Answer:.
Explanation:,
Select the correct answer.
Which factor is the common link between positivist theory and social disorganization theory?
OA. physiology of an individual
OB. personal trait of an individual
OC. social environment
OD
crime rate
Reset
Nex
Answer:
C. Social Environment
Explanation:
The factor which is the common link between positivist theory and social disorganization theory is the social environment. The correct option is C.
What is the common link?Social environment is the common link between positivist theory and social disorganization theory. Both theories emphasize the importance of the social context in shaping individual behavior and crime rates.
Both theories emphasize the role of the social environment in influencing an individual's behavior, including the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities.
Positivist theory focuses on individual factors such as biology and psychology, while social disorganization theory looks at the community and its institutions. However, both agree that the social environment plays a critical role in shaping behavior and crime.
Therefore, the correct option is C.
Learn more about Social environment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29746941
#SPJ7
if the length of a certain rectangle is decreased by 4cm and the width is increased by 3cam,a square with the same area would result.find the perimeter of original rectangle
Answer:
if the length of a certain rectangle is decreased by 4cm and the width is increased by 3cam,a square with the same area would result.find the perimeter of original rectangle
I don't know if it's correct but hope it helps!!!!!! :)
why are you asked to rise when a jury walks into a cort room?
9. “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” In this quote Thomas Jefferson refers to the right to bear arms as a last resort. What can you conclude?
a. Thomas Jefferson was against the 2nd Amendment.
b. He believed that this amendment might be used to defend ourselves against bad governments.
c. People can use the second amendment in any circumstanced.
d. Thomas Jefferson believes that freedom of speech is essential.
Is it a good idea to have so many different levels of police jurisdiction? What are the advantages and, or disadvantages?
Answer and Explanation:
In general, we can say that it is a good idea to have different levels of police jurisdiction in a region, but this system has some disadvantages, in addition to the advantages. Among the advantages, we can say that the different jurisdictions make police work organized and fast, since all jurisdictions can work together with different elements. Furthermore, this allows a complete and efficient police control, consistent with the reality of the city. Among the disadvantages, we can say that this can limit police work in some cases, especially in relation to police reinforcement in other states and the rapid action of police in different jurisdictions to which they are related.
y'all I need a serious answer for this one PLZZ
I am trying to do a project for law enforcement our project was to use our imagination and make a tool which police can use during crimes.
but now all I need is name some cool name for my tools in law enforcement
please help I will also follow you
Answer:
tazer baton?
Explanation:
A person who serves “at the pleasure of the president”
A is appointed or nominated by the president
B can be fired by the president at any time for any reason
C works within the Executive Branch of the federal government
D usually serves in a high-ranking office
Answer:
legal bem louco não entendi nada
discuss the effect of absence of rule of law
Answer:
Absence of rule of law will cause
1. conflicts in society
2. rise in criminal activities
3. loss of life and destruction of properties
Explanation:
absence of rule of law causes so many negative effects.
the effects are negative because law is absence.
1. Conflicts will rise in society wen the law in the country or place doesn't work or is not used. so people will do things they want to do anytime they like. they will commit sins and crimes which they will not be judged for or confronted for
when this happens it will lead to the second point - rise in criminal activities
armed robbers and kidnappers and other cruel people in society will put the law in there hands and do all they like. point guns at you and Rob you of all they want this will lead to the third point - loss of life and properties because when they decide to fight back den they will beat you to death or shoot you.
Question 1 (Essay Worth 10 points)
(HC) Do you think a defendant is more likely to lose in a criminal or a civil proceeding? Explain.
Your response should be at least five sentences. Use complete sentences and offer evidence to back up your opinion.
PLS HELP FAST AND TELL DETAILS
Answer:
Criminal!!
Explanation:
In a civil case the plaintiff needs only to prove their case on a “balance of probabilities”, meaning more likely yes than no.Criminal defendants have a number of other Constitutional protections, because the outcome if they are found guilty is potentially a loss of freedom. Civil cases typically only involve paying money, which is a much lesser threat than the loss of liberty.For example, criminal defendants in most cases are entitled to a trial by jury. While a defendant’s liability in a civil lawsuit must be proven to be more likely than not, criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The outcome of a successful criminal case may include fines, restitution, probation, or imprisonment.
which is the strongest country in the world