Answer:
This means to be fair and just in dealing with everyone; treat everyone equally. Make decisions without playing favorites and don't take advantage of others. Don't blame others carelessly or unjustly. Take only your fair share, take turns, and share with others.
Explanation:
Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether each argument is valid or invalid. First find the form of the argument by defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the conclusion using the predicates. If the argument is valid, then use the rules of inference to prove that the form is valid. If the argument is invalid, give values for the predicates you defined for a small domain that demonstrate the argument is invalid. QUESTION A AND B ALREADY SOLVED. PLEASE solve part C, D, E using same method, and give some explantion for your answer. THANKS! The domain for each problem is the set of students in a class. (a) Every student on the honor roll received an A. No student who got a detention received an A. No student who got a detention is on the honor roll. H(x): x is on the honor roll A(x): x received an A. D(x): x got a detention.
Hello! I'm happy to help you out in this matter. Following is the answer to your argument :
(c) Every student who received an A is on the honor roll.
H(x): x is on the honor roll
A(x): x received an A.
This argument is invalid. We can show this by giving a counterexample. For example, consider a scenario where there is a student named John who received an A, but he is not on the honor roll. This scenario contradicts the conclusion of the argument, which states that every student who received an A is on the honor roll. Therefore, the argument is invalid.
(d) No student who is on the honor roll received a detention.
H(x): x is on the honor roll
D(x): x got a detention.
This argument is valid. We can prove its validity using the rules of inference. The argument can be written symbolically as ¬∃x(H(x) ∧ D(x)), which can be rewritten using De Morgan's law as ∀x(¬H(x) ∨ ¬D(x)). This is a valid argument form known as the rule of inference called universal instantiation.
(e) Every student who did not receive an A got a detention.
A(x): x received an A.
D(x): x got a detention.
This argument is invalid. We can show this by giving a counterexample. For example, consider a scenario where there is a student named Sarah who did not receive an A, but she did not get a detention either. This scenario contradicts the conclusion of the argument, which states that every student who did not receive an A got a detention. Therefore, the argument is invalid.
Learn more about validity at https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ11
Read the excerpt from the passage. ". . . You could almost see that thought turn in him as he turned, and pace in him as he paced; so completely possessing him, indeed, that it all but seemed the inward mold of every outer movement. "
Which idea does the author convey through the use of figurative language?
The author uses figurative language to convey the idea that the character's thought is deeply ingrained and influential in his actions.
The idea that is conveyedThe phrase "you could almost see that thought turn in him as he turned" suggests a strong correlation between the character's mental process and his physical movements.
The use of the word "pace" further emphasizes the connection, as it implies a rhythmic and repetitive motion that mirrors the character's thought process.
By describing the thought as "the inward mold of every outer movement," the author suggests that it shapes and molds the character's behavior in a profound and pervasive manner. Overall, the figurative language portrays the character's thoughts as a powerful force that drives and directs his actions.
Read more on ideas that are conveyed here https://brainly.com/question/1914190
#SPJ4
Scrie un text de 30 40 cuvinte in care sa prezinti doua trasaturi si 2 abilitati ale omului moder fata de omul preistoric folosind 4 adverbe si 4 adjective.evidentiaza le prin sublinierea cu 2 cul ori
Omul modern se diferențiază de omul preistoric prin multe aspecte. Două trăsături care îl caracterizează pe omul modern sunt inteligența și creativitatea. Abilitățile sale de a gândi critic și de a inova sunt și ele remarcabile.
Omul modern este capabil să rezolve probleme complexe și să găsească soluții neașteptate, iar aceste abilități îl ajută să progreseze și să evolueze.
Pe de altă parte, omul preistoric era cunoscut pentru forța sa fizică și abilitățile sale de vânător, dar nu avea același nivel de inteligență sau creativitate.În prezent, omul modern este capabil să comunice cu ușurință și eficiență, deoarece are o abilitate crescută de a vorbi și de a scrie.
De asemenea, omul modern este foarte adaptabil și poate face față cu succes situațiilor noi și dificile. Inteligența și creativitatea sa îi permit să inoveze și să progreseze în domeniile științei, tehnologiei și artei.
În concluzie, omul modern are abilități superioare și trăsături deosebite care îl diferențiază în mod clar de omul preistoric. Aceste trăsături și abilități îl ajută să fie adaptabil și să progreseze într-un mod eficient și productiv.
Learn more about omul preistoric at:
https://brainly.com/question/10726765
#SPJ11