The voltage v(t) = [9]e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) / [1+12L/9] V for t >
To find the voltage v(t) for t > 0 in the given circuit, we need to analyze the circuit using Kirchhoff's laws and the equations that describe the behavior of the circuit elements.
The circuit consists of a resistor R = 2 Ω, an inductor L = 1 H, and a voltage source V = 6 u(t) V, where u(t) is the unit step function. We can use Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) to write an equation for the voltage across the circuit:
V - L di/dt - IR = 0
where i is the current through the circuit and di/dt is the rate of change of the current. Since the initial current in the inductor is zero, we can assume that i(0) = 0.
Taking the derivative of both sides of the equation with respect to time, we get:
d²i/dt² + (R/L) di/dt + (1/L) i = (1/L) (dV/dt)
This is a second-order linear differential equation with constant coefficients. The homogeneous solution is:
i_h(t) = c₁ e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) + c₂ e[tex]^(^-^R^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
where c₁ and c₂ are constants determined by the initial conditions. Since i(0) = 0, we have:
c₁ + c₂ = 0
or
c₁ = -c₂
The particular solution to the non-homogeneous equation is:
i_p(t) = (1/L) ∫(0 to t) e[tex]^(^-^(^t^-^τ^)^/^(2^L^)[/tex]) (dV/dτ) d[tex]^(^-^(^t^-^τ^)^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
Since V = 6 u(t) V, we have:
(dV/dτ) = 6 δ(t-τ) V/s, where δ(t-τ) is the Dirac delta function.
Substituting this into the expression for i_p(t), we get:
i_p(t) = (6/L) ∫(0 to t) e^(-(t-τ)/(2L)) δ(t-τ) dτ
The integral evaluates to:
i_p(t) = (6/L) e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
The general solution to the non-homogeneous equation is:
i(t) = i_h(t) + i_p(t) = c₁ e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) + c₂ e[tex]^(^-^R^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) + (6/L) e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
Using the initial condition i(0) = 0 and the fact that i(0) = di/dt(0), we can write:
c₁ + c₂ + 6/L = 0
and
-c₁ R/(2L) - c₂/(2L) - 3/L = 0
Solving these equations for c₁ and c₂, we get:
c₁ = 9/2L, c₂ = -9/2L - 6/L
Substituting these values into the expression for i(t), we get:
i(t) = (9/2L) e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) - (9/2L + 6/L) e[tex]^(^-^R^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
Finally, we can use Ohm's law to find the voltage across the resistor:
v(t) = IR = 2i(t) = 9 e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) - (9 + 12L) e[tex]^(^-^R^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex])
Therefore, the voltage v(t) = [9]e[tex]^(^-^t^/^(^2^L^)[/tex]) / [1+12L/9] V for t >
Learn more about voltage Link in below
brainly.com/question/13592820
#SPJ11
what is the difference between an argument that is valid and one that is invalid? construct an example each.
An argument is said to be valid when its conclusion follows logically from its premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
On the other hand, an argument is said to be invalid when its conclusion does not follow logically from its premises. This means that even if the premises are true, the conclusion may not necessarily be true.
For example, consider the following argument:
Premise 1: All cats have tails.
Premise 2: Tom is a cat.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tom has a tail.
This argument is valid because if we accept the premises as true, then the conclusion logically follows. However, consider the following argument:
Premise 1: All dogs have tails.
Premise 2: Tom is a cat.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tom has a tail.
This argument is invalid because even though the premises may be true, the conclusion does not logically follow from them. In this case, the fact that all dogs have tails does not necessarily mean that all cats have tails, so we cannot use this premise to support the conclusion.
To know more about argument visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27100677
#SPJ11