. In this exercise, you will conduct regression analysis with binary and categorical variables. (a) Use the command tabulate to show the categories of the variable occupation and their frequencies. What is the relative frequency of the category Sales

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

euhm ... did u just asked if a figure with h=9inches and b=12inches is rectangular???

Does it matter what the diagonals are etc?

if the frame has angles of 90° and it has two different lengths then it has to be rectangular. The sides of a square would have the same lengths.

Answer:

If its x^2 + 3x - 1 it is not a factor.

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2+3x - 1  is a factor of x^3+2x^2-5x-6​?

Try dividing:

x^2+3x - 1 ) x^3 + 2x^2 - 5x - 6​( x - 1

                  x^3 + 3x^2 - x

                          - x^2  -4x - 6

                          -x^2 - 3x + 1

                                   - x - 7  <------- remainder.

Answer:

600 butter : 2000 flour : 200 sugar : 400 currants = 72 cakes

120 cakes could be made with 1 kg of butter

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, 72 cakes = 6 dozen cakes

( since 12 cake = 1 dozen cake ).

a. First calculate quantity of each ingredient per dozen by dividing each by 1.5 (18/12).

• Butter - 150/1.5 = 100 g per dozen

For 6 dozen :

100g x 6 = 600 g

• Flour - 500/1.5 = 333.33 g per dozen

For 6 dozen :

333.33 g x 6 = 2000 g

• Sugar - 50/1.5 = 33.33 g per dozen

For 6 dozen :

33.33 x 6 = 200 g

• Currants - 100/1.5 = 66.67 g per dozen

For 6 dozen :

66.67 x 6 = 400 g

b. It is given that,

150g butter is required to make = 18 cakes

Then by using unitary method, we get,

1 g of butter is required to make = 18/150 cakes

Since, 1 Kg = 1000 g

Then,

1000 g of butter is required to make = (18/150) × 1000

= 120 cakes

Hence, with 1 kg of butter 120 whole cakes can be made.

Hope this answer helps you :)

Have a great day :)

Mark brainliest

Answer:

The margin of error is of 0.01.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.7}{2} = 0.15[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.15 = 0.85[/tex], so Z = 1.037.

The margin of error is of:

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

Standard deviation was 0.21.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 0.21[/tex]

Sample of 450:

This means that [tex]n = 450[/tex]

What is the margin of error, assuming a 70% confidence level, to the nearest hundredth?

[tex]M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

[tex]M = 1.037\frac{0.21}{\sqrt{450}}[/tex]

[tex]M = 0.01[/tex]

The margin of error is of 0.01.

Answer:

12 bottles of water.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since each walker drinks a bottle of water every 1/4 kilometre, we know that one walker drinks 4 bottles of water every kilometre since 4/4 = 1. We are trying to find how much water they drank after walking 3 kilometres, so we would multiply 3 by 4 getting us an answer of 12.

Hi there! Use the difference of two squares formula below:

[tex] \large \boxed{ {x}^{2} - {y}^{2} = (x + y)(x - y)}[/tex]

You need to know that what number times itself and get 16. 16 comes from 4×4 or 4².

Then,

[tex] \large{ {x}^{2} - 16 = (x + 4)(x - 4)}[/tex]

[tex] \large{(x + 4)(x - 4) = 0}[/tex]

Solve the equation for all real values of x.

[tex] \large{x = 4, - 4}[/tex]

If you don't like using a formula. You can do this:

[tex] \large{ {x}^{2} - 16 = 0} \\ \large{ {x}^{2} = 16} \\ \large{x = \pm \sqrt{16} } \\ \large{x = \pm 4}[/tex]

If you remember the square root well, the square root of 16 is 4×4. Pull out the two 4's and thus the square root of 16 is 4.

For the square both sides method above (second method), we can define that:

[tex] \large \boxed{ \large{ {x}^{2} = a \longrightarrow x = \pm a }}[/tex]

Answer

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A) 2( 4×5 +6×5+6×4)=148 cm²

B) 2( 4x6 + 13 ×6 + 13×4) = 308 in²

Answer:

Number of tile need = 300 tiles

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Dimensions of floor = 3 m by 4 m

Perimeter of square tile = 80 cm

Find:

Number of tile need

Computation:

Perimeter of square tile = 4(Side)

80 = 4(Side of tile)

Side of tile = 80 / 4

Side of tile = 20 cm

Side of tile = 0.2 meter

Area of tile = 0.2 x 0.2

Area of tile = 0.04

Area of floor = 3 x 4

Side of tile = 12 square meter

Number of tile need = 12 / 0.04

Number of tile need = 300 tiles

Answer:

1,000 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

This system of election result forecast is called a non-representative poll with a high percent margin of error. and used as an alternative to an expensive and tedious representative poll system.

Non-representative polls can be used to produce accurate electoral predictions and may frequently be done faster and cheaper than typical survey procedures.

Not just for the election forecasts, but also for public opinion on a wide variety of social, economic, and cultural topics, non-representative polling appears promising.

Answer:

4 or....

Step-by-step explanation:

I think its 4. maybe not

Answer:

n=-17

Step-by-step explanation:

8(2n-5)=3(6n-2)

1) Distributive property

16x-40=18x-6

16x−40=18x−6

2) Subtract 16x16x from both sides.

-40=18x-6-16x

−40=18x−6−16x

3) Simplify 18x-6-16x18x−6−16x to 2x-62x−6.

-40=2x-6

−40=2x−6

4) Add 66 to both sides.

-40+6=2x

−40+6=2x

5) Simplify -40+6−40+6 to -34−34.

-34=2x

−34=2x

6) Divide both sides by 22.

-\frac{34}{2}=x

−

2

34

=x

7) Simplify \frac{34}{2}

2

34

to 17

−17=x

8) Switch sides.

x=−17

Answer:

the correct answer is option B

Answer:

its nothing 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3/8 or 1/3 if you round it.

1. 40°

2. 50°

3. 45°

4. a. draw a line from angle P to downward but make it so it can cut angle OPQ from the half

b. 70°

c. angle TPQ = angle OPQ ÷2

angle TPQ = 140÷2= 70°

Answer:

A(-3,4) B(1,-8)

y-y1/x-x1 =y2-y1/x2-x1

y-4/x--3 = -8-4/1--3

y-4/x+3 = -12/1+3

y-4/x+3 =-12/4

y-4/x+3 = -3

y-4 = -3(x+3)

y-4=-3x-9

y+3x +9-4=

y+3x+5=0

Answer:

y = -3x - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

-3, 4 and 1, -8

1 - -3 = 4

-8 - 4 = -12

[tex]\frac{-12}{4}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-3}{1}[/tex] = -3

gradient/slope = -3

now substituting in the point -3, 4 to find the y intercept:

4= -3 x -3 + c

4 = 9 + c

-5 = c

y intercept = -5

equation is y = -3x - 5

I dont know Im sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

I just want points in not that smart

Answer:

A. 3/8*2=6/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Think about a whole number as (whole number)/1

(2/1)

Then multiply

3/8*2/1=6/8

Hope that helps!

Answer:59

Step-by-step explanation:

beacause you need to added them all together

Answer:

4 to the 2nd power is the equivalent to 2 to the 4th power

Step-by-step explanation:

2⁴ = 16 = 4²

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

2*2*2*2= 16

Answer:

DE

Step-by-step explanation:

You can tell by the markings. Since there are two vertical markings it concludes that those sides are the same length.

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

100,000/400,000 x 100

= 1/4 x 100

= 25%

Hence, 100,000 is 25% of 400,000

Feel free to mark this as brainliest :D

Answer:

x/100 x 400,000 = 100,000

x100                            x100

400,000x = 10,000,000

Divide by 400,000 on both sides:

X = 25%

Answer:

your awnser would be [4, −6]

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

175,760,000 different California license plates can be made.

Step-by-step explanation:

Possible outcomes for each number of letter:

10 numbers(from 0 to 9) and 26 letters.

Format of the plate:

Number - letter - letter - letter - number - number - number

The numbers of possible outcomes are:

10 - 26 - 26 - 26 - 10 - 10 -10

How many different plates?

We multiply these values. So

10*26*26*26*10*10*10 = 175,760,000

175,760,000 different California license plates can be made.

Answer:

This means that population proportion of women athletes who graduate from the BIG10 is now not more than 73%

Step-by-step explanation:

Here,  

The null hypothesis is p = 0.73

Alternate hypothesis is p> 0.73

The level of significance = 0.10 or 10%

Sample size = 23

Sample proportion = 19/23 = 0.826

Z test statistics  

= (p’-p)/Sqrt ((p(1-p)/n))

Substituting the given values, we get –  

Z = (0.826-0.73)/Sqrt ((0.73(1-0.73)/23)) = 1.037

Thus, the P values for Z>1.037  

= 1- P(Z less than or equal to 1.037)

= 1- 0.8501

= 0.150

P-value  is greater than the  level of significance

We will accept the null hypothesis

This means that population proportion of women athletes who graduate from the BIG10 is now not more than 73%