Since the area is below the axis, the work done on the gas is negative and the answer is -15 J.
For process, B-C, the work done on the gas by the environment is determined by the area under the curve. As shown on the graph, the area is a trapezoid, so the formula for its area is ½ (b1+b2)h. ½ (2 atm + 1 atm) x (10 cm - 20 cm) = -15 J. Since the area is below the axis, the work done on the gas is negative.
Therefore, the answer is -15 J.
For process, C-A, the heat absorbed/released by the gas is equal to the negative of the heat absorbed/released in process A-B. Thus, Q = -17 J. The negative sign implies that the heat is released by the gas in this process.
For the entire cycle, the net work done is the sum of the work done in all three processes. Therefore, Wnet = Wbc + Wca + Wab = -480 J + 15 J + 465 J = 0. Qnet = ΔU + Wnet, where ΔU = 0 (since the gas returns to its initial state). Therefore, Qnet = 0.
For process B-C, the value of W, the work done on the gas by the environment, is -15 J. For process, C-A, the value of Q, the heat absorbed/released by the gas, is -17 J. For the entire cycle, the net work done is 0 and the net heat absorbed/released by the gas is also 0.
In the pV diagram given, the cycle for a diatomic ideal gas with Cp = 3.5 R and Cy = 2.5 R is shown. The given cycle has three processes: B-C, C-A, and A-B. The objective of this question is to determine the work done on the gas by the environment, W, and the heat absorbed/released by the gas, Q, for each process, as well as the network and heat for the entire cycle. The first law of thermodynamics is used for this purpose:
ΔU = Q - W. For any cycle, ΔU is zero since the system returns to its initial state. Therefore, Q = W. For process, B-C, the work done on the gas by the environment is determined by the area under the curve. The area is a trapezoid, and the work is negative since it is below the axis. For process, C-A, the heat absorbed/released by the gas is equal to the negative of the heat absorbed/released in process A-B. The work done by the gas is equal to the work done on the gas by the environment since the process is the reverse of B-C. The net work done is the sum of the work done in all three processes, and the net heat absorbed/released by the gas is zero since Q = W.
To know more about trapezoid visit
brainly.com/question/31380175
#SPJ11
Please answer all parts
a Problems (25 pts. Each) 1. A charged insulating cylinder of radius a and infinite length has a uniform charge per unit length 2. It is surrounded by a concentric thick conducting shell of inner radi
A charged insulating cylinder of radius a and infinite length has a uniform charge per unit length of 2. It is surrounded by a concentric thick conducting shell of inner radius b and outer radius c. The electric field inside the cylinder is zero, and the electric field outside the shell is equal to the electric field of an infinite line charge with charge per unit length of 2.
The electric field inside the cylinder is zero because the charge on the cylinder is uniformly distributed. This means that the electric field lines are parallel to the axis of the cylinder, and there are no electric field lines pointing radially inward or outward.
The electric field outside the shell is equal to the electric field of an infinite line charge with charge per unit length of 2. This is because the shell is a conductor, and the charge on the cylinder is distributed evenly over the surface of the shell. The electric field lines from the cylinder are therefore perpendicular to the surface of the shell, and they extend to infinity in both directions.
Learn more about insulated cylinder here:
brainly.com/question/30749236
#SPJ11
Please answer all parts
a Problems (25 pts. Each) 1. A charged insulating cylinder of radius a and infinite length has a uniform charge per unit length 2. It is surrounded by a concentric thick conducting shell of inner radius
6) (10 points) Stacey is stopped at a red light and heading North. When the light turns green, she accelerates at a rate of 15 m/s 2 . Once she reaches a speed of 20 m/s, she travels at a constant speed for the next 5 minutes and then decelerates at a rate of 12 m/s 2 until she stops at a stop sign. a) What is the total distance Stacey travels heading North? b) Stacey makes a right turn and then accelerates from rest at a rate of 7 m/s 2 before coming to a constant speed of 13 m/s. She then drives at this constant speed for 10 minutes. As she approaches her destination, she applies her brakes and she comes to a stop in 4 seconds. What is the total distance Stacey travels heading East? c) What is the magnitude and direction of Stacey's TOTAL displacement from the first traffic light to her final destination?
a) Stacey's total distance traveled heading North is approximately 6039 meters.
b) Stacey's total distance traveled heading East is approximately 7816.23 meters.
c) Stacey's total displacement from the first traffic light to her final destination is approximately 9808.56 meters at an angle of approximately 38.94 degrees from the horizontal.
To calculate Stacey's total distance traveled and her total displacement, we'll break down the scenario into two parts: her journey heading North and her subsequent journey heading East.
a) Heading North: Stacey accelerates at a rate of 15 m/s^2 until she reaches a speed of 20 m/s. She then travels at a constant speed for 5 minutes (300 seconds) before decelerating at a rate of 12 m/s^2 until she stops at a stop sign. To calculate the total distance traveled during this segment, we need to calculate the distance covered during acceleration, the distance covered at a constant speed, and the distance covered during deceleration.
During acceleration, we can use the equation v^2 = u^2 + 2as, where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and s is the distance covered. Plugging in the values, we have (20 m/s)^2 = (0 m/s)^2 + 2 * 15 m/s^2 * s. Solving for s, we find s = 6.67 meters.
During deceleration, we can use the same equation with negative acceleration since the velocity is decreasing. Plugging in the values, we have (0 m/s)^2 = (20 m/s)^2 + 2 * (-12 m/s^2) * s. Solving for s, we find s = 33.33 meters.
The distance covered at a constant speed is given by the formula distance = speed * time. Stacey traveled at a constant speed of 20 m/s for 5 minutes, which is 300 seconds. Therefore, the distance covered is 20 m/s * 300 s = 6000 meters.
Adding up the distances, the total distance Stacey traveled heading North is 6.67 meters (acceleration) + 6000 meters (constant speed) + 33.33 meters (deceleration) = 6039 meters.
b) Heading East: Stacey makes a right turn and accelerates from rest at a rate of 7 m/s^2 until she reaches a constant speed of 13 m/s. She then travels at this constant speed for 10 minutes (600 seconds). Finally, she applies her brakes and comes to a stop in 4 seconds. To calculate the total distance traveled during this segment, we need to calculate the distance covered during acceleration, the distance covered at a constant speed, and the distance covered during deceleration.
During acceleration, we can use the same equation as before. Plugging in the values, we have (13 m/s)^2 = (0 m/s)^2 + 2 * 7 m/s^2 * s. Solving for s, we find s = 12.71 meters.
The distance covered at a constant speed is given by the formula distance = speed * time. Stacey traveled at a constant speed of 13 m/s for 10 minutes, which is 600 seconds. Therefore, the distance covered is 13 m/s * 600 s = 7800 meters.
During deceleration, we can again use the same equation but with negative acceleration. Plugging in the values, we have (0 m/s)^2 = (13 m/s)^2 + 2 * (-a) * s. Solving for s, we find s = 13.52 meters.
Adding up the distances, the total distance Stacey traveled heading East is 12.71 meters (acceleration) + 7800 meters (constant speed) + 13.52 meters (deceleration) = 7816.23 meters.
c) To find the magnitude and direction of Stacey's total
displacement from the first traffic light to her final destination, we need to calculate the horizontal and vertical components of her displacement. Since she traveled North and then East, the horizontal component will be the distance traveled heading East, and the vertical component will be the distance traveled heading North.
The horizontal component of displacement is 7816.23 meters (distance traveled heading East), and the vertical component is 6039 meters (distance traveled heading North). To find the magnitude of the displacement, we can use the Pythagorean theorem: displacement^2 = horizontal component^2 + vertical component^2. Plugging in the values, we have displacement^2 = 7816.23^2 + 6039^2. Solving for displacement, we find displacement ≈ 9808.56 meters.
To determine the direction of displacement, we can use trigonometry. The angle θ can be calculated as the inverse tangent of the vertical component divided by the horizontal component: θ = arctan(vertical component / horizontal component). Plugging in the values, we have θ = arctan(6039 / 7816.23). Solving for θ, we find θ ≈ 38.94 degrees.
Therefore, Stacey's total displacement from the first traffic light to her final destination is approximately 9808.56 meters in magnitude and at an angle of approximately 38.94 degrees from the horizontal.
To know more about distance calculations, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12662141#
#SPJ11
if you make an error in measuring the diameter of the Drum, such that your measurement is larger than the actual diameter, how will this affect your calculated value of the Inertia of the system? Will this error make the calculated Inertia larger or smaller than the actual? please explain.
If the diameter of the drum is measured larger than the actual diameter, the calculated inertia of the system will be larger than the actual inertia.
If you make an error in measuring the diameter of the drum such that your measurement is larger than the actual diameter, it will affect your calculated value of the inertia of the system. Specifically, the error will result in a calculated inertia that is larger than the actual inertia.
The moment of inertia of a rotating object depends on its mass distribution and the axis of rotation. In the case of a drum, the moment of inertia is directly proportional to the square of the radius or diameter. Therefore, if you overestimate the diameter, the calculated moment of inertia will be larger than it should be.
Mathematically, the moment of inertia (I) is given by the equation:
I = (1/2) * m * r^2
where m is the mass and r is the radius (or diameter) of the drum. If you incorrectly measure a larger diameter, you will use a larger value for r in the calculation, resulting in a larger moment of inertia.
This error in measuring the diameter will lead to an overestimation of the inertia of the system. It means that the calculated inertia will be larger than the actual inertia, which can affect the accuracy of any further calculations or predictions based on the inertia value.
Learn more about inertia:
https://brainly.com/question/1140505
#SPJ11
Roberto is observing a black hole using the VLA at 22 GHz. What is the wavelength of the radio emission he is studying? (Speed of light – 3 x 10' m/s) a. 1.36 nm b. 1.36 mm c. 1.36 cm d. 1.36 m Mega
The wavelength of the radio emission that Roberto is studying is 1.36 m (option d).
Radio emission refers to the radiation of energy as electromagnetic waves with wavelengths ranging from less than one millimeter to more than 100 kilometers. As a result, the radio emission is classified as a long-wave electromagnetic radiation.The VLA stands for Very Large Array, which is a radio telescope facility in the United States. It comprises 27 individual antennas arranged in a "Y" pattern in the New Mexico desert. It observes radio emission wavelengths ranging from 0.04 to 40 meters.
Now, let's use the formula to find the wavelength of the radio emission;
v = fλ,where, v is the speed of light, f is the frequency of the radio emission, and λ is the wavelength of the radio emission.
Given that Roberto is observing a black hole using the VLA at 22 GHz, the frequency of the radio emission (f) is 22 GHz. The speed of light is given as 3 x 10⁸ m/s.
Substituting the given values in the formula above gives:
v = fλ3 x 10⁸ = (22 x 10⁹)λ
Solving for λ gives;
λ = 3 x 10⁸ / 22 x 10⁹
λ = 0.0136 m
Convert 0.0136 m to Mega ; 0.0136 m = 13.6 x 10⁻³ m = 13.6 mm = 1.36 m
Therefore, the wavelength of the radio emission that Roberto is studying is 1.36 m.
Learn more about radio emission https://brainly.com/question/9106359
#SPJ11
Let’s visualize a parallel plate capacitor with a paper dielectric in-between the plates. Now, a second identical capacitor, but this one has a glass sheet in-between now. Will the glass sheet have the same dependence on area and plate separation as the paper?
Swapping the paper for glass has what effect? This is the precise idea of dielectric: given the same capacitor, the material makes a difference. Comparing the paper and glass dielectrics, which would have the higher dielectric and hence the higher total capacitance? Why?
Dielectric materials, such as paper and glass, affect the capacitance of a capacitor by their dielectric constant. The dielectric constant is a measure of how effectively a material can store electrical energy in an electric field. It determines the extent to which the electric field is reduced inside the dielectric material.
The glass sheet will not have the same dependence on area and plate separation as the paper dielectric. The effect of swapping the paper for glass is that the glass will have a different dielectric constant (also known as relative permittivity) compared to paper.
In general, the higher the dielectric constant of a material, the higher the total capacitance of the capacitor. This is because a higher dielectric constant indicates that the material has a greater ability to store electrical energy, resulting in a larger capacitance.
Glass typically has a higher dielectric constant compared to paper. For example, the dielectric constant of paper is around 3-4, while the dielectric constant of glass is typically around 7-10. Therefore, the glass dielectric would have a higher dielectric constant and hence a higher total capacitance compared to the paper dielectric, assuming all other factors (such as plate area and separation) remain constant.
In summary, swapping the paper for glass as the dielectric material in the capacitor would increase the capacitance of the capacitor due to the higher dielectric constant of glass.
To know more about dielectric constant click this link -
brainly.com/question/13265076
#SPJ11
The 300 m diameter Arecibo radio telescope detects radio waves with a 3.35 cm average wavelength.
(a)What is the angle (in rad) between two just-resolvable point sources for this telescope?
(b) How close together (in ly) could these point sources be at the 2 million light year distance of the Andromeda galaxy?
"At the distance of the Andromeda galaxy (2 million light-years), the two just-resolvable point sources could be approximately 2.74 × 10⁴ light years close together." The resolution of a telescope refers to its ability to distinguish between two closely spaced objects or details in an observed image. It is a measure of the smallest angular separation or distance that can be resolved by the telescope.
To calculate the angle between two just-resolvable point sources for the Arecibo radio telescope, we can use the formula for the angular resolution of a telescope:
θ = 1.22 * (λ / D),
where:
θ is the angular resolution,
λ is the wavelength of the radio waves, and
D is the diameter of the telescope.
From question:
λ = 3.35 cm (or 0.0335 m),
D = 300 m.
(a) Calculating the angle (θ) between two just-resolvable point sources:
θ = 1.22 * (0.0335 m / 300 m) = 0.0137 rad.
Therefore, the angle between two just-resolvable point sources for the Arecibo radio telescope is approximately 0.0137 radians.
To calculate how close together these point sources could be at the 2 million light-year distance of the Andromeda galaxy, we need to convert the angle (θ) into a linear distance at that distance.
From question:
Distance to Andromeda galaxy = 2 million light years,
1 light year ≈ 9.461 × 10¹⁵ meters.
(b) Calculating the linear distance between two just-resolvable point sources at the distance of the Andromeda galaxy:
Distance to Andromeda galaxy = 2 million light years * (9.461 × 10¹⁵ m / 1 light year) = 1.892 × 10²² m.
The linear distance (d) between two point sources can be calculated using the formula:
d = θ * distance.
Substituting the values:
d = 0.0137 rad * 1.892 × 10²² m = 2.589 × 10²⁰ m.
To convert this distance into light-years, we divide by the conversion factor:
2.589 × 10²⁰ m / (9.461 × 10¹⁵ m / 1 light year) ≈ 2.74 × 10⁴ light years.
Therefore, at the distance of the Andromeda galaxy (2 million light-years), the two just-resolvable point sources could be approximately 2.74 × 10⁴ light years close together.
To know more about the resolution of the telescope visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25821830
#SPJ11
cefazonin (Kefzol) 350 mg IM q4h. Supply: cefazonin (Kefzol) 500 mg Add 2 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride and shake well. Provides a volume of 2.2 mL. (225mg/mL) Store in refrigerator and discard after 24 hours. The correct amount to administer is:
The correct amount to administer is approximately 1.556 mL of Cefazonin (Kefzol).
Dose required: 350 mg
Stock concentration: 225 mg/mL
To calculate the volume required, we can use the formula:
Volume required = Dose required / Stock concentration
Substituting the given values:
Volume required = 350 mg / 225 mg/mL
Calculating this expression gives us:
Volume required ≈ 1.556 mL
Now, according to the given information, the total volume provided when 500 mg of Cefazonin (Kefzol) is added to 2 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride is 2.2 mL. Since the volume required (1.556 mL) is less than the total volume provided (2.2 mL), it is appropriate to administer this amount for a single dose.
Therefore, the correct amount to administer is approximately 1.556 mL of Cefazonin (Kefzol).
Please note that it is essential to follow the storage instructions and discard the medication after 24 hours, as mentioned in the given information.
Learn more about Dose at: https://brainly.com/question/13318948
#SPJ11
Question 4 An electron has a total energy of 4.41 times its rest energy. What is the momentum of this electron? (in keV) с 1 pts
Main Answer:
The momentum of the electron is approximately 1882.47 keV.
Explanation:
To calculate the momentum of the electron, we can use the equation relating energy and momentum for a particle with mass m:
E = √((pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2)
Where E is the total energy of the electron, p is its momentum, m is its rest mass, and c is the speed of light.
Given that the total energy of the electron is 4.41 times its rest energy, we can write:
E = 4.41 * mc^2
Substituting this into the earlier equation, we have:
4.41 * mc^2 = √((pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2)
Simplifying the equation, we get:
19.4381 * m^2c^4 = p^2c^2
Dividing both sides by c^2, we obtain:
19.4381 * m^2c^2 = p^2
Taking the square root of both sides, we find:
√(19.4381 * m^2c^2) = p
Since the momentum is typically expressed in units of keV/c (keV divided by the speed of light, c), we can further simplify the equation:
√(19.4381 * m^2c^2) = p = √(19.4381 * mc^2) * c = 4.41 * mc
Plugging in the numerical value for the energy ratio (4.41), we get:
p ≈ 4.41 * mc ≈ 4.41 * (rest energy) ≈ 4.41 * (0.511 MeV) ≈ 2.24 MeV
Converting the momentum to keV, we multiply by 1000:
p ≈ 2.24 MeV * 1000 ≈ 2240 keV
Therefore, the momentum of the electron is approximately 2240 keV.
Learn more about:
The equation E = √((pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2) is derived from the relativistic energy-momentum relation. This equation describes the total energy of a particle with mass, taking into account both its kinetic energy (related to momentum) and its rest energy (mc^2 term). By rearranging this equation and substituting the given energy ratio, we can solve for the momentum. The result is the approximate momentum of the electron in keV.
#SPJ11
A storage tank at STP contains 28.9 kg of nitrogen (N2).
What is the pressure if an additional 34.8 kg of nitrogen is
added without changing the temperature?
A storage tank at STP contains 28.9 kg of nitrogen (N₂). We applied the Ideal Gas Law to determine the pressure when 34.8 kg of nitrogen was added without changing the temperature.
The pressure inside the storage tank is determined using the Ideal Gas Law, which is given by:
PV = nRT
where P is the pressure, V is the volume of the gas, n is the number of moles of the gas, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.
Knowing that the temperature is constant, the number of moles of nitrogen in the tank can be calculated as follows:
n1 = m1/M
where m1 is the mass of nitrogen already in the tank and M is the molar mass of nitrogen (28 g/mol).
n1 = 28.9 kg / 0.028 kg/mol = 1032.14 mol
When an additional 34.8 kg of nitrogen is added to the tank, the total number of moles becomes:
n₂ = n₁ + m₂/M
where m₂ is the mass of nitrogen added to the tank.
n₂ = 1032.14 mol + (34.8 kg / 0.028 kg/mol) = 2266.14 mol
Since the volume of the tank is constant, we can equate the two forms of the Ideal Gas Law to obtain:
P1V = n₁RT and P₂V = n₂RT
Dividing the two equations gives:
P₂/P₁ = n₂/n₁
Plugging in the values:
n₂/n₁ = 2266.14 mol / 1032.14 mol = 2.195
P₂/P₁ = 2.195
Therefore, the pressure inside the tank after the additional nitrogen has been added is:
P₂ = P₁ x 2.195
In conclusion, A storage tank at STP contains 28.9 kg of nitrogen (N₂). To calculate the pressure when 34.8 kg of nitrogen is added without changing the temperature, we used the Ideal Gas Law.
The number of moles of nitrogen already in the tank and the number of moles of nitrogen added to the tank were calculated separately. These values were then used to find the ratio of the pressures before and after the additional nitrogen was added. The pressure inside the tank after the additional nitrogen was added is 2.195 times the original pressure.
To know more about nitrogen refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29506238#
#SPJ11
If a rock is launched at an angle of 70 degrees above the horizontal, what is its acceleration vector just after it is launched? Again, the units are m/s2 and the format is x-component, y-component. 0,- 9.8 sin(709) 0,- 9.8 9.8 cos(709), -9.8 sin(709) 9.8 Cos(709), 9.8 sin(709)
To determine the acceleration vector just after the rock is launched, we need to separate the acceleration into its x-component and y-component.
Here, acceleration due to gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s² downward, we can determine the x- and y-components of the acceleration vector as follows:
x-component: The horizontal acceleration remains constant and equal to 0 m/s² since there is no acceleration in the horizontal direction (assuming no air resistance).
y-component: The vertical acceleration is influenced by gravity, which acts downward. The y-component of the acceleration is given by:
ay = -9.8 m/s²
Therefore, the acceleration vector just after the rock is launched is:
(0 m/s², -9.8 m/s²)
https://brainly.com/question/30899320
#SPJ11
In an EM wave which component has the higher energy density? Depends, either one could have the larger energy density. Electric They have the same energy density Magnetic
An electromagnetic wave, often abbreviated as EM wave, is a transverse wave consisting of mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields that fluctuate simultaneously and propagate through space.
The electric and magnetic field components of an electromagnetic wave (EM wave) are inextricably linked, with each of them being perpendicular to the other and in phase with one another. As a result, one cannot claim that one field component carries more energy than the other. The electric and magnetic fields both carry the same amount of energy and are equal to each other.
In an electromagnetic wave, the electric and magnetic field components are inextricably linked, with each of them being perpendicular to the other and in phase with one another. Therefore, one cannot claim that one field component carries more energy than the other. The electric and magnetic fields both carry the same amount of energy and are equal to each other. Thus, both the electric and magnetic field components have the same energy density.
To know more about electromagnetic wave visit:
brainly.com/question/29774932
#SPJ11
An airplane lands with an initial velocity of 90 m/s and then
decelerates at 2.0 m/s2 for 40 sec. What is its final velocity?
The final velocity of the airplane is 10 m/s. This means the airplane will be moving at a speed of 10 meters per second after 40 seconds when it has decelerated from its initial velocity of 90 meters per second.
Due to the negative acceleration and velocity acting in opposite directions, it means the airplane is slowing down or decelerating.
The formula for finding the final velocity is given as:
v = u + at
Where:
v = final velocity
u = initial velocity
a = acceleration
t = time
Substitute the given values into the formula:
v = 90 + (-2.0 × 40)
v = 90 - 80
v = 10 m/s
Therefore, the final velocity of the airplane is 10 m/s. This means the airplane will be moving at a speed of 10 meters per second after 40 seconds when it has decelerated from its initial velocity of 90 meters per second.
Learn more About velocity from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
Energy is conserved in the collision. Write an expression in
terms of photon wavelength to represent the electron’s increase in
energy as a result of the collision.
In the collision, the energy is conserved. The expression in terms of photon wavelength that represents the electron's increase in energy as a result of the collision can be given by:E=hc/λwhere, E is energy,h is the Planck constant,c is the speed of light, andλ is the wavelength of the photon.
To understand the relationship between energy and wavelength, you can consider the equation: E = hf, where, E is energy,h is Planck's constant, and f is frequency.We can relate frequency with wavelength as follows:f = c/λwhere,f is frequency,λ is wavelength,c is the speed of light. Substitute the value of frequency in the equation E = hf, we get:E = hc/λTherefore, energy can also be written as E = hc/λ, whereλ is the wavelength of the photon.
Learn more about energy:
brainly.com/question/2003548
#SPJ11
A beam of particles is directed at a 0.012-kg tumor. There are 1.2 x 1010 particles per second reaching the tumor, and the energy of each particle is 5.4 MeV. The RBE for the radiation is 14. Find the biologically equivalent dose given to the tumor in 27 s
The biologically equivalent dose given to the tumor in 27s is 3.8904 J.
A beam of particles is directed at a 0.012-kg tumor.
Conversion of MeV to Joules:
1 eV = 1.6022 × 10^-19 J
1 MeV = 1.6022 × 10^-13 J
Hence, the energy of one particle in Joules is as follows:
5.4 MeV = 5.4 × 1.6022 × 10^-13 J= 8.66228 × 10^-13 J
Find the kinetic energy of each particle:
K.E. = (1/2) mv²= (1/2) × 1.67 × 10^-27 kg × (3 × 10^8 m/s)²= 1.503 × 10^-10 J/ particle
Now, let's calculate the total energy that falls on the tumor in one second:
Energy of one particle x Number of particles = 8.66228 × 10^-13 J x 1.2 x 10^10= 1.03 x 10^-2 J/s
Mass of the tumor = 0.012 kg
Using the RBE formula we have:
RBE= Dose of standard radiation / Dose of test radiation
Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) = Physical Dose x RBE
In this problem, we know that BED = 14
Physical dose = Total energy that falls on the tumor in one second x Time= 1.03 x 10^-2 J/s × 27 s= 2.781 x 10^-1 J
Hence, the biologically equivalent dose is BED = Physical Dose x RBE= 2.781 x 10^-1 J × 14= 3.8904 J
Learn more about biologically equivalent dose :
https://brainly.com/question/28384838
#SPJ11
A metallic sphere has a charge of +4.00 nC. A negatively charged rod has a charge of -6.00 nC. When the rod touches the sphere, 7.48 x 10º electrons are transferred. What is the new charge on the sphere?
The new charge on the sphere after the transfer of electrons is -7.97 nC.
Given:
Charge on the metallic sphere = +4.00 nC
Charge on the rod = -6.00 nC
Number of electrons transferred = 7.48 x 10¹⁰ electrons.
One electron carries a charge of -1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ C.
By using the formula:
Charge gained by the sphere = (7.48 x 10¹⁰) × (-1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹)
Charge gained by the sphere = -1.197 x 10⁻⁸ C
New charge on the sphere = Initial charge + Charge gained by the sphere.
New charge on the sphere = 4.00 nC - 11.97 nC
New charge on the sphere ≈ -7.97 nC.
Hence, the new charge on the sphere after the transfer of electrons is -7.97 nC.
To know more about the charge:
https://brainly.com/question/13871705
#SPJ4
The new charge on the sphere is -9.57 x 10^-9 C (or -9.57 nC, to two significant figures).
When the negatively charged rod touches the metallic sphere having a charge of +4.00 nC, 7.48 x 10^10 electrons are transferred. We have to determine the new charge on the sphere. We can use the formula for the charge of an object, which is given as:Q = ne
Where, Q = charge of the object in coulombs (C)n = number of excess or deficit electrons on the object e = charge on an electron = -1.60 x 10^-19 C
Here, number of electrons transferred is: n = 7.48 x 10^10 e
Since the rod is negatively charged, electrons will transfer from the rod to the sphere. Therefore, the sphere will gain 7.48 x 10^10 electrons. So, the total number of electrons on the sphere after transfer will be: Total electrons on the sphere = 7.48 x 10^10 + (No. of electrons on the sphere initially)
No. of electrons on the sphere initially = Charge of the sphere / e= 4.00 x 10^-9 C / (-1.60 x 10^-19 C)= - 2.5 x 10^10
Total electrons on the sphere = 7.48 x 10^10 - 2.5 x 10^10= 5.98 x 10^10The new charge on the sphere can be determined as:Q = ne= 5.98 x 10^10 × (-1.60 x 10^-19)= - 9.57 x 10^-9 C
Note: The charge on the rod is not required to calculate the new charge on the sphere.
Learn more about charge
https://brainly.com/question/13871705
#SPJ11
Consider the same problem as 5_1. In case A, the collision time is 0.15 s, whereas in case B, the collision time is 0.20 s. In which case (A or B), the tennis ball exerts greatest force on the wall? Vector Diagram Case A Case B Vi= 10 m/s Vf=5 m/s V₁=30 m/s =28 m/s
In case A, the tennis ball exerts a greater force on the wall.
When comparing the forces exerted by the tennis ball on the wall in case A and case B, it is important to consider the collision time. In case A, where the collision time is 0.15 seconds, the force exerted by the tennis ball on the wall is greater than in case B, where the collision time is 0.20 seconds.
The force exerted by an object can be calculated using the equation F = (m * Δv) / Δt, where F is the force, m is the mass of the object, Δv is the change in velocity, and Δt is the change in time. In this case, the mass of the tennis ball remains constant.
As the collision time increases, the change in time (Δt) in the denominator of the equation becomes larger, resulting in a smaller force exerted by the tennis ball on the wall. Conversely, when the collision time decreases, the force increases.
Therefore, in case A, with a collision time of 0.15 seconds, the tennis ball exerts a greater force on the wall compared to case B, where the collision time is 0.20 seconds.
Learn more about denominator.
brainly.com/question/32621096
#SPJ11
Two firecrackers explode at the same place in a rest frame with a time separation of 11 s in that frame. Find the time between explosions according to classical physics, as measured in a frame moving with a speed 0.8 c with respect to the rest frame. Answer in units of s.
According to classical physics, the time between explosions measured in the frame moving with a speed of 0.8c is approximately 18.33 seconds.
To find the time between explosions according to classical physics, we can use the concept of time dilation. In special relativity, time dilation occurs when an observer measures a different time interval between two events due to relative motion.
The time dilation formula is given by:
Δt' = Δt / √[tex](1 - (v^2 / c^2))[/tex]
Where
Δt' is the time interval measured in the moving frame,
Δt is the time interval measured in the rest frame,
v is the relative velocity between the frames, and
c is the speed of light.
In this case, the time interval measured in the rest frame is 11 seconds (Δt = 11 s), and the relative velocity between the frames is 0.8c (v = 0.8c).
Plugging these values into the time dilation formula, we have:
Δt' = 11 / √[tex](1 - (0.8c)^2 / c^2)[/tex]
Δt' = 11 / √(1 - 0.64)
Δt' = 11 / √(0.36)
Δt' = 11 / 0.6
Δt' = 18.33 s
Therefore, according to classical physics, the time between explosions measured in the frame moving with a speed of 0.8c is approximately 18.33 seconds.
To know more about time here
https://brainly.com/question/30413417
#SPJ4
Heat is sometimes lost from a house through cracks around windows and doors. What mechanism of heat transfer is involve O A radiation O B. convection o C transmission OD.conduction
The mechanism of heat transfer involved in the loss of heat from a house through cracks around windows and doors is convection.
When there are cracks around windows and doors, heat is primarily lost through convection. Convection occurs when warm air inside the house comes into contact with the colder air outside through these gaps. The warm air near the cracks rises, creating a convection current that carries heat away from the house.
This process leads to heat loss and can result in increased energy consumption for heating purposes. Proper sealing and insulation of windows and doors can help minimize this heat transfer through convection, improving energy efficiency and reducing heating costs.
learn more about " heat transfer":- https://brainly.com/question/16055406
#SPJ11
2. An electron is xeleased from rest at a distance of 9.00 cm from a proton. If the proton is held in place, how fast will the electron be moving when it is 300 cm from the proton? (me = 9.11 X 103 kg, q= 1.6810-196)
The electron's speed can be determined using conservation of energy principles.
Initially, at a distance of 9.00 cm, the electron possesses zero kinetic energy and potential energy given by -U = kqQ/r.
At a distance of 300 cm, the electron has both kinetic energy (1/2)mv² and potential energy -U = kqQ/r. The total energy of the system, the sum of kinetic and potential energy, remains constant. Thus, applying conservation of energy, we can solve for the electron's speed.
Calculating the values using the given data:
Electron mass (me) = 9.11 x 10³ kg
Electron charge (q) = 1.68 x 10⁻¹⁹ C
Coulomb constant (k) = 9 x 10⁹ Nm²/C²
Proton charge (Q) = q = 1.68 x 10⁻¹⁹ C
Initial distance (r) = 9.00 cm = 0.0900 m
Final distance (r') = 300 cm = 3.00 m
Potential energy (U) = kqQ/r = 2.44 x 10⁻¹⁶ J
Using the equation (1/2)mv² - kqQ/r = -U, we find that v = √(3.08 x 10¹¹ m²/s²) = 5.55 x 10⁵ m/s.
Hence, the electron's speed at any point in its trajectory is 5.55 x 10⁵ m/s.
To learn more about the principles of conservation of energy and related topics, click this link:
brainly.com/question/16974883
#SPJ11
A generating station is producing 1.1×106 W of power that is to be sent to a small town located 6.8 km away. Each of the two wires that comprise the transmission line has a resistance per length of 5.0×10−2 d/km. (a) Find the power lost in heating the wires if the power is transmitted at 1600 V. (b) A 100:1 step-up transformer is used to raise the voltage before the power is transmitted. How much power is now lost in heating the wires? (a) Number Units (b) Number Units
(a) 150W
(b) 31858.20 W (approximately)
(a) Let's find the power loss in heating the wires if the power is transmitted at 1600 V.
As we know that P = I²R ,
Where,
P = Power,
I = Current,
R = Resistance
As we know that,
V = IR ,
where,
V = Voltage,
I = Current,
R = Resistance
R = ρ l/A ,
where,
ρ = Resistivity,
l = Length,
A = Area
Therefore, P = I²ρ l/A or P = V²/R ,
where,
V = Voltage,
R = Resistance
P = (1600)²/(2 x 5.0×10−2 d x 6.8 km) = 150 W
(b) Now, let's find the power loss in heating the wires if 100:
1 step-up transformer is used to raise the voltage before the power is transmitted.
Therefore, the new voltage, V = 1600 x 100
= 160000V, and
the new current, I = 1.1×10⁶ / 160000
= 6.875A.
Now,
resistance,
R = 2 x 5.0×10−2 d x 6.8 km
= 680 Ohms
P = I²R
= (6.875)² x 680 = 31858.20 W
Therefore, the power loss in heating the wires after using the transformer is 31858.20 W (approximately).
Learn more about power form this link:
https://brainly.com/question/2248465
#SPJ11
2. Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following: Are they Are the particles Any restriction quantum distinguishable? on the number particles? of particles in each energy Statistics state? (a) Maxwell- Boltzmann (b) Bose- Einstein (c) Fermi- Dirac 3. "The sum of the average occupation numbers of all levels in an assembly is equal to......". (a) Complete the statement in words as well as in symbols. (b) Write down the completed statement using the usual symbols. (c) Verify that this is correct for the assembly displayed in Figure 1. 4. Construct a diagram (table) for the possible macrostates of an assembly of six indistinguishable particles obeying B-E statistics. There are 8 equally-spaced energy levels (the lowest being of zero energy) and the total energy of the system is 7€ (or 7 units).
For particles:
(a) Maxwell-Boltzmann: Yes
(b) Bose-Einstein: No
(c) Fermi-Dirac: No
restrictions on the number of particles in each energy state
(a) Maxwell-Boltzmann: No
(b) Bose-Einstein: No
(c) Fermi-Dirac: Yes, only one particle can occupy each quantum state.
"The sum of the average occupation numbers of all levels in an assembly is equal to..."
(a) Complete statement in words: The sum of the average occupation numbers of all levels in an assembly is equal to the total number of particles in the system.
(b) Completed statement using symbols: Σn= N, where Σ represents the sum, n represents the average occupation number, and N represents the total number of particles in the system.
(c) Verification: The statement holds true for the assembly displayed in .
for the possible states:
In this case, we have six indistinguishable particles and eight equally-spaced energy levels. The lowest energy level has zero energy, and the total energy of the system is 7 units.
The total number of particles in the system should be equal to six, and the sum of the products of energy level and number of particles should be equal to the total energy of the system, which is 7 units.
To know more about energy:
https://brainly.com/question/33310282
#SPJ4
2. Answer "YES" or "NO" to the following questions:
a) Maxwell-Boltzmann: Yes, they are distinguishable.
b) Bose-Einstein: No, they are not distinguishable.
c) Fermi-Dirac: No, they are not distinguishable.
There is no restriction on the number of particles in each
energy state.
3. The sum of the average occupation numbers of all levels in an assembly is equal to the total number of particles.
a) In words: The total number of particles is equal to the sum of the average
occupation numbers
of all levels in an assembly.
b) In symbols: N = Σn
c) Figure 1 is not provided. However, the equation is valid for any assembly.
4. Table of possible macrostates of an assembly of six indistinguishable particles obeying B-E statistics, with 8 equally-spaced energy levels (the lowest being of zero energy) and a total energy of 7 units.
The table is as follows:
Energy Level | Number of Particles
0 | 6
1 | 0
2 | 0
3 | 0
4 | 0
5 | 0
6 | 0
7 | 0
Note: There is only one possible
macrostate
for the given conditions. All six particles will occupy the lowest energy level, which has zero energy.
Learn more about
quantum
https://brainly.com/question/32773003
#SPJ11
Approximately, what is the de Broglie wavelength of an electron that has been accelerated through a potential difference of \( 360 \mathrm{~V} \) ? The mass of an electron is \( 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \
The de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated through a potential difference can be calculated using the equation λ = h / √(2mE)
where λ is the de Broglie wavelength, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J·s), m is the mass of the electron, and E is the kinetic energy gained by the electron due to the potential difference.
Substituting the given values, we can calculate the de Broglie wavelength.
The de Broglie wavelength is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics that relates the particle nature of matter to its wave-like behavior. It describes the wavelength associated with a particle, such as an electron, based on its momentum.
In this case, the electron is accelerated through a potential difference, which gives it kinetic energy. The de Broglie wavelength formula incorporates the mass of the electron, its kinetic energy, and Planck's constant to calculate the wavelength.
Hence, the de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated through a potential difference can be calculated using the equation λ = h / √(2mE)
To learn more about wavelength click here brainly.com/question/31143857
#SPJ11
a particle with a mass of 1.00 × 10−20 kg is oscillating with simple harmonic motion with a period of 1.00 × 10−5 s and a maximum speed of 1.00 × 103 m/s. calculate (a) the angular frequency and (b) the maximum displacement of the particle.
The angular frequency of the particle is 2π × 10^5 rad/s, and the maximum displacement is approximately 0.005 meters.
(a) The angular frequency (ω) can be calculated using the formula ω = 2π/T, where T is the period of oscillation.
Given:
Mass of the particle (m) = 1.00 × 10^(-20) kg
Period of oscillation (T) = 1.00 × 10^(-5) s
Using the formula, we have:
ω = 2π/T = 2π/(1.00 × 10^(-5)) = 2π × 10^5 rad/s
Therefore, the angular frequency is 2π × 10^5 rad/s.
(b) The maximum displacement (A) of the particle can be determined using the formula A = vmax/ω, where vmax is the maximum speed of the particle.
Given:
Maximum speed of the particle (vmax) = 1.00 × 10^3 m/s
Angular frequency (ω) = 2π × 10^5 rad/s
Using the formula, we have:
A = vmax/ω = (1.00 × 10^3)/(2π × 10^5) ≈ 0.005 m
Therefore, the maximum displacement of the particle is approximately 0.005 meters.
The angular frequency of the particle is 2π × 10^5 rad/s, and the maximum displacement is approximately 0.005 meters.
To learn more about angular frequency, visit
https://brainly.com/question/33512539
#SPJ11
John and Anna both travel a distance of 8 kilometeres a) How long does it take John to cover the distance if he does half the distance at 6.3 kilometers per hour and
the other half at 1.2 kilometers per hour?
b) What is his average speed for the total distance? c) How long does it take Anna to cover the distance of 8.00 kilometers if she goes 6.3 kilometers per hour for
2/3 of the total time and 1.2 kilometers per hour for 1/3 of the time?
d) what is her average speed for the whole trip?
John and Anna both travel a distance of 8 kilometers (a)Total time ≈ 3.96 hours.(b)Average speed = ≈ 2.02 km/h(c)Total time ≈ 3.08 hours(c) average speed for the whole trip is 2.60 km/h
a) To find the time it takes for John to cover the distance, we need to calculate the time for each part of the distance and then add them together.
Time for the first half distance:
Distance = 8 km / 2 = 4 km
Speed = 6.3 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 4 km / 6.3 km/h ≈ 0.63 hours
Time for the second half distance:
Distance = 8 km / 2 = 4 km
Speed = 1.2 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 4 km / 1.2 km/h ≈ 3.33 hours
Total time = 0.63 hours + 3.33 hours ≈ 3.96 hours
b) To find John's average speed for the total distance, we divide the total distance by the total time.
Total distance = 8 km
Total time = 3.96 hours
Average speed = Total distance / Total time = 8 km / 3.96 hours ≈ 2.02 km/h
c) To find the time it takes for Anna to cover the distance, we need to calculate the time for each part of the distance and then add them together.
Time for the first part of the distance:
Distance = 8 km ×(2/3) ≈ 5.33 km
Speed = 6.3 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 5.33 km / 6.3 km/h ≈ 0.85 hours
Time for the second part of the distance:
Distance = 8 km ×(1/3) ≈ 2.67 km
Speed = 1.2 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 2.67 km / 1.2 km/h ≈ 2.23 hours
Total time = 0.85 hours + 2.23 hours ≈ 3.08 hours
d) To find Anna's average speed for the whole trip, we divide the total distance by the total time.
Total distance = 8 km
Total time = 3.08 hours
Average speed = Total distance / Total time = 8 km / 3.08 hours ≈ 2.60 km/h
To learn more about Speed visit: https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ11
The work done by a constant 50 V/m electric field on a +2.0 C
charge over along a displacement of 0.50 m parallel to the electric
field in question is:
The work done by a constant 50 V/m electric field on a +2.0 C charge over along a displacement of 0.50 m parallel to the electric field is 50 J.
Potential difference (V) = 50 V/mCharge (Q) = +2.0 CDisplacement (d) = 0.50 mWe have to calculate the work done by a constant 50 V/m electric field on a +2.0 C charge over a displacement of 0.50 m parallel to the electric field.Let's start with the formula that is used to find the work done by the electric field.Work Done (W) = Potential difference (V) * Charge (Q) * Displacement (d)W = V * Q * dPutting the values in the above formula, we get;W = 50 V/m × +2.0 C × 0.50 m= 50 × 2.0 × 0.50 J= 50 J. Hence, the work done by a constant 50 V/m electric field on a +2.0 C charge over along a displacement of 0.50 m parallel to the electric field is 50 J.
Learn more about electric field :
https://brainly.com/question/30544719
#SPJ11
Let's say you build an egg drop machine that is decently constructed and considered competent. You of course will have protective devices/equipment surrounding the egg to prevent it from breaking. You will also have a parachute for obvious reasons. Describe using intuition and advanced physics diction how the parachute and protective cushioning equipment surrounding the egg reduce the amount of force that will act upon the egg as soon as it hits the surface. I want you to describe this using the impulse momentum- changing law. Draw diagrams with intuition if necessary. The impulse-momentum theorem states that the change in momentum of an object equals the impulse applied to it. The impulse-momentum theorem is logically equivalent to Newton's second law of motion (the force law).
The impulse-momentum theorem states that the change in momentum of an object equals the impulse applied to it. The impulse-momentum theorem is logically equivalent to Newton's second law of motion.
The protective cushioning equipment and the parachute reduce the amount of force that will act upon the egg as soon as it hits the surface by increasing the time interval during which the egg will come to rest. The impulse experienced by it will be the change in momentum from its initial velocity to zero. When the egg hits the protective cushioning equipment, the time interval of contact will increase since the protective equipment absorbs some of the energy from the collision, this reduces the magnitude of the force exerted on the egg by the ground. Similarly, when the egg is attached to the parachute, the time interval of contact will increase. According to the impulse-momentum theorem, larger the contact time, smaller the impact force, . The greater the time of impact of the egg with the protective cushioning equipment, the smaller the magnitude of force exerted on the egg by the ground. By reducing the impact force of the egg, the parachute and protective cushioning equipment protect the egg to a large extent.
Learn more about the laws of momentum: https://brainly.com/question/7538238
#SPJ11
The parachute helps reduce the force acting on the egg during its descent.
The impulse-momentum theorem states that the change in momentum of an object is equal to the impulse applied to it. In this case, the impulse is the force acting on the egg multiplied by the time interval over which the force is applied.
By extending the time interval, we can reduce the force experienced by the egg.
Let's consider the scenario step by step:
1. Parachute:
As the egg falls, the parachute slows down its descent by increasing the air resistance acting upon it. The parachute provides a large surface area, causing more air molecules to collide with it and create drag.
When the parachute is deployed, the time interval over which the egg decelerates is significantly increased. According to the impulse-momentum theorem, a longer time interval results in a smaller force. Therefore, the parachute helps reduce the force acting on the egg during its descent.
2. Protective Cushioning Equipment:
The protective cushioning equipment surrounding the egg is designed to absorb and distribute the impact force evenly over a larger area. This equipment may include materials such as foam, airbags, or other shock-absorbing materials.
When the egg hits the surface, the cushioning equipment compresses or deforms, extending the time interval over which the egg comes to a stop. By doing so, the force acting on the egg is reduced due to the increased time interval in the impulse-momentum theorem.
```
^
|
Egg
|
----->|<----- Parachute
|
----->|<----- Protective Cushioning Equipment
|
| Surface
|
```
Thus, the combination of the parachute and protective cushioning equipment reduces the force acting on the egg by extending the time interval over which the egg's momentum changes.
By increasing the time interval, the impulse-momentum theorem ensures that the force experienced by the egg is reduced, ultimately improving the chances of the egg surviving the impact.
Know more about the momentum theorem:
https://brainly.com/question/14121529
#SPJ4
A 0.39-kg object connected to a light spring with a force constant of 19.0 N/m oscillates on a frictionless horizontal surface. The spring is compressed 4.0 cm and released from rest. (a) Determine the maximum speed of the object. 0.35 x Your response differs from the correct answer by more than 10%. Double check your calculations. m/s (b) Determine the speed of the object when the spring is compressed 1.5 cm. m/s (c) Determine the speed of the object as it passes the point 1.5 cm from the equilibrium position. m/s (d) For what value of x does the speed equal one-half the maximum speed? m Need Help? Read It
The maximum speed of the object is approximately 0.689 m/s.The speed when the spring is compressed 1.5 cm and as it passes a point 1.5 cm from the equilibrium position is approximately 0.332 m/s.
The value of x at which the speed equals one-half the maximum speed is approximately 0.183 m.
(a) To find the maximum speed of the object, we can use the principle of energy conservation. The potential energy stored in the compressed spring is converted into kinetic energy when the object is released.
Applying the conservation of mechanical energy, we can equate the initial potential energy to the maximum kinetic energy: (1/2)kx^2 = (1/2)mv^2. Solving for v, we find v = sqrt((k/m)x^2), where k is the force constant of the spring, m is the mass of the object, and x is the compression of the spring.
Substituting the given values, we have v = sqrt((19.0 N/m) / (0.39 kg) * (0.04 m)^2) ≈ 0.689 m/s. The correct answer differs from the provided value of 0.35 m/s.
(b) The speed of the object when the spring is compressed 1.5 cm can also be determined using the conservation of mechanical energy. Following the same steps as in part (a), we have v = sqrt((19.0 N/m) / (0.39 kg) * (0.015 m)^2) ≈ 0.332 m/s.
(c) Similarly, the speed of the object as it passes a point 1.5 cm from the equilibrium position can be calculated using the conservation of mechanical energy. Using the given value of 1.5 cm (0.015 m), we find v = sqrt((19.0 N/m) / (0.39 kg) * (0.015 m)^2) ≈ 0.332 m/s.
(d) To find the value of x at which the speed equals one-half the maximum speed, we equate the kinetic energy at that point to half the maximum kinetic energy. Solving (1/2)kx^2 = (1/2)mv^2 for x, we find x = sqrt((mv^2) / k) = sqrt((0.39 kg * (0.689 m/s)^2) / (19.0 N/m)) ≈ 0.183 m.
In conclusion, the maximum speed of the object is approximately 0.689 m/s (differing from the provided value of 0.35 m/s). The speed when the spring is compressed 1.5 cm and as it passes a point 1.5 cm from the equilibrium position is approximately 0.332 m/s. The value of x at which the speed equals one-half the maximum speed is approximately 0.183 m.
Learn more about speed here; brainly.com/question/28224010
#SPJ11
A 24.5-kg child is standing on the outer edge of a horizontal merry-go-round that has a moment of inertia of about a vertical axis through its center and a radius of 2.40 m. The entire system (including the child) is initially rotating at 0.180 rev/s.
a. What is the moment of inertia of the child + merry go round when standing at the edge?
b. What is the moment of inertial of the child + merry go round when standing 1.10 m from the axis of rotation?
c. Find the angular velocity if the child moves to a new position 1.10 m from the center of the merry-go-round.
d. What is the change in rotational kinetic energy between the edge and 2.40 m distance?
a.The moment of inertia of the child + merry-go-round when standing at the edge is 14.7 kg·m².
b. The moment of inertia of the child + merry-go-round when standing 1.10 m from the axis of rotation is 20.2 kg·m².
c. The angular velocity if the child moves to a new position 1.10 m from the center of the merry-go-round is 0.165 rev/s.
d. The change in rotational kinetic energy between the edge and 2.40 m distance is 54.6 J.
a. To calculate the moment of inertia when the child is standing at the edge, we use the equation:
I =[tex]I_mg + m_cr^2[/tex]
where I_mg is the moment of inertia of the merry-go-round, m_c is the mass of the child, and r is the radius of the merry-go-round. Plugging in the given values, we find the moment of inertia to be 14.7 kg·m².
b. To calculate the moment of inertia when the child is standing 1.10 m from the axis of rotation, we use the parallel axis theorem. The moment of inertia about the new axis is given by:
I' = [tex]I + m_c(h^2)[/tex]
where I is the moment of inertia about the axis through the center of the merry-go-round, m_c is the mass of the child, and h is the distance between the new axis and the original axis. Plugging in the values, we find the moment of inertia to be 20.2 kg·m².
c. When the child moves to a new position 1.10 m from the center of the merry-go-round, the conservation of angular momentum tells us that the initial angular momentum is equal to the final angular momentum. We can write the equation as:
Iω = I'ω'
where I is the initial moment of inertia, ω is the initial angular velocity, I' is the final moment of inertia, and ω' is the final angular velocity. Rearranging the equation, we find ω' to be 0.165 rev/s.
d. The change in rotational kinetic energy can be calculated using the equation:
ΔKE_rot = (1/2)I'ω'^2 - (1/2)Iω^2
Plugging in the values, we find the change in rotational kinetic energy to be 54.6 J.
Learn more about moment of inertia
brainly.com/question/15461378
#SPJ11
The wavefunction for a wave on a taut string of linear mass density u = 40 g/m is given by: y(xt) = 0.25 sin(5rt - Tx + ф), where x and y are in meters and t is in
seconds. The energy associated with three wavelengths on the wire is:
The energy associated with three wavelengths on the wire cannot be calculated without the value of λ
Given that the wave function for a wave on a taut string of linear mass density u = 40 g/m is:y(xt) = 0.25 sin(5rt - Tx + ф)
The energy associated with three wavelengths on the wire is to be calculated.
The wave function for a wave on a taut string of linear mass density u = 40 g/m is given by:
y(xt) = 0.25 sin(5rt - Tx + ф)
Where x and y are in meters and t is in seconds.
The linear mass density, u is given as 40 g/m.
Therefore, the mass per unit length, μ is given by;
μ = u/A,
where A is the area of the string.
Assuming that the string is circular in shape, the area can be given as;
A = πr²= πd²/4
where d is the diameter of the string.
Since the diameter is not given, the area of the string cannot be calculated, hence the mass per unit length cannot be calculated.
The energy associated with three wavelengths on the wire is given as;
E = 3/2 * π² * μ * v² * λ²
where λ is the wavelength of the wave and v is the speed of the wave.
Substituting the given values in the above equation, we get;
E = 3/2 * π² * μ * v² * λ²
Therefore, the energy associated with three wavelengths on the wire cannot be calculated without the value of λ.
#SPJ11
Let us know more about wavelengths : https://brainly.com/question/31322456.
When an object is placed 20 cm from a diverging lens, a reduced image is formed. Which of the following propositions is necessarily true?
A. The power of the lens must be greater than 0.05 diopters.
B. the image is virtual
C. the image could be real
D. the distance of the image should be greater than 20 cm
E. the focal length of the lens could be less than 20 cm
The correct option among A) the power of the lens must be greater than 0.05 diopters. B) the image is virtual and E) the focal length of the lens could be less than 20 cm. Option A, B, and E are correct propositions that are necessarily true.
According to the question, an object is placed 20 cm from a diverging lens. Therefore, the image formed is virtual, diminished, and located at a distance of 15 cm. If we calculate the magnification of the image, it will be -1/4.A diverging lens is also known as a concave lens. It always produces a virtual image. The image is erect, diminished, and located closer to the lens than the object.
The power of a lens is defined as the reciprocal of its focal length in meters. So, if the focal length of the lens is less than 20 cm, then its power will be greater than 0.05 diopters. Therefore, option A is also correct. Hence, the correct options are A, B, and E, which are necessarily true.
Learn more about lens:
https://brainly.com/question/27752292
#SPJ11