find ut when u = xe−5t sin θ .

The volume of the truck bed is simply the product of its three dimensions, which are given as length, width, and height. Therefore, the volume of the truck bed can be calculated as:

Volume = length x width x height

or

Volume = b x w x h

where b, w, and h represent the dimensions of the truck bed in feet, meters, or any other unit of length.

In summary, the volume of a right rectangular prism, such as a moving truck bed, can be obtained by multiplying the length, width, and height of the prism.

To provide further explanation, a right rectangular prism is a three-dimensional solid figure with six rectangular faces. The faces opposite each other are congruent, and the parallel faces have equal dimensions. The length, width, and height of the prism are perpendicular to each other, and the product of these dimensions gives the volume of the prism. In the context of a moving truck, the volume of the truck bed determines the amount of space available for loading and transporting goods.

Learn more about dimensions here: brainly.com/question/31106945

#SPJ11

The measure of the secant tangent angle m∠AXC is equal to 45°

The secant tangent angle is the angle formed by a tangent and a secant that intersect outside of a circle. The measure of the secant tangent angle can be found using the following formula:

θ = 1/2 (arc EB - arc BD)

where arc EB and arc BD are the measures of the arcs intercepted by the secant and tangent, respectively.

m∠AXC = 1/2(arc AC - arc BC)

m∠AXC = 1/2(115 - 25)

m∠AXC = 1/2(90)

m∠AXC = 45°

Therefore, the measure of the secant tangent angle m∠AXC is equal to 45°

Read more about secant tangent here:https://brainly.com/question/9132922

#SPJ1

Answer: 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The formulas V=Bh and V=lwh are related because the base area B equals lw

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

V = Bh

V = lwh

The above formulas are formulas to calculate the volume of a rectangular prism

By substiution, we have

Bh = lwh

Divide both sides by h

B = lw

This means that the base area of the prism is lw

Read more about equivalent expressions at

https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

The coefficient of x^5 in the Maclaurin series generated by f(x) = sin(4x) is 256/15.

To find the coefficient of x^5 in the Maclaurin series generated by f(x) = sin 4x, we need to first find the derivatives of f(x) up to the fifth order, evaluate them at x=0, and then use the formula for the Maclaurin series coefficients.

The Maclaurin series of a function f(x) is an infinite series that represents the function as a sum of its derivatives evaluated at x=0, multiplied by powers of x. The formula for the Maclaurin series coefficients is given by:

an = (1/n!) * f^(n)(0)

where f^(n)(x) denotes the nth derivative of f(x), evaluated at x. To find the coefficient of x^5 in the Maclaurin series generated by f(x) = sin 4x, we need to find the fifth derivative of sin(4x), evaluate it at x=0, and then use the formula above.

We have:

f(x) = sin(4x)

f'(x) = 4cos(4x)

f''(x) = -16sin(4x)

f'''(x) = -64cos(4x)

f''''(x) = 256sin(4x)

f^(5)(x) = 1024cos(4x)

Therefore, the coefficient of x^5 in the Maclaurin series generated by f(x) = sin(4x) is given by:

a5 = (1/5!) * f^(5)(0) = (1/120) * 1024 = 256/15

Hence, the coefficient of x^5 in the Maclaurin series generated by f(x) = sin(4x) is 256/15.

Learn more about Coefficient:

brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

Answer:

13.5 cm^2

9*3 = 27

27/2=13.5

Answer: 30 costumes

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the total amount of costumes.

In order to get 30% , we need to divide 9 by the total amount of costumes (x), but first we need to change 30% to its multiplier:

30% ÷ 100 = 0.3 (multiplier).

[tex]\frac{9}{x} =30[/tex]%

[tex]\frac{9}{x} =0.3[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{9}{0.3}[/tex]

[tex]x=30[/tex] costumes

Or if that is confusing:

[tex]\frac{9}{x} =30[/tex]%

[tex]\frac{9}{x} =0.3[/tex]

[tex]\frac{x}{9} =\frac{1}{0.3}[/tex]

[tex]x=9 *\frac{1}{0.3}[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{9}{0.3}[/tex]

[tex]x=30[/tex] costumes

The above equations are exactly the same, they are just written differently.

We can now check if our answer is correct:

[tex]\frac{9}{30} = 0.3\\0.3*100=30[/tex]%

Hope you understand!

Answer:

650

Step-by-step explanation:

calculate 8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]% of 600 then add this value to 600 for increase

8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] % × 600 ← convert mixed number to improper fraction

= [tex]\frac{25}{3}[/tex] % × 600

= [tex]\frac{\frac{25}{3} }{100}[/tex] × 600 ( % is out of 100 )

= [tex]\frac{25}{300}[/tex] × 600

= 25 × 2

= 50

then increase is 50

so 600 increased by 8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] % = 600 + 50 = 650

Here is the completed piecewise function that models Roland's pay:

[tex]\[f(x) = \begin{cases} 95x & \text{if } x \leq 100 \\1.25(x-100) + 95(100) & \text{if } 101 \leq x \leq 300 \\1.55(x-300) + 95(100) + 1.25(300-100) & \text{if } x > 300\end{cases}\][/tex]

This piecewise function represents Roland's pay based on the different pay rates for the respective ranges of units produced.

To create a piecewise function to model Roland's pay, we need to consider the different ranges of units produced and the corresponding pay rates.

Let's complete the missing portions of each expression:

[tex]\[f(x) = \begin{cases} 95x & \text{if } x \leq 100 \\1.25(x-100) + 95(100) & \text{if } 101 \leq x \leq 300 \\1.55(x-300) + 95(100) + 1.25(300-100) & \text{if } x > 300\end{cases}\][/tex]

In the piecewise function:

- For [tex]\(x \leq 100\)[/tex], Roland receives 95 cents for each unit, so the expression is [tex]\(f(x) = 95x\).[/tex]

- For [tex]\(101 \leq x \leq 300\),[/tex] Roland receives $1.25 for each unit between 101 and 300. The base pay for the first 100 units (at 95 cents each) is added, resulting in the expression [tex]\(f(x) = 1.25(x-100) + 95(100)\).[/tex]

- For [tex]\(x > 300\)[/tex], Roland receives $1.55 for each unit over 300. Both the base pay for the first 100 units and the additional pay for units between 101 and 300 are added, leading to the expression [tex]\(f(x) = 1.55(x-300) + 95(100) + 1.25(300-100)\).[/tex]

This piecewise function models Roland's pay based on the different pay rates for the different ranges of units produced.

For more such questions on piecewise function: https://brainly.com/question/27262465

#SPJ11

The table increased in price by 2/5, which means the new price is 2/5 more than the original price. Therefore: The original price of the table was £95.

New price = original price + 2/5 * original price
£133 = x + 2/5 * x
To solve for x, we can simplify the equation by multiplying both sides by the denominator of the fraction, which is 5:
665 = 5x + 2x
665 = 7x
Dividing both sides by 7, we get:
x = 95
Therefore, the original price of the table was £95.
To find the original price of the table, we'll first determine the amount of the price increase and then subtract it from the final price. Here are the steps:
1. Let the original price be x.
2. The table increased in price by 2/5, so the increase is (2/5)x.
3. After the increase, the table was priced at £133, so the equation is x + (2/5)x = £133.
Now we'll solve for x:
4. First, find a common denominator for the fractions. The common denominator for 1 (coefficient of x) and 5 is 5.
5. Rewrite the equation with the common denominator: (5/5)x + (2/5)x = £133.
6. Combine the terms with x: (5/5 + 2/5)x = (7/5)x = £133.
7. To solve for x, divide both sides by 7/5 or multiply by its reciprocal, 5/7: x = £133 * (5/7).
8. Perform the calculation: x = £95.

learn more about price here: https://brainly.com/question/19091385

#SPJ11

The number of different tests the professor can design is 120.

Since the professor has 10 problems and needs to choose 3 for each test, we can use the combination formula to calculate the number of different tests she can design.

The formula for combinations is n choose k = n! / (k! * (n-k)!) where n is the total number of items, and k is the number of items being chosen.

In this case, n = 10 and k = 3, so we have:

10 choose 3 = 10! / (3! * (10-3)!) = 120

Therefore, the professor can design 120 different tests.

You can learn more about combinations at

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

A) The surface charge density on the metal disks is 2.45 μC/m^2.

B) The surface charge density on the Pyrex glass is -2.45 μC/m^2.

To determine the surface charge density on the disks and the glass, we need to use the formula for capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with a dielectric between the plates:

C = ε0εrA/d

where C is the capacitance, ε0 is the permittivity of free space (8.85 x 10^-12 F/m), εr is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) of the Pyrex glass, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between the plates. We can rearrange this equation to solve for the surface charge density:

σ = Q/A

where σ is the surface charge density and Q is the charge on the plates.

First, we need to calculate the capacitance of the capacitor:

C = ε0εrA/d = (8.85 x 10^-12 F/m)(4.7)(π(0.05 m)^2)/(0.00061 m) = 1.74 x 10^-11 F

The charge on each plate can be calculated using the potential difference:

Q = CV = (1.74 x 10^-11 F)(1300 V) = 2.26 x 10^-8 C

Now we can calculate the surface charge density on the disks:

σ = Q/A = (2.26 x 10^-8 C)/(π(0.05 m)^2) = 2.45 μC/m^2

The surface charge density on the glass is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign:

σ = -2.45 μC/m^2

This means that the disks have a positive surface charge density, while the glass has an equal but negative surface charge density.

To learn more about relative permittivity click here: brainly.com/question/31073353

#SPJ11

The line integral of f along the given circle is 0.

We need to evaluate the line integral of the vector field f = (z − y) i + (x − z) j + (y − x) k along the given path, which is a circle of radius 4 in the plane x y z = 3, centered at (1, 1, 1) and oriented clockwise when viewed from the origin.

To parameterize the circle, we can use the following parametric equations:

x = 1 + 4 cos t

y = 1 + 4 sin t

z = 3

where t varies from 0 to 2π as we traverse the circle once in the clockwise direction.

Taking the derivative of the parameterization with respect to t, we get:

dx/dt = -4 sin t

dy/dt = 4 cos t

dz/dt = 0

Now we can evaluate the line integral using the formula:

∫C f · dr = ∫[a,b] f(r(t)) · r'(t) dt

where C is the curve, r(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t)) is its parameterization, and f(r(t)) is the vector field evaluated at r(t).

Substituting the parameterization and the derivative into the integral, we get:

∫C f · dr = ∫[0,2π] (3 - (1+4sin(t))) (-4sin(t)) + ((1+4cos(t)) - 3) (4cos(t)) + ((1+4sin(t)) - (1+4cos(t))) (0) dt

Simplifying, we get:

∫C f · dr = ∫[0,2π] (-16sin(t)cos(t) + 16cos(t)^2 + 4sin(t) - 4cos(t)) dt

Integrating each term, we get:

∫C f · dr = [-8cos(t)^2 + 16sin(t)cos(t) + 4cos(t) - 4sin(t)]|[0,2π]

Substituting the limits, we get:

∫C f · dr = [(-8cos(2π)^2 + 16sin(2π)cos(2π) + 4cos(2π) - 4sin(2π)) - (-8cos(0)^2 + 16sin(0)cos(0) + 4cos(0) - 4sin(0))]

Since cos(2π) = cos(0) = 1 and sin(2π) = sin(0) = 0, the expression simplifies to:

∫C f · dr = [(-8 + 0 + 4 - 0) - (-8 + 0 + 4 - 0)] = 0

Therefore, the line integral of f along the given circle is 0.

Learn more about line integral here

https://brainly.com/question/28381095

#SPJ11

The expression is 4x.

The expression is x + 3.

The expression is 4(x + 3).

The number of sweets she used can be represented by the product of the number of cakes, x, and the number of sweets on each cake, which is 4.

The number of cakes Paul made can be represented by the sum of the number of cakes Jennifer made, x, and 3.

The number of sweets Paul used can be represented by the product of the number of cakes Paul made, which is x + 3, and the number of sweets on each cake, which is 4.

Know more about expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

If a and b have the same remainder when divided by m, then a is congruent to b modulo m.

We know that when a positive integer a is divided by a positive integer m, there is a unique quotient q and a remainder r such that a = mq + r and 0 ≤ r < m. This is called the Division Algorithm.

Now suppose a mod m = b mod m. This means that both a and b leave the same remainder when divided by m. So we can write a = mq + r and b = mq + r' for some integers q, r, and r' where 0 ≤ r, r' < m.

Then we have a - b = mq + r - mq - r' = (r - r') which is clearly divisible by m since m divides r - r'. Therefore, we have shown that m divides a - b, or equivalently, a ≡ b (mod m).

To summarize, if two integers have the same remainder when divided by a positive integer m, then they are congruent modulo m. This result is used frequently in number theory and modular arithmetic.

Learn more about modulo here: brainly.com/question/29262253

#SPJ11

In conclusion, the series ∑ (n = 0 to ∞) 2^n * 9^n * n! diverges and does not have a finite sum.

To find the sum of the series ∑ (n = 0 to ∞) 2^n * 9^n * n!, we can start by analyzing the terms of the series.

Let's consider the nth term of the series:

Tn = 2^n * 9^n * n!

We notice that the term involves the exponential growth of 2^n and 9^n, as well as the factorial n! term. This suggests that the series may diverge since both exponential and factorial growth tend to increase rapidly.

To confirm this, let's examine the ratio of consecutive terms:

R = Tn+1 / Tn

R = (2^(n+1) * 9^(n+1) * (n+1)!) / (2^n * 9^n * n!)

Simplifying the expression, we get:

R = (2 * 9 * (n+1)) / n!

As n approaches infinity, this ratio does not tend to zero, indicating that the terms of the series do not converge to zero. Therefore, the series diverges, and we cannot find a finite sum for it.

To know more about series,

https://brainly.com/question/31966672

#SPJ11

According to the diagram, the area of the regular polygon is 144√3.

To find the area of a regular polygon, use the formula:

Area = (1/2) × Perimeter × Apothem

In this case, given the length of one side of the polygon (12) and the apothem (2√3). The perimeter of a regular polygon is calculated by multiplying the number of sides (n) by the length of one side (s).

Plug in the values and calculate the area:

Perimeter = n × s = 12 × 12 = 144

Area = (1/2) × Perimeter × Apothem

Area = (1/2) × 144 × 2√3

Simplifying further:

Area = 72 × 2√3

Area = 144√3

Therefore, the area of the regular polygon is 144√3.

Find out more on regular polygon here: https://brainly.com/question/1592456

#SPJ1

The faster bus is running at a velocity of 67 mph and the sluggish one is proceeding at a speed of 56 mph.

Let  "x" speed of the quicker bus

and the slower bus "x - 11",

since we comprehend that it is travelling 11 mph less than the faster one. When both meet, a total distance of 492 miles will have been covered (which is the distance between the two towns). We can utilize the formula:

distance = rate x time

Applicable to each auto:

distance = rate x time

distance = x (mph) x 4 (hours) (for the swifter motorcoach)

distance = (x - 11) (mph) x 4 (hours) (for the slower vehicle)

By adding those equations together, we are given:

492 = 4x + 4(x - 11)

After decreasing the equation, we acquire:

492 = 8x - 44

536 = 8x

Therefore, x = 67

So, the more rapidly running coach is going at an velocity of 67 mph and the sluggish one is proceeding at a speed of (67 - 11)

= 56 mph.

Learn more on velocity here https://brainly.com/question/24445340

#SPJ1

There  is no maximum value of κ on the curve y=3e^x.

To find the point of maximum curvature on the curve y=3e^x, we need to first find the second derivative of y with respect to x, which will give us the curvature of the curve:

y = 3e^x

y' = 3e^x (since the derivative of e^x is e^x)

y'' = 3e^x (since the second derivative of e^x is also e^x)

Now, to find the point of maximum curvature, we need to set y'' equal to zero and solve for x:

y'' = 3e^x = 0

e^x = 0

This equation has no real solutions, which means that there is no point of maximum curvature on the curve y=3e^x.

To find the maximum curvature, we can use the formula:

κ = |y''| / (1 + y'^2)^(3/2)

Since we know that y'' = 3e^x, we can simplify this formula to:

κ = 3e^x / (1 + (3e^x)^2)^(3/2)

To find the maximum value of κ, we can take the derivative of κ with respect to x and set it equal to zero:

dκ/dx = 3e^x (9e^2x - 2) / (1 + 9e^2x)^(5/2) = 0

This equation has no real solutions, which means that there is no maximum value of κ on the curve y=3e^x.

Visit to know more about Curve:-

brainly.com/question/29364263

#SPJ11

The population of interest is all adults in the United States, the sample is 5000 randomly selected adults, the parameter is the proportion of adults with a bachelor's degree or higher, and the statistic is the proportion of adults in the sample with a bachelor's degree or higher.

1 - The population is the entire group of interest, which in this case is all adults in the United States.

2 - The sample is a subset of the population, selected in a random and representative way, in order to make inferences about the larger population. In this scenario, the sample consists of 5000 adults randomly selected from the population of all adults in the United States.

3 - The parameter is a numerical measurement that describes a characteristic of a population. In this case, the parameter of interest is the proportion of adults in the United States with a bachelor's degree or higher. This is because we are interested in making inferences about the entire population of adults in the United States.

4 - The statistic is a numerical measurement that describes a characteristic of a sample. In this scenario, the statistic of interest is the proportion of adults in the sample who have a bachelor's degree or higher. This is because the sample is used to estimate the parameter of the population.

To estimate the population parameter from the sample statistic, we can use statistical inference techniques such as confidence intervals or hypothesis testing. The accuracy of our estimates depends on the sample size, sampling method, and other factors that influence the quality of the data. It's important to ensure that the sample is representative of the population and that any bias or confounding factors are taken into account when making inferences.

To learn more about the population

https://brainly.com/question/27779235

#SPJ4

The length of the building's shadow comes out to be 18 ft and the minimum amount of plastic wrap needed to completely wrap 7 containers is 365.4 in². Hence, the correct answers are D and B respectively.

The triangle formed by the shadow and the tree and the building and the shadow are similar to each other. This can be explained as follow:

One angle of each is 90 and the next angles are of the same magnitude as the angle made by the sun on Earth equal, thus by the AA similarity criterion the triangles are similar.

Thus by the corresponding part of the similar triangle:

The shadows of each are proportional to the height of the object

Hence, 4 : x :: 6 : 27

where x is the length of the building's shadow

x = 18 ft

Given:

diameter = 3.5 inches

radius = 3.5 ÷ 2 = 1.75 inches

height = 3 inches

Surface area = 2πr (h + r)

= 2 * 3.14 * 1.75 * (3 + 1.75)

= 52.2 in².

Plastic required for 7 such containers = 7 * 52.2

= 365.4 in²

Learn more about Similar Triangles:

https://brainly.com/question/29782809

#SPJ1

The question asked has mentioned the same question twice, thus the appropriate question should be:

A small tree that is 6 feet tall casts a 4-foot shadow, while a building that is 27 feet tall casts a shadow in the same direction. Determine the length of the building's shadow.

12 feet

14 feet

15 feet

18 feet

A deli wraps its cylindrical containers of hot food items with plastic wrap. The containers have a diameter of 3.5 inches and a height of 3 inches. What is the minimum amount of plastic wrap needed to completely wrap 7 containers? Round your answer to the nearest tenth and approximate using π = 3.14.

769.3 in2

365.4 in2

109.9 in2

52.2 in2

a. The polynomial function that passes through the points (-3, 15), (1, 11), and (0, 6) is y = -2x² - 3x + 6.

b. The polynomial function that passes through the points (-2,-7), (-1, -3), (0, 3), (1, 5), and (2, -3) is y = -1/2x⁴ - 3/2x³ + 3x² + 7/2x + 3.

c. The polynomial function that passes through the points (4,-1) and (-3, 13) is y = -3x + 11.

d. The polynomial function that passes through the points (-1,-6), (0, 2), (1, 8), and (2, 42) is y = 6x³ + 2x² - 18x

a. Using the given points, we can create a system of three equations:

15 = 9a - 3b + c

11 = a + b + c

6 = c

Solving this system of equations gives us a = -2, b = -3, and c = 6

b. Using the given points, we can create a system of five equations:

-7 = 16a - 8b + 4c - 2d + e

-3 = -2a + b - c + d + e

3 = e

5 = 2a - b + c + d + e

-3 = 16a + 8b + 4c + 2d + e

Solving this system of equations gives us a = -1/2, b = -3/2, c = 3, d = 7/2, and e = 3.

c. Using the given points, we can create a system of two equations:

-1 = 4m + b

13 = -3m + b

Solving this system of equations gives us m = -3 and b = 11.

d. Using the given points, we can create a system of four equations:

-6 = -a + b - c + d

2 = b

8 = a + b + c + d

42 = 8a + 4b + 2c + d

Solving this system of equations gives us a = 6, b = 2, c = -18, and d = 4

Learn more about polynomial on

https://brainly.com/question/2833285

#SPJ1

The surface area of the rectangular prism is 1236 in².

We have,

The surface area of the rectangular prism.

= lower surface + top surface + back surface + front surface

+ 2 x side surface

Each surface is in the form of a rectangle.

So,

= 14 x 8 + 14 x 8 + 23 x 8 + 23 x 8 + 2 x (23 x 14)

= 112 + 112 + 184 + 184 + 2 x 322

= 112 + 112 + 184 + 184 + 644

= 1236 in²

Thus,

The surface area of the rectangular prism is 1236 in².

Learn more about rectangles here:

https://brainly.com/question/15019502

#SPJ1

The length of the arc is solved to get the proportion

= x / 12π = 130 / 360

this proves that the proportion would solve the arc length

length of arc is calculated using the formula given below

= (given angle)  / 360 x 2 π r

Where

x is length or arc

r is radius = 6 in

given angle = 130 degrees

then substituting into the formula

x = (given angle)  / 360 x 2 π r

x = 130  / 360 * 2 *  π * 6 in

x = 130  / 360 * 12π

dividing both sides by 12π

x / 12π = 130 / 360 (this equals the given proportion)

but solving for x

x = 13.61 in

Learn more about arc length at

https://brainly.com/question/2005046

#SPJ1

Surface area of larger triangular pyramid is 49cm².

Given,

Altitude of smaller pyramid = 3 cm.

Altitude of larger pyramid = 7 cm.

Surface area of smaller pyramid = 9cm².

Now,

Relation between altitudes of similar pyramids and surface area :

Surface area of smaller pyramid / Surface area of larger pyramid = (altitude of smaller pyramid / altitude of larger pyramid)²

Let us assume the surface area of larger pyramid be x cm²

Substituting the given values in the relation,

9 cm²/x cm² = (3/7)²

x = 49 cm² .

Thus the surface area of larger pyramid is 49 cm².

Learn more about Pyramids,

https://brainly.com/question/31878050

#SPJ1

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

540 X 2.5 = 1350 calories burned at soccer.

1350 + 800 = 2150 total calories burned.

2150 > 2000.

yes, more energy was used than consumed

We do not have enough evidence to suggest that the ammeter used does not meet the marketing specifications.

Statistical inference is the process of making conclusions or predictions about a population based on a sample.

Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample to support a claim about a population.

To determine if the ammeter used meets the marketing specifications, we need to test if the sample variance is significantly larger than the acceptable standard deviation of 0.2 amp.

We can use a chi-square distribution to test this hypothesis.

The test statistic is given by:

=> x²= (n-1)× s² / σ²

Where n is the sample size, s² is the sample variance, and σ² is the true population variance.

We are given that n = 10, s² = 0.065, and we want to test if the ammeter does not meet the marketing specifications,

Which means that the true population variance is greater than 0.04.

We can calculate the test statistic as follows:

x² = (10-1) × 0.065 / 0.04 = 10.54

The critical value of the chi-square distribution with 9 degrees of freedom (n-1) and a significance level of 0.05 is 16.92.

Since our test statistic is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the true population variance is no larger than 0.04.

Therefore,

We do not have enough evidence to suggest that the ammeter used does not meet the marketing specifications.

Learn more about Stastics at

https://brainly.com/question/29753183

#SPJ4

The statement given "if 0 is an eigenvalue of the matrix of coefficients of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns, then the system has infinitely many solutions." is true because if 0 is an eigenvalue of the matrix of coefficients of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns, then the system has infinitely many solutions

If a matrix of coefficients of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns has 0 as an eigenvalue, it implies that the homogeneous version of the system (where all constant terms are 0) has non-trivial solutions. This is because the eigenvectors associated with 0 eigenvalue form the null space of the matrix, which represents the set of all solutions to the homogeneous system.

Since the homogeneous system has non-trivial solutions, this means that the original system of equations is linearly dependent, which in turn implies that there are infinitely many solutions. This is because there are linear combinations of the given solutions that are also solutions to the system. Therefore, the statement "if 0 is an eigenvalue of the matrix of coefficients of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns, then the system has infinitely many solutions" is true.

""

if 0 is an eigenvalue of the matrix of coefficients of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns, then the system has infinitely many solutions. true or false

""

You can learn more about matrix at

https://brainly.com/question/27929071

#SPJ11

Answer:

18ft

Step-by-step explanation:

6/27= 4.5, 27/4. 4.5x4=18

Answer:

18ft

Step-by-step explanation:

I am taking the test right now and I think this would be the correct answer!

A simple way I found out: 6/4 = 1.5 so I took 1.5 and divided 27 by it.  27/1.5 = 18

Hope this helped!