a tree leaf appears to be green. which statement explains why the leaf isn't a blackbody radiator
The leaf reflects light and does not emit it.
In 1 paragraph tell me What u have learned in civics
Answer:
I learned about the the study of the rights and duties of citizenship.
Explanation:
When the founders were creating a new American government, the abuses
of power from a single ruler were fresh in their minds. They didn't want
another king! So the United States government was designed to prevent any
single person or group from becoming too powerful. We call this idea
"separation of powers."
The Constitution separates the government's power into three branches.
Each branch has separate responsibilities, but they all must interact with
each other in different ways. This separation of powers includes a system of
checks and balances, which are ways that each branch can limit the others.
Based on the passage, the founders of the United States would most likely agree with
which of the following statements?
A
Kings do not have enough power.
B
Kings can take advantage of their power.
с
A government should have few checks and balances.
D
The branches of government do not need to interact.
Answer:
B . Kings can take advantage of their power.
Explanation:
From the given passage, we can assume that the primary goal of establishing the Constitution was for the "separation" of powers among various branches. This was done with the idea of making sure that power is not concentrated in just one area or person.
The separation of government's powers into three branches ensures equal level of authority. Moreover, the statement "They didn't want another king!" provides a supporting point to the separation of the power. So, by the act of this power separation, the founders of the United States would most likely agree with the statement that kings can take advantage of their powers, which is what the founders are trying to prevent.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
How do you think this act impact me with American families?
how did american involvement in vietnam change under president johnson and nixon?
Answer:
They tried getting more directly involved
Explanation:
LBJ wanted to send troops to Vietnam for one reason, the domino effect. This domino effect feared that if communism grows in a country in a specific region, then it will spill into other countries in that region. The domestic support for this war was terrible, even Sweden hated it so much that they supported the Vietcong. Nixon did support it for a bit, but he knew his administration will be very popular if he took the troops out and so he did.
Identify 5-7 actions that each president took that escalated and increased American involvement in Vietnam.
Answer:
Increased American involvement in Vietnam.
Explanation:
The U.S. involvement in Vietnam began in 1954, through ongoing conflict in the region of North and South. South Vietnam wanted to remain close ties with the West. Ngo Dinh Diem as a President in South Vietnam, it became possible for the U.S. to fight and overthrow Communism.
Both the presidents Truman and Eisenhower defended French support in Vietnam by providing economic aid.
The Domino effect raised in foreign policy during the Presidency of Kennedy and Johnson to support America's military involvement in the Vietnam War.
There were more than 16,000 U.S. advisers in South Vietnam during Kennedy presidency.
ANSWER ASAP PLEASE
Why do you think Gandhi believed that civil disobedience and passive resistance would be effective against the British?
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes. Why else would he lead his country that way?
Gandhi had reason to believe that the British were better trained and better armed than his own military. But he also knew that in the end he would win. He says this in the movie Gandhi
Brigadier: You don't think we're just going to walk out of India!
Gandhi: Yes. In the end, you will walk out. Because 100,000 Englishmen simply cannot control 350 million Indians, if those Indians refuse to cooperate.
I think this is as good an answer to your question as I can give you.
The arrival of Aryan people in India led:
Alexander hamiltion was involved in the Washington farewell address because
What are two ways by which a bill can die? It gets a majority vote. It is not reported to the floor. It is filibustered and a cloture is enacted. The conference committee cannot reconcile its two versions.
Answer:
B and D.
Explanation:
The two ways a bill can be killed are not reporting the bill to the floor and no reconciliation of the two versions of bill by the two committe.
To make a law come to pass, a bill has to go through various process. In these processes, there are ways that can kill the bill also. The first one is, when the bill is not reported to the floor. When a bill will not be reported to the floor, there will be no debate or consideration done over the bill. Thus, killing the bill.
The other ways is when the two committees cannot reconcile its two versions. The House and the Senate, both, present their version of the bill to the president, if two versions do not reconcile, it can kill the bill.
Therefore, options B and D are correct.
What is the climate of India like?
Answer: India are subject to a humid subtropical climate and a subtropical highland climate. Though they experience warm to hot summers, temperatures during the coldest months generally fall as low as 0 °C (32 °F)
The nature of warfare during World War I on the Westem and Eastern fronts can best be described as
O lighting quick strikes known as "blitzkrieg"
O a series of swift and decisive battles
navy battles fought in the Pacific Ocean
O a war of attrition or stalemate fought primarily in trenches
Answer:
Last one, trench warfare
Explanation:
Question 22(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points)
(05.02 HC)
Which of these statements best reflects Sulla's vision of how to rule Rome?
A"The Senate must be strengthened to strengthen the Republic."
"The people must have more power to be more content."
O "Creating reforms is the job of the consults; dictators lead."
O "The plebeians are capable of governing themselves well."
Answer:
A
Explanation:
i did the test
4. PART B: Which section from the text best supports the answer to Part
A?
A "He met a lot of different people on his trip and learned a lot about
Islam and the fight against colonialism." ( Paragraph 9)
B "He also met a lot of white people that he considered brothers and
allies in the fight for civil rights, and he returned to the United
States with a different attitude." ( Paragraph 9)
C "His home was firebombed with his four daughters inside, but
luckily they were able to escape unharmed." ( Paragraph 10)
D“They portrayed him as a violent troublemaker who hated white
society." ( Paragraph 11)
Answer: B. He also met a lot of white people that he considered brothers and allies in the fight for civil rights, and he returned to the United States with a different attitude." ( Paragraph 9)
Explanation:
Since Malcolm’s views on civil rights changed throughout his life as his beliefs shifted to accept more of the opinions as well as the help of the white civil rights activists.
He also met a lot of white people that he considered brothers and allies in the fight for civil rights, and he returned to the United States with a different attitude."
Therefore, the correct option is B
Explain how these events during the reconstruction era affected the United States both at the time and for decades to come? WILL GOVE BRAINLY
What makes Jesus' sacrifice actually capable of forgiving sins, whereas the animal sacrifice of
the Old Testament was largely symbolic?
Answer:
Atonement in the Old Testament was a temporary faith exercise of sacrifice done by those who believed in God and showed it by offering those sacrifices. Jesus did far more than just temporarily cover sin: He destroyed it, rising from the dead, conquering the power of sin and death for all who believe.
Explanation:
In the 1800s, you do not need to be a citizen to vote in the state of Oregon. Instead, voting is tied to the length of one’s residency in the state. But with a recent influx of immigrants from China and Hawaii, white racist lawmakers are growing uneasy about the exercise of political power by nonwhite residents. Predict how white Oregon lawmakers prevented Chinese and Hawaiian immigrants from voting while maintaining the rights of Dutch, German, or Norwegian immigrants to vote.
Answer:
Lawmakers could prevent the Chinese and Hawaiian people of Oregon from participating in the elections by establishing a law, where only European and American citizens had the right to vote.
Explanation:
Oregon's white and racist lawmakers were aware that the population of the Chinese and Hawaiian population was very large in Oregon. these legislators considered Chinese and Hawaiian culture to be inferior and lacking in political and democratic concepts. Because of this prejudice, they did not want this portion of the population to have an influence on American political issues. However, they believed that European citizens and heterogeneously white people, had a cultural value equal to the American value and, therefore, their participation in Oregon politics was welcome.
To prevent Chinese and Hawaiian citizens from voting, lawmakers could formulate a law that allowed only Americans and Europeans resident in Oregon to participate in these elections.
Who was a key leader in India’s independence movement?
HoChi Minh
Ferdinand Marcos
Aung San Suu Kyi
Mohandas Gandi
Answer:
Mohandas Ghandi
Explanation: Ghandi was the key leader in india's independence movement.
HoChi Minh led the vietnamese independence movement.
Ferdinand Marcos was a filipino polititian
Aung san Suu Kyi is a Burmese politician and the former the minister of foreign affairs
Mohandas Gandi was a key leader in India’s independence movement.
The answer is option D.
What was Mohandas Gandhi known for?
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is widely recognized as one of the twentieth century's greatest political and spiritual leaders. Honored in India as the father of the nation, he pioneered and practiced the principle of Satyagraha—resistance to tyranny through mass nonviolent civil disobedience.
What did Gandhi do for India?
His non-violent resistance helped end British rule in India and has influenced modern civil disobedience movements across the globe. Widely referred to as Mahatma, meaning great soul or saint in Sanskrit, Gandhi helped India reach independence through a philosophy of non-violent non-cooperation.
Learn more about Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi here: brainly.com/question/20804049
#SPJ2
Please help me ASAP I will give extra points
Directions: In a paragraph, identify what type of business you would like to open and what type of business organization you would consider opening it under. Then, write another paragraph comparing and contrasting why the type of business organization you chose is better than another. You should have 2 paragraphs each total 5 or more sentences.
Answer:
Basically just think of a business idea, and say why it is better than another idea, or competitors, be sure to add intro and conclusion.
Explanation:
This will show that your business idea has some competitive advantage.
DID TTHE CONCEPT OF MANIFEST DESTINY MOTIVATE THE SETTTLEMENT OF THE AMERICAN WEST ?
Answer:
It's been awhile since this subject was tought so if I remember correctly the answer is yes.
Explanation:
Since Manifest Destiny gave those who settled in the west more money, land, resources, and it also strengthened economy for the Americans.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
What was the outcome of the Vietnam War?
A: The United States gained control of all of Vietnam
B: The South Vietnamese overthrew the North Vietnamese
C: North and South Vietnam agreed to settle their differences and remain two separate countries
D: The United States failed in their efforts to contain communism in Southeast Asia
Answer:
D
North Vietnam invaded South Vietnam successfully and turned both sides to communism
Why did the United States invade the island of Grenada and remove the revolutionary military council in 1983?
Answer:
to prevent the spread of the communist government to the other Caribbean islands.
Explanation:
The United States invaded America in the year 1983. The Reagan administration mainly invaded the land of Grenada to stop the communism government from spreading to the other Caribbean islands. It also protected the lives of many Americans who were living in Grenada at that time.
The Reagan government believed in building a strong army so as to challenge the power of the communist.
US president Reagan over thrown the Revolutionary Military Council of Grenada who posed a threat to the American citizens in Grenada by his communist principals. Thus in order to secure the safety of the American people in Grenada, the US army invade the island and removed the revolutionary military council in the year 1983.
How Much Did The 1% Of The United States Make Of The National Income In 1944?
Answer:
There are only long answers to any questions about taxation in American history, no matter how short the questions. Here we have a short question, and only room for a short answer. So let’s make a start.
The “exceedingly high” part of this question most likely refers to the federal income tax’s “confiscatory” top rates coming out of World War II, which the Eisenhower Administration left in place into the 1960s. During the war, the top “marginal rate” was 94%, but 94% of what? Then as now, income tax rates moved up at distinct break points. In this made-up example, consider a 15% rate up to $25,000, 21% from $25,000 to $50,000, and 25% over $50,000. Those making $50,001 or more won’t pay a quarter of their total income, but rather 15% of the first $25,000, 21% of the next $25,000, and 25% of everything above $50K. That’s why the system is called progressive - the percentage rate progresses upward with income, but the higher percentage applies only to new (marginal) income above each break point. In 1944-45, “the most progressive tax years in U.S. history,” the 94% rate applied to any income above $200,000 ($2.4 million in 2009 dollars, given inflation).
Explanation:
sana makatulong ;)
Answer:
$10,000 and over
Explanation:
18. When starting and waging a war it is not right that matters, but victory. Close your hearts to pity. Act brutally.
Eighty million people [Germans) must obtain what is their right. ... The stronger man is right.
-Adolf Hitler, 1939
Some countries, including France and England, chose to appease Hitler rather than confront him in hopes of
maintaining peace. These
words of Hitler's clarify that appeasement -
A. was the chief cause of World War II
B. had little or no effect on Hitler's plans
C. encouraged Hitler to become more brutal
D. was ultimately rewarded with peaceful actions
Answer:
The Answer is B.
Explanation:
Anyone know thisss??!??!?
I believe the answer is the first one
How did Americans’ lives change during the Great Depression?
Answer:
The Great Depression of 1929 devastated the U.S. economy. A third of all banks failed. 1 Unemployment rose to 25%, and homelessness increased. 2 Housing prices plummeted 67%, international trade collapsed by 65%, and deflation soared above 10%.
Explanation:
Which Of the following describes how the German people felt about the treaty of versailes
Answer: Hope This Helps!
Explanation:
When the Germans heard about the Treaty of Versailles, they felt 'pain and anger'. They felt it was unfair. It was a 'Wrong' – an IMPOSED settlement. They had not been allowed to take part in the talks – they had just been told to sign.
The Germans felt pain and despair about the treaty of Versailles because they were made to take all the blame for the war.
What is The Treaty of VersaillesTreaty of Versailles was one of the most controversial treaties in history of Western ppwers.
The treaty's implored a “war guilt” clause which forced Germany and other Central Powers to take all the blame for World War I.
This implied a loss of territories, reduction in military forces, and reparation payments to Allied powers.
Learn more about the Treaty of Versailles at https://brainly.com/question/454593
#SPJ2
MARKING BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT!
1.) Which of the following events or trends was a result of the other three?
A.) The American Revolution
B.) The Enlightenment
C.) The French Revolution
D.) The Growing Middle Class
Primary Source #1: Bailey and Kennedy, eds., The American Spirit, Volume I: To 1877, Houghton Mifflin,1998
African-born James L. Bradley was a slave who purchased his freedom. In 1834, while a student at the Lane Seminary in Cincinnati, Ohio, he wrote a short account of his life. This is an excerpt from his account.
… I will begin as far back as I can remember. I think I was between two and three years old when the soul-destroyers tore me from my mother’s arms, somewhere in Africa, far back from the sea. They carried me a long distance to a ship; all the way I looked back, and cried. The ship was full of men and women loaded with chains; but I was so small, they let me run about on deck. After many long days, they brought us into Charleston, South Carolina. A slaveholder bought me, and took me up into Pendleton County. I suppose that I staid [stayed] with him about six months. He sold me to a Mr. Bradley, by whose name I have ever since been called. This man was considered a wonderfully kind master; and it is true that I was treated better than most of the slaves I knew. I never suffered for food, and never was flogged with the whip; but oh, my soul! I was tormented with kicks and knocks more than I can tell. My master often knocked me down, when I was young. Once, when I was a boy, about nine years old, he struck me so hard that I fell down and lost my senses. I remained thus some time, and when I came to myself, he told me he thought he had killed me. At another time, he struck me with a currycomb [metal comb used for grooming horses], and sunk the knob into my head. I have said that I had food enough; I wish I could say as much concerning my clothing. But I let that subject alone, because I cannot think of any suitable words to use in telling you.…
Question: How did James L. Bradley obtain his freedom?
Answer:
By working in his spare time for a number of years (which often meant sleeping only three hours a night!), Bradley was able to buy his freedom. During his time as a slave, Bradley regretted his lack of schooling.
Explanation:
sana po makatulong:-)
Is Farming is revolutionary because it increased humans' ability to use the land to support us; today, we still benefit from the advancement of farming
Answer:
In simple words, In Britain, the 18th-century Agricultural Revolution opened the way for the Industrial Revolution. Food production has increased as a result of new agricultural methods and advanced livestock breeding. This resulted in a growth in populace and improved health. Enclosures became common as a result of the modern farming techniques.