Determine whether each pair of triangles is similar. Justify your answer.
S

18
00
R
9
P
16
T
yes; AQRP ~ ASRT by SAS Similarity
yes; AQRP ~ ATRS by SAS Similarity
yes; AQRP - ATRS by ASA Similarity
No; The corresponding sides are not proportional.

Answer:

work is shown and pictured

answer is c

Answer:

the correct answer among the choices is C

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply both sides of the ODE

[tex]x'+2tx+5t[/tex]

by [tex]e^{t^2}[/tex]:

[tex]e^{t^2}x'+2te^{t^2}x=5te^{t^2}[/tex]

Now the left side can be condensed as the derivative of a product:

[tex]\left(e^{t^2}x\right)'=5te^{t^2}[/tex]

Integrate both sides, then solve for x :

[tex]e^{t^2}x=\dfrac52e^{t^2}+C[/tex]

[tex]\implies x(t)=\dfrac52+Ce^{-t^2}[/tex]

Given that x(0) = 8, we find

[tex]8=\dfrac52+Ce^0\implies C=\dfrac{11}2[/tex]

so that the particular solution to this IVP is

[tex]\boxed{x(t)=\dfrac{5+11e^{-t^2}}2}[/tex]

Answer:

  36°

Step-by-step explanation:

Please refer to the attached figure.

Triangles ANC, AMB, BCN, CBM are all isosceles by virtue of the given congruences. By symmetry, we also claim that ΔABC is isosceles (AB≅AC).

We aren't sure how their internal angles relate, but we can write a couple of equations.

Let x = m∠BAC, y = m∠BCN.

∠NCA = ∠NAC  = ∠MBA = ∠MAB = x

∠BCM = ∠BMC = x +y

∠BMC = ∠MBA +∠MAB = 2x

So, we have ...

  ∠BMC = x +y = 2x   ⇒    y = x

And the sum of angles around ΔABC is ...

  x +(2x) +(2x) = 180°

  x = 180°/5 = 36°

The measure of angle BAC is 36°.

Hey there! :)

Answer:

2nd choice. (x - 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given in the question:

(x²-4) ÷ (x + 2) = x-2

This is an example of difference of squares.

We can rearrange the equation by multiplying both sides by (x+2) to become:

(x² - 4) = x - 2 (x + 2)

Therefore, the binomial that must be multiplied by (x+2) is the second choice, x-2.

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Looks like the limit is

[tex]\displaystyle\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\frac{x^4-36y^2}{x^2+18y^2}[/tex]

Let [tex]y=x^m[/tex] with [tex]m\ge1[/tex], so the limit is equivalent to

[tex]\displaystyle\lim_{x\to0}\frac{x^4-36x^{2m}}{x^2+18x^{2m}}=\lim_{x\to0}\frac{x^2-36x^{2(m-1)}}{1+18x^{2(m-1)}}=0[/tex]

Now let [tex]x=y^n[/tex] with [tex]n\ge1[/tex], so the limit is

[tex]\displaystyle\lim_{y\to0}\frac{y^{4n}-36y^2}{y^{2n}+18y^2}=\lim_{y\to0}\frac{y^{2(2n-1)}-36}{y^{2(n-1)}+18}=-\dfrac{36}{18}=-2[/tex]

The value of the limit evidently depends on path of approach, so the limit does not exist.

Answer:

none of the above

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 5 * 2^x

Let x = 3

f(3) = 5 * 2^3

     = 5 * 8

    = 40

Answer:

The results of the hypothesis test suggests that there is no difference in productivity level of two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast).

p-value = 0.0473

Step-by-step explanation:

To perform this test we first define the null and alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis plays the devil's advocate and usually takes the form of the opposite of the theory to be tested. It usually contains the signs =, ≤ and ≥ depending on the directions of the test.

While, the alternative hypothesis usually confirms the the theory being tested by the experimental setup. It usually contains the signs ≠, < and > depending on the directions of the test.

For this question, we want to test if there is a difference in productivity level of the two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast).

Hence, the null hypothesis would be that there isn't significant evidence to suggest that there is a difference in productivity level of two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast). That is, there is no difference in the productivity level of two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast).

The alternative hypothesis is that there is significant evidence to suggest that there is a difference in productivity level of two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast).

Mathematically, if the average productivity level of the East Coast group is μ₁, the average productivity level of the Midwest group is μ₂ and the difference in productivity level is μ = μ₂ - μ₁

The null hypothesis is represented as

H₀: μ = 0 or μ₂ = μ₁

The alternative hypothesis is represented as

Hₐ: μ ≠ 0 or μ₂ ≠ μ₁

So, to perform this test, we need to compute the test statistic

Test statistic for 2 sample mean data is given as

Test statistic = (μ₂ - μ₁)/σ

σ = √[(s₂²/n₂) + (s₁²/n₁)]

μ₁ = average productivity level of the East Coast group = 1299 parts shipped

n₁ = sample size of East Coast group surveyed = 35

s₁ = standard deviation of the East Coast group sampled = 350

μ₂ = average productivity level of the Midwest group = 1456 parts shipped

n₂ = sample size of Midwest group surveyed = 35

s₂ = standard deviation of the Midwest group sampled = 297

σ = √[(297²/35) + (350²/35)] = 77.5903160379 = 77.59

We will use the t-distribution as no information on population standard deviation is provided

t = (1456 - 1299) ÷ 77.59

= 2.02

checking the tables for the p-value of this t-statistic

Degree of freedom = df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 35 + 35 - 2 = 68

Significance level = 0.01

The hypothesis test uses a two-tailed condition because we're testing in both directions.

p-value (for t = 2.02, at 0.01 significance level, df = 68, with a two tailed condition) = 0.047326

The interpretation of p-values is that

When the (p-value > significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and when the (p-value < significance level), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

So, for this question, significance level = 0.01

p-value = 0.047326

0.047326 > 0.01

Hence,

p-value > significance level

This means that we fail to reject the null hypothesis & say that there isn't enough evidence to suggest that there is a difference in productivity level of two warehouses (East Coast and the Midwest Coast).

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

∠QRT=24

∠TRS=24

∠QRS=48

i wasnt sure which angle measure you wanted so im giving you all

Step-by-step explanation:

there is a thereom on angle bisectors that should help you with this problem

the angle is split in half but both are equal

4x+12=2x+18

-2x        -2x

2x+12=18

-12          -12

2x=6

÷2 ÷2

x=3

fill it in

4(3)+12

12+12

24

2(3)+18

6+18

24

I HOPE THIS HELPS

If [tex]a = 0[/tex], then [tex]y = ax^2+bx+c[/tex] turns into [tex]y = 0x^2+bx+c[/tex]. That [tex]0x^2[/tex] term goes away because it turns into 0, and adding 0 onto anything does not change the expression.

So  [tex]y = 0x^2+bx+c[/tex] turns into [tex]y = bx+c[/tex] which is a linear equation (b is the slope, c is the y intercept). It is no longer a quadratic as quadratic equations always graph out a curved parabola.

As an example, you could graph out [tex]y = 0x^2+3x+4[/tex] and note how it's the exact same as [tex]y = 3x+4[/tex], both of which are straight lines through the two points (0,4) and (1,7).

Answer:

slope is m=1. y-intercept is -1

Answer:

Slope is 1 and intercept is -1. Slope can be found by taking the rise and run of 2 points on a graph. and intercept is just when x = 0

Answer:

860.

Step-by-step explanation:

66 x 10= 660

20 x 10= 200

660+200= 860.

Answer:880

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]66 x 10=66020 x 10=200200+660=880[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]3x - 4y = 17ndx - y = 3 \\ 3x - x - 4y + 44y = 17 - 3 \\ 3x - x = 17 - 3 \\ 2x = 17 - 3 \\ 2x = 14 \\ x = 7 \\ \\ 7 - 4y = 3 \\ - 4y = - 4 \\ y = 1[/tex]

Answer:

x = 7

y = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 4y = 17

x - 4y = 3

Solve x in the second equation.

x = 3 + 4y

Put x as 3 + 4y in the first equation and solve for y.

3(3 + 4y) - 4y = 17

9 + 12y - 4y = 17

9 + 8y = 17

8y = 17 - 9

8y = 8

y = 8/8

y = 1

Put y as 1 in the second equation and solve for x.

x = 3 + 4(1)

x = 3 + 4

x = 7

Answer:

double

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is c-25

hope this helps

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

its congruent by HL or RHSaxiom

Answer:

HL

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] In\: right \triangle 's DAB \: \&\: CBA\\

\angle DAB \cong \angle CBA... (each 90\degree) \\ hypotenuse \: DB \cong hypotenuse \: CA. (given) \\

side AB \cong side BA.. (common) \\

\therefore \triangle DAB \cong \triangle CBA.. (By \: RHS\: or \: HL \: Postulate) [/tex]

Answer:

y = 2x + 21

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write out known variables

y = mx + b

m = 2

y = 2x + b

Step 2: Find b

9 = 2(-6) + b

9 = -12 + b

b = 21

Step 3: Rewrite linear equation

y = 2x + 21

Answer:The first one

Step-by-step explanation:

V rectangular prism = Area of the base *5

Answer:

3 meters

63 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for his two breaks to occur after even distances, simply divide his total path in three:

[tex]B = \frac{9}{3}\\ B=3\ meters[/tex]

He will reach his first break after 3 meters.

If he can only take 9 pieces at a time the number of trips required is:

[tex]n=\frac{36}{9}\\ n=4[/tex]

Note that he will have to back to the back yard for the first three trips (traveling back the 9 meters path). The total distance traveled is:

[tex]d= 3*(9+9)+9\\d=63\ meters[/tex]

He will travel 63 meters.

Answer:

(c) I paid 200% of what I could have online and on sale.

Step-by-step explanation:

The multiplier for a increase of a% is 1 + a/100.

In this question:

You paid twice, which means that the multiplier is 2. So

a is the increase, as a percent.

[tex]1 + \frac{a}{100} = 2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{a}{100} = 1[/tex]

[tex]a = 100[/tex]

You had an increase of 100% on the price. Since the original amount was 100% you paid 100 + 100 = 200%(100% more, 2 times) of what you could have paid.

So the correct answer is:

(c) I paid 200% of what I could have online and on sale.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

If we look at the longest sides and shortest sides of both triangles (the sides that have a length we already know), we can see that the scale factor is 68/17 and 32/8, which both equal 4.

So, we know that all sides of the bigger triangle will be 4 times longer than  the sides of the smaller triangle. On the smaller triangle, the second longest leg is 15 units. We also want to find the second longest leg of the bigger triangle.

We know that the length of the second longest leg of the bigger triangle is 60, because 15*4=60.

We have an equation: 60=4x=12

We isolate x:

4x=48

x=12

So, x is 12.

Answer:

(1,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

x=1

y=1

6(1) + 1=7

6+1=7

Answer:

x=1, y=1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

2b+b=3b because2+1 = 3

Answer:

the answer is yes

Step-by-step explanation:

yes it is equivalent expression because 2b+b and 3b have the same value and length or numerator which equals yes.

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \because \triangle ACB \cong \triangle DCE... (given) \\

\therefore \angle A \cong \angle D... (c.a.c.t)\\

\therefore m\angle A = m\angle D\\

\therefore 50\degree = 10x\\\\

\therefore x = \frac{50\degree}{10}\\\\

\huge \orange {\boxed {\therefore x = 5\degree}} [/tex]

Answer:

Result = 9b/25 or 36b/100

Step-by-step explanation:

The number is b

step 1

b is decreased by 40%

value of 40% of b = 40/100 *b = 4b/10

New value after this change = b - 40% decreased value of b = b -4b/10

= (10b-4b)/10 = 6b/10

Step 2 The new value obtained is again decreased by 40%

value of 40%  number found in step 1 =  40% of value found in step 1

value of 40%  number found in step 1 =  40/100 * 6b/10 = 24b/100

This value (24b/100) is subtracted from value found in step 1(6b/10) as given that  value obtained is decreased by 40%

new value found after 40% decrease = 6b/10 - 24b/100

new value found after 40% decrease = 60b/100 - 24b/100= 36b/100

new value found after 40% decrease =  36b/100 = 9b/25

Thus, the result of b is decreased by 40% and decreased again by 40% is 9b/25

Answer:

9.110434

Step-by-step explanation:

√83 ≈ 9.110434

Answer:

Negative Binomial

Step-by-step explanation:

The girl receives only 5% of mail which are addressed to her. Rest of 95% mails belong to other family members.

P (X) = 5%

P (X) = 95 / 5

P (X) = 19

The family receives 19 mails out of which only 5% will address the girl. The all other mails belong to the other family members.

Answer:

7.22?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

w = -7z/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Our goal is to isolate w

1. subtract 3w from both sides to get 2w+9z = 2z

2. Subtract 9z from both sides to get 2w = -7z

3. Divide both sides by 2 to get w = -7z/2

We cannot simplify further, so this is our answer.

Answer:

99% one-sided lower confidence bound = 26.77

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate a 99% one-sided lower confidence bound for the population variance.

The sample size is n=25.

The degrees of freedom are then:

[tex]df=n-1=25-1=24[/tex]

The critical value of the chi-square for this confidence bound is:

[tex]\chi^2_{0.01, \,24}=42.98[/tex]

Then, the lower confidence bound can be calculated as:

[tex]LB=\dfrac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{0.01,24}}=\dfrac{24\cdot(6.9)^2}{42.98}=\dfrac{1,142.64}{42.68}=26.77[/tex]

Answer:

35/42 = b/7    and b= 35/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Our base is unkhown so it will be the variable in our equation :

so b is 35/6 cm