' + y = A8(t - 3.), y(0) = 1, y'(0) = 0

To know more about differential equation , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235#

#SPJ11

a) The volume generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis using the second Pappus-Guldinus theorem is V = 2π(0.64)

b) Using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem, the y-coordinate of the centroid of the curve is y = 0.736.

c) The area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem is A = 2π(0.736)(3.810)

a) The second Pappus-Guldinus theorem states that the volume generated by revolving a plane curve about an axis outside of the curve is equal to the product of the length of the curve and the distance traveled by the centroid of the curve. Applying this theorem to the given curve, we have V = 2π(0.64).

b) The first Pappus-Guldinus theorem states that the volume generated by revolving a plane curve about an axis is equal to the product of the area of the curve and the distance traveled by the centroid of the curve. In this case, we are given the length and area of the curve and are asked to find the y-coordinate of the centroid. Using the formula for the length of the curve and the given area,

we can find the radius of gyration of the curve about the x-axis. Then, using the formula for the centroid of a curve, we can find the y-coordinate of the centroid, which is y = 0.736.

c) Again, using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem, we can find the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis. We have the length and the area of the curve, and we have already found the y-coordinate of the centroid in part

(b). Using these values, we can calculate the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis, which is A = 2π(0.736)(3.810).

Learn more about Pappus-Guldinus

brainly.com/question/12977692

#SPJ11

For the expression f(x) = (-2x + 3 if x < -2) 5x - 6 if x ≥ -2) for x = 2, f(x) is equal to 4 (d).

To evaluate the expression, substitute the given value for the variable. In this case, given that x = 2. Then substitute this value into the expression and simplify.

f(x) = (-2x + 3 if x < -2)

   (5x - 6 if x ≥ -2)

Since x = 2≥ −2, use the second definition of f: 5x − 6. Therefore, f(2) = 5(2) − 6 = 10 − 6 = 4

​

Find out more on evaluation here: https://brainly.com/question/25907410

#SPJ1

Answer

A positive value of z indicates that the observation is above the mean, or it is further to the right of the mean than one standard deviation.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. the number of standard deviations of an observation is below the mean.

In a standard normal distribution, the mean is 0 and the standard deviation is 1.

A negative value of z indicates that the observation is below the mean, or in other words, it is further to the left of the mean than one standard deviation.

Similarly, a positive value of z indicates that the observation is above the mean, or it is further to the right of the mean than one standard deviation.

To know more about standard deviations refer here

https://brainly.com/question/23907081#

#SPJ11

The first positive consecutive odd integer as 'x'. Since the consecutive odd integers are 2 units apart, the second consecutive odd integer can be represented as 'x + 2' using quadratic equation.

Let's assume the first consecutive odd integer as 'x'. Since they are consecutive, the second consecutive odd integer will be 'x + 2'.

According to the given information, the square of the first integer ([tex]x^{2}[/tex]), added to 3 times the second integer (3 * (x + 2)), equals 24. Mathematically, this can be written as:

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 3(x + 2) = 24

Expanding and simplifying the equation, we have:

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 3x + 6 = 24

Rearranging the equation to standard quadratic form:

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 3x + 6 - 24 = 0

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 3x - 18 = 0

Now we can solve this quadratic equation using factoring, completing the square, or the quadratic formula to find the values of 'x' and 'x + 2', which will be the consecutive odd integers that satisfy the given condition.

Learn more about quadratic here:

https://brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

The given equation can be rewritten as an exponential equation like:

4x + 8 = exp(x + 5)

Remember that the exponential equation is the inverse of the natural logarithm, this means that:

exp( ln(x) ) = x

ln( exp(x) ) = x

Here we have the equation:

ln(4x + 8) = x + 5

If we apply the exponential in both sides, we will get:

exp( ln(4x + 8)) = exp(x + 5)

4x + 8 = exp(x + 5)

Now the equation is exponential.

Learn more about the exponential function:

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The probability of getting more than 12 successes in 14 trials with success probability 0.9 is approximately 0.9919. The variance of the given binomial distribution is 1.26 (rounded to two decimal places). The standard deviation of the given binomial distribution is approximately 1.123.

Part 1: To find the probability P(More than 12) for a binomial experiment with n=14 trials and success probability p=0.9, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the binomial distribution:

P(More than 12) = 1 - P(0) - P(1) - ... - P(12)

where P(k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes in 14 trials:

[tex]P(k) = (14 choose k) * 0.9^k * 0.1^(14-k)[/tex]

Using a calculator or a statistical software, we can compute each term of the sum and then subtract from 1:

P(More than 12) = 1 - P(0) - P(1) - ... - P(12)

= 1 - binom.cdf(12, 14, 0.9)

≈ 0.9919 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the probability of getting more than 12 successes in 14 trials with success probability 0.9 is approximately 0.9919.

Part 2: The mean of a binomial distribution with n trials and success probability p is given by:

mean = n * p

Substituting n=14 and p=0.9, we get:

mean = 14 * 0.9

= 12.6

Therefore, the mean of the given binomial distribution is 12.6 (rounded to two decimal places).

Part 3: The variance of a binomial distribution with n trials and success probability p is given by:

variance = n * p * (1 - p)

Substituting n=14 and p=0.9, we get:

variance = 14 * 0.9 * (1 - 0.9)

= 1.26

Therefore, the variance of the given binomial distribution is 1.26 (rounded to two decimal places).

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

standard deviation = sqrt(variance)

= sqrt(1.26)

≈ 1.123 (rounded to three decimal places)

Therefore, the standard deviation of the given binomial distribution is approximately 1.123.

To know more about probability refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The value which is not a solution of either inequality x > 2 and x < 2 is 2

The inequality x > 2 represent all the value greater than two but does not include 2 in the range all the values from 2 to infinity it can be written as (2 , ∞) .

The inequality x < 2 represent all the value lesser than two but does not include 2 in the range  all the values from - infinity to 2 it can be written as (-∞ , 2) .

Both the inequalities does not include 2 in the range

The number line represents the inequalities x > 2 and x < 2

To know more about inequality click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ1

The antiderivative of the original expression, with a constant of integration c is (1/7) * e^(7x-1) / (-6(7x)^6) + c

We want to compute the antiderivative of the expression 7ex − 1 / (7x)7 dx. To do so, we can use the formula for integration by substitution, which states that if we have an integrand of the form f(g(x))g'(x), we can substitute u = g(x) and rewrite the integral in terms of u and du/dx. This allows us to simplify the integral and hopefully make it easier to solve.

So let's apply this formula to the given expression. We notice that we have an exponential function, which suggests that we should try to let u be the exponent. Specifically, we can let u = 7x, so that we have:

u = 7x

du/dx = 7

dx = du/7

Now, we can substitute these expressions for u and dx into the integral:

∫ 7ex−1 / (7x)7 dx

= ∫ 7eu−1 / (7u/7)7 * (du/7) (using the substitutions above)

= (1/7) ∫ e^(u-1)/u^7 du

We can simplify the integral a bit further by using the formula for the antiderivative of e^x, which is simply e^x + c. In this case, we have e^(u-1) in the integrand, so we can write:

(1/7) ∫ e^(u-1)/u^7 du

= (1/7) * e^(u-1) / (-6u^6) + c

Now we can substitute back in our original variable, x, to obtain the final antiderivative:

= (1/7) * e^(7x-1) / (-6(7x)^6) + c

And that's it! This is the antiderivative of the original expression, with a constant of integration c.

Learn more about antiderivative

brainly.com/question/31396969

#SPJ11

The system has infinitely many solutions, and one of them is (9, -3/4).

To have a system of linear equations with infinitely many solutions, the two equations must represent the same line. Therefore, we need to obtain a second equation that has the same slope and y-intercept as 2x + 8y = 12.Here's how we can do that:2x + 8y = 12 is equivalent to 2(x + 4y) = 12, which reduces to x + 4y = 6.To create a second equation that represents the same line, we can multiply this equation by a constant, say 2, which gives us:2(x + 4y) = 12 (original equation)2x + 8y = 12 (distribute 2 on the left side)4x + 16y = 24 (multiply both sides by 2)Dividing both sides by 4, we get x + 4y = 6, which is the same as the first equation. Therefore, the system of equations is:2x + 8y = 124x + 16y = 24This system of equations is consistent and has infinitely many solutions because the two equations are equivalent and represent the same line, and every point on this line satisfies both equations.The solution to this system can be found using either equation by solving for one variable in terms of the other and substituting into either equation. For instance, we can solve for y in terms of x as follows:x + 4y = 6 => 4y = 6 - x => y = (6 - x)/4Substituting this expression for y into the first equation gives us:2x + 8((6 - x)/4) = 122x + 2(6 - x) = 1230 - 2x = 12 => 2x = 18 => x = 9Substituting x = 9 into y = (6 - x)/4 gives us:y = (6 - 9)/4 = -3/4Therefore, the system has infinitely many solutions, and one of them is (9, -3/4).

Learn more about Dividing here,Write a division problem with 1/4 as the dividend and 3 as the divisor. then, find the

quotient.

the answer has to be w...

https://brainly.com/question/30126004

#SPJ11

Right angles are angles that measure 90 degrees. Angle 2 is a right angle. Obtuse angles are angles that measure greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Angle 3 is an obtuse angle. It measures approximately 130 degrees.

To measure the angles shown for each given, we need a protractor. A protractor is an instrument used to measure angles. It is a semicircular transparent sheet of plastic or glass with the edges marked from 0 to 180 degrees. To measure the angles, place the center of the protractor on the vertex of the angle.

Align the base line of the protractor with one of the sides of the angle. Determine the size of the angle by reading the number of degrees between the two sides of the angle. Using the angle measurements, we can categorize the angles as acute, right, obtuse or straight angles. Acute angles are angles that measure less than 90 degrees. In the given angles, angles 1 and 4 are acute angles. Angle 1 measures approximately 60 degrees and angle 4 measures approximately 45 degrees.

Right angles are angles that measure 90 degrees. Angle 2 is a right angle. Obtuse angles are angles that measure greater than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. Angle 3 is an obtuse angle. It measures approximately 130 degrees. Straight angles are angles that measure 180 degrees. There is no straight angle in the given angles. The measures of the angles using the protractor and the category of each angle are summarized in the table below. Angle Measurement

Category Angle 160 degrees

Acute Angle 290 degrees

Right Angle 3130 degrees

Obtuse Angle 445 degrees

To know more about obtuse angle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30813354

#SPJ11