find the average value of the function over the given interval. f(x) = 36 − x2 on [−2, 2]

The function f(x) = 501170(0. 98)^x gives the population of a Texas city `x` years after 1995.

What was the population in 1985? (the initial population for this situation)\

Solution:Given,The function f(x) = 501170(0.98)^xgives the population of a Texas city `x` years after 1995.To find,The population in 1985 (the initial population for this situation).We know that 1985 is 10 years before 1995.

So to find the population in 1985,

we need to substitute x = -10 in the given function.Now,f(x) = 501170(0.98) ^xPutting x = -10,f(-10) = 501170(0.98)^(-10)f(-10) = 501170/0.98^10f(-10) = 501170/2.1589×10^6

Therefore, the population in 1985 (the initial population) was approximately 232 people.

To know more about initial Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32209767

#SPJ11

This value is consistent with the given boundary layer thickness of 5 mm, which further supports the idea that the gas in question is air.

The most likely gas in this scenario is air, which is a commonly used gas in many engineering applications.

To see why, let's use some basic fluid dynamics principles to estimate the Reynold's number (Re) of the flow past the flat plate. The Reynold's number is a dimensionless quantity that characterizes the type of flow (laminar or turbulent) and is defined as:

Re = (ρVL)/μ

where ρ is the density of the gas, V is the velocity of the gas, L is a characteristic length (in this case, the distance from the leading edge of the flat plate to the measurement location), and μ is the dynamic viscosity of the gas.

Using the given values, we can calculate:

Re = (ρVL)/μ = (1.2 kg/m^3)(12 m/s)(0.6 m)/(1.8 x 10^-5 Pa·s) ≈ 2 x 10^6

This value is well above the critical Reynold's number for transition from laminar to turbulent flow, which is typically around 5 x 10^5 for flow past a flat plate. Therefore, the flow is most likely turbulent.

For a turbulent boundary layer, the boundary layer thickness (δ) is related to the distance from the leading edge (x) by the equation:

δ ≈ 0.37x/Re^(1/5)

Using the given values and the calculated Reynold's number, we can estimate:

δ ≈ 0.37(0.6 m)/(2 x 10^6)^(1/5) ≈ 0.005 m = 5 mm

Learn more about consistent here

https://brainly.com/question/15654281

#SPJ11

The costs of carrying inventory do not include the interest on funds tied up in inventory. The firm's operating income at sales of 30,000 units will be $30,000. The correct answer is $30,000.

Calculate the firm's operating income at sales of 30,000 units, we first need to calculate the total contribution margin, which is the contribution margin per unit multiplied by the number of units sold:
Contribution margin per unit = $3.00
Number of units sold = 30,000
Total contribution margin = $3.00 x 30,000 = $90,000
Next, we can calculate the firm's total operating expenses, which are the fixed costs of $60,000:
Total operating expenses = $60,000
Finally, we can calculate the firm's operating income by subtracting the total operating expenses from the total contribution margin:
Operating income = Total contribution margin - Total operating expenses
Operating income = $90,000 - $60,000
Operating income = $30,000
Therefore, the firm's operating income at sales of 30,000 units will be $30,000. The correct answer is $30,000.

Read more about inventory.

https://brainly.com/question/15118949

#SPJ11

We used the integral test to compare the series from (n=1) to ([infinity]) of (1/4n - 1) to the integral (1/4)ln(n) - n. By taking the limit of the ratio of the nth term of the series to the corresponding term of the integral and simplifying using L'Hopital's rule, we found that the limit was zero, indicating that the series converges.

To determine whether the series from (n=1) to ([infinity]) of (1/4n - 1) converges, we can use the integral test. This test involves comparing the series to the integral of the corresponding function.

First, we need to find the integral of (1/4n - 1). We can do this by integrating each term separately:

∫(1/4n) dn = (1/4)ln(n)

∫(-1) dn = -n

So the integral of (1/4n - 1) is (1/4)ln(n) - n.

Next, we can compare this integral to the series by taking the limit as n approaches infinity of the ratio of the nth term of the series to the corresponding term of the integral.

lim(n → ∞) [(1/4n - 1) / ((1/4)ln(n) - n)]

Using L'Hopital's rule, we can simplify this to:

Lim(n → ∞) [(1/4n^2) / (1/(4n))]

Which simplifies to:

Lim(n → ∞) (1/n) = 0

Since the limit is zero, we can conclude that the series converges by the integral test.

You can learn more about L'Hopital's rule at: brainly.com/question/29480665

#SPJ11

The original price was $125, the discount was $43.75, and the sale price was $81.25.

We can find the discount as follows: To find the discount: Discount = Original Price - Sale Price Discount = $125 - $81.25

Discount = $43.75Therefore, the discount is $43.75

We can now find the selling price as follows: Selling Price = Original Price - Discount Selling Price = $125 - $43.75Selling Price = $81.25Therefore, the selling price is $81.25. To summarize: Original Price: $125Discount: $43.75Sale Price: $81.25The original price was $125, the discount was $43.75, and the sale price was $81.25.

To know more about Sale Price visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31104614

#SPJ11

Inferential statistics allows researchers to draw conclusions about a population based on sample data, without knowing the complete distribution of the underlying population.

Inferential statistics is a concept in statistics that allows us to draw conclusions about a population based on a sample of data, without having complete knowledge about the distribution of the underlying population.

It involves using probability theory to estimate population parameters based on sample statistics.

This approach is useful in research when it is not feasible or practical to study an entire population.

Instead, a smaller, representative sample can be taken to draw conclusions about the larger population.

Inferential statistics allows researchers to make informed decisions and predictions based on data that is not fully known, ultimately leading to more accurate and reliable results.

Learn more about Inferential statistics

brainly.com/question/30761414

#SPJ11

A schedule example that demonstrates a write-read conflict involving actions of transactions T1 and T2 on objects X and Y.  The write-read conflict occurs at step 2, when T2 reads the value of X after T1 has written to it, but before T1 has committed or aborted.

A write-read conflict occurs when one transaction writes a value to a data item, and another transaction reads the same data item before the first transaction has committed or aborted.
An example schedule with actions of transactions T1 and T2 on objects X and Y that results in a write-read conflict:
1. T1: Write(X)
2. T2: Read(X)
3. T1: Read(Y)
4. T2: Write(Y)
5. T1: Commit
6. T2: Commit
In this schedule, the write-read conflict occurs at step 2, when T2 reads the value of X after T1 has written to it, but before T1 has committed or aborted. This can potentially cause problems if T1 later decides to abort, since T2 has already read the uncommitted value of X.

Read more about transactions.

https://brainly.com/question/29979697

#SPJ11

The correct answer is x=π/2 and 3π/2, as these are the values that satisfy the equation cos²x + 4cosx = 0 in the given range.

To solve the equation cos^2 x + 4cos x = 0, we can factor out cos x to get cos x (cos x + 4) = 0.

Therefore, either cos x = 0 or cos x + 4 = 0.

If cos x = 0, then x = π/2 and 3π/2 (since we are given that 0 ≤ x < 2π).

If cos x + 4 = 0, then cos x = -4, which is not possible since the range of cosine is -1 to 1.

To solve the equation cos²x + 4cosx = 0, we can factor the equation as follows:
(cosx)(cosx + 4) = 0

Now, we have two separate equations to solve:
1) cosx = 0
2) cosx + 4 = 0

For equation 1, cosx = 0:
The values of x that satisfy this equation in the given range (0≤x<2π) are x=π/2 and x=3π/2.

For equation 2, cosx + 4 = 0:
This equation simplifies to cosx = -4, which has no solutions in the given range, as the cosine function has a range of -1 ≤ cosx ≤ 1.

The correct answer is x=π/2 and 3π/2, as these are the values that satisfy the equation cos²x + 4cosx = 0 in the given range.

To know more about equation, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/17145398

#SPJ11

Mathematical induction, the statement is true for all integers n > 1. For this, we will start with

Base Case: When n = 2, we have:

∑(5i – 4) = 5(1) – 4 + 5(2) – 4 = 2(5*2 - 3)/2 = 7

So, the statement is true for n = 2.

Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that the statement is true for some positive integer k, i.e.,

∑(5i – 4) = k(5k - 3)/2  for k > 1.

Inductive Step: We need to show that the statement is also true for k + 1, i.e.,

∑(5i – 4) = (k + 1)(5(k+1) - 3)/2

Consider the sum:

∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k + 1

This can be written as:

(5(1) – 4) + (5(2) – 4) + ... + (5k – 4) + (5(k+1) – 4)

= ∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k + 5(k+1) – 4

= [∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k] + (5(k+1) – 4)

= k(5k - 3)/2 + 5(k+1) – 4 by the inductive hypothesis

= 5k^2 - 3k + 10k + 10 – 8

= 5k^2 + 7k + 2

= (k+1)(5(k+1) - 3)/2

So, the statement is true for k + 1.

Therefore, by mathematical induction, the statement is true for all integers n > 1.

To know more about mathematical induction refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29503103?#

#SPJ11

The cost (c) of a monthly phone contract can be calculated using the formula c = l + p, where l represents the fixed line rental cost and p represents the price of calls made.

The formula for calculating the cost (c) of a monthly phone contract is given as c = l + p, where l represents the fixed line rental cost and p represents the price of calls made. This formula simply adds the line rental cost and the call price to obtain the total cost of the contract.

In the given scenario, the line rental is £10, and the price of calls made is £39. To calculate the cost, we substitute these values into the formula: c = £10 + £39 = £49. Therefore, the cost of the phone contract in this case would be £49.

By following the formula and substituting the given values, we can determine the cost of the phone contract accurately. This approach allows us to calculate the cost for different line rentals and call prices, providing flexibility in evaluating the total expenses of monthly phone contracts.

Learn more about accurately here:

https://brainly.com/question/12740770

#SPJ11

The residual life expectancy of a pug is approximately 2.52 years.

To compute the residual, we need to subtract the observed value (life expectancy of a pug) from the predicted value. In this case, the predicted value is 7.48 years.

Let's assume that the observed value is the average life expectancy of pugs. Please note that life expectancies can vary depending on various factors, and this figure is used here for illustration purposes.

Let's say the observed value is 10 years.

The residual can be calculated as follows:

Residual = Observed Value - Predicted Value

Residual = 10 years - 7.48 years

Residual ≈ 2.52 years

Therefore, the residual is approximately 2.52 years.

To learn more about residual

https://brainly.com/question/30243733

#SPJ11

The expressions (-5/9) + 7/21 and 7/21 + (-5/9) are equivalent by the commutative property of addition

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

(-5/9)+7/21=7/21+(-5/9)

Express properly

So, we have

(-5/9) + 7/21 = 7/21 + (-5/9)

The commutative property of addition states that

a + b = b + a

In this case, we have

a = -5/9

b = 7/21

Using the above as a guide, we have the following conclusion

This means that the expressions are equivalent by the commutative property of addition

Read more about expressions at

https://brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

While adding predictor variables to a multiple regression model can potentially decrease the adjusted R², it can also increase it if the added predictors contribute significantly to the explained variance. The statement is not entirely correct.

The statement "adding predictor variables to a multiple regression model can only decrease the adjusted R²" is not entirely correct. Let me explain why:
When you add a predictor variable to a multiple regression model, the R² value, which represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is explained by the predictor variables, may increase or stay the same. However, it cannot decrease.
The adjusted R², on the other hand, takes into account the number of predictor variables in the model and adjusts the R² value accordingly.

As we add more predictors, there's a chance that the adjusted R² may decrease if the additional predictors do not contribute significantly to the explained variance.
However, it is not true that adding predictors can "only" decrease the adjusted R².

If the added predictor variables provide substantial power and improve the model, the adjusted R² can increase.

For similar question on regression.

https://brainly.com/question/29657622

#SPJ11

The student's statement that "adding predictor variables to a multiple regression model can only decrease the adjusted R2" is not entirely correct.

While it is true that adding irrelevant predictor variables can decrease the adjusted R2, adding relevant predictor variables can increase or at least maintain the adjusted R2. This is because the adjusted R2 measures the goodness of fit of a regression model, taking into account the number of predictor variables and sample size. Therefore, if the added predictor variable has a significant relationship with the dependent variable, it can improve the model's ability to explain variance and increase the adjusted R2.

In summary, the effect of adding predictor variables on adjusted R2 depends on their relevance to the dependent variable and the existing predictor variables in the model.

To learn more about goodness of fit click here, brainly.com/question/29212845

#SPJ11

The farmer's total earnings are $35,333.33 he earns $3,000 for each acre of brown rice, so he earns (3,000)(22/3) = $22,000 from the brown rice

Let the number of acres of white rice that the farmer plants be "x" and let the number of acres of brown rice be "y."

The farmer plants white rice and brown rice on 10 acres, so we have: [tex]x + y = 10[/tex] (1)

White rice requires 2 liters of pesticide per acre and brown rice requires 1 liter of pesticide per acre.

The farmer has 18 liters of pesticide to use, so we have: [tex]2x + y = 18[/tex] (2)

Solve the system of equations (1) and (2) by substitution or elimination:

Substitution: y = 10 - x

[tex]2x + (10 - x) = 18[/tex]

[tex]2x + 10 - x = 18[/tex]

[tex]3x = 8[/tex]

[tex]x = 8/3[/tex]

The farmer should plant 8/3 acres of white rice, which is approximately 2.67 acres. Since he has 10 acres of land in total, he should plant the remaining (10 - 8/3) = 22/3 acres of brown rice, which is approximately 7.33 acres.

The farmer earns $5,000 for each acre of white rice, so he earns [tex](5,000)(8/3) = $13,333.33[/tex] from the white rice. He earns $3,000 for each acre of brown rice, so he earns [tex](3,000)(22/3) = $22,000[/tex] from the brown rice.

His total earnings are [tex]$13,333.33 + $22,000 = $35,333.33.[/tex]

To know more about total earnings, Visit :

https://brainly.com/question/14003255

#SPJ11

Answer: Therefore, the total area inside the loop is (32/15)[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] square units.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the t values at which the curve intersects itself, we need to solve the equation x(t1) = x(t2) and y(t1) = y(t2) simultaneously, where t1 and t2 are different values of t.

x(t1) = x(t2) gives us:

9 - (4/2)t1^2 = 9 - (4/2)t2^2

Simplifying this equation, we get:

t1^2 = t2^2

t1 = ±t2

Substituting t1 = -t2 in the equation y(t1) = y(t2), we get:

(-4/6) t1^3 + 4t1 + 1 = (-4/6) t2^3 + 4t2 + 1

Simplifying this equation, we get:

t1^3 - t2^3 = 6(t1 - t2)

Using t1 = -t2, we can rewrite this equation as:

-2t1^3 = 6(-2t1)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

t1 = ±sqrt(3)

Therefore, the curve intersects itself at t = +[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] and t = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

To find the total area inside the loop, we can use the formula for the area enclosed by a parametric curve:

A = ∫[a,b] (y(t) x'(t)) dt

where x'(t) is the derivative of x(t) with respect to t.

x'(t) = -4t

y(t) = (-4/6) t^3 + 4t + 1

Therefore, we have:

A = ∫[-[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]] ((-4/6) t^3 + 4t + 1)(-4t) dt

A = ∫[-[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]),[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]] (8t^2 - (4/6)t^4 - 4t^2 - 4t) dt

A = ∫[-[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]] (-4/6)t^4 + 4t^2 - 4t dt

A = [-(4/30)t^5 + (4/3)t^3 - 2t^2] [-[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]]

A = (32/15)[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Therefore, the total area inside the loop is (32/15)[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] square units.

To Know more about curve refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29990557#

#SPJ11

`-2+-6` in absolute value minus `-2--6` in absolute value is equal to `4`.

To solve for `-2+(-6)` in absolute value and `-2-(-6)` in absolute value and subtract them, we first evaluate the two values of the absolute value and perform the subtraction afterwards.

Here is the solution:

Simplify `-2 + (-6) = -8`.

Evaluate the absolute value of `-8`. This gives us: `|-8| = 8`.

Therefore, `-2+(-6)` in absolute value is equal to `8`.

Next, simplify `-2 - (-6) = 4`.

Evaluate the absolute value of `4`.

This gives us: `|4| = 4`.

Therefore, `-2-(-6)` in absolute value is equal to `4`.

Now, we subtract `8` and `4`. This gives us: `8 - 4 = 4`.

Therefore, `-2+-6` in absolute value minus `-2--6` in absolute value is equal to `4`.

To know more about absolute value minus visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31140452

#SPJ11

To reverse the order of integration, we need to redraw the region of integration and change the limits of integration accordingly.

The region of integration is defined by the following inequalities:

0 ≤ y ≤ 3

4 ≤ x ≤ 16/3y

Therefore, we can draw the region of integration as a rectangle in the xy-plane with vertices at (4, 0), (16/3, 0), (16/9, 3), and (0, 3). Then, we can integrate with respect to x first and then y.

So, the integral becomes:

integral from 0 to 3 (integral from 4 to 16/3y (xye^(-x) dx) dy)

Now, we can integrate with respect to x:

integral from 0 to 3 [(-xye^(-x)) evaluated from x=4 to x=16/3y] dy

Simplifying this expression, we get:

integral from 0 to 3 [(16y/3 - 4)y e^(-(16/3)y) - (4y) e^(-4) ] dy

This integral can be evaluated using integration by parts or a numerical integration method.

Learn more about integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

The total pressure of a wet gas mixture containing water vapor, nitrogen and helium is 131.5 kPa

Explanation:Given partial pressures are:Pnitrogen = 53.0 kPaPhelium = 25.5 kPa

The total pressure of a wet gas mixture containing water vapor, nitrogen and helium is calculated using Dalton's law of partial pressure.

Dalton's law states that the total pressure of a mixture of gases is equal to the sum of the partial pressures of the individual gases.

Partial pressure of water vapor = 15.6 kPa

Total pressure = Pnitrogen + Phelium + Partial pressure of water vaporTotal pressure = 53.0 + 25.5 + 15.6Total pressure = 94.1 kPaNow, we need to find the pressure at 60°C which is not given. But we can find it using the ideal gas equation.

PV = nRTP = nRT/VAt constant temperature, pressure is proportional to density.

P1/P2 = d1/d2ρ = P/RT

Therefore, at constant temperature,V1/V2 = P1/P2

Therefore, the pressure of the wet gas mixture at 60°C, which is the total pressure, is:P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2

Using this formula;P1 = (P2V2/T2) * T1/V1P2 = 94.1 kPa (given)T1 = 60°C + 273 = 333 KV2 = 1 mol (as 1 mole of gas is present)

R = 8.31 J/mol

KP1 = ?

V1 = nRT1/P1 = 1 * 8.31 * 333 / P1 = 2667.23 / P1P1 = 2667.23 / V1P1 = 2667.23 kPa

Hence, the total pressure of the wet gas mixture at 60°C, containing water vapor, nitrogen and helium is 131.5 kPa.

To know more about pressure ,visit

https://brainly.com/question/30673967

#SPJ11

Answer: A (One on the very top)

Step-by-step explanation:

In the problem ABCD = MNOP it goes by order.

A  = M

B = N

C = O

D = P

And answer A says that C is equal to O, which is true in the problem ABCD = MNOP.

Answer:

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum number of pounds of cotton candy grapes Michaela can buy without spending more than $20 is 4 pounds. The options that solve the problem are 3, 4 and 5

Michaela's favorite fruit is cotton candy grape. She has a budget of $20 to spend on a gallon of cider that costs $3.50 and the rest on cotton candy grapes. The cotton candy grapes cost $3.75 per pound.

We have to determine how many pounds of grapes Michaela can buy without spending more than $20.

To solve the problem, we will follow the steps given below:

Let's assume that Michaela spends $x on cotton candy grapes. Since she has $20 to spend,

she can spend $(20 - 3.5) = $16.5 on cotton candy grapes.

We can form an equation for the amount spent on grapes as:

3.75x ≤ 16.5

If we divide both sides of the inequality by 3.75, we will get:

x ≤ 16.5/3.75≈ 4.4

Therefore, the maximum number of pounds of cotton candy grapes Michaela can buy without spending more than $20 is 4 pounds.

Therefore, the options that solve the problem are 3, 4 and 5 (since she can't buy more than 4 pounds).

To know more about cotton candy grapes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29191422

#SPJ11

The limit is 3, which is greater than 1, so the series is divergent.

Using the ratio test, the series is convergent if the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms (|aₙ₊₁/aₙ|) is less than 1, divergent if it's greater than 1, and inconclusive if it's equal to 1. In this case, aₙ = (−3)ⁿ/n².


1. Identify aₙ₊₁: aₙ₊₁ = (−3)ⁿ⁺¹/(n+1)²
2. Calculate the ratio |aₙ₊₁/aₙ|: |[(−3)^(n+1)/(n+1)²] / [(−3)ⁿ/n²]|
3. Simplify the ratio: |(−3)^(n+1)/(n+1)² * n²/(−3)ⁿ| = |(−3)ⁿ⁺¹⁻ⁿ * n²/(n+1)²| = |(−3) * n²/(n+1)²|
4. Take the limit as n approaches infinity: lim (n→∞) (3n²/(n+1)²)

To know more about ratio test click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15586862#

#SPJ11

Denise and Alex paid a sales tax of $1.51 on their $21.60 bill and the total amount they paid, including sales tax, was approximately $23.11.

Denise and Alex go to a restaurant for breakfast and a 7% sales tax is applied to their $21.60 bill.

Let's see how much sales tax they paid on their bill of $21.60.So, sales tax = 7% of $21.60

=> (7/100) × $21.60

=> $1.51 (approx)

The total amount they paid for their breakfast, including sales tax = $21.60 + $1.51 = $23.11 (approx)

Therefore, Denise and Alex paid a sales tax of $1.51 on their $21.60 bill and the total amount they paid, including sales tax, was approximately $23.11. This is how sales tax is calculated.

To learn more about sales tax here:

https://brainly.com/question/30109497

#SPJ11

Thus, the equation of plane that passes through the point (7, 8, −9) and is perpendicular to the line v = (0, −7, 3) t(1, −2, 3) is −7x − y = 57.

To find the equation of a plane, we need a point on the plane and a normal vector.

We are given a point on the plane as (7, 8, −9).

To find the normal vector, we need to find the cross product of two vectors that are on the plane. We are given a line, which lies on the plane, and we can find two vectors on the line: (1, −2, 3) and (0, −7, 3). We can take their cross product to get a normal vector:
(1, −2, 3) × (0, −7, 3) = (−21, −3, 0)

Note that the cross product is perpendicular to both vectors, so it is perpendicular to the plane.

Now we have a point on the plane and a normal vector, so we can write the equation of the plane in the form Ax + By + Cz = D, where (A, B, C) is the normal vector and D is a constant.

Substituting the values we have, we get:
−21x − 3y + 0z = D

To find D, we plug in the point (7, 8, −9) that lies on the plane:
−21(7) − 3(8) + 0(−9) = D
−147 − 24 = D
D = −171

So the equation of the plane is:
−21x − 3y = 171 + 0z
or
21x + 3y = −171.

Note that we can divide both sides by −3 to get a simpler equation:
−7x − y = 57.

Therefore, the equation of the plane that passes through the point (7, 8, −9) and is perpendicular to the line v = (0, −7, 3) t(1, −2, 3) is −7x − y = 57.

Know more about the equation of plane

https://brainly.com/question/10524369

#SPJ11

Two vectors are orthogonal if their dot product is zero. So, we need to find the dot product of (3, x, -5) and (2, x, x) and set it equal to zero:

(3, x, -5) ⋅ (2, x, x) = (3)(2) + (x)(x) + (-5)(x) = 6 + x^2 - 5x

Setting 6 + x^2 - 5x = 0 and solving for x gives:

x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0

Factoring the quadratic equation, we get:

(x - 2)(x - 3) = 0

So, the solutions are x = 2 and x = 3.

Therefore, the values of x such that (3, x, −5) and (2, x, x) are orthogonal are x = 2 and x = 3.

To know more about orthogonal , refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/31051370#

#SPJ11

The solution to the system of equations is (3, 19/8). option (C) is correct.

The given system of equations are:

2e - 3f = -9 ... Equation (1)

e + 3f = 18 ... Equation (2)

Solving using linear combination:

Step 1: Rearrange the equations to be in the form

Ax + By = C.

Multiply Equation (1) by 3, and Equation (2) by 2 to get:

6e - 9f = -27 ... Equation (3)

2e + 6f = 36 ... Equation (4)

Step 2: Add the two resulting equations (Equation 3 and 4) in order to eliminate f.

6e - 9f + 2e + 6f = -27 + 36

==> 8e = 9

==> e = 9/8

Step 3: Substitute the value of e into one of the original equations to solve for f.

e + 3f = 18

Substituting the value of e= 9/8, we have:

9/8 + 3f = 18

==> 3f = 18 - 9/8

==> 3f = 143/8

==> f = 143/24

Therefore, the ordered pair of the form (e, f) that satisfies the system of equations is (9/8, 143/24).

Rationalizing the above result, we can get the solution as follows:

(9/8, 143/24) × 3 / 3(27/24, 143/8) × 1/3(3/8, 143/24) × 8 / 8(3, 19/8)

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is (3, 19/8).

Hence, option (C) (3, 19/8) is correct.

To know more about system of equations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21620502

#SPJ11

The annual value of Brenda's job can be calculated by considering her base salary and the contributions made by the company towards her insurance costs.

By determining the total annual contributions towards insurance and adding them to Brenda's base salary, we can find the annual value of her job. To calculate the annual value of Brenda's job, we first need to determine the contributions made by the company towards her insurance costs. The company pays for 1/4 of the cost of medical insurance, which amounts to (1/4) * $350 = $87.50 per month or $87.50 * 12 = $1050 per year. Similarly, the company pays for 1/2 of the cost of dental insurance, which amounts to (1/2) * $75 = $37.50 per month or $37.50 * 12 = $450 per year.

As for vision insurance, the company covers the full yearly cost of $120. Additionally, the company covers the full monthly cost of life insurance, which amounts to $20 * 12 = $240 per year.

To calculate the annual value of Brenda's job, we add up her base salary of $450 per week, the contributions towards medical insurance ($1050), dental insurance ($450), vision insurance ($120), and life insurance ($240). Therefore, the annual value of Brenda's job is $450 + $1050 + $450 + $120 + $240 = $2310.

Learn more about insurance  here:

https://brainly.com/question/32233665

#SPJ11

To find the time when the aquarium is filled, we can use the following formula:

time = volume / rate

where volume is the total volume of water to be filled (56 gallons), and rate is the rate at which the water is being filled (1 3/4 gallons per minute).

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

time = 56 / 1 3/4

time = 42 1/4 minutes

Therefore, the aquarium will be filled at 42 1/4 minutes past 10:50am

Learn more about volumes visit : brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ11

The Taylor series for f (n)(9) = (−1)nn! 3n(n 1) centered at 9 is  ∑[n=0 to ∞] (-1)ⁿ 3ⁿ (x-9)ⁿ (ⁿ+¹).

Using Taylor's formula with the remainder in Lagrange form, we have

f(x) = ∑[n=0 to ∞] (fⁿ(9)/(n!))(x-9)ⁿ + R(x)

where R(x) is the remainder term.

Since fⁿ(9) = (-1)^n n!(n+1)3ⁿ, we have

f(x) = ∑[n=0 to ∞] (-1)ⁿ 3ⁿ (x-9)ⁿ (n+1)

To find the radius of convergence, we use the ratio test:

lim[n→∞] |(-1)ⁿ 3(ⁿ+¹) (ⁿ+²)/(ⁿ+¹) (ˣ-⁹)| = lim[n→∞] 3|x-9| = 3|x-9|

Therefore, the series converges if 3|x-9| < 1, which gives us the radius of convergence:

r = 1/3

So the Taylor series for f centered at 9 is

f(x) = ∑[n=0 to ∞] (-1)ⁿ 3ⁿ (x-9)ⁿ (ⁿ+¹)

and its radius of convergence is r = 1/3.

Learn more about taylor series : https://brainly.com/question/23334489

#SPJ11

the sum of the series Σ an is:

Σ an = Σ [1 - 3/(n+2)] = Σ 1 - Σ 3/(n+2) = ∞ - 1 = ∞.   the sum of the series diverges to infinity.

To find the value of an, we can use the formula for the nth partial sum and its relation to the (n+1)th partial sum:

sn = a1 + a2 + ... + an

sn+1 = a1 + a2 + ... + an + an+1 = sn + an+1

Subtracting sn from sn+1, we get:

an+1 = sn+1 - sn

Using the given formula for sn, we get:

an+1 = [(n+1)-1]/[(n+1)+1] - [(n-1)+1]/[(n-1)+1]

an+1 = (n-1)/(n+2)

Therefore, the nth term of the series is:

an = (n-1)/(n+2)

To find the sum of the series, we can use the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series:

S = a1 / (1 - r)

where a1 is the first term and r is the common ratio. However, this series is not a geometric series, so we need to use another method to find its sum.

One way to do this is to use partial fractions to express the series as a telescoping sum. We can write:

an = (n-1)/(n+2) = (n+2 - 3)/(n+2) = 1 - 3/(n+2)

Then, the sum of the series can be expressed as:

Σ an = Σ [1 - 3/(n+2)]

= Σ 1 - Σ 3/(n+2)

The first sum Σ 1 is an infinite series of ones, which diverges to infinity. The second sum can be written as a telescoping sum:

Σ 3/(n+2) = 3/3 + 3/4 + 3/5 + ... = 3[(1/3) - (1/4) + (1/4) - (1/5) + (1/5) - (1/6) + ...]

The terms in square brackets cancel out, leaving:

Σ 3/(n+2) = 3/3 = 1

To learn more about series visit:

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

There are 308 more number beef tacos than fish tacos.

Given that the cafeteria made three times as many beef tacos as chicken tacos and 50 more fish tacos than chicken tacos. They made 945 tacos in all.

Let the number of chicken tacos made be x.

Then the number of beef tacos made = 3x (because they made three times as many beef tacos as chicken tacos)

And the number of fish tacos made = x + 50 (because they made 50 more fish tacos than chicken tacos)

The total number of tacos made is 945,

Simplify the equation,

x + 3x + (x + 50)

= 9455x + 50

= 9455x

= 945 - 50

= 895x

= 895/5x

= 179

Therefore, the number of chicken tacos made = x = 179

The number of beef tacos made = 3x

= 3(179)

= 537

The number of fish tacos made = x + 50

= 179 + 50

= 229

The number of more beef tacos than fish tacos = 537 - 229

= 308.

Therefore, there are 308 more beef tacos than fish tacos.

To know more about number, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11