Answer:
- The speech must present a clear and identifiable danger.
Explanation:
'Prior restraint' is characterized as the government's authority to suppress or prohibit the forms of expression like speech, writing, art, media prior to being published or broadcasted if it poses a threat to national security or community.
The First Amendment of the United States constitution provides this liability to the government to impose censorship or judicially suppress the forms of expression like speech is evaluated or restricted before it is presented in order to give priority to national security and safety of the citizens of the country.
In reference to the above definition, the government is liable to prove the speech in question only when 'the speech offers a clear and identifiable danger to national security, community, or citizens.'
Government, if it wants to prove any prior restraint to be applied the speech that the government declares is presented in a clear and identifiable danger. So, the correct option is C.
The restrictions that a government wants to apply can be portrayed to the general public in very clear and identifiable manner that a threat is really a concerned matter.
For example if there is a demonetization in the country to curb the rate of corruption in the nation, the speech by the supreme leader of the country must clearly state that govt. considers it as threat.Such threat of corruption should be conveyed to public in simple terms that explains that corruptions can lead to downfall in the economy. Another example is of a pandemic that has hit the country.If there is a need to instate lockdown in the country to avoid virus outbreak, the speech has to be clearly indicative of threats and deaths that can take place due to such virus.Hence, the correct option is C that the speech of the government has to be clearly identifying the danger about prior restraint that has to be applied for control of situations.
To know more about government speech, click the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/24443858
Mention the similarities and differences between book painting and scroll painting.
I need the answers in points.
Similarities : -
both book and wall are paint with some pencil and some pen. in both colors are used to paint.both are the moments of enjoyment. both are use to pass our free time.in both we can practice of painting.Differences : -
wall painting is a bad habit and book painting is a good habit.by painting on book we appreciate by others and by painting on wall we punish by others.our painting on book is shown to everyone and painting on wall order us to remove the painting or clean the wall. wise people paint on books and naughty children paint on walls.Answer:
SIMILARITIES:
a) Both are done with pen and pencil
b) In both, colours are used for painting.
DIFFERENCES:
a) Scroll painting is an art form which is practiced in predominant parts of EAST Asia while book painting is an art form that has been historically used in more Western countries, as well as a few Eastern countries
In 1999, more than 100,000 pro-democracy protestors gathered in Tiananmen Square. true False
Which of the following is NOT a method by which a case gets to the Supreme Court?
A.
through the Supreme Court's constitutionally mandated original jurisdiction
B.
through an automatic review process whereby the Supreme Court must approve every law passed by Congress and signed by the president, before it can officially go into effect
C.
through the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction
D.
all of the above methods are ways in which cases get to the Supreme Court
Answer: through an automatic review process whereby the Supreme Court must approve every law passed by Congress and signed by the president, before it can officially go into effect