Answer:
I agree with the statement “The Treaty of Versailles was a fair settlement” to a certain extent. I know that Germany had been unmerciful during the war leading to thirty seven million casualties. Therefore “The Big Three”: Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Wilson (USA), the driving forces behind the treaty, need not be merciful in return. When you put the Treaty of Versailles in perspective against World War I it appears to be fair towards Germany. The war had destroyed most country’s economies and a large area of land. These, among many other things, needed to be restored. Considering that Germany had been defeated and they were largely at fault for the start of the war it was fair to make them pay reparations. After the war Germany was still a serious threat to the world. People believed that they would not give up. Therefore one of the main aims of the peace treaty was to make sure that the risk of Germany attacking again was as low as possible. The treaty of Versailles was fair to take away Germany’s armed forces and colonies as it protected the rest of the world in the short term and punished them. However, we now know that the Treaty of Versailles failed as the world has seen another, even more horrific war. I believe that the Treaty was unnecessarily harsh and not as fair as it should have been. All of the victorious nations were furious with Germany so at the time very few thought of being fair towards their enemy of four years. This is reflected in the treaty through the reparations Germany was forced to pay. These were outrageously high (£660 million) and later changed. The confiscation of Germany’s territories and colonies and the reduction in their army was also excessively severe. Although this was meant to keep peace in the short term it only angered Germany more, sparking revenge. War Guilt was also an unnecessary condition that publicly humiliated Germany triggering resentment. This was tactlessly done to compensate the victorious public who desired a subject to blame for the loss of their loved ones. Similarly the rest of the treaty was too harsh because the rulers had to please their countries if they wished to be re-elected. Germany did not get any second chances from the peace treaty. Their pride majorly suffered at the forced decrease in their army and they were not able to improve themselves in their colonies as those were repossessed causing jealousy and anger. The peace treaty unfairly focused too much on punishing Germany for what they did wrong rather than trying to maintain peace. This is because the public was too angry to think intelligently about preventing future losses. In general I believe that the Treaty of Versailles had good intentions however mainly due to public pressure it was too harsh and unfair. The Big Three had an impossible task and pleasing everyone was not probable but I believe they did the best that they could at the time. However the treaty was largely unfair and too severe contributing to World War II.
Explanation:
If you were King Henry, explain how you would respond to this letter?
Answer:
King Henry would most likely feel a bit of guilt for locking her in the tower to her death. While he was very determined to produce a male heir, he was still a Christian with Christian morals. As to his response, I'm not sure if a response is truly necessary since the letter was more of a "please don't forget me, and you are condemned to dam,nation for this" declaration. If he did respond it would probably be a senseless justification for her imprisonment and perhaps an apology.
Explanation:
the first peace agreement between modern egypt and isreal was known as the
Answer:
The isreal treaty i believe
Explanation:
What is the principle of diversification and how did it help promote the success of businesses in the 1950s?
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Diversification refers to a risk management strategy whereby different investments are mixed within a portfolio. This is done in order to lower risk and also yield higher long term returns.
During the 1950s, investors chose securities that had minimal relationship with one another so as to reduce their overall risk Some other reasons for diversification in thus era was to maximize shareholder's value and also due to growth.
What was one major outcome of the invasion of Poland in 1939?
Answer:
The major outcome of the invasion of Poland in 1939 was that it started World War II. Explanation: The German invasion of Poland was a military action of Nazi Germany aimed at annexing the Polish territory.
Explanation:
This should help you <3
Rob DeSalle studies genes and DNA. According to him, what about genes determines how complex living things are?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached or further references we can say the following.
Rob DeSalle studies genes and DNA. According to him, genes determine how complex living things are in that these genes specifically characterize every single living being on planet Earth.
For Rob DeSalle, the number of genes does not determine if you are a better species than others. Or the wrong idea that if some species have different amounts of genes this means that it has better DNA or is a superior species.
Desalle indicates that some amoebas have more DNA in their cells, compared to humans. For him, the key lies in how the species uses its DNA in order to determine its complex life.
13. The two parts of the U.S. Congress are the Senate and the Supreme Court.
a. True
b. False
14. How many U.S. Senators are there?
a. 50
b. 100
c. 102
d. 435
15. We elect a U.S. Senator for how many years?
a. 2
b. 4
c. 6
d. 8
16. The House of Representatives has how many voting members?
a. 50
b. 100
c. 102
d. 435
17. We elect a U.S. Representative for how many years?
a. 2
b. 4
c. 6
d. 8
18. We elect a President for how many years?
a. 2
b. 4
c. 6
d. 8
19. In what month do we vote for President?
a. April
b. August
c. October
d. November
20. If the President can no longer serve, who becomes President?
a. The Vice President
b. The Speaker of the House
c. The Secretary of State
d. The Secretary of Defense
21. Who is Commander in Chief of the military?
a. The Secretary of Defense
b. The President
c. The Vice President
d. The Speaker of the House
22. Who signs bills to become laws?
a. Congress
b. The Supreme Court
c. The President
d. The Vice President
According to the Changes at Work lesson notes, which historical figure was best known for advocating for child labor laws?
Question 3 options:
Mary Harris Jones
Ida Tarbell
Samuel Gompers
John Muir
Why were so many tribes able to invade the Western Roman Empire?
Answer:
The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns' invasion of Europe in the late fourth century.
20 POINTS HELP
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
a During early westward expansion after the Civil War, Native Americans had an advantage over
U.S. troops because they knew the land so well.
b. The Medicine Lodge Creek Treaty attempted to establish peace between the U.S. and Native
Americans and move Native Americans to reservations.
At the beginning of westward expansion after the Civil War, several Native American tribes
successfully banded together in a joint effort to end encroachment on the plains.
d A tract of public land set apart for a special purpose is a reservation.
C.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
What was the result of passing this act? 100 point
The relocation of numerous Native Americans to an area where they would be safe to raise their families.
The massacre of Mexicans by the Native Americans.
The Native Americans did not accept the governments deal and numerous battles ensued.
The result was enslavement of the Native Americans by white settlers and the killing of Native American men to allow it to happen.
The result was the killing of white men by the Native Americans.
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the choices, the act in question was the Indian Removal Act passed in 1830.
It authorized relocation of Native Americans but many of them died on their way. So the first choice is not the answer.
Mexicans were not involved so the second choice is out as well.
There was no enslavement of the Native Americans as they were sovereign states. Native Americans who died in the "Trail of Tears" included men, women and children. Third choice is not the answer.
The Native Americans had less weapons and could not have killed a lot of white men.
That leaves the third choice as the right answer: The Native Americans did not accept the governments deal and numerous battles ensued.
Answer:
The result was enslavement of the Indians by white settlers and the killing of Indian men to allow it to happen.
Explanation:
i just got done with the lesson
Question 6 of 20
Product A and Product B are complementary products. If the demand for
Product A decreases, how will it affect Product B?
A. The supply of Product B will increase.
B. The demand for Product B will decrease.
C. The supply of Product B will decrease.
D. The demand for Product B will increase.
SUBMIT
Which statement best describes a manor in the medieval era?
O It was a large town owned by nobles and worked in by serfs.
O It was a large house where nobles and knights lived together.
It was a large house where nobles and servants lived together.
It was a large town owned by church officials and worked in by nobles.
Era una casa grande donde convivían nobles y caballeros.
Answer:
its B:)
Explanation:
What did Erasmus teach needed to happen within the Church? Did his suggestions eventually come to pass?
Answer:
Erasmus
Explanation:
Erasmus was a Dutch scholar and Catholic priest whose views were distinct from many other religious reformers. Erasmus travelled throughout Europe as a biblical and humanist educator. He trusted the power of words and used his writing to attack scholars theology and clerical abuses and promote his philosophy of Christ.
Erasmus was condemned from all sides because of his ideas which were opposed by clergies. He had worked for peace and unity, only to experience war and breakup.
Can anybody help me with this???
Answer:
Great Britain nearly went to war with the U.S. as a result of the Trent Affair.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Have a nice day :)
Put the following events of the Industrial Revolution in the order they happened. Start with the oldest event first.
= Creation of the Middle Class
= Industrial Revolution
= Urbanization
= Increases in the chance for Social Mobility
= Creation of Socialist and Communist Ideals
Answer:
34251this is the order in my opinion
HOPE IT HELPEDThe correct sequence of the events of the Industrial Revolution according to the order of their occurrence is as follows,
Industrial RevolutionCreation of Communist and Socialist ideas.Creation of the middle classUrbanizationIncreases in the chance for social mobility.The Industrial Revolution completely changed the ideas and the standard of living of the people, and industries were being set-up as a result of increasing population and demand.
Industrial RevolutionThe Industrial Revolution is one of the most influential events of the Nineteenth Century, which started after the invention of steam engine. Commodities were being commercialized and globalized. There were different ideologies of people, leading to formation of Socialist and Communist ideas. This led to the creation of a middle class. Middle class was characterized by well furnished homes and residing in posh colonies. Creation of middle class soon led to the urbanization of cities and the countries at large.The chances for social mobility increased after travel was also commercialized during the end of Industrial Revolution.
Hence, the order of appearances and occurrence of events of the Industrial revolution are as aforementioned above.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/855594
16. What was the experience of the Soviet Union during World War Il compared to the United States?
O A. The Soviet Union contributed fewer soldiers.
O B. The Soviet Union was left more politically unstable.
O C. The Soviet Union
suffered greater losses of life.
O D. The Soviet Union entered the war later.
Answer:
C. The Soviet Union suffered greater losses of life
Explanation:
The Nazis were literally invading the Russians and murdering people inside the country. The Soviets lost a tremendous amount of lives during that war.
Anybody know the answer to this
Answer:
the lack of food
Explanation:
they were starved
keneng tengene?
Help me!
Answer:
I'M HERE NA MAY QUEEN I WILL SAVE YOU... ❤️❤️✨
[tex]\\[/tex]
Answer:
I didn't understand it
Correct get's brainiest. What let Europeans to explore Africa in the 1400s?
A. the death of Mansa Musa
B. the need for new raw materials and resources
C. the demand for new lands to help ease overpopulation
D. the desire to find a route are Africa to Asia
the answer is is c or b to this
Question 11
Which statements indicate smart steps for the first-time investor?
OA.
Start making "opportunity cost" decisions now! Start giving up something
nice now for something a lot better later.
B.
When you get your first credit card, do not use that credit card to regularly
finance any purchases!
C. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
OD. All of the above.
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
A first-time investor refers to an individual such as entrepreneur who is inexperienced but willing to allocate or commit his or her capital in anticipation of an expected financial return or profits in the future.
The following statements indicate smart steps for the first-time investor;
A. Start making "opportunity cost" decisions now. He or she should be willing to give up something nice momentarily for something a lot better in the future. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
Simply stated, it is the cost of not enjoying the benefits, profits or value associated with the alternative forgone or best alternative choice available.
B. He or she shouldn't use his or her first credit card to regularly finance any purchases.
C. As a rule, do not ever invest any amount more than you can afford to lose in the event of a downturn.
What were some of the governing policies of the Song Dynasty?
Answer:
The New Policies (Chinese: 新法; pinyin: xīnfǎ), also known as Xining Reform (熙宁变法), Xifeng Reform (熙丰变法) or Wang Anshi Reform (王安石变法), were a series of reforms initiated by the Northern Song dynasty reformer Wang Anshi when he served as minister under Emperor Shenzong from 1069–1076.
Explanation:
How did World War II increase opportunities for women?
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
World War II resulted in several women taking jobs that were even considered before to be jobs that men only can do. Women took jobs in different factories and in defense plants. Women also became shipbuilders, welders, built airplanes as well as producing ammunition.
These jobs gave women many opportunities and resulted in more women having jobs. Even when the war ended, they continued working in several factories.
The Muslim conquest of India resulted in the ___. Sultanate of Delhi Qing Dynasty Mongol Empire Gupta Empire
Answer:
Sultanate of Delhi
Explanation:
I checked it on quizlet.
pagtutulungan ng mga tao para sa mabuting layunin
what are you saying?
Name the islands of Ancient Rome.
Tiber Island
I'm pretty sure thats the only one. :)
John C. Calhoun Internal Improvements (Transportation): Supported or Opposed?
What were the causes and consequences of the appeasement policies of the 1930’s?
Answer:
On September 29th, 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain flew to Munich to participate in a conference with Adolf Hitler of Germany, Eduoard Daladier, premier of France, and Benito Mussolini of Italy. The topic: the cession of the Czech Sudetenland to Germany. Czechoslovakia was not invited to the conference, and the Czech delegate was forced to remain outside the room until the conference was over.
Ten hours later, an agreement was reached which granted each of Hitler’s demands. The following morning, Chamberlain presented to Hitler an additional treaty which, to paraphrase it, demonstrated “the desire of the peoples of both our countries never to go to war again.” Then Chamberlain flew back to London, and when he arrived was granted a tremendous reception. He was invited to Buckingham Palace by George VI. After his audience with the King, Chamberlain then addressed the crowd that developed and uttered the now famous sentence: “I believe this represents peace in our time.”
As everyone knows, six months later, Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia and, 11 months after Munich, England and Germany were at war. Ever since then, Munich has been characterized as England’s greatest embarrassment, Chamberlain has been characterized as a wimp with an umbrella, and any attempt to “sooth or to pacify,” which is the original meaning of Appeasement, has been tainted with the stigma of Munich.
During the Battle of Britain three British journalists (Michael Foot, Peter Howard, and Frank Owen), writing under the pseudonym “Cato,” wrote Guilty Men, blaming Chamberlain, Stanley Baldwin (Prime Minister from 1935-37), and Ramsay MacDonald (Prime Minister from 1929-35), and other members of the National Government (the Government from 1931-40) entirely for the crisis that Britain found itself in then. According to Foot, Howard, and Owen, they “. . . were “guilty” of being blind to their duty, of failing to rearm sufficiently, of refusing to hear – in fact of stifling – other voices which spoke the truth.” (1) This has been the consensus that has been accepted in the past 58 years by nearly everyone.
Britain eventually did win the war, but at a large cost. It was forced to liquidate many of its overseas investments, and even to give 99-year leases for military bases on its colonies in North America to the United States. It has lost all of its Great Power status. Its economy has suffered from gradual decline – so much so that Great Britain is now one of the poorest industrialized countries in the world. In fact 12 years ago, even Italy surpassed Britain’s per capita income.
After the war, the Cold War developed, and the initiative in foreign policy passed from Great Britain to the United States. So did the stigma of Munich, which helped to intensify the Cold War during the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Every time a President wanted to decrease the tension, he has been attacked for being an “appeaser.” For example, when the Berlin Wall was built in 1961, John F. Kennedy received, among other things, an umbrella from students at the Free University (in West Berlin). The point: don’t give in to the Soviets.
He got the “lesson” and in the following year brought the United States the closest it’s ever been to nuclear holocaust in the Cuban Missile Crisis. He and President Lyndon Johnson escalated the most unwinnable war in American history: Vietnam. During the 1970s, Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter attempted to reach a detente (or understanding) with the Soviets. But this policy was never attempted seriously, as the Soviet Union was still deeply distrusted. By the late 1970s, it was abandoned when President Carter, to retaliate against the Soviet invasion of Afganistan, launched a grain embargo and boycotted the (Moscow) Olympics.
Then Ronald Reagan was elected President. During his first term, he increased military spending by a significant amount, did not meet with any Soviet (“Evil Empire”) leader, and made the ill-quoted 1983 remark “We start bombing in five minutes.” He followed a policy diametrically opposed to appeasement. Perhaps as a result, America won the cold war, perhaps not. In any event, that’s not my purview.
Even today, when the United States is dealing with such leaders as Bashar al-Assad, it has to act tough, as if, if it doesn’t, Munich will reoccur. It was 70 years this September that Chamberlain flew to Munich, and “dishonoured his nation.” Seventy years is a long time, but it is interesting to note that that conference is still very much with us today.
Explanation:
Based on the map below, which of the following is a true statement about transportation in 1825?
Answer:
The Erie Canal opened up trade opportunities from the East Coast to the Midwest
Explanation:
The map in the question shows the Erie Canal, a water route from New York to the midwest in the United States. It serves as a mess of transporting commodities, mainly commercial quantities, and agricultural produce. It also serves as migrating routes for many people moving from New York to less populated places in the Midwest, such as Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Chicago, and other areas in the West.
What role did Opportunity play in women’s rights during civil right
Under the Articles of Confederation, the unicameral Congress had all of these powers
except
A.to declare war
B.to spend money
C.to make treaties
D.to raise money